G0300399-00-D LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Dennis Coyne Hannover LSC 19 August 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
LIGO-G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
G v1Advanced LIGO1 Status of Ground-Based Gravitational-wave Interferometers July 11, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory Astrod 5, Bangalore,
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
G D Advanced LIGO1 David Shoemaker Aspen at Elba 23 May 2002.
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development Update Dennis Coyne LSC Meeting at LLO 16 March 2004.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors David Shoemaker NSF Operations Review Hanford, 26 February 2001.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
Thermal Compensation Review David Ottaway LIGO Laboratory MIT.
G M LIGO Laboratory1 Overview of Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker PAC meeting, NSF Review 5 June 2003, 11 June 2003.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Design for Advanced LIGO Phil Willems NSF Review, Oct , 2002 MIT.
Overview of Advanced LIGO March 2011 Rencontres de Moriond Sheila Rowan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems Design & Interferometer Sensing & Optics Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 13 Meeting, 5 June 2003.
LIGO and Advanced LIGO: Technical Issues Dave Ottaway (for LIGO Scientific Community) LIGO Lab Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
G D Initial LIGO improvements & Advanced LIGO P Fritschel PAC Meeting LLO, 18 May 2005.
G D Advanced LIGO1 David Shoemaker  Gary Sanders Elba “Aspen” Meeting 23 May 2002.
Overview of Research in the Optics Working Group Gregory Harry, on behalf of the OWG Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 25, 2007 LSC Meeting –
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
G M LIGO Laboratory1 Responses to Review Questions David Shoemaker, Peter Fritschel NSF Review of Advanced LIGO 12 June 2003.
1 LIGO and GEO Developments for Advanced LIGO Sheila Rowan, Stanford University/Univ. of Glasgow on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Annual.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
Thermal noise from optical coatings Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - on behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration - 25 July
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker NSF LIGO Review 23 October 2002.
G R 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO March 2006.
David Shoemaker Aspen 3 February 03
G R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update Dennis Coyne LSC LLO March 2005.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
G R Advanced LIGO1 David Shoemaker LIGO PAC 28 June 2002.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 The Future - How to make a next generation LIGO David Shoemaker, MIT AAAS Annual Meeting 17 February 2003.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
Advanced LIGO Status Report
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
G R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO August 2004.
G R Advanced LIGO1 David Shoemaker LLO LSC 19 Aug 2002.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
LIGO G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
Material Downselect Rationale and Directions Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Technology On behalf of downselect working.
NSF Annual Review of the LIGO Laboratory
Characterization of Advanced LIGO Core Optics
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Main Efforts of the Core Optics WG
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
David Shoemaker AAAS Conference 17 February 2003
Overview of Advanced LIGO
Advanced LIGO Research and Development
Presentation transcript:

G D LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Dennis Coyne Hannover LSC 19 August 2003

G D LIGO Laboratory2 Advanced LIGO Advanced LIGO proposal submitted, February 2003 Follows closely the baseline »3 interferometers, each 4km »Signal recycled configuration »~180 W laser »Sapphire substrates »Quad monolithic suspensions »Active isolation system Working its way through the NSF More on organization etc. at end of talk What’s new technically?

G D LIGO Laboratory3 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION Laser

G D LIGO Laboratory4 Pre-stabilized Laser Challenge is in the high-power ‘head’ »Coordinated by Univ. of Hannover/LZH »Three groups pursuing alternate design approaches to a 100W demonstration –Master Oscillator Power Amplifier (MOPA) [Stanford] –Stable-unstable slab oscillator [Adelaide] –Rod systems [Hannover] »LZH approach chosen as baseline March 2003 »With ½ of power head, P: 110 W, M 2 x,y: 1.05 Happily, Obsolete

G D LIGO Laboratory5 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION Input Optics, Modulation

G D LIGO Laboratory6 Input Optics University of Florida takes lead, preliminary design underway Complete RTP-based EOM prototype operational »built-in temperature stabilization works »undergoing high power modulation tests for RFAM stability successful testing of fully integrated birefringence compensated, thermal lens compensated AdL Faraday isolator up to 40 W »40 dB isolation »negligible thermal lensing, > 99% TEM00 in original basis »moving to 20 mm clear aperture design LASTI/AdL MC optics spec'ed and designed thermal modeling of AdL mode cleaner under way using FEMLAB and Melody »no firm results yet, but discovered bug in Melody autolocker at high powers first demonstration of laser-induced thermal adaptive telescope »large focal length dynamic range: 1 m < f < infinity »modeling underway to analyze mode quality

G D LIGO Laboratory7 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM Test Masses

G D LIGO Laboratory8 Core Optics: Sapphire Focus is on developing data needed for choice between Sapphire and Fused Silica as substrate materials Fabrication of Sapphire: 4 full-size Advanced LIGO boules grown, 31.4 x 13 cm; two acquired (one ‘nice’ and one ‘not so nice’) Significant characterization, generally very good results Remaining threshold: is absorption level, homogeneity workable or changeable? Downselect Sapphire/Silica (further) delayed to March 2004 Mean absorption: 67 ppm.cm -1  200 mm scan 2.5 mm steps

G D LIGO Laboratory9 (Good) Fall-back if sapphire unworkable – or ‘fall forward’ if it looks technically better New measurement: Heraeus 312 »250mm x 100mm, CSIRO polish »120 Million Q Issue: mechanical losses in Input Test Mass material Measurement of sizeable piece of SV underway Annealing furnace coming to HWS – 12”x12”x24”; will allow pursuing large-scale annealing Effort underway to refine annealing, realize procedure for polished optics Core Optics: Fused Silica

G D LIGO Laboratory10 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM COATINGS Mirror coatings

G D LIGO Laboratory11 Coatings Optical absorption (~0.5 ppm), scatter look acceptable for conventional coatings Thermal noise due to coating mechanical loss is the challenge Hiatus in coating experimental work while setting up vendor relationships Have just chosen CSIRO and SMA/VIRGO for next phase of coating experiments Thermoelastic noise pinned down (thermal expansion measured at MSU) Interaction with substrate properties, so if had to choose today….. »Sapphire: Alumina Tantala (or Silica Tantala or Silica Alumina, similar) »Fused silica: Silica Tantala Expanding the coating development program to other materials, processes »Hafnia looks Hot; talking more broadly with people in the field First to-be-installed coatings needed in ~2.5 years – sets the time scale Standard coating

G D LIGO Laboratory12 Thermal Compensation 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM COATINGS

G D LIGO Laboratory13 Active Thermal Compensation Removes excess ‘focus’ due to absorption in coating, substrate Plans, construction for tests at ACIGA Gingin moving along well »Suspensions going together, substrates shipped May have a role in initial LIGO – optimization for available power »Planning a ‘staring’ patterned CO 2 beam to heat (or ‘cool’) initial LIGO optics

G D LIGO Laboratory14 Seismic Isolation 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM COATINGS

G D LIGO Laboratory15 Isolation I: Pre-Isolator Element of Adv LIGO – although LIGO I requires much higher performance than Adv LIGO Aggressive development of hardware, controls models Demonstration of requirements Approach chosen: Hydraulic External Pre-Isolator (HEPI) Tested on BSC; to be tested on HAM, at LASTI Parts in fabrication, planned installation in Feb ‘04

G D LIGO Laboratory16 Isolation II: Two-stage platform Stanford Engineering Test Facility Prototype characterization starting Initial indications are that the design is a good success Instrumentation mounted Bid package ready for LASTI prototypes – should identify vendors for actual production!

G D LIGO Laboratory17 Suspension 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM COATINGS

G D LIGO Laboratory18 Suspensions I: Test Mass Quads Success of GEO600 a significant comfort »All suspensions now installed PPARC support: significant financial and technical contribution; quad suspensions, electronics, and some sapphire substrates »U Glasgow, Birmingham, Rutherford Appleton Updating of requirements and concept »Choice of <10Hz bounce mode Intensive exchanges to bring new team members up to speed »4 day Glasgow meeting just concluded Studies of damping, actuation, clamping…

G D LIGO Laboratory19 Suspensions II: Triples Prototype of Mode Cleaner triple suspension now complete In testing at Caltech, basic dynamics, damping OSEM design being refined To be installed in LASTI late 2003 Recycling mirror design underway

G D LIGO Laboratory20 GW Readout 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 200 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM COATINGS

G D LIGO Laboratory21 GW readout, Systems GEO-600 starting to lock with signal recycling (no cavities in arms, though) Glasgow 10m prototype »SR experiment control matrix elements confirmed, near diagonal, fit models Caltech 40m prototype construction nearly complete, early testing Baseline strain readout chosen: DC fringe offset »Allows other subsystem requirements to be set Tracking several efforts to improve on the baseline Adv LIGO sensing system (through upgrades, conceivably baseline changes if merited): »Mesa beams which better fill mirrors, reduce thermal noise »Variable-transmission signal recycling mirrors (ACIGA proposed contribution) »Injection of squeezed vacuum into output port

G D LIGO Laboratory22 Anatomy of the projected Adv LIGO detector performance Suspension thermal noise Internal thermal noise Newtonian background, estimate for LIGO sites Seismic ‘cutoff’ at 10 Hz Unified quantum noise dominates at most frequencies for full power, broadband tuning NS Binaries: for two LIGO observatories, 3 interferometers, »Initial LIGO: ~20 Mpc »Adv LIGO: ~350 Mpc Stochastic background: »Initial LIGO: ~3e-6 »Adv LIGO ~3e-9 10 Hz 100 Hz 1 kHz Initial LIGO

G D LIGO Laboratory23 Proposal Status Submitted in March Proposal to NSF is $122 M; additional support from international partners (GEO and ACIGA), current and future LIGO Lab operating budget »Subsystem leads LSU, GEO (UK, Hannover), UFlorida, ACIGA, Caltech, MIT »Fiduciary responsibility is with the LIGO Lab Review in June »Great support from LSC »Useful for us technically »Went quite well

G D LIGO Laboratory24 Closeout Comments Advanced LIGO will provide the capability to observe a variety of astrophysical phenomena including inspiral events, continuous-wave sources, bursts, and stochastic backgrounds. Achievement of the design strain sensitivity (more than a factor of ten beyond Initial LIGO) is feasible and detection of events is plausible. Detection of any source would be a dramatic direct confirmation of the existence of gravitational waves and would have exciting and wide-ranging implications for gravitational physics, astrophysics, and our understanding of the universe. The committee agrees that the current state of the proposed project is at a sufficiently mature level that the process leading to construction should proceed. Although technical challenges remain, the plan for solving the technical problems appears sound and no major obstacles have been identified that would justify delaying the construction of Advanced LIGO.

G D LIGO Laboratory25 Proposed Plan Initial LIGO Observation 2002 – 2006 »1+ year observation within LIGO Observatory »Significant networked observation with GEO, LIGO, TAMA, VIRGO »No plans to make significant upgrades to Initial LIGO system Structured R&D program to develop technologies »Cooperative Agreement carries R&D in Lab to Final Design, 2005 Proposal submitted in March for fabrication, installation NSF review in June 2003 First equipment money requested for 2005 »Sapphire Test Mass material, seismic isolation fabrication »Prepare a ‘stock’ of equipment for minimum downtime, rapid installation Start installation in 2007 »Baseline is a staged installation, Livingston and then Hanford »Two 4km instruments at Hanford, one 4km instrument at Livingston Start coincident observations in 2010

G D LIGO Laboratory26 Advanced LIGO The Last Page Something comforting