R I T Team Members: Dan Lester → Team Lead Chris Feuerstein → Lead Engineer/Electrical Lead Mike Schwec → Electrical Support Jacob Hillmon → Electrical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Advertisements

Left to Right: Michael Kelton, Ethan Hall, Greg Wegman, Vashisht Lakhmani.
Autonomous Sensor and Control Platform Rover Tae Lee Josh Reitsema Scott Zhong Mike Chao Mark Winter.
Motor Control Lab Using Altera Nano FPGA
1. P09203 – 1kg Robotic Motor Module Gen 2 Platform This project is Sponsored by the Kate Gleason Foundation.  Team Members:  Lauren Farnsworth → Team.
1. P09203 – 1kg Robotic Motor Module Gen 2 Platform This project is Sponsored by the Kate Gleason Foundation.  Team Members:  Lauren Farnsworth → Team.
1kg Motor Module, First Generation P08208 – Mechanical Design P08205 – Electronics, Controls & Support RP1 MSD II
1. P09203 – 1kg Robotic Motor Module Gen 2 Platform This project is Sponsored by the Kate Gleason Foundation.  Team Members:  Lauren Farnsworth → Team.
Electrical and Computer Engineering Preliminary Design Review Team 14: BMW Brainwave Manipulated Wagon.
R I T Team Members: Dan Lester → Team Lead Chris Feuerstein → Lead Engineer/Electrical Lead Mike Schwec → Electrical Support Jacob Hillmon → Electrical.
Development of Laser Fuser Test Bed Project Number: P07501 Justin McMillan.
A.G.I.L.E Team Members: Brad Ramsey Derek Rodriguez Dane Wielgopolan Project Managers: Dr. Joel Schipper Dr. James Irwin Autonomously Guided Intelligent.
RP1 1kg Motor Module, First Generation P08208 – Mechanical Design P08205 – Wireless & PWM Motor Controller MSD I
R I T Team Members: Dan Lester → Team Lead Chris Feuerstein → Lead Engineer/Electrical Lead Mike Schwec → Electrical Support Jacob Hillmon → Electrical.
Nandini Vemuri (EE) Jason Jack (CE) Ryan Schmitt (CE) Jeff Howe (EE) John Corleto (CE) Emily Phillips (EE) Power Distribution Subsystem Wireless Communication.
P08456-LED Lighting for an Underwater ROV Jeremy Schiele-Project Manager Jonathan Lent-Mechanical Engineer Ryan Seeber-Computer Engineer Justin VanSlyke-Mechanical.
P11212Land Vehicle for Education: Controls Team Control Board Design The MSA Control Board boasts a Arduino Nano which contains most importantly an ATMega328.
R I T Advisors: Dr. Wayne WalterMechanical Engineering Dept. Faculty Jeffrey WebbTeacher’s Assistant Team Members: Aman Verma EE - Electrical Craftsman.
R I T Team Members: Nathan Boyer → Team Lead Brandon Howell → Power Electronics Engineer Brad Whitlock → Electrical Lead Joe Krisher → Mechanical Systems.
Team GPS Rover Critical Design Review Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
R I T Team Members: Nandini Vemuri → Team Lead, System Testing, Motor Expert Jason Jack → GUI Design, Microcontroller Expert, Website Administrator John.
Underwater Technologies
P09311: Interface for Multi-Purpose Driver/Data Acquisition System Adam Van FleetProject Leader, EE DAQ Hardware Development David HoweElectrical Engineer.
Senior Project Design Review Remote Visual Surveillance Vehicle (RVSV) Manoj Bhambwani Tameka Thomas.
Team GPS Rover Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
RP1 Project Dini Dini Emily Emily Ryan Ryan Jeff Jeff Jason Jason John John.
MSD P07302End of Project Review1 Motor Controller Subsystem MSD P07302 Project Sponsor: KGCOE Project Members: D. ShenoyProject Manager S. TallauSoftware.
RP10 Robotics Platform Team Cyberdyne Interim Presentation February 17, 2009, 4-5 PM Project Sponsor: Dr. Wayne Walter, RIT KGCOE Faculty Coach: Dr. James.
Nandini Vemuri (EE) Jason Jack (CE) Ryan Schmitt (CE) Jeff Howe (EE) John Corleto (CE) Emily Phillips (EE) Power Distribution Subsystem Wireless Communication.
EDGE™ Wireless Open-Source/Open-Architecture Command and Control System (WOCCS) Group Members: –Eric Hettler –Manuel Paris –Ryan Miller –Christian Moreno.
Robotic Vehicle Platform: Background Presentation Steven Rois (ME) Chris Wakeley (ME) Kenneth Smith (ME) Andrew Krall (ME)
Team Members: Christian Moreno (ME) – Project Manager Marshall Hammond (EE) – Interface Manager Leanne Cushing (ME) Chris Liberty (EE) Leo Espinoza (EE)
R I T Team Members: Dan Lester → Team Lead Chris Feuerstein → Lead Engineer/Electrical Lead Mike Schwec → Electrical Support Jacob Hillmon → Electrical.
RIT Robotics Platform Laurie Underhill David Gomez Matt Dwyer Joseph Ho Joe KrisherRick Frisicano Design Project Management Team.
R I T Team Members: Dan Lester → Team Lead Chris Feuerstein → Lead Engineer/Electrical Lead Mike Schwec → Electrical Support Jacob Hillmon → Electrical.
Steven Rois (ME) Chris Wakeley (ME) Andrew Krall (ME) Kenneth Smith (ME) Advisor: Prof. George Slack October 14, 2009.
MULTIPURPOSE DIGITAL CDMA FM REMOTE CONTROLLER FIRDOUS KAMAL MIZAN MIAH EE – 513 4/19/2005 COMMUNICATION ELECTRONICS.
Deon Blaauw Modular Robot Design University of Stellenbosch Department of Electric and Electronic Engineering.
Critical Design Review February 23 rd, 2010 Hassan Alabudib Kamal Sabi Peng Chen Marisol Lozano Roman Yirui Huang.
MSD P07302Design Review1 Motor Controller Subsystem MSD P07302 Project Sponsor: KGCOE Project Members: D. ShenoyProject Manager S. TallauSoftware Design.
Sponsor/Customer: Dr. Ferat Sahin Multi Agent Bio-Robotics Lab Faculty Guide: Prof. George Slack Team Members: Matthew LeStrange – Electrical Engineering.
BeH ā v Student Behavior FeedbackSystem. Overview Team BeHāV Overview Schematic Parts Software Hub Timeline Budget.
Bi-Directional RF Data Communication A Robot Control Device Team BDRFC.
Wireless Sensor Monitoring Group Members: Steven Shih (ECE) Brian Reilly (ECE) Dan Eke (COMPE) Sponsored by:
Flatiron Mobile Device Security Monitor Thomas Horacek Lucas Greve.
Abstract Proposed Approach Solution Development Project Requirements Estimated Resources Other Resources Financial Resources Project Schedule Computer.
Wandering Ambassador P13215 Baabak Mamaghani (EE) Team Lead David Gillette (EE) PCB Matt Pendel (EE) PCB/Enclosure Armando Briones (CE) Software Sagar.
P09204: Second Generation Design Team Members: Jason Jack Nandini Vemuri Jeff Howe John Corleto Emily Phillips Ryan Schmitt.
EDGE™ Wireless Open-Source/Open-Architecture Command and Control System (WOCCS) Group Members: –Eric Hettler –Manuel Paris –Ryan Miller –Christian Moreno.
Group Members Mike Svendsen – Computer Engineer Steve Towey – Computer Engineer Brian Walker – Architect Richard George – Industrial Technology Client.
Team 6 DOODLE DRIVE Alexander Curtis Peachanok Lertkajornkitti | Jun Pan | Edward Kidarsa |
Status Report #2 Autonomous Lawnmower Team 5 April Fowler Jose Manzanares Ranjith Raghunath Christopher Gerhardt 5 Feb 07 To design and implement an autonomous.
ECE398: The Design Review Fall What the Design Review is  Board meeting with engineers- (faculty, TA, classmates)  Structured discussion of your.
Architecture View Models A model is a complete, simplified description of a system from a particular perspective or viewpoint. There is no single view.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 4  SPRING 2015 Matt Carpenter, Grant Gumina, Chris Holly, and Michael Pak.
Daredevil Robot Direction Module (DRDM) Senior Design II Midterm Presentation.
Mark Randall & Kevin Claycomb Faculty Advisor: David Mitchell Industrial Sponsor: IEEE.
Daredevil Robot Direction Module (DRDM) Senior Design II Final Presentation.
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy Array May1005 Alex Apel Stephen Rashid Justin Robinson.
Maze Twinbots Group 28 Uyen Nguyen – EE Ly Nguyen – EE Luke Ireland - EE.
Specifications Presetation Review: Robotic Platform 1kg (RP1)‏ Customer Needs Design Specifications Project Progress Benchmarking Responsibilities and.
EDGE™ Final Project Plan Presentation P09001 – RFID Reader & Active Tag Philip Davenport (Industrial and Systems Engineering)
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
P9204 – 1kg Robotic Platform System level Design.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
The 4th Annual Colorado Robot Challenge
P07203 Dynamometry Laboratory Infrastructure
10 Kilogram Payload Robotic Platform
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2011
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

R I T Team Members: Dan Lester → Team Lead Chris Feuerstein → Lead Engineer/Electrical Lead Mike Schwec → Electrical Support Jacob Hillmon → Electrical Support Huan Yu-Chen → Mechanical Lead Delnessaw Hirpa → Mechanical Support David Ng → Microcontroller Lead Oliver Yuen → Microcontroller Support P08201 – 10kg Robotic Platform This project is supported by a gift from the Gleason Foundation to the mechanical Engineering department at RIT.

R I T Project Description The goal of this project is to construct a land-based robotic platform for the Vehicle Systems Technology Track. This 10 kg platform is just one of a family of scalable platforms ranging from 1kg to 100kg. This project focuses on improving previous projects from the 7200 family, which fall short of expected outcomes. The re-designed platform is to be modular, open architecture, open source, scalable, and fully instrumented robotic/remote controlled, for use in a variety of education, R & D, and outreach applications within and beyond the RIT KGCOE. This student team will re-design two modular, robotic platforms capable of carrying a payload anywhere in the robotics lab on the RIT campus. The drive platform configuration shall have at least four wheels, with at least two motor modules, and a payload capacity of 10kg. The platform will be required to accomplish two sets of test as stated in the PRP.

R I T Customer Needs The platform must re-use as many parts from previous designs as possible. Re-use of motor module materials, such as drive motors, batteries, and ring gears The platform must perform safely Emergency stop system The platform must be able to carry a payload of 10kg Rigid chassis, designed with strong 80/20 material The platform must fit within the $8000 Budget split between all 3 project groups. Re-use of P07201 materials and budget is estimated to be >$1000 The platform must be battery powered Powered by 2 12V batteries The platform must be robust Strong materials and versatile electronics The platform must utilize off the Shelf Components Microcontroller/communication is provided by outside vendors The platform must perform all testing requirements successfully Capable of manual control and autonomous navigation The platform must use interchangeable modules that can be swapped within 120 seconds. Motor module turntables are able to efficiently slide in and out of 80/20 material The platform must be able to be scaled up or down in size and payload capacity. Similar in design to RP100 The platform must be open source to allow for other senior design projects on it. H-Bridge, Battery Monitor, and, PCB Board are in house and fully documented.

R I T Grading Rubric for Project Review Presentation Project description and high level customer needs – 2 points – team provided a clear summary of the project, including high level customer needs Description of selected concept – 2 points - The team provided a clear, concise outline of the selected concept. Ability to design a system to meet desired needs – 2 points - Students have clearly demonstrated that the product satisfies all requirements. Objective evaluation of project's successes and failures – 2 points - Team objectively identifies strong and weak points of the final design, including potential for future improvements. Ability to communicate detailed design information effectively (written, graphical, and oral) – 2 points - Very effective written and verbal communication.

R I T Robotic Platform Concept Fully assembled appearance of the platform

R I T Basic frame The frames were constructed from 1”x 1” 8020 Aluminum extrusion. The extrusion will be connected to the desired structure using fasteners.

R I T Overall weight,dimension and cost of the chassis –Weight =8.0lbs –Width = 19.0” –Height = 8.0” –Length = 24.0” –cost = $273.55

R I T Method of Connection to the Motor Module –The motor module will have an aluminum tube attached to it where the chassis frame will just slide into it and secured in place using pin.

R I T Motor Module: Original Design Concept Driving Motor Steering Motor Encoder Cover Encoder Mount Ring Gear Turntable Yoke Aluminum Tubes Wheel Direct Drive Shaft Power Transmission shaft

R I T Motor Module: Updated Design Concept

R I T Strengths/Successes and Weaknesses/Failures This section needs to define strength and weaknesses of your subsystem Format: + A strength/success you think necessary to present - A weakness/failure you think necessary to present

R I T Electrical Systems Overview

R I T In-House Battery Monitor

R I T In House CMOS H-Bridge

R I T In House H-Bridge Logic Circuit

R I T In House CMOS H-Bridge

R I T Power Distribution Board

R I T Electrical Interconnect Diagram

R I T Risk Analysis of Electrical Components Control System –Motor controller and motor module –Loss of communication Power System Failure –Inadequate battery life (1hr spec) –Low battery power Cabling Issues –Cabling interference –Motor noise

R I T Strengths/Successes and Weaknesses/Failures This section needs to define strength and weaknesses of your subsystem Format: + A strength/success you think necessary to present - A weakness/failure you think necessary to present

R I T Overview of computer system Sequence Diagram Keywords: *GUI: Graphical User Interface *UART: Universal Asynchronous Receiver Transmitter *PWM: Pulse Width Modulation

R I T GUI Demo UML

R I T Wireless Modules RF Transceivers (250kbps) Commercial band: 2.4GHz Compliant with IEEE Range: 20 – 30 meters indoor Power: 2xAA No line of sight required UART pins on expansion header TI MSP430

R I T State Diagram

R I T UART/RS232 Conversion ST232 IC DB9 Female Connector (RS232) 4 capacitors included with 0.1uF Standard 3.3V – 5V TTL Baud rate: 300 – Ready to assemble Low cost

R I T Microcontroller FreeScale CSM12D module w/ Project Board –Microcontroller Initializations –Software implementation Directional & stop/emergency stop commands Ability to align each motor module separately –System response after loss of communication

R I T Computer System Layout PWM ControlFunctions (Output)Pin Number PWM 0Steer Module # 19 PWM 1Steer Module #211 PWM 2Steer Module #130 PWM 3Steer Module #232 PWM 4Drive Module #134 PWM 5Drive Module #236 6 Digital OutputsFunctionsPin Number EnableEmergency Stop37 F/R #1Left Drive Motor33 L/R #1Left Steer Motor35 F/R #2Right Drive Motor29 L/R #2Right Steer Motor31 5

R I T Strengths/Successes and Weaknesses/Failures Strengths/Successes: + Wireless & Range + LOS is not needed + Low power consumption + Future development + Open source + Easy to program Weaknesses/Failures: - Limited experience - Navigation mode not fully functional - Limited PWM channels - No input feedback

R I T –Pros: –Wireless Communication –Programmable/Functionality –Durability –Cons: –Implementation complexity –Security –Cost

R I T Total BOM Cost Mechanical Cost Breakdown Electrical Cost Breakdown $ $ $ Microcontroller Cost Breakdown Total Electrical: Lot of One – $ Lot of Ten – $

R I T Milestones November 16 th – order parts for Bill of Materials February 1 st – Motor Module machined, assembled, and tested by week 7 of winter quarter March 21 st – Initial Integration of major sub function components April 25 th – Design verification testing May 2 nd – Function and performance review May 9 th – Tech Paper, Design Poster and Website due May 16 th – Final Project Review

R I T Questions?