Susanne Biundo, Karen Myers, Kanna Rajan How is Planning & Scheduling Changing the World?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adaptive Ground Antenna Arrays for Low Earth Orbiting Satellites.
Advertisements

WPI CS534 Showcase Jeff Martin. * Computer Software on Deep Space 1 * Used to execute plans/mission objectives * Model based * Constraint based * Fault.
PLANSERVE Planning and Scheduling Techniques for the Intelligent Problem Solving Grid Planning and Scheduling Team ISTC-CNR National Research Council of.
“Modeling the MER Mission” Chin Seah NASA Ames Research Center.
Mary (Missy) Cummings Humans & Automation Lab
Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH ESA Wireless Sensor Motes Study George Prassinos, SSC, University of Surrey.
JPL Autonomous Space Mission Simulation Flight Team Bob Hoffman Josh Ruggiero Adam Nikolic Dusty Terrill.
Aerospace Engineering By Patrick Ferrell. Aerospace Engineering is the main branch of engineering concerned with the research, design, development, construction,
HyspIRI Airborne Preparatory Mission Large Area Mapping In California Benefits to Remote Sensing of the Delta
April 2003 Atacama Expedition HCI Field Research Report Angela Wagner Kristina McBlain.
Dr. Jennifer Rochlis. Overview Build a technology testbed for future rover concepts Develop and demonstrate operations and mission concepts.
Space Systems Bob Hall & John Carrico.
Carnegie Mellon Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Science Planner Science Observer Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003.
European Network of Excellence in AI Planning Intelligent Planning & Scheduling An Innovative Software Technology Susanne Biundo.
Distributed Network Scheduling Bradley J. Clement, Steven R. Schaffer Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Contact:
© 2007 Tom Beckman Features:  Are autonomous software entities that act as a user’s assistant to perform discrete tasks, simplifying or completely automating.
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
Science Objectives & Investigation Methodology Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon SCIENCE OPS [contributions from Peter, Trey, Dom, Kristen, Kristina and Mike] Life.
1 Description and Benefits of JWST Commanding Operations Concept TIPS/JIM Meeting 17 July 2003 Vicki Balzano.
Deploying RAXEM2 Planning Improvements in Daily Work Practice Giulio Bernardi, Amedeo Cesta & Gabriella Cortellessa ISTC-CNR [PST] Institute for Cognitive.
ASTEP Life in the AtacamaCarnegie Mellon Limits of Life in the Atacama: Investigation of Life in the Atacama Desert of Chile Communication System Design.
1 SpaceOps 2002 Autonomous Operations For The Swift Mission T3-47 John Ong/Swift Software Systems Manager NASA/GSFC Code 582/ Mike Rackley/Swift.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) Entry, Descent, Landing, and Deployment.
AI in Space Exploration Stephen Dabideen Yizenia Mora.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
HPN: IFSS1 Intelligent Flight Support System (IFSS) A Real-Time Intelligent Decision Support Prototype PRESENTER/COTR Anthony Bruins (X37071) HPN Software.
Verifying Autonomous Planning Systems Even the best laid plans need to be verified Prepared for the 2005 Software Assurance Symposium (SAS) DS1 MSL EO1.
Carnegie Mellon Interactive Resource Management in the COMIREM Planner Stephen F. Smith, David Hildum, David Crimm Intelligent Coordination and Logistics.
Verifying AI Plan Models Even the best laid plans need to be verified Margaret Smith – PI Gordon Cucullu Gerard Holzmann Benjamin Smith Prepared for the.
Goal-Driven Autonomy Learning for Long-Duration Missions Héctor Muñoz-Avila.
DARPA ITO/MARS Project Update Vanderbilt University A Software Architecture and Tools for Autonomous Robots that Learn on Mission K. Kawamura, M. Wilkes,
NASA Use Cases for the Earth Observation Sensor Web Karen Moe NASA Earth Science Technology Office WGISS-26 Boulder,
Network UAV C3 Stage 1 Final Briefing Timothy X Brown University of Colorado at Boulder Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program Electrical and Computer.
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
Adaptive Ground Antenna Arrays for Low Earth Orbiting Satellites Code 584 / Dan Mandl 2005 ISD Technology Workshop 1 Adaptive Ground Antenna Arrays for.
Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Infrastructure Earth Science Vision Session IGARSS 2002 Toronto, CA June 25, Needs for an Intelligent Distributed.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
ST5 PDR June 19-20, Section 4.0 Future Status James A. Slavin Project Scientist 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC.
31 March 2009 MMI OntDev 1 Autonomous Mission Operations for Sensor Webs Al Underbrink, Sentar, Inc.
1 Earth Science Technology Office The Earth Science (ES) Vision: An intelligent Web of Sensors IGARSS 2002 Paper 02_06_08:20 Eduardo Torres-Martinez –
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
Space Autonomy as Migration of Functionality: The Mars case (#15) Tim Grant *, André Bos *, Mark Neerincx †, Antonio Olmedo.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
Carnegie Mellon Rover Concept of Operation Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
Autonomous Mission Management of Unmanned Vehicles using Soar Scott Hanford Penn State Applied Research Lab Distribution A Approved for Public Release;
1 Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit SOL-18 Anomaly: NASA IV&V Involvement April 2004.
MARS EXPLORATION PROGRAM NSTA Robotics E-Class MARS EXPLORATION PROGRAM NSTA Robotics E-Class Sheri Klug Mars Space Flight Facility Arizona State University.
SAS_05_Contingency_Lutz_Tal1 Contingency Software in Autonomous Systems Robyn Lutz, JPL/Caltech & ISU Doron Tal, USRA at NASA Ames Ann Patterson-Hine,
Rover and Instrument Capabilities Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Michael Wagner, James Teza, Stuart Heys Robotics Institute, Carnegie.
CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s Revised Budget. CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s New Vision and Objectives (as of January 14, 2004)  VISION  The fundamental goal.
P. Mokashi IES Team Meeting, SwRI 29 May IES (SwRI) Develop sequences (flight and EQM test) Develop tables, macros and patches if necessary Test.
Mars Exploration Rover Machine Using Java Technology Presented by k.Pranusha k.Ishwarya.
Science Methods & Approach Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
E-USOC operations in Increments José Miguel Ezquerro Navarro E-USOC/UPM Jul 2010POIWG#28 - Huntsville, AL.
Autonomy: Executive and Instruments Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nicola Muscettola NASA Ames Reid Simmons Carnegie Mellon.
Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen.
Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI CI Kick-Off Meeting Devils Thumb Ranch, Colorado September 9-11, 2009 Observation Planning and Autonomous Mission Execution.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Life in the Atacama Field Experiments 2004 David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute.
1 Science Goal Monitor (SGM) Code 588 / Jenny Geiger.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Software Architecture Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 David Wettergreen.
NASA Ames Research Center
Project and Workshop Objectives
Navigation Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Dominic Jonak Carnegie Mellon.
AI in Space – Lessons From NASA’s Deep Space 1 Mission
Colorado Space Grant Consortium
Autonomous Operations in Space
Presentation transcript:

Susanne Biundo, Karen Myers, Kanna Rajan How is Planning & Scheduling Changing the World?

Susanne Biundo, Karen Myers, Kanna Rajan

A brief word on the State of the PracticeAutominder: An Intelligent Cognitive Orthotic System Client Modeler Plan Manager Intelligent Reminder Generator Client Plan Activity Info Inferred Activity Sensor Data Reminders Client Model Info Activity Info Preferences Plan Updates Client Model PI: Martha Pollack

Pléiades:Earth Observation Satellite Management Daily automatic selection and scheduling of complex observations: mono or stereo, ground targets or areas. Fair sharing of the use of the satellite between several owner entities Jean Michel Lachiver, CNES Michel Lemaître, Gérard Verfaillie, ONERA Toulouse, France

The AMC Allocator:Advanced Scheduling for US Airforce Problem: Day-to-day allocation of aircraft & crews to airlift/tanker missions Characteristics –Large scale: 1,000s of missions; 100s of assets –Continuous, dynamic stream of mission requirements Core Technology: Incremental, constraint-based search –Rapid gen. of airlift/tanker schedules –Localized revision in response to changing circumstances –Flexible, what-if option generation Status: Embedded in AMC’s operational planning system & transitioning into use DARPA Carnegie Mellon PI: Steve Smith

Susanne Biundo, Karen Myers, Kanna Rajan ICAPS Andalusian Regional Ministry Of The Enviornment (SPAIN) University of Granada SEPIA Planning Group Distributed execution over the internet PI: Luis Castillo

The EO-1 Autonomous Sciencecraft Onboard planning part of autonomy software flying onboard Earth Observing One Spacecraft Fall 2003 – present Planning software onboard enables spacecraft to autonomously monitor and retarget volcanoes, flooding, cryosphere PI: Steve Chien

ASTEP LITA Atacama Field Campaign (Sep-Oct 2004) –Zöe rover with life detecting instruments –On-board planning and autonomous navigation over long distances Rover executive results (preliminary, telemetry still being analyzed) –Total hours of operations (cumulative over several runs): 17 hours –Total distance covered: 16 km –Longest autonomous traverse: 3.3Km2h 29m –“Roughest traverse”: 1h 2m with 19 faults recovered –Faults addressed: Navigator “confused” Internal processes failed Early and late arrival at waypoint Robust Task Execution for Rovers: LITA Courtesy: Nicola Muscettola IDEA PI: Nicola Muscettola

Susanne Biundo, Karen Myers, Kanna Rajan

Mexar The problem of spacecraft memory dumping Domain –ESA Mars Express mission Problem components –Finite memory banks –Limited downlink windows –Limited data rate Planning and Scheduling Team, CNR - Italy – Input-solver Interface Solver-output Interface Solver PI: Amedeo Cesta

Commanding Spirit & Opportunity with MAPGEN Mixed-Initiative ground- based Activity Planning Decision Support system –Generative planning –Plan editing –Constraint formulation and moves –Deals with time and resources First AI based system to command a vehicle on the surface of another planet ROI for NASA > 20% for science return in comparision to a manual planning process PI: Kanna Rajan