Flink: Lessons of interoperability Peter Mika Dept. of Business Informatics Free University Amsterdam 1 st Intl. Workshop on.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Connecting Social Content Services using FOAF, RDF and REST Leigh Dodds, Engineering Manager, Ingenta Amsterdam, May 2005.

Advertisements

Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.

1 Ontolog OOR Use Case Review Todd Schneider 1 April 2010 (v 1.2)

The Institute for Learning and Research Technology is a national centre of excellence in the development and use of technology-based methods in teaching,

Building and Analyzing Social Networks Web Data and Semantics in Social Network Applications Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham February 15, 2013.

Making the Web searchable, or the Future of Web Search Peter Mika Yahoo! Research Barcelona.

1 Combining Provenance with Trust in Social Networks for Semantic Web Content Filtering Jennifer Golbeck University of Maryland, College Park May, 2006.

Microsoft and Web 2.0 In the enterprise. A working definition of Web 2.0.

1 Semantic Technology supporting science Peter Mika / Dept. of Computer Science / Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

Planning for Flexible Integration via Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) APSR Forum – The Well-Integrated Repository Sydney, Australia February 2006 Sandy.

SocioBiblog : A Decentralized Platform for Sharing Bibliographic Information Aman Shakya 1, Hideaki Takeda 1, Vilas Wuwongse 2, Ikki Ohmukai 1 1 National.

NetworkedPlanet Networked Information – Networked Knowledge Topic Maps & Web 3.0 © 2007 Networked Planet Limited. Web 3.0 Technology Platform to enable.

Future Software Architectures Combining the Web 2.0 with the Semantic Web to realize future Web Communities Maarten Visser

CSCI 572 Project Presentation Mohsen Taheriyan Semantic Search on FOAF profiles.

Semantic Web and Web Mining: Networking with Industry and Academia İsmail Hakkı Toroslu IST EVENT 2006.

ADL_Initiative Report to #CETISROW.

ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.

1 Semantic Data Management Xavier Lopez, Ph.D., Director, Spatial & Semantic Technologies.

Web-based Portal for Discovery, Retrieval and Visualization of Earth Science Datasets in Grid Environment Zhenping (Jane) Liu.

Building Trustworthy Semantic Webs Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas Semantic web technologies for secure interoperability and.

Building and Analyzing Social Networks Case Studies of Semantic Social Network Analysis Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham February 22, 2013.

A J Miles Rutherford Appleton Laboratory SKOS Standards and Best Practises for USING Knowledge Organisation Systems ON THE Semantic Web NKOS workshop ECDL.

The Semantic Web Service Shuying Wang Outline Semantic Web vision Core technologies XML, RDF, Ontology, Agent… Web services DAML-S.

Data and Applications Security Semantic Web and Social Networks Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham November 2013.

Tim Finin University of Maryland, Baltimore County 29 January 2013 Joint work with Anupam Joshi, Laura Zavala and our students SRI Social Media Workshop.

Brian Matthews, CRIS 2002, 30/08/02 ERIS Workshop, CRIS2002 Architecture Brian Matthews, Business & Information Technology Dept, CLRC

September 30, 2002EON 2002Slide 1 Integrating Ontology Storage and Ontology-based Applications A lesson for better evaluation methodology Peter Mika:

Linked-data and the Internet of Things Payam Barnaghi Centre for Communication Systems Research University of Surrey March 2012.

Topic Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Review Draft/Issued document 0.1.

METADATA WORKSHOP Conclusions Keith Jeffery Peter Wittenburg.

Linking Tasks, Data, and Architecture Doug Nebert AR-09-01A May 2010.

1 CS 502: Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Lecture 19 Interoperability Z39.50.

Web: Minimal Metadata for Data Services Through DIALOGUE Neil Chue Hong AHM2007.

Semantic Web Technologies Research Topics and Projects discussion Brief Readings Discussion Research Presentations.

Oracle Database 11g Semantics Overview Xavier Lopez, Ph.D., Dir. Of Product Mgt., Spatial & Semantic Technologies Souripriya Das, Ph.D., Consultant Member.

Semantic Computing Research Group 1 UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY OntoViews – A Tool for.

Semantic Clipboard User Interface is integrated in the Browser Architecture of the Semantic Clipboard Illustration of a license incompliant content reuse.

The Semantic Logger: Supporting Service Building from Personal Context Mischa M Tuffield et al. Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia Group University of Southampton.

PHS / Department of General Practice Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Knowledge representation in TRANSFoRm AMIA.

1 Ontolog OOR-BioPortal Comparative Analysis Todd Schneider 15 October 2009.

A centre of expertise in digital information management Shaping the e-future? Grids, Web Services and Digital Libraries Professor Tony.

Microsoft Research Faculty Summit Jennifer Golbeck Assistant Professor, College of Information Studies University of Maryland, College Park Social.

THE SEMANTIC WEB By Conrad Williams. Contents  What is the Semantic Web?  Technologies  XML  RDF  OWL  Implementations  Social Networking  Scholarly.

IoT Meets Big Data Standardization Considerations

And the Watson Plugin for the NeOn Toolkit. IST NeOn-project.org The Semantic Web is growing… #SW Pages.

UNEP Terminology Workshop - Geneva, April 15, Environmental Terminology & Thesaurus Workshop UN Environment Programme Regional Office of Europe.

Lessons learned from Semantic Wiki Jie Bao and Li Ding June 19, 2008.

A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.

Wolf Siberski1 Semantic Web Framework Requirements Analysis (D 1.2.2) Wolf Siberski.

X-RAY. A java project can be scanned for instances of design patterns The results are represented in a table – design pat- tern participants are associated.

Selected Semantic Web UMBC CoBrA – Context Broker Architecture  Using OWL to define ontologies for context modeling and reasoning  Taking.

Rinke Hoekstra Use of OWL in the Legal Domain Statement of Interest OWLED 2008 DC, Gaithersburg.

Introduction to SQL Server 2000 Reporting Services Jeff Dumas Technical Specialist Microsoft Corporation

1 Intelligent Information System Lab., Department of Computer and Information Science, Korea University Semantic Social Network Analysis Kyunglag Kwon.

The AstroGrid-D Information Service Stellaris A central grid component to store, manage and transform metadata - and connect to the VO!

Easy Access with templates I: Create a database Lesson 16 By the end of this lesson you will be able to complete the following: Find the best database.

Chapter 8A Semantic Web Primer 1 Chapter 8 Conclusion and Outlook Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen.

Interoperable Internet Scale Security Framework for RFID Networks

Semblog Project Personal Information Distribution with Social Network

Session 3A: Catalog Services and Metadata Models

Development of the Amphibian Anatomical Ontology

Lecture #11: Ontology Engineering Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham

Flexible Extensible Digital Object Repository Architecture

Flexible Extensible Digital Object Repository Architecture

Web Services for Semantic Interoperability and Integration

Analyzing and Securing Social Networks

Data and Applications Security

LOD reference architecture

Semantic Markup for Semantic Web Tools:

Metadata The metadata contains

Presentation transcript:

Flink: Lessons of interoperability Peter Mika Dept. of Business Informatics Free University Amsterdam 1 st Intl. Workshop on Interoperability of SW portals

Content Flink Interoperability Flink + Interoperability

What is Flink? Flink is a directory of Semantic Web research Browse the social network of all authors at ISWC ‘01-’04 Profiles with personal information, s, publications View statistics Download profiles in FOAF format Export for Social Network Analysis Demonstration of latest SW technology 1 st prize at the Semantic Web Challenge (2004) Open source (soon) Try it!

Technology highlights Social network mining from the Web and other legacy sources ( s, publications) Social networks based ontology extraction Collection of FOAF data from the SW (“scuttering”) Aggregation and identity reasoning (“smushing”) Custom inferencing using Sesame OWL use sameAs, inverse functional properties Web Service integration geographic lookup WML interface …

JUNG Network API Semantic Web Web Sesame FOAF profiles Web mining s IMAP or POP3 Sesame Publications Google Scholar, Bibster Network analysis Web application RDF storage Sesame Metadata enrichment (Identity reasoning, geographic lookup)

Interoperability (1) Interoperability on the knowledge level = syntax + semantics + context Syntax Easy (but a ‘forgiving’ parser would be nice) Semantics Doable: shared ontologies, ontology mapping (e.g. for foaf:interests), unique object identification (e.g. for foaf:Person), Context Challenge

Interoperability (2): Context Provenance: where the information comes from, when was it collected? Time-to-live: how long is it going to stay valid? Trust and ratings: is it considered trustworthy (by someone), is it important (for someone)? Security: who can access it and how? …

Interoperability (3): Process How do we find each other? Registries vs. pointers How do we exchange? Connectivity Protocol (e.g. subscriptions vs. advertizements) What do we exchange? Files, access etc. Why would we exchange? The economics

Flink and the FOAF-web Flink interoperates with the FOAF-web Producer and consumer of FOAF data But: 762 other definitions of Person ( including swrc:Personwww.swoogle.org FOAF-web is the kind of nightmare the SW promises to be Open, decentralized system Distributed data and services Issues of syntax and semantics Lack of authority, privacy etc.

Flink and the FOAF-web (2) Majority of files are incorrect XML, RDF or FOAF Errors from the obvious to the sneaky e.g. Ignore FOAF extensions What to do with them? Ignore on import, don’t export FOAF interests? A ‘loose end’ in FOAF (like dc:Creator) Ignore (on import) Who is right? Let the user decide

How to contact Dan Brickley?

Summary Interoperability is a challenge: Knowledge: syntax + semantics + context Process Interoperability is about coming to an agreement Realize the trade-off between level of commitment vs. scale