1 Configuration Development for HIF Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole Array HIF Final Focus Meeting July 2, 2002 Tom Brown Chang Jun Phil Heitzenroeder

2 Interface Issues Thermal 4 K magnets must be insulated from C Flinabe in a few mm of space. Vacuum target chamber needs to be isolated from beam lines. Debris from target must be kept out of beam lines. Electromagnetic Loads Forces between quadrupole magnets must be reacted by strutures between the magnets. Adequate preload on the magnets must be provided to avoid quenching, Radiation Magnets must be shielded for 30 yr. life. Nuclear heating of the superconducting magnets must be as low as possible. Alignment Beam alignment must be maintained within TBD dimensions. Maintenance & Assembly Array should be capable of tolerating the loss of a few beam lines (symmetric side to side). Goal: to be able to replace failed beam lines in <6 mos. Array assembly must be practical from the field construction point of view. Utility Feeds Cryogenic feed lines, power lines, instrumentation lines, Flinabe lines from all of the 104 beam lines must all be accommodated.

3 Preliminary Concept 52 Beam Lines / side Focusing magnets utilize Nb 3 Sn superconductor. Target chamber Focusing magnet

4 Vacuum boundary Chamber / Focusing Magnet Interface Detail

5 Support Tube / Vacuum Concept Vacuum Chamber Alignment Tubes

6 Configuration based on the Shell magnet arrangement. Support tube and guide Shell magnet concept Local detail

7 Beam geometry used in model Target Final focus quadrupoles Dipole

8 Magnet Assembly Thermal & Radiation Shielding Nb 3 Sn Magnets Inner vacuum pipe Magnet preload compression jacket Exploded View Ground wall electrical insulation Quadrupole Details

9 Shell configuration –Last Magnet

10 Jeff Latkowski shield build Proposed alternate build Last Magnet Build Dimensions

11 Magnets Installed in Guide Tubes The “nose” is the difficult area. There is insufficient space for the guide tubes. The dipoles here will be supported by the vacuum pipes. Bulk shielding is a problem! Detail

12 Lattice space: 60 by 60cm Simplified Configuration

13 Force Direction & Magnitude 0.707q/a 0.28q/a 0.07q/a q=2*10 7 a=0.6m a

14 Edge Magnets –Note uncompensated edge magnets have 10 times the force on them as inner magnets! –An option suggested by MIT is to provide a set of “edge magnets” surrounding the quadrupoles. Advantages: Force on focusing magnets would be reduced and therefore alignment will be easier to maintain. Structures between focusing magnets can be greatly reduced in size. The “active” focusing magnets will all be the same and will operate at the same current.

15 July IFE: Conductors section at the End stage of compression One conductor has 1*10cm section. 40cm 20cm Electromagnetic Analysis of Shell Type Magnet Design

16 A1 B3 B2 C2 B1 A3 A2 B4 C1 C3 ZA1 ZA2 ZA3 ZB1 ZB2ZB3 ZC1 ZC2ZC3 July IFE: Conductors section of first quarter

17 July IFE: Conductors section & magnetic flux lines

18 July IFE: Conductors section & magnetic flux lines in first quarter

19 July IFE: Conductors section & magnetic flux lines (magnified)

20 July IFE: magnetic forces at conductors (ANSYS, current is 1MA). (see 2-6 for the conductors position with names)

21 Conclusion The design shown is only a “first cut”. –Basic philosophy of this design is to allow each focusing beam array to be individually removed. –The inner magnet triplets are all contained in a common vacuum chamber, but there are issues. 1.This design locates radiation shielding in the vortex tube region and around the sides of vacuum housing. Is this adequate? 2.There is insufficient space in first focusing magnet region. This area is almost totally occupied by the focusing magnets, leaving no room for the guide tubes or shielding. 3.All magnets must transfer electromagnetic loads through the superconducting thermal insulation. Concepts for doing this need to be developed. 4.Bulk radiation shielding will be located in the vacuum housing. Outgassing may be a problem. Maintainability issues need to be more fully understood from the points of view of component activation and personnel access. Shell type magnet design is used since this easily allows “compression collars” to surround the coil to inhibit coil motion. The shell design lends itself to the conical array of magnets. Initial electromagnetic analyses have been performed for both the “block” and “shell” magnet configurations. –Forces on the outer coils are large, but the addition of “edge coils” can significantly reduce them.