Financial Globalisation

Aims of Lecturer (1)To explore the extent of financial globalisation (2)To explore the main forces and agents driving the process of financial globalisation (3)To explore the social, political and economic consequences of financial globalisation

Structure of Lecture Part One: Offer a descriptive account of evolution of international monetary system. Part Two: Explore different incommensurate explanation for why the IMS has evolved in manner that it has since the early 1970s

Part One From Gold to Keynes Gold Standard Emerged gradually Features of World Monetary System in late part of C19th: London as the Global Financial Centre Relatively Free Flow of Capital (to degree it followed the flag)

Gold Standard important in disciplining domestic actors Links domestic economic actors to global market disciplines. Makes the economy ‘knave proof’

System destroyed by WWI Attempts to resituate Gold Standard failed (‘Gold Standard on the Booze’ (Keynes)). Problems of International Imbalances and Recycling (Dawes Plan) Attempts to restore ‘wrong parities’ Changes in Domestic Politics

1930s: Things fall apart!!! International Capital mobility collapsed Global Deflation Gold is abandoned.

Bretton Woods Conference 1944 (White and Keynes) Fixed but adjustable pegs. Dollar tied to Gold Deregulate Current Account but not the Capital Account A new form of Liberal World Economy

Bretton Woods never really worked: Current Account convertibility was not established until 1958 in Europe and 1964 in Japan From this moment onwards capital account controls came under pressure Sterling Devalued in 1967 Dollar devalued in 1971 and came off Gold completely in 1973.

From 1973 see fairly rapid ‘de-regulation’ by major states. Three aspects: Deregulation of particular national markets Removal of controls separating functionally distinct market Removal of Controls over movement of capital across boarders

Deregulation. International Dynamic. Secure position as a major financial centre May Day Deregulation 1975 (US), UK ‘Big Bang’ reforms in 1980s (1986), Japan deregulation (2001)

Massive Increase in Volume of Trading across different markets. The daily volume of share trading on the New York Stock exchange increased from approximately 10 million in 1970 to over 1 billion in 2005.

According to the BIS the size of global financial market increased from about 300 billion in 1974 to 7000 billion in By 2004 the total daily foreign exchange turnover reached $2317 million compared to $590 million in 1989

High Levels of Volatility Early 2000s Dow Jones lost half its value Values of major currencies fluctuant by 50 to 100 per cent Finance itself becomes critical industry, Between a quarter and a third of UK employees involved in Finance Cultural normalisation of debt and speculation

Exists semi-globalised world financial system

Explanations for What has Happened Keynesian (Strange, Grieve, Smith et al): Policy failures and lack of political will. In its slightly more radical forms address social power of key financier group Soultions: Better Supranational Regulation, The Reintroduction of Capital Controls and National Re-regulation

Neo-Liberal: Basically positive view of development. In so far as there are instabilities these are product of government failures.

Marxist interpretation: Finance is really not the key issue What we living through extended period of financialisation/ fictitious accumulation Capital is value in motion, it must do something!

Ideally Money Capital, Manufacturing Capital, Commodity Capital, Money Capital (Real Accumulation) But if not possible Money Capital, Money Capital

The rise in financial volatility since 1973 is not a unfortunate consequence of government decisions but consequence of structural logics of capital Harvey talks necessary rise in financial volatility Parallels with dominance of Image and the Simulacrum. Also Parallels with 1920s

Post-modern Interpretation McGoun Money is Sign. People want it not to do anything with it but because of the prestige it brings. The real value of money is a ‘sign value’ Game. Trade for stake of trading!

For McGoun this is new and relatively benign and perhaps sustainable. Crisis in the Financial Simulacrum do not effect real economy

Conclusions It clear quite fundamental changes in global financial structure since 1973 Force us to rethink relationship between Finance and Production We should not fetishise the spatial or become preoccupied about debates I have no idea how stable global financial system. When will the Perfect storm hit!