Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb. 2003
Advertisements

Adaptive Grid Reverse-Time Migration Yue Wang. Outline Motivation and ObjectiveMotivation and Objective Reverse Time MethodologyReverse Time Methodology.
Selecting Robust Parameters for Migration Deconvolution University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Local Reverse Time Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Function Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Local Reverse Time Migration with VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah May 1, 2008 PhD Defense 99 pages.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.
Finite-Frequency Resolution Limits of Traveltime Tomography for Smoothly Varying Velocity Models Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Specular-Ray Parameter Extraction and Stationary Phase Migration Jing Chen University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Salt Boundary Delineation by Transmitted PS Waves David Sheley.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Reverse-Time Migration By A Variable Grid-Size And Time-Step Method Yue Wang University of Utah.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
TARGET-ORIENTED LEAST SQUARES MIGRATION Zhiyong Jiang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu, GXT Bob Estill, Unocal Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Gerard T. Schuster, University of Utah.
Improve Migration Image Quality by 3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Finite-Frequency Resolution Limits of Traveltime Tomography for Smoothly Varying Velocity Models Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Arbitrary Parameter Extraction, Stationary Phase Migration, and Tomographic Velocity Analysis Jing Chen University of Utah.
Key Result Seismic CAT Scan vs Trenching.
FAST VELOCITY ANALYSIS BY PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Stabilization of Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu University of Utah.
LEAST-SQUARES MIGRATION OF BOTH PRIMARIES AND MULTIPLES Ruiqing He, Gerard Schuster University of Utah Oct
Local Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao and Gerard Schuster Univ. of Utah.
Midyear Overview of Year 2001 UTAM Results T. Crosby, Y. Liu, G. Schuster, D. Sheley, J. Sheng, H. Sun, J. Yu and M. Zhou J. Yu and M. Zhou.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Fresnel-zone Traveltime Tomo. for INCO and Mapleton Data Fresnel-zone Traveltime Tomo. for INCO and Mapleton Data Jianming Sheng University of Utah Feb.
Migration Deconvolution vs Least Squares Migration Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
1 Fast 3D Target-Oriented Reverse Time Datuming Shuqian Dong University of Utah 2 Oct
Crosscorrelation Migration of Free-Surface Multiples in CDP Data Jianming Sheng University of Utah February, 2001.
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
3-D Migration Deconvolution: Real Examples Jianhua Yu University of Utah Bob Estill Unocal.
Reverse-Time Migration For 3D SEG/EAGE Salt Model
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: P-to-S Converted Wave Case Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Crosscorrelation Migration of Free-Surface Multiples in RVSP Data Jianming Sheng University of Utah February, 2001.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution in Common Offset Domain Jianxing Hu University of Utah.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
V.2 Wavepath Migration Overview Overview Kirchhoff migration smears a reflection along a fat ellipsoid, so that most of the reflection energy is placed.
Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data J. Sheng, G. T. Schuster, K. L. Pankow,
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
New Migration Deconvolution Filters Jianhua Yu University of Utah.
Prestack Migration Intuitive Least Squares Migration Green’s Theorem.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: Salt Flank Imaging by PS Waves Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney 1 1 Schlumberger UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 8, 2008.
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Migration Velocity Analysis 01. Outline  Motivation Estimate a more accurate velocity model for migration Tomographic migration velocity analysis 02.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D SSP Data Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping Cao Gerard T. Schuster October 2009.
Reverse Time Migration of Prism Waves for Salt Flank Delineation
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Naoshi Aoki Feb. 5,
A Blind Test of Traveltime and Waveform Inversion Colin A. Zelt 1, R. Gerhard Pratt 2, Andrew Brenders 2, Sara Hanson-Hedgecock 1 and John A. Hole 3 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
1 Prestack migrations to inversion John C. Bancroft CREWES 20 November 2001.
3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Bob Estill ( Unocal) Jianhua Yu (University of Utah)
Raanan Dafni,  PhD in Geophysics (Tel-Aviv University)  Paradigm R&D ( )  Post-Doc (Rice University) Current Interest: “Wave-equation based.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
The Earth’s Near Surface as a Vibroseis Signal Generator Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah.
Shuqian Dong and Sherif M. Hanafy February 2009 Interpolation and Extrapolation of 2D OBS Data Using Interferometry.
Enhancing Migration Image Quality by 3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Gerard Schuster Jianhua Yu, Jianxing Hu University of Utah andGXT
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
Reverse Time Migration
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Least Squares Migration
Presentation transcript:

Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah

Outline Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Wavepath Migration Wavepath Migration Implementation of WM Implementation of WM Numerical Results Numerical Results Conclusions Conclusions

Forward Modeling ( Xg, 0 ) ( Xs, 0 ) Specular Ray

3D Kirchhoff Migration ( Xg, 0 ) ( Xs, 0 ) 3D Fat Ellipsoid

3-D KM of a Single Trace RS A A B B C C

Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Traveltime Information Where Was Wave Reflected ? The Whole Fat Ellipsoid ! Problem 1 Strong Far-Field Migration Artifact Problem 2 Slow for 3-D Iterative Velocity Analysis

Outline Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Wavepath Migration Wavepath Migration Implementation of WM Implementation of WM Numerical Results Numerical Results Conclusions Conclusions

3D Wavepath Migration ( Xg, 0 ) Fat Ray FatEllipsoid KM : Fat Ellipsoid, O(N ) WM: Hatching Area, O(N ) 31.5

3-D WM of a Single Trace RS A B C A B C

Traveltime + Ray Direction True Reflection point Small Migration Aperture FewerArtifactsLessExpensive Wavepath Migration

To Achieve Higher CPU Efficiency To Achieve Higher CPU Efficiency Compared to 3-D KM Compared to 3-D KM To Generate Comparable or Better To Generate Comparable or Better Image Quality than 3-D KM Image Quality than 3-D KM Key Goals of 3-D WM

Related References Time-Map Migration Time-Map Migration Sherrif & Geldhart (1985) Sherrif & Geldhart (1985) Wave Equation Tomography Wave Equation Tomography Woodward & Rocca (1988) Woodward & Rocca (1988) Gaussian Beam Migration Gaussian Beam Migration Ross Hill (1990) Ross Hill (1990) Kirchhoff Beam Migration Kirchhoff Beam Migration Yonghe Sun et al., (1999) Yonghe Sun et al., (1999)

Outline Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Wavepath Migration Wavepath Migration Implementation of WM Implementation of WM Numerical Results Numerical Results Conclusions Conclusions

Key Steps in WM Raypath RSRaypath Fresnel Zone Migration Quasi-ellipsoidQuasi-ellipsoid

Outline Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Wavepath Migration Wavepath Migration Implementation of WM Implementation of WM Numerical Results Numerical Results 3-D Prestack Point Scatterer Data 3-D Prestack Point Scatterer Data 3-D Prestack SEG/EAGE Salt Data 3-D Prestack SEG/EAGE Salt Data 3-D Prestack West Texas Field Data 3-D Prestack West Texas Field Data Conclusions Conclusions

3-D Prestack KM Point Scatterer Response Reflectivity Y Offset (km) X Offset (km) Reflectivity Y Offset (km) X Offset (km) Reflectivity Y Offset (km) X Offset (km) Reflectivity Y Offset (km) X Offset (km) Z0 Z0-1 Z0-9 Z0+8

Reflectivity Y Offset (km) X Offset (km) Reflectivity Y Offset (km) X Offset (km) Reflectivity Y Offset (km) X Offset (km) Reflectivity Y Offset (km) X Offset (km) D Prestack WM Point Scatterer Response Z0 Z0-1 Z0-9 Z0+8

Outline Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Wavepath Migration Wavepath Migration Implementation of WM Implementation of WM Numerical Results Numerical Results 3-D Prestack Point Scatterer Data 3-D Prestack Point Scatterer Data 3-D Prestack SEG/EAGE Salt Data 3-D Prestack SEG/EAGE Salt Data 3-D Prestack West Texas Field Data 3-D Prestack West Texas Field Data Conclusions Conclusions

A Common Shot Gather Trace Number 1390 Time (sec) 0 5.0

Inline Velocity Model Offset (km) 09.2 Depth (km) SALT

Inline KM (CPU=1) Inline WM (CPU=1/33) Offset (km) Depth (km) Offset (km) 09.2

Inline KM (CPU=1) Inline WM (CPU=1/170) Offset (km) Depth (km) Offset (km) 09.2 (subsample)

Zoom Views of Inline Sections Offset: 3~6.5 km, Depth: 0.3~1.8 km WM Model KM SubWM

Offset: 1.8~4 km, Depth: 0.6~2.1 km WM Model KM SubWM Zoom Views of Crossline Sections

Inline: 1.8~7.2 km, Crossline: 0~4 km WM Model KM SubWM Horizontal Slices (Depth=1.4 km)

Outline Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Wavepath Migration Wavepath Migration Implementation of WM Implementation of WM Numerical Results Numerical Results 3-D Prestack Point Scatterer Data 3-D Prestack Point Scatterer Data 3-D Prestack SEG/EAGE Salt Data 3-D Prestack SEG/EAGE Salt Data 3-D Prestack West Texas Field Data 3-D Prestack West Texas Field Data Conclusions Conclusions

A Common Shot Gather Trace Number Time (sec) 0 3.4

Inline KM (CPU=1) Inline WM (CPU=1/14) Offset (km) Depth (km) Offset (km)

Inline KM (CPU=1) Inline WM (CPU=1/50) Offset (km) Depth (km) Offset (km) (subsample)

Crossline KM (CPU=1) Crossline WM (CPU=1/14) Offset (km) Depth (km) Offset (km)

Crossline KM (CPU=1) Crossline WM (CPU=1/50) (subsample) Offset (km) Depth (km) Offset (km)

Inline: 0~4.6 km, Crossline: 0~3.8 KM (CPU=1) Horizontal Slices (Depth=2.5 km) WM (CPU=1/14) WM (Sub, CPU=1/50)

Outline Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Problems in Kirchhoff Migration Wavepath Migration Wavepath Migration Implementation of WM Implementation of WM Numerical Results Numerical Results Conclusions Conclusions

Conclusions SEG/EAGE Salt Data SEG/EAGE Salt Data Fewer Migration Artifacts Fewer Migration Artifacts Better for Complex Salt Boundary Better for Complex Salt Boundary Higher Computational Efficiency Higher Computational Efficiency CPU CPU KM: 1 WM: 1/33 KM: 1 WM: 1/33 Subsampled WM: 1/170 Subsampled WM: 1/170

Conclusions West Texas Field Data West Texas Field Data Fewer Migration Artifacts Fewer Migration Artifacts Similar Image Quality Similar Image Quality Higher Computational Efficiency Higher Computational Efficiency CPU CPU KM: 1 WM: 1/14 KM: 1 WM: 1/14 Subsampled WM: 1/50 Subsampled WM: 1/50

Acknowledgements Acknowledgements We thank UTAM sponsors for their financial support