Francesco Devoto Study on Performance of First Level Muon Trigger of ATLAS experiment at LHC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern SM Higgs Discovery Channels ATLAS High Level Trigger Trigger & Physics Selection Higgs Channels: Physics Performance.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
Report from the Muon Trigger WG Aleandro Nisati On behalf of the Muon Trigger Slice Community Muon Week, April 18° 2007.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
28/2/2006S. Rosati - MC Workshop1 Muon Identification and Reconstruction Stefano Rosati INFN – Roma 1.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
Neil Collins Birmingham Masterclass Tuesday 24 April 2007 ATLAS and the LHC.
BEAUTY 2006, 28/09/06Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS & CMS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of ATLAS and CMS.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
17th Sep JapanTau04 - International workshop on Tau Lepton Physics1 Discovery Potential of the SM Higgs at the LHC Junichi Tanaka ICEPP, University.
CKM2006 at Nagoya University Dec. 14 th 2006 Makoto Tomoto Nagoya University on behalf of CMS and ATLAS collaborations Rare B decays in ATLAS and CMS.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.
IOP HEPP 6-8 April 2009Matthew Tamsett, RHUL 1 Determining the ATLAS electron trigger efficiency in BSM channels from Data Matthew Tamsett, RHUL Supervisor:
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Muon System and Physics Performance Ludovico Pontecorvo CERN-INFN.
1 Perspectives for quarkonium production in CMS Carlos Lourenço, on behalf of CMSQWG 2008, Nara, Japan, December 2008.
Sez. di Lecce Universita` degli Studi del Salento The Muon Trigger in ATLAS Giovanni Siragusa On behalf of the ATLAS Muon Trigger group.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
Search for a Z′ boson in the dimuon channel in p-p collisions at √s = 7TeV with CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Search for a Z′ boson in the.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
Il Trigger di Alto Livello di CMS N. Amapane – CERN Workshop su Monte Carlo, la Fisica e le simulazioni a LHC Frascati, 25 Ottobre 2006.
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
Marcello Bindi, on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration KRUGER 2010 : Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC 06/12/20101.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
1 c. mills (Harvard U.) 20 September, 2010 W and Z Physics at ATLAS Corrinne Mills Harvard DOE Site Visit 20 September 2010.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February
Expectations of the first 2 years of LHC operations A.Rozanov ITEP Winter School of Physics February Outline LHC Experiments SM physics Higgs SUSY.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Status of the ATLAS first-level Central Trigger and the Muon Barrel Trigger and First Results from Cosmic-Ray Data David Berge (CERN-PH) for the ATLAS.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
Studies of W( → e ν ) boson production in pp interactions in ATLAS Journées Jeunes Chercheurs 2010 Dimitra Tsionou Supervisors: Lucia Di Ciaccio (LAPP)
Di-muon decays of J/ψ mesons and Z bosons have been used to study the muon reconstruction and identification efficiency of the ATLAS detector as a function.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
Charged particle yields and spectra in p+p and Heavy Ion Collisions with ATLAS at the LHC Jiří Dolejší (Charles University Prague) for the ATLAS collaboration.
Study of Z  e + e - + Jets with CMS at the LHC Christos Lazaridis University of Wisconsin-Madison Preliminary Examination.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
A. Parenti 1 RT 2007, Batavia IL The CMS Muon System and its Performance in the Cosmic Challenge RT2007 conference, Batavia IL, USA May 03, 2007 Andrea.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Presentation transcript:

Francesco Devoto Study on Performance of First Level Muon Trigger of ATLAS experiment at LHC

Summary ATLAS Trigger System Conclusions First Level Muon Trigger  Selection Algorithm  Performance with Simulated Data  First Test with Cosmic Rays Data LHC and ATLAS Experimental Apparatus

Ring Radius Circumference 4.2 km ~27 km Center of Mass Energy14 TeV Luminosity10 34 cm -2 s -1 Bunch Crossing 40 MHz (t bx =25 ns) n° proton for bunch~10 11 At LHC the protons will collide in 4 points where the following 4 experimental apparatus were installed: ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) CMS (Compact Muon Solenoid) ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment) LHCb (Large Hadron Collider bPhysics) The beginning of data taking is scheduled for 2008 Proton-Proton Collider Large Hadron Collider

46 m Solenoidal Magnetic Field + Vertex Detectors: PIXEL SCT TRT CALORIMETER: Toroidal Magnet MUON SPECTROMETR : Precision Chambers (MDT and CSC) Trigger Chambers (RPC in the barrel and TGC in the end-cap) Z (  Y X 22 mATLAS Experimental Apparatus Pseudorapidity Electromagnetic Hadronic

 B Physics  Function period with low luminosity ( L = cm -2 s -1 ) Physics Programm  LHC is a factory all of Standard Model particles as well as of potenzial new particles with mass in the TeV range  Reserch of Higgs boson  Sperimental Limit (LEP): m H >113.5 Gev/c 2  LHC will be able to obseve a Higgs boson with mass up to 1TeV and it will measure its mass and pairing with great precision  Precision Measurements  W and t high production  Reserch of SuperSimmetric Particles (SUSY)

Trigger/DAQ Problem 1000 TB s -1 TRIGGER System Initial Rate R = L ×  p-p ≈ 1GHz DAQ ? Data Trasmission Storage

ATLAS Trigger System Level-1 Trigger The trigger system must be able to make a selection of the events that have some characteristics of interest Level 1 Level 2 Event Filter 1GHz 100kHz ~100Hz Muon Detector Muon Trigger Software Trigger High Level Triggers Hardware Trigger Calorimeter Trigger Central Trigger Processor Front-End LVL2 Trigger Region of Interest ~2.5  s ~10 ms ~1s

ATLAS Trigger System: Muon Spectrometer Barrel RPC Detector EndCap TGC Detector Barrel: |  | < 1.05 EndCap: 1.05 <|  | < 2.7

RPC  View  View Chamber Cover Barrel Barrel Muon Spectrometer 

The interest physical processes happen with high p T A p T selection is necessary to eliminate the processes that are not of interest LVL1-µ: Threshold Selection Eff pTpT 1 Fluctuation energy lost in the calorimeter Uncertainty on the position of the interaction vertex Scattering Magnetic field disuniformity p T threshold

Muon pT = pT Threshold Same algorithm both for low and high-pT 3 Low-pT + 3 High-pT threshold avalaible! Side  p-p Algorithm: Identification of candidate muon track coming from interaction vertex within p T range Infinite momentum track (p T  ) d+ e d- depends on the muon p T d+ d- PIVOT Plane RPC 2 Low-pT Plane RPC 1 High-pT Plane RPC 3 Coincidence Windows Calculation: Associate to each pivot strip a COINCIDENCE WINDOW in the Low-pT and High-pT system LVL1-µ: Trigger Algorithm Pivot Strip Low-pT Strip

Low-pT Coincidence Matrix LVL1-µ: Coincidence Matrix (CM) 6 GeV 8 GeV 10 GeV 3 slots for Low-pT Threshold avalaible: Default 6, 8, 10 GeV/c 3 slots for High-pT: Default 11, 20, 40 GeV/c Thr= 6 GeV Thr= 8 GeV Thr= 10 GeV 6 GeV+ 8 GeV+10 GeV

LVL1-µ: Hardware and Simulation RPC segnals are sent to CMA Synchronize input signals Make coincidence Give trigger results for  and  projection LVL1 ATHENA Analyse Data Simulated Single  The package that simulates the trigger is integrated in ATHENA the ATLAS official framework 4 CM create a PAD PAD generate the information of the RoI RoI Spatial Extension = ∆  × ∆  ≈ 0.1 × 0.1

LVL1-µ Performance: Efficiency Curves Low-pT Efficiency Plateau Region Plateau Efficiency ~82%

High-pT Efficiency Plateau RegionPlateau Efficiency ~78% LVL1-µ Performance: Efficiency Curves

LVL1-µ Performance: Geometrical Inefficiency Map Magnetic Ribs Apparatus Support Structures Lift  Crack    = 3  =  rad

Muon Selection Asymmetry Spectrometer layout is not exactly symmetrical respect to this plane then selection asymmetries are possible Muons are deflected in the r–  plane under the action of magnetic field Muons track are symmetrical respect to z=0 plane There are significant asymmetries under threshold while above it is small Events under threshold will be processed and rejected by HLTs P T = 10 GeV/c  

First Level Trigger Special Configuration: First Collision p-p LHC first collision will be with a luminosity of L= cm -2 s -1 The initial program is for the tweak of machines and calibration of deterctors but also the first data on b-physics Low-p T threshold are MU4 (fully opened), MU5 (5GeV/c) e MU6 (6GeV/c) For High-p T standard threshold HLTs there are in DAQ but the algorithm disabled Fully Opened 5 GeV/c 6 GeV/c Fully Opened 5 GeV/c 6 GeV/c

Coincidence windows are completely opened! The maximum width is given by the Matrix hardware processor size (64x32 channels) Cosmic Trigger: Special Lvl1 algorithm configuration is used to maximize Trigger efficiencies with cosmic events! Cosmic Trigger: Special Lvl1 algorithm configuration is used to maximize Trigger efficiencies with cosmic events! First Level Trigger Special Configuration: Cosmic Ray

Muons hitting RPC System Muons selected by LVL1 #of muons selected by LVL1 Efficiency: LVL1 cosmic = 0.50.1% LVL1 standard = 0.10.1% MU4 Rate Expected MU4 Rate Expected ~600Hz LVL1 cosmic algorithm is applied on a semple of 300k events, P>1 GeV Coincidence matrix fully opened Standard Threshold First Level Trigger Special Configuration: Cosmic Ray

Cosmic events surface distribution triggerated by RPC Z (cm) X (cm) 18m 12 m Distribution obtened with sperimental data from sector 13 Simulated distribution First Level Trigger Special Configuration: Cosmic Ray Tracks muons reconstruction software was developed by Neaples group

LVL-1 Algorithm in M5 (November 2007) Same algorithm both projection (η e φ) Request pointing to vertex Sperimental value consistent with MC estimation First Level Trigger Special Configuration: Cosmic Ray

Using the Level-1 Efficiency curves we may estimate the rates with different threshold Level-1 Efficiency Inclusive μ Cross Section at LHC MU6 Barrel Trigger ~ 12 kHz (low lumi) Mu20 Barrel Trigger ~ 2 kHz (high lumi) MU6 Barrel Trigger ~ 12 kHz (low lumi) Mu20 Barrel Trigger ~ 2 kHz (high lumi) ThresholdLum (cm -2 s -1 ) TriggerTotal (Hz)  /K Contribution MU4 (Fully Open) Low-p T % MU Low-p T % MU Low-p T % MU Low-p T % MU Low-p T % MU High-p T % MU High-p T % MU High-p T % LVL1-µ Trigger Rates

Selection Efficiency in the Low-pT Region p T (GeV/c) N events × × × × 10 6 p T (GeV/c) % events with no RPC signal LVL1 Efficiency %(1.4 ± 0.1) · %(3.4 ± 0.1) · %(4.8 ± 0.1) · %(33.4 ± 0.3) · Low-p T Events Position They are concentrated in the transition region between Barrel and EndCap

Event track with p T =2.5GeV/c that enter in the spectrometer EndCap region but it is selected by LVL1 RPC Barrel Barrel LVL1 RoI pTpT % events in the EndCap but triggerated by RPC % % % % Selection Efficiency in the Low-pT Region

Efficiency Curve LVL1, LVL2 and EF It was possible elaborate an eventual trigger menu for the first run at luminosity of cm -2 s -1 ThresholdLevel 1Level 2Event Filter Rate (Hz) MU4PS=1000~1kPT1 1 MU MU6PS=200224PT1 1 MU MU10PS=100112PT1 1 MU MU15PS=2019PT1 1 MU20i14PT14PT14 MU408PT8 8 2MU64PT4 4 2MU20< 1PT1 1

Risults and Conclusions Cosmic Rays Selection Efficiency = 0.5±0.1%  MU4 Rate Expected = ~ 600Hz Rate Expected MU6 = 22kHz L = cm -2 s -1 Rate Expected MU20 = 13kHz L = cm -2 s -1 Rate value obteined completely satisfy the request of limit LVL1-  pass band Elaboration of an Trigger Menu for first p-p run at luminosity of cm -2 s -1 Study on Performance of First Level Muon Trigger Selection Efficiency in the region with RPC >99%  Low-p T Selection Geometrical Efficiency = 82%  High-p T Selection Geometrical Efficiency = 78%

Backup Slides

LVL1-µ: CM, PAD e RoI Estensione spaziale = ∆  × ∆  ≈ 0.1 × 0.1 I segnali dagli RPC sono inviati alla CM Sincronizza segnali d’ingresso Effettua le coincidenze Operazioni di majority Fornisce i risultati del trigger sia per la proiezione  che  4 CM costituiscono una PAD La PAD genera le informazioni relative alle RoI: Region of Interest

P T = 20 GeV/c The inversion of the asymmetry sign between Low and High-p T is due at intersection of muons trajectories Muon Selection Asymmetry  

Barrel Simulation: Cosmic Trigger Coincidence windows are completely opened! The maximum width is given by the Matrix hardware processor size (64x32 channels) Cosmic Trigger RoadMap: Special Lvl1 algorithm configuration is used to maximize Trigger efficiencies wrt to cosmic events! Standard Configuration Coincidence Windows fully opened Top-Down Algorithm Cosmic Trigger RoadMap: Special Lvl1 algorithm configuration is used to maximize Trigger efficiencies wrt to cosmic events! Standard Configuration Coincidence Windows fully opened Top-Down Algorithm

40 GeV/c Fermi Function: Rates Calculus: Parameterizing efficiency curves The Rates Calculus Programm need the knowledge of efficiency curves with a step of 500MeV/c We don’t have such granularity 6 GeV/c Fermi Function Polynomial Line Fermi Function Polynomial:  (p t ) = D + Ex -1 + Fx -2 + Gx -3 Line:  (p t ) = H + Ix

Selection Efficiency in the very Low-p T region: p T =2GeV/c Selection Efficiency in the Barrel at 2 GeV/c= (0.14  0.01)% Number of RoI Events in the Barrel spectrometer |  |<1.05 Threshold events with Roi=1 MuCTPi Position of events with RoI=1  of the Barrel muons selected by RPC

Selection Efficienza in the very Low-p T region: p T =2GeV/c Selection Efficiency in the Endcap at 2 GeV = (0.083  0.004)% Events in the EndCap spectrometer |  |>1.05 Numero di RoI attivate MuCTPi Position of events with RoI=1  of EndCap muons selected by RPC Threshold events with Roi=1

Rates Calculus: Rates Value Variation The LVL1 selection efficency value contribute significantly to the uncertainly on rates Small oscillation of efficiency value in the low p T region produce considerable variation on rate value Efficiency value of 0.5% for p T ≈ 2 GeV/c produce an increase of rate value from ~13kHz to ~19kHz Nominal Value