JetMET DQM Status Kenichi Hatakeyama, Anwar Bhatti, Frank Chlebana, Jared Sturdy DQM Meeting November 4th, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GCT Software Jim Brooke GCT ESR, 7 th November 2006.
Advertisements

Level-1 Trigger CMS Week, Brussels 14 Sep C.-E. Wulz Deputy Trigger Project Manager Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna Prepared with slides/material.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Trigger validation Ricardo Goncalo, RHUL Physics Validation - 14 September 2007.
A Package For Tracking Validation Chris Meyer UC Santa Cruz July 6, 2007.
October 31, 2008METDQM Study1 Summary from MET DQM Plot Scanning.
SCT Offline Monitor Measuring Module Hit Efficiencies Helen Hayward University of Liverpool.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
2011 HV scan SF6 flow-meter accident 2011 Results comparison RPC HV efficiency scan Pigi Paolucci on behalf of RPC collaboration.
A. Cimmino - P. Paolucci - G. Polese / DCS meeting DQM tool for the DCS data What the RPC community needs: 1.Make online/offline DCS data.
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Tracker
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
Offline Tracker DQM Shift Tutorial. 29/19/20152 Tracker Shifts Overview Online Shifts at P5 (3/day for 24 hours coverage) – One Pixel shifter and one.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
HCAL1 Status 2003 Oleg Gavrishchuk, JINR, Dubna 1. HCAL1 performance 2003 General design High Voltage system LED monitoring 2. Tests in muon halo beam.
Status of Neutral Dijet Analysis on Data from 200GeV Proton Proton Collisions Using the STAR Detector at RHIC B. S. Page for the Collaboration STAR.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
73X Validation, Feb. 23 rd, 2015 Robert Schöfbeck, Mariarosaria D’Alfonso, Matthias Weber report on 73X rereco Feb. 23 th, 2015 Robert Schoefbeck, Mariarosaria.
Detector Diagnostics Calibration Analysis Ped/LED/Laser RadDam Analysis Detector Optimization Lumi Detector Performance Monitoring DQM On/Offline Prompt.
RPC DQA but also Monitoring for the DCS group: status and prospective for Marcello Bindi RPC L1MU Barrel DQM - 08/05/2013.
Analysis of HF optimization scan data 21 July 2015 Monika Grothe (Wisconsin) 1 21 July 2015 HF optimization scan analysis.
Preliminary analysis of p-Pb data update n. 6 Lorenzo Bonechi LHCf Catania meeting – 19 December 2013.
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
CMS pixel data quality monitoring Petra Merkel, Purdue University For the CMS Pixel DQM Group Vertex 2008, Sweden.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
17 February All Experimenters’ MeetingAlan L. Stone - Louisiana Tech University1 Data Taking Statistics Week of 2003 February Dedicated some.
HCAL DPG Status1 Olga Kodolova / Frank Chlebana HCAL DPG Status Olga Kodolova for the HCAL DPG October 20, 2011.
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
UCLA group meeting1/11 CSC update – a 2-week summary Status of CMS at LHC: L=2*10 32 reached 25-Oct-2010 (=the original goal for 2011) and 42 pb -1 collected.
Part I – Shifter Duties Part II – ACR environment Part III – Run Control & DAQ Part IV – Beam Part V – DCS Part VI – Data Quality Monitoring Part VII.
Fake MET Noisy channels –Online/offline strategies Non-collision backgrounds –Beam halo –Beam loses –Cosmics Hot channels From Song Ming Wang: Joint D0/CDF/CMS.
David Adams ATLAS DIAL: Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL August 5, 2002 BNL OMEGA talk.
HCAL General Meeting: DPG Status1 Olga Kodolova / Frank Chlebana HCAL DPG Status Olga Kodolova Frank Chlebana HCAL General Meeting Apr 21, 2011.
February 07, 2002 Online Monitoring Meeting Detector Examines Should aid in: 1.Diagnosing problems early and getting it fixed 2.Making decisions on the.
RPC DQM status Cimmino, M. Maggi, P. Noli, D. Lomidze, P. Paolucci, G. Roselli, C. Carillo.
Online monitor for L2 CAL upgrade Giorgio Cortiana Outline: Hardware Monitoring New Clusters Monitoring
FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti.
Pixel DQM Status R.Casagrande, P.Merkel, J.Zablocki (Purdue University) D.Duggan, D.Hidas, K.Rose (Rutgers University) L.Wehrli (ETH Zuerich) A.York (University.
DQM for the RPC subdetector M. Maggi and P. Paolucci.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.
Zhen YAN, Muon Offline DQ meeting, 05/10/2015 Signed off runs(express stream) since last Friday meeting Default defects:  MS_RPC_BA_ROD_PROBLEM_1  MS_RPC_BC_ROD_PROBLEM_1.
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
22 January 2009 David1 Look at dead material and fake MET in Jx samples mc08 10 TeV simulations, release J0 to J6 are tag s479_r586, ‘ideal geometry’
24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.
Emmanuel Busato Jet/Met meeting 12/19/2002 Goal : Correlation between f90 and other variables for 0.5 cones ? - for jets constructed without CH - for jets.
394 Data ValSkim Validation JetMET DQM and Validation Group.
Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.
HI July Exercise and Muon DQM preparation Mihee Jo Mihee Jo / Lab meeting.
LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project RCT/CTP7 Readout Isobel Ojalvo, U. Wisconsin Level-1 Trigger Meeting June 4, June 2015, Isobel Ojalvo Trigger Meeting:
Responsibles: Jon Butterworth (UCL), Claire Gwenlan (Oxford), Daniela Rebuzzi (Pavia, INFN) ATLAS MC Validation Meeting, 24 May 2011 HERWIG validation.
Jet Validation Kittikul Kovitanggoon*, Chiyoung Jeog, Sung-Won Lee Texas Tech University 1.
AEM, Sept Frank Chlebana (Fermilab) Status of the LHC and CMS Frank Chlebana (Fermilab) All Experimenter’s Meeting Sept
ID Week 13 th of October 2014 Per Johansson Sheffield University.
Manqi Ruan Discussing & Support: Roman, Francois, Vincent, Supervisor: Z. ZHANG (LAL) & Y. GAO (Tsinghua)) DQ Check for CERN Test.
TGC On-Line Monitoring Status for 1 beam Before LHC Startup on TomBox: A single machine (pc-tgc-mon-rod-01) receives all TGC events.
L1Calo EM Efficiency Maps Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Weekly Meeting 07/03/2011.
P.Miné Visu CMS1 Philippe Miné LLR, Ecole Polytechnique, IN2P3/CNRS, France Introduction Views and options Tutorial Demonstration Practice Visualization.
MET Slice Monitoring Xiaowen Lei, Venkat Kaushik Ken Johns.
R. Croft, Exclusive Diffractive Higgs Signal at L1, Jan 2005 Diffractive Higgs Events in the L1 Trigger ( Work in progress ) Richard Croft, University.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ECAL Shift Duty: A Beginners Guide By Pourus Mehta.
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Calibration Status of the art – the first tTrig calculated from data
PEDESTAL STABILITY OF HCAL DURING GLOBAL RUNS AND 2009 CASTOR DQM ANALYSIS Emine GÜRPINAR Cukurova University 7/31/2018.
Pixel DQM Status & Plans
Group CERN Taylan Yetkin Post-Doctoral Research Scholar.
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Presentation transcript:

JetMET DQM Status Kenichi Hatakeyama, Anwar Bhatti, Frank Chlebana, Jared Sturdy DQM Meeting November 4th, 2008

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting2 JetMET POG Monitoring Plots From CRAFT data JetMET POG DQM is already run routinely

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting3 JetMET DQM Shift Instruction

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting4 Data Certification for “Jets”  For jets we are looking at Several different algorithms (IterativeCone, SISCone, PFlow, JPT) Regions in the detector (Barrel, EndCap, Forward) High and low jet pt triggers  Quality test compares current histogram with a reference histogram Chi2 or KS test  Several distributions are tested (Pt, eta, phi, constituents, HOverE)

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting5 Determining the Quality Flags for “Jets”  Quality flags for the different jet algorithms determined by comparing histogram to reference  JetMET_Jet_AAA (AAA = IterativeCone, SISCone, PFlow, JPT)  if ( (JetMET_Jet_AAA_Pt_Low_Val > 950 ) && (JetMET_Jet_AAA_Pt_High_Val > 950 ) && (JetMET_Jet_AAA_Eta_Low_Val > 950 ) && (JetMET_Jet_AAA_Eta_High_Val > 950 ) && (JetMET_Jet_AAA_Phi_Low_Val > 950 ) && (JetMET_Jet_AAA_Phi_High_Val > 950 ) && (JetMET_Jet_AAA_Constituents_Low_Val > 950 ) && (JetMET_Jet_AAA_Constituents_High_Val > 950 ) && (JetMET_Jet_AAA_HOverE_Low_Val > 950 ) && (JetMET_Jet_AAA_HOverE_High_Val > 950 ) ) JetMET_Jet_AAA = 1

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting6 Data Certificaiton for “MET”  For MET, we are looking at met (MET from Barrel+Endcap+HF), and metNoHF (MET from Barrel+Endcap only).  Data Certification for MET: Currently fit MEx & MEy distributions to double Gaussians and check Chi2 and the peak.  Chi2 of double Gaussian fits: reduced chi2 <20 for lum section or 200 for entire run (Need to adjust the criteria based on the statistics)  Mean of the fitted Gaussian form: within +/-10 GeV Looking into METPhi, MET, METsignificance also  For these, need to compare with reference histograms (Chi2 or KS test) Performed for the entire run and also per lumi section.  Currently we use “monitoring variable versus lumi section” 2D histograms, but a long run can exceed the axis range… (see later slides)

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting7 DBS information is organized in three layers Able to select subcomponent (HB,HO, HE, HF) Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 JetMET_Global JetMET_Jet_ICone JetMET_Jet_ICone_Barrel JetMET_Jet_SISCone JetMET_Jet_ICone_EndCap JetMET_Jet_PFlow JetMET_Jet_ICone_Forward JetMET_Jet_JPT JetMET_Jet_SISCone_Barrel... JetMET_MET JetMET_MET_All JetMET_MET_NoHF Currently have histograms for ICone, SISCone, and PFlow… Data Certification Outputs

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting8 Data Certification Algorithm Implementation  Data Certification runs as a standalone cmsRun job Next step: move this into the harvesting job  Using a root Chi2 or KS test to compare current histogram against a reference Reference histograms need to be accessible Looking into the qtest code…  Results are saved in a “Data Certification” folder in the DQM root file

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting9 DCS queries which return HV/LV settings for the HCAL takes several minutes (~3 min) to complete Example from run Many channels are stable HBM_HV1_2_08/M1 CH1 HB /22/08 14:36: HBM_HV1_2_08/M1 CH1 HB /22/08 14:36: HBM_HV1_2_08/M1 CH1 HB /22/08 14:36: Some channels are changing HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 14:37: HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 14:37: HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 14:37: … HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 14:38:19 32 HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 14:38:25 20 HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 14:38:31 12 HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 14:38:50 4 HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 15:41: HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 15:41: HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 15:41: … HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 15:42: HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 15:43: HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 15:43: HBP_HV2_1_10/M2 CH1 HB /22/08 15:43: HV starts out low, is lowered, then raised DCS Queries

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting10 Data Certification  The JetMET Data Certification is determined entirely from the results saved in the DQM root file…  Jet Data Certification is reported for the entire run  MET Data Certification is reported for the entire run and also per lumi section  Will use DCS information to identify Luminosity Sections with bad data…  Should be folded into the DPG (HCAL, ECAL) Data Certification results…

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting11 MET DQM in CRAFT data (in following slides…)

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting12 Run MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) Lumi Section With HF Barrel+Endcap Only First few lumi sections appear to be problematic. Number of events

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting13 Run cont’d  Zoom-in view  Problem only in a first few lumi sections  On a lumi section based method, can keep the majority of events

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting14 Run cont’d  Data certification Looking at  Chi2 of double Gaussian fits: reduced chi2 <20 (lum section) or 200 (entire run) (Need to adjust the criteria based on the statistics)  Mean of the fitted Gaussian form: within +-10 GeV

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting15 Run MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) Lumi Section With HF Barrel+Endcap Only No major problem. Number of events

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting16 Run cont’d  Data certification output Good run

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting17 Run MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) Lumi Section With HF Barrel+Endcap Only Noise in HF at phi~0.8 Check of the mean MEx or MEy will detecot this problem. Number of events

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting18 Run cont’d  Data certification output MET without HF mostly OK

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting19 Run MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) Lumi Section With HF Barrel+Endcap Only Number of events met with/withtou HF seem to suffer from hot tower(s)

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting20 Run cont’d  Data certification outputs Bad Run

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting21 Run MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) Lumi Section With HF Barrel+Endcap Only Number of events No major problem.

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting22 Run cont’d  Data certification outputs

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting23 Summary from MET DQM Plot Scanning

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting24 Summary  Data certification results from the current rather crude algorithm are already interesting!  Need to run updated version of JetMET DQM code This has additional histograms needed for DC Need to wait until CMSSW_2_2_X  Move Data Certification into the “harvesting step” Results will be written to DQM root file…  Need to designate area for reference histograms Used to determine Data Quality flags  Continue algorithm development on DQM output Need easy access to DQM root files…

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting25 Backups

November 4, 2008DQM Meeting26 Physics Analysis  People doing an analysis using jets will initially restrict themselves to the central (barrel) well understood region and require a minimum set of working detector components….  Example query to construct dataset: RunStart, RunStop HB, EB JetMET_Jet_ICone_Barrel Trigger, Tracker, Luminosity  Quality flags should have the required granularity