DCZ status & results B A B AR Trigger Workshop, December 2004 Jamie Boyd University of Bristol for the Trigger Upgrade Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.
Advertisements

Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 L1 Configuration and Future Prospects DCZ cuts and new GLT objects L1 rate diagnosis Can an improved.
24 September 2002Paul Dauncey1 Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
SPD commissioning Ricci, Míriam, Daniel, Edu, Hugo et al. from 1.
Luminosity Monitor MWPC status report A.Kiselev OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg,
J. Estrada - Fermilab1 AFEII in the test cryostat at DAB J. Estrada, C. Garcia, B. Hoeneisen, P. Rubinov First VLPC spectrum with the TriP chip Z measurement.
ZPD Overview Stephen Bailey Harvard University ZPD Conceptual Design Review 11 September 2001.
Eunil Won Harvard University April 11, 2003 for ZPD FDR 1 ZPD Prototype Tests and DAQ Implementation Introduction Prototype Tests - Electrical Signals.
1 CLEO PAC 11/March/00 M. Selen, University of Illinois CLEO-III Trigger & DAQ Status Trigger Illinois (Cornell) DAQ OSU Caltech Cornell.
Some mediation on fast track reconstruction of BESIII Wang Dayong Mar 10,2004.
An Asynchronous Level-1 Tracking Trigger for Future LHC Detector Upgrades A. Madorsky, D. Acosta University of Florida/Physics, POB , Gainesville,
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Status of NA62 straw electronics and services Peter LICHARD, Johan Morant, Vito PALLADINO.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Oct C. Smith - PCAL/EC Commissioning 1 PCAL/EC Commissioning Document
DAQ MICO Report Online Monitoring: –Status All histograms are now implemented Still not fully online –Only monitoring from data file (slightly offline,
27 July 2006Trigger Upgrades Review1 Status & Plans of the TDWG Mission Statement What Do We have to Guide Us ? Caveats & Concerns Current & Anticipated.
14/6/2000 End Cap Muon Trigger Review at CERN 1 Muon Track Trigger Processing on Slave and Hi-pT Boards C.Fukunaga/Tokyo Metropolitan University TGC electronics.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
ATLAS Trigger / current L1Calo Uli Schäfer 1 Jet/Energy module calo µ CTP L1.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
1 DAQ Update MEG Review Meeting, Feb. 17 th 2010.
1 BNL report ~ the history of Run7 start up ~ Yoshihide Nakamiya.
4 Dec 2008G. Rakness (UCLA)1 Online Software Updates and RPC data in the RAT …including Pad Bit Mapping and Efficiency… Greg Rakness University of California,
TGC Timing Adjustment Chikara Fukunaga (TMU) ATLAS Timing Workshop 5 July ‘07.
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
June 7, 2004Karen Dow CODA at Bates BLAST Data Acquisition.
ZPD Project Overview B A B AR L1 DCT Upgrade FDR Masahiro Morii Harvard University Design Overview Progress and Changes since CDR Current Status Plans.
The BoNuS Detector Concept Design Status Howard Fenker March 11, 2005.
2007 Run Update for STAR Jeff Landgraf For the STAR collaboration.
December 16, 2005M Jones1 New Level 1 Track Triggers Outputs from SLAM provide lists of axial tracks plus associated stereo information Consider new Level.
Ted Liu, July 5,00, idea on Ztrigger L1 Trigger Strategy L1 Trigger Requirements and Trigger Lines L1 Trigger performance Background Study Improving Performance:
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Detector Summary Tracker. Well, as far as the tracker hardware is concerned, we are done. – Need to do the system test to make sure nothing has degraded.
HBD Status Report from Run 9 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting July 8, 2009.
Julie Prast, Calice Electronics Meeting at LAL, June 2008 Status of the DHCAL DIF Detector InterFace Board Sébastien Cap, Julie Prast, Guillaume Vouters.
11 th April 2003L1 DCT Upgrade FDR – TSF SessionMarc Kelly University Of Bristol On behalf of the TSF team Firmware and Testing on the TSF Upgrade Marc.
Station-4 MuID System: Status Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab 1/7/091E906 Collaboration Meeting.
News and Related Issues Ted & Kirsten May 27, 2005 TDWG News since last meeting (April 29th) Organization Issues: how to improve communication Future Plans:
Evelyn Thomson Ohio State University Page 1 XFT Status CDF Trigger Workshop, 17 August 2000 l XFT Hardware status l XFT Integration tests at B0, including:
Overview B A B AR L1 DCT Upgrade FDR Masahiro Morii Harvard University Scope of the Project Current Status Schedule  Commissioning.
SVT 4/5 operation CDF meeting 1/16/2003 G. Punzi for the SVT group.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Sector logic firmware and G-link Merger board designs
Calibration Status of the art – the first tTrig calculated from data
eXtremely Fast Tracker; An Overview
DC trigger test Present layout Trigger electronics
Su Dong L1 DCT Upgrade Final Design Review Apr/11/03
DC trigger test Trigger electronics Experience with cosmic
Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo
L1 Trigger Strategy Ted Liu, Lawrence Berkeley Lab
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
L1 simulation review Aug 2005 Jamie Boyd
Trigger Background Experience & Predictions
The Glt Simulation Valerie Halyo.
Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests
DC trigger Present DC design Lab tests and implementation.
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
New Ideas on long-term DCT upgrade: conceptual design for DOCAZ
Trigger operation during 2007 run
XFT2B: Plans and Tasks XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.1.
Presentation transcript:

DCZ status & results B A B AR Trigger Workshop, December 2004 Jamie Boyd University of Bristol for the Trigger Upgrade Group

December 2004Jamie Boyd2 Intro Goal: reduce the L1 trigger rate due to beam-related background by cutting on track z0 ZPD is a 3-D enhanced version of the PTD Finds tracks and fit them to helix (SL7 & SL10 seeds used) Measures p T, dip angle ( ) and z 0 Primary usage: Cut on |z 0 | to remove background z 0 of all tracks in L-1 events Physics Background

December 2004Jamie Boyd3 DCZ Project Outline ZPD (replacing PTD) does the 3-dim. tracking Replace TSF to send full stereo segment data New interconnects (cards and cables) New online software + simulation BABAR Drift Chamber BLT L1 Accept PTD GLT TSF PTD New TSF ZPD

December 2004Jamie Boyd4 ZPD Modules Designed and produced at Harvard 8 modules in the system +3 good spares Operated and debugged in IR2 for the entire Run 4 Firmware is final Each module covers 3/8 phi span – but only looks for tracks with SL7 / SL10 seeds in central 8 th

December 2004Jamie Boyd5 TSF Modules Designed and produced in the UK (Manchester, Bristol, RAL) Arrived in Summer ’04 24 modules in the system 25 production modules, plus 4 SLAC Firmware is final Job is to find track segments as 8 wire Pivot cells using 16bit LUT 16 TSF-X modules which deal with SL 1-4, TSF-Y modules which deal with SL 5-7 TSF X crate = 16 boards

December 2004Jamie Boyd6 Recent History Ran with DCZ triggering BaBar for last few days of run4 Slightly incomplete test TSF firmware either worked for TSF DAQ data or for TSF->BLT data (but not both) System configuration not done using the proper method (config objects not in DB) L3 being driven by Old TSF segments Since then took some magnet off COSMICs with DCZ triggering BaBar Fixed TSF firmware Optimised timing of signals to GLT TSF extenders fitted / recabled the DCZ crates

December 2004Jamie Boyd7 Z-Triggering B A B AR DCZ triggered B A B AR for the first time on July 29 Nothing fell over… Modest L1T rate reduction seen with conservative GLT setting Luminosity Deadtime L1T rate HER LER Run 50636, July 31, 2004

December 2004Jamie Boyd8 A Z-Triggered Event 1Z 2Z 1Z’ 1Z 1Z’1Zt 2Zt 1Z

December 2004Jamie Boyd9 DCZ Track Efficiency Use reco. tracks in DCZ’s , p T acceptance 98% for isolated tracks 93-94% for tracks in hadronic events Consistent with simulation studies

December 2004Jamie Boyd10 DCZ Track Resolution Compare the track params. measured by DCZ and reco Resolution consistent with simulation z 0 core resolution ~4.6 cm NB: Background peaks around ±20 cm

December 2004Jamie Boyd11 IP Correction Effect of IP not being at (0,0) in x-y can be corrected (remaining wave from no x correction so far) A small charge asymmetry effect seen in the bias after correction – to be understood

December 2004Jamie Boyd12 TSF Data (from COSMIC run) Comparing Old and New TSF DAQ data for same events

December 2004Jamie Boyd13 Timing to GLT Signals line up as well as (or better) than with old dct Signal stretch is same as before DCZ latency is ~5.5us which is in spec. GLT input mask timing shows ZPD timing could adjusted by ½ clk8

December 2004Jamie Boyd14 L1 Trigger Rate DCZ does its job just as well as we hoped Finding tracks and measuring z 0 and p T How do we use this information? ZPD can count tracks with cuts on |z 0 | and |1/p T | We’ve tried |z 0 | 200(800) MeV GLT can combine “Z tracks” with other trigger objects We’ve added “&1Z” to a few lines for the test runs It’s a delicate balancing act Physics efficiency (which physics?) and robustness Maximum reduction of L1 trigger rate Su Dong will discuss the trigger lines configuration in his talk

December 2004Jamie Boyd15 What is sent to the GLT? 1x16-bit, 2x8-bit and 1x4-bit phi maps sent to GLT every clk4 (269ns) Sent to GLTDec. bit Pt(MeV)Tan dipZ0 (cm)Z0errNmiss hit cut mask 16 bit phi map 0>200-2 – 3-15 – 15 ( ) 1 st sector 1>200-2 – 3-15 – 15 ( ) 2nd sector 8 bit phi map2>200-2 – 3-10 – 10<15YA10|A7 either sector 8 bit phi map3>800-2 – 3-15 – 15<15NA10|A7 either sector 4 bit phi map4>350-2 – 3-10 – 10<15YA10|A7 either sector DAQ data only5>300-2 – 3-6 – 6<15YA10|A7 either sector DAQ data only6>250-3 – 3-10 – 10<15NA10 only DAQ data only7>250-3 – 3-10 – 10<15NA7 only

December 2004Jamie Boyd16 Remaining (few) issues Firmware Remove 80  s DAQ delay (being worked on) Fix a broken register that controls the EZ* phi span Online Make DCZ configuration from DB (underway) Feed L3 from New TSF (should work but not attempted yet) Offline Complete and Validate DCZ simulation Wont be able to do physics with DCZ data until we have simulated data Monitoring in OPR

December 2004Jamie Boyd17 Summary DCZ working as planned Triggered BaBar for first time (end of run4) Resolution and efficiency as expected Since then have cleaned up a few problems (TSF firmware, timing, mechanical issues) DCZ will be production trigger when we start taking data again Need to start thinking about the best way to use its capabilities to best suit BaBar (L1 rate versus physics efficiency) A few small software tasks to finish before then