1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.

Advertisements

10 June 2006MICE Collaboration Meeting CM-151 Can MICE Solid and Liquid Absorbers be Characterized to better than 0.3 Percent? Michael A. Green 1, and.

MICE- AFC Unit Mechanical Design of the Cold Mass Support System Oxford University Rohan Senanayake.

The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction

1 Cooling the Hydrogen (Helium) Absorbers with Small Coolers Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Video.

4m Undulator Design Concepts Amanda J Brummitt CCLRC RAL On behalf of the HeLiCal Collaboration.

MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA

Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 114 September 18, 2008.

October, 2003 P. Fabbricatore and S. Farinon Spectrometer magnets – Possible layout of cryostat in the end region In order to define the cryostat layout.

Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System

Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.

MICE Collaboration meeting at CERN March 28 – April 1, 2004 MICE Cooling Channel --- AFC Module work group report Wing Lau – Oxford.

23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

1 MICE Mtg Oct 2002 Elwyn Baynham RAL Focussing Absorber Magnet Elwyn Baynham ; Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov ; Jim Rochford Applied Science Division.

1 Issues concerning the Design of the Tracker Solenoids Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 17 August 2005.

1 Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Cost Update Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 10 February 2005.

10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.

Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek - LBNL MICE Video Conference #129 February 25, 2010.

9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.

MTA Cryostat & cooling loop design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department/ Engineering and Design Group Preparation of the Mucool/MICE.

11/26/2002Edgar L Black IIT MICE Video Conference November 27, 2002 Summary of safety implementation for proposal.

Talk outline 1 st talk: –Magnetic forces –Quench in the absorber cryostat 2 nd talk: –Shielding of magnetic fringe fields.

1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.

MICE Collaboration meeting at CERN March 28 – April 1, 2004 MICE Cooling Channel --- AFC Module progress update Wing Lau – Oxford.

Magnet and Absorber Heat Loads and Cooling with Various Small Coolers

12 March 2006NFMCC Meeting, IIT, Chicago1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

CM-18 June Magnet Conductor Parameters and How They affect Conductor Selection for MICE Magnets Michael Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.

1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005.

MICE Collaboration Meeting CM-151 Is the the pulse tube cooler a must or is it simply better for the MICE AFC module? Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley.

Progress on the MuCool and MICE Coupling Coils * L. Wang a, X. K Liu a, F. Y. Xu a, A. B. Chen a, H. Pan a, H. Wu a, X. L. Guo a, S. X Zheng a, D. Summers.

Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Roy Preece Rutherford Appleton Lab October 28, 2011 MICE Collaboration Meeting.

Status and Integration of the Spectrometer Solenoid Magnets Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL June 15, 2007.

LBNL Test Cryostat Preliminary Design Review Tuning – Field Correction Soren Prestemon, Diego Arbelaez, Heng Pan, Scott Myers, Taekyung Ki.

Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR

MICE collaboration meeting Osaka 1 – 4 August 2004 AFC Module update & Plan Presented by Wing Lau -- Oxford University.

Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule Yun He MLC external review October 03, 2012.

Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Workshop: Spectrometer Solenoid Overview Steve Virostek - LBNL February 17, 2012.

Stress and Cool-down Analysis Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.

1 WANG,Li/SINAP WANG Li, WANG ShuHua, LIU YiYong, SUN Sen, HU Xiao, YIN LiXin Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, CAS, Shanghai , China Shanghai.

Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.

Preliminary Design for the Coupling Coil Cryostat in MICE

February 13, 2012 Mu2e Production Solenoid Design V.V. Kashikhin Workshop on Radiation Effects in Superconducting Magnet Materials (RESMM'12)

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.

MICE Cooling Channel Magnets: Spectrometer Solenoid Procurement RF Module Coupling Coil Proposal Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC 07.

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test1 Tests of a PT415 Cooler with HTS Leads in the Drop-in Mode Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA 94720,

56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai

56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC at LBNL January 25, 2009.

MICE/MuCool Coupling Magnets to 22 ICST/HIT MICE/Muool Coupling Magnets Progress Li Wang for MICE Group Institute of Cryogenics.

22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.

1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.

CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.

Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Test Results Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Spectrometer Solenoid Review November 18, 2009.

The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC

Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.

MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Recovery Review - December 3-4, Steve Virostek MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Assembly.

MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.

Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)

FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.

Technology & Engineering Division Lead Stabilization Alexey Radovinsky (PSFC, MIT) MICE CC Cryostat Design Review Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Michael A. Green and Heng Pan

Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet

Status of work (cryostat, control Dewar, cooling system)

Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule

On the Ground Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment ( MICE ) – pre-cursor to a neutrino factory.

A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN

Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green

BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu

Updated concept of the CBM dipole magnet

Presentation transcript:

1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK 21 May 2004

2 Absorber Focus Coil Module Absorber Main Vacuum Can Absorber Vacuum Shell 50 K Shield Main Vacuum Can Focus Coil Cryostat Superconducting Coil Hydrogen Window Magnet Bobbin Vacuum Window Hydrogen Pipe Focus Coil Cryostat Window LH 2 Absorber Body Absorber Vacuum

3 Focusing Magnet Cross-section Axis of Rotation Superconducting Coil Aluminium Coil Bobbin

4 Schematic of the Focusing Magnet Cold Mass Support Support Band 50 K Intercept Coil Support Bracket Cold Mass Vacuum Vessel Support Adjustment The design longitudinal force W z is 20 metric tons. The design radial force W r is greater than 5 metric tons.

5 MICE Focusing Magnet Design Parameters * * * This applies for p = 200 MeV/c and  = 420 mm Module L = 844 mm Coils operate in Gradient mode 6061-T6 Al

6 Support Structure Deflection and Stress of the Focusing Magnet at Maximum Current Force Model DisplacementStress  max = MPa  max = mm F r = 8.87 MN F z = 3.52 MN p = 240 MeV/c,  = 420 mm Coil Current = A

7 The Focus Coil Load Line and its Temperature Margin Cu to S/C Ratio = 4 Cu RRR > 100 No. Filaments = 55 Filament Diameter = 78  m J c (4.2 K, 5 T) = 2940 A mm -2 I c (4.2 K, 5 T) = 760 A Twist Pitch = 12.7 mm Conductor Parameters I = A I = A

8 Focus Coil Heat Load 1 st Stage = 52 W (42 to 44 W is the leads) Focus Coil Heat Load 2 nd Stage = 1.2 to 1.9 W (depending on 1 st stage T) Cooling the Focus Coil with a Sumitomo K Cooler Note: There is at least one other cooler that is suitable for cooling the focus Magnet.

First Stage of Cooler 1 cooler 2 coolers MLI Radiation Heat Leak (W) 4.8 Cold Mass Support Heat Leak (W) 3.0 Plumbing Heat Leak (W) 1.0 Current & Instrumentation Lead Heat Load (W) 42.6 Total Heat Load to 1st Stage per Cooler (W) 51.4 First Stage Temperature (K) ~63~40 Second Stage of Cooler 1 cooler 2 coolers MLI Radiation Heat Leak (W) Cold Mass Support Heat Leak (W) Plumbing Heat Leak (W) Current & Instrumentation Lead Heat Load (W) ~1.0~0.6 Total Heat Load to 2nd Stage (W) ~1.85~1.15 2nd Stage Temperature (K) > 4.6> 3.4 Why use two coolers instead of one? Answer: To lower the 1 st and 2 nd stage temperatures and lower the heat leak to the 2 nd stage.

10 How the magnet is cooled affects the  T in the magnet cold mass. a) Magnet cooled in one area b) Magnet cooled around the outside T = 4.30 K T = 5.40 K T = 4.43 K Q R = 1.0 W m -2 Cooling all around the outside of the cold mass reduces the  T within the cold mass by a factor of eight over line cooling in a region 100 mm wide over the length of the cold mass. Cooled Region 100 mm Wide

11 Cryogen free cooling of the MICE focus magnet is possible.  T = T3 - T0. However  T is dominated by T2 - T1, the strap  T. L > 350 mm

12 What is wrong with cryogen free cooling for the focus coil? The cooler must be attached to the magnet through a flexible copper strap. The  T from the magnet to the cooler cold head is proportional to the strap length and is inversely proportional to the strap cross-section area and thermal conductivity. The minimum strap length for the focus magnet is about 350 mm. For a  T less than 0.2 K, the strap area must be from 25 to 50 cm 2 depending on the RRR of the strap copper. There is the added  T within the magnet from the strap to the magnet high field point Advantage: A cryogen free coil can be cooled down with the coolers.

13 Magnet connection to the Cooler with a Liquid Helium Cold Pipe  T = T3 - T0 is small. T3 - T2 may be the largest single term.

14 The Advantages of using a Liquid Helium Heat Pipe T3-T2 is small (< 0.1 K) with liquid He around the coil. T2-T0 is small < 0.05 K with proper design. Heat pipe filters out temperature oscillations in cold head. Cooler can be some distance from the magnet, because the temperature drop T2-T0 is independent of distance. Less space is needed for flexible tubes than for a Cu strap. There is good vibration isolation from the cold head. Each cooler can have its own cold pipe. If a cooler is warm, the heat flow from the cooler to the magnet is low. Liquid He in coil provides a cushion during a power failure. Disadvantage: The cold mass must be cooled down using liquid cryogens.

15 Concluding Comments The focus coils are designed to carry internal forces up to 360 metric tons. The cold mass supports are designed for 20 tons in the z direction and >5 tons in the r direction. The magnet can is cooled with a pair of coolers. The magnet cold mass should be cooled down with liquid cryogens. The  T from hot spot to cooler cold head <0.2 K.