LIGO-G030310-00-D 1 S3 expectations, S2 calibration M. Landry LHO CW Search Group F2F Milwaukee, Jun 16-17 03.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G Z S3/S4 Calibration A cast of thousands… including Peter Fritschel, Gabriela González, Corey Gray, Mike Landry, Greg Mendell, Brian O’Reilly,
Advertisements

Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
LIGO- G Z March 22, 2006March 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Catalogue Status Keith Thorne (PSU) for the Spectral Line Catalogue.
1 LIGO-G Z Penn State / LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2003 March 18 Calibration Testing Patrick Sutton, with Michael Landry, Gabriela Gonzalez,
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
E2E school at LLO1  Han2k »Model of the LHO 2k IFO »Designed for lock acquisition study  SimLIGO1 »Model of all LIGO 1 IFOs »Designed for –noise hunting.
LIGO-G M Photon Calibrator DRR & CDR: Response to Reviewers’ Report Phil Willems, Mike Smith.
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
Update on S5 Search for GRB and Gravitational Wave Burst Coincidence Isabel Leonor University of Oregon.
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
9/23/08G Z Status of the S5 calibration Michael Landry For the Calibration Committee LSC September 2008 Michael Landry For the Calibration Committee.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
LIGO- G060XXX-00-R E2E meeting, September How to design feedback filters? E2E meeting September 27, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
LIGO-G W Summary of S1 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab 9 September 02.
Burst noise investigation for cryogenic GW detector TITECH NAOJ Daisuke TATSUMI 2nd Symposium ‐ New Development in Astrophysics through Multi-messenger.
G D Tasks After S3 Commissioning Meeting, Oct 6., 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Commissioning Report LSC Meeting, Hanover August 19, 2003 Peter Fritschel, MIT.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.
3/19/08G D S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2008 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,
6.3 Your Budget Worksheet. Section 6.3 Your Budget Worksheet  Goals: Identify steps you should take to create a budget worksheet. Explain common problems.
04. November 2004 A. Freise A. Freise, M. Loupias Collaboration Meeting November 04, 2004 Alignment Status.
LIGO-G D “First Lock” for the LIGO Detectors 20 October 2000 LIGO Hanford Observatory Stan Whitcomb.
Enhanced LIGO with squeezing: Lessons Learned for Advanced LIGO and beyond.
1 Virgo commissioning: Next steps December 12 st 2005 Hannover, ILIAS-GWA WG1 Matteo Barsuglia, LAL/CNRS.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
G D Commissioning Progress and Plans Hanford Observatory LSC Meeting, March 21, 2005 Stefan Ballmer.
LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Hanover LSC Meeting, August 18, 2003 LIGO S2 Calibration Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Representing the calibration.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
LIGO-G D Commissioning and Detector Plans Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 6 June 2003 Caltech.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
M. Mantovani, ILIAS Meeting 7 April 2005 Hannover Linear Alignment System for the VIRGO Interferometer M. Mantovani, A. Freise, J. Marque, G. Vajente.
3/21/06G D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
LIGO-G Z S2 and S3 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the Calibration team Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins.
G D LIGO Commissioning Update LSC Meeting, Nov. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
LIGO- G D E7: An Instrument-builder’s Perspective Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting Upper Limits Plenary Session 22 May 2002 LIGO Livingston.
Status of LIGO Andri M. Gretarsson Livingston Observatory LIGO-G L.
AOUC committee 30apr15 RFI issues at AO 2015 AOUC committee Phil Perillat.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO-G D “Bi-linear” Noise Mechanisms in Interferometers Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech GWDAW 15 December 2000.
23/7/2003LIGO Document G C1 LIGO S2 Overview Philip Charlton California Institute of Technology On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LIGO-G Z SenseMonitor Updates for S3 Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
G Z August 17, 2004 S2/S3 Calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University For the Calibration Team ( cast of thousands!) LIGO Science.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )
LIGO-G D Commissioning P Fritschel LIGO NSF review, 23 October 2002 M.I.T.
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
OPT Online Workshop : What is OPT? (Pre & Post-completion OPT)
Next Generation Low Frequency Control Systems
Linear Regression.
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Commissioning Update PAC 15, Dec. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
S2/S3 calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University Plus
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Accuracy of the internal multiple prediction when the angle constraints method is applied to the ISS internal multiple attenuation algorithm. Hichem Ayadi.
First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1
h(t): are you experienced?
2015 AOUC committee Phil Perillat
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
S3 Performance of the LIGO Interferometers as Measured by SenseMonitor
Calibration: S2 update, S3 preliminaries
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G D 1 S3 expectations, S2 calibration M. Landry LHO CW Search Group F2F Milwaukee, Jun

LIGO-G D 2 Some S3 expectations, desires It is hard to know what the ifo’s will be like four months from now, so caveat emptor (or as my philosophical cabbie said about the San Antonio Spurs this morning, you can make all the predictions you want, but it don’t mean squat) Run to start Halloween, duration Nov/Dec May run ~1 week, commission/correct ~1 week, resume. If seismic mitigation delayed at LLO, could extend run into New Year. Besides, the holidays are very quiet All three ifo’s at comparable sensitivities, at least as good as LLO during S2 More WFS degrees of freedom controlled on all ifo’s

LIGO-G D 3 expectations, desires, contd. All 10 angular d.o.f. controlled on H1. H2 and L1: more than 2, perhaps not all 10. Eight? Currently 10 d.o.f. on H1 (was 8 during S2), but only 2 on H2, and ~4 on L1 RFI cleanup, installation of linear power supplies Acoustic mitigation efforts

LIGO-G D 4 longer term stuff Seismic retrofit at LLO Power up in H2, L1 Thermal lensing (new recycling mirrors) (others include microseismic peak reduction at LHO, photon calibrator, ISS, WFS5, replacement lossy PMC)

LIGO-G D 5 S2 calibration Online calibration during S2 was available: frequency series very representative, however, DC factor of 20% (better) sensitivity must be applied Full model for all sites employed for both online and postrun calibration Multiple DC methods analyzed for S2, with good agreement Frequency series (olg, sensing, response) for H1 produced and handed off to Patrick Sutton (validation, production of alpha, beta time series) H2 frequency series by the end of this week Need to understand epoch in which a given calibration is applicable

LIGO-G D 6 S2 calibration, contd. Calibration to-do »Matlab models: check against measurements (DC, frequency sweeps, hardware transfer functions) »Check calibrations measured in different epochs against time- propagated ones »Error estimation »Autocal vs official cal S2 comparo »UGF tracking, alignment function comparison, short term fluctuations, and calibration of other ifo channels Expect final signoff on calibration documentation i.e. files and associated documentation by end of July – however, should have workable calibration ~2 weeks