Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop The MICS4 Process.
Advertisements

Jit Udset/Outcomes/Talking Points The Orkney Partnership: Outcomes Focused Reviews Our Experience.
Margaret Geary Crime Reduction & Social Inclusion Director Government Office for the West Midlands.
The Department of Energy Enterprise Risk Management Model
Facilitated by Joanne Fraser RiverSystems
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Performance management guidance
Child Safeguarding Standards
Presentation to HRPA Algoma January 29, My favourite saying… Fail to plan, Plan to Fail. 2.
Project Management Shuffle Directions: take the definitions from the following cards and write a song using the tune from “Cupid Shuffle”
Project Management Framework May 2010 Ciaran Whyte Risk Administrator Planning & Strategic Projects Unit.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Project Plans CSCI102 - Systems ITCS905 - Systems MCS Systems.
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
Action Implementation and Evaluation Planning Whist the intervention plan describes how the population nutrition problem for a particular target group.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Project Management Basics
Purpose of the Standards
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
Advanced Project Management Project Plan Templates
Project Human Resource Management
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
Project Charter – Softball NSW Team Cathy Kerr – General Manager Andrew Dodshon – President Andrew Hamilton – Consultant Steering Committee Frances Crampton.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Project Evaluation Report (Indigo Project Solutions)
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Z26 Project Management Introduction lecture 1 13 th January 2005
Getting Started Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Overall Quality Assurance, Selecting and managing external consultants and outsourcing Baku Training Module.
Technology Transfer Execution Framework. 2 © 2007 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Relationship Between Your EPRI Value and.
Project Charters Module 3
Lecture 3 Title: Information Technology Project Methodology By: Mr Hashem Alaidaros MIS 434.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
STEP 4 Manage Delivery. Role of Project Manager At this stage, you as a project manager should clearly understand why you are doing this project. Also.
Information System Project Management Lecture Five
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
CHARTER – User Intelligence Groups Group Objectives Scope & Activities Key Areas For Success  Visibility of expenditure on goods and services across the.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Managing programs that promote personal effectiveness.
Conducting Professional Development Programme LEADING TO LEARN, LEARNING TO LEAD.
MGT 461 Lecture #27 Project Execution and Control Ghazala Amin.
1 Project Management C13PM Session 2 Project Initiation & Definition Russell Taylor Business Department Staff Workroom
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage the IT Portfolio World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Community-Based Deer Management Collaborative Deer Management Outreach Initiative.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
1 Health Needs Assessment Workshop Sue Cavanagh Keith Chadwick.
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
P3 Business Analysis. 2 Section F: Project Management F1.The nature of projects F2. Building the Business Case F4. Planning,monitoring and controlling.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
Australian National Audit Office Better Practice Guide: Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives Presentation to the Canberra PMI Chapter 7 March.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 12. Risk Management.
Project Management and Monitoring & Evaluation
Project Management Tools
Professional Certificate in Strategic Change Management
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Presentation transcript:

Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address the problem that the success of intervention implementation can be overlooked Monitoring the progress of implementation is important and includes:  regular intervention management/ steering group meetings  risk management  partnership satisfaction analysis  intervention milestone monitor  evaluability assessment Implementation and Monitoring

Types of Implementation There are several approaches to implementation that can be taken:  Pilot approach – involves gaining feedback from a sub-group of the target group about strategies, resources etc  Phased-in approach – implementation of an intervention across different sites, communities or regions  Immediate implementation – interventions that have been affective in the past or have a standard approach It is recommended to implement the pilot approach because it serves to further engage the target group which can further secure their vital role Implementation and Monitoring

Governance Intervention governance is essentially about shared decision making and managing the project throughout its life Key components to effective governance include:  Clearly defined roles and responsibilities  A representative intervention management committee  Well defined risks and issues  Regular reporting of implementation progress It is important to all players know how and agree with how the intervention governance structure will operate Implementation and Monitoring

Intervention Management Committee A management or steering committee is primarily responsible for ensuring delivery of intervention activities and appropriate risk management The intervention management committee responsibilities involve 5 mains functions: 1.Approval of changes to the intervention and its supporting documentation 2.Monitoring and review of the intervention 3.Providing assistance to the intervention when required 4.Resolving intervention conflicts 5.Formal acceptance of intervention deliverables Implementation and Monitoring

Intervention Management Committee For management committees to work effectively the right people must be involved Management committee appointments should be based on individual skills and attributes rather than on their formal roles Representatives from key stakeholder groups and the project manager should form part of the committee The steering/ management committee should meet regularly throughout the course of the intervention to monitor implementation and risks or issues Implementation and Monitoring

Risk Management Many situations in PHN can be seen as high risk as a result of making decisions with imperfect information or based on personal preferences. A risk consists of two parts; an undesirable outcome the probability of its occurrence People have different risk profiles based on previous analysis and personal preferences → having risks identified and reviewed by a group of people can ensure a more objective approach Implementation and Monitoring

StepActionDescriptionExample 1Risk identificationDetermining the possible risks of an intervention or faced by a population. Project staff turnover. 2Risk analysisDetermining the importance of the risk, in terms of probability of occurrence and impact, as well as the expected effect of alternative actions. Disruptions in intervention implementation, relationship building, salary budget, loss of tacit knowledge. Probability estimated through human resource staff statistics. 3Action evaluationDetermining what can be done to reduce the probability of the event or to mitigate its impact. Appropriate recruitment to appoint an appropriate candidate, appealing salary package, professional development opportunities, performance management and career options. 4ImplementationEnsuring responsibility for implementing the decided actions is assigned and the decisions executed. Required actions allocated to the human resource department, project manager, project staff supervisor etc 5DocumentationEnsure reporting of the analysis, actions undertaken and the outcomes to improve future decisions and for accountability to funding agency/ senior management. Documentation of planned and achieved actions in minutes, implementation plan or a risk register. The five steps of risk management

Partnership Satisfaction Partnerships are important for bringing together a diversity of skills and resources for more effective outcomes Most partnerships move along a continuum: degree of commitment, change required, risk involved, levels of interdependence, power, trust and a willingness to share ground Successful partnerships have a clear purpose, add value to the work of the partners and are carefully planned and monitored The partnership analysis tool is a useful tool to assess, monitor and maximise its ongoing effectiveness and is designed to provide a focus for discussion between organisations Implementation and Monitoring

Monitoring Milestones Milestones are significant scheduled events that act as a progress marker in the life of an intervention The project team should regularly review and assess achievement of each milestone in the implementation plan The planned achievement dates of milestones can change overtime but a milestone history monitor can be used to show milestones rescheduling during the intervention Implementation and Monitoring

Example - Milestone history chart

Evaluability Assessment Evaluability assessment Involves assessing whether or not the intervention is ready for evaluation Evaluability assessment should avoid premature or inappropriate evaluation Evaluability assessment determines whether the critical pre-conditions for evaluation are present: Rational relationships between intervention activities and goal Intervention is properly implemented Partners agree on evaluation questions and methodology → If an intervention does meet these pre-conditions it should not be evaluated Implementation and Monitoring