Inspiring and Enquiring Elisabeth Skinner Martin Jenkins University of Gloucestershire
Some students prefer scribing (McAlpine 2004) EBL threatens low confidence …. poor independent learning EBL builds confidence …. strengthens independent learning
Capacity building or personal development does not occur before participation but through participation (Warburton 1998:33) Build confidence before EBL?X Build confidence through EBL?
The Focus of this Paper Persuading students to take part despite low confidence Providing support to maintain motivation Because the rewards (growing confidence) are great
The Case Study Level One: Town and country planning 64 students = 23 campus + 41 distance EBL activity in groups: investigating a chosen planning application found online Vehicle for both learning and assessment over nine weeks
Inspiring ‘Engagement’ is to “gain the full attention of students” (McAlpine 2004:126) –Ensure relevance –Create excitement Design an activity that is “so enticing, so intriguing, and so marvelous (sic) that [students] really do not want to miss out on it” (Bender 2003:47) Choices: groups, application, assessment
Support: Information and Practice “Instructional responsibility in relation to practice is to provide a learning environment in which there is both structure and formative feedback since the two are supportive of a deep approach to learning” (McAlpine 2004:129) Course materials (print and online) Clear instructions with assignment checklist F2F classes Learning activities
Support: Practice and Feedback WebCT discussion group with teacher presence and feedback Campus class groupwork with teacher help and feedback Group as learning community with mutual support
Evaluation Observing attendance online and in class Mid-point survey of campus class only Standard end-of-module evaluation Assessed 300 word individual reflection
Support for independence Inspired to work independently –7/10 distance groups –3/6 campus groups Slow starters –3/6 campus groups (absent students, waiting for deadline) –3/10 distance groups (absent students, online decisions difficult)
Five mid point drop outs Pressures for all students Groupwork –25% de-motivating –75% motivating
Inspiring independent learning Mid-point survey –70% inspired, engaged –50% fun End-of-module evaluation 4 out of 5 median score for developing new skills, extending learning, opportunities for independent learning, enjoyment
Marks students –average mark 64% –25% students –Average mark 57% –15% 70+
Assessed reflection One student critical of the EBL activity Problems with groupwork Sense of excitement and inspiration “I found this project both exciting and challenging. We picked a complex application …. and I learned a great deal. I enjoyed the challenge immensely and my motivation stayed high during the task.” (Distance learner)
Assessed reflection “This assignment was a good way to see exactly how the planning system works; it is hard to understand when you’re just being told about it, so it was easier to understand when looking at it in terms of a specific application in a more practical set-up.” (Campus student) Extensive learning Explicit comments on growth of confidence through knowledge and skills
“I am naturally a nosy, inquisitive person and love being given the chance to find out about anything, particularly something as important as housing and associated laws. I enjoyed the task and think that it was a successful method of getting students to do their own research into what a planning application involves.” (Campus student) Students went the extra mile – investigations online and on the ground
Tentative conclusions Provided stimulating, relevant activity with choices Provided support online and in class to maintain motivation Consider role of groupwork and individuals in groups Inspired the majority of students to engage to help students grow in confidence
References Bender, T. (2003) Discussion-based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning (Virginia, Stylus Publishing) McAlpine L (2004) Designing learning as well as teaching: A research-based model for instruction that emphasizes learner practice, in Active Learning in Higher Education Vol 5, Issue 2 July 2004 pp Salmon, G. (2000) E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online (London, Kogan Page.)