1 Next adventure: The Flow of Water in the Vadose Zone The classic solutions for infiltration and evaporation of Green and Ampt, Bruce and Klute, and Gardner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yhd Subsurface Hydrology
Advertisements

Hydrodynamics in Porous Media
Lecture 15: Capillary motion
Soil Physics 2010 Outline Announcements More tension infiltrometers More infiltration.
Conductivity Testing of Unsaturated Soils A Presentation to the Case Western Reserve University May 6, 2004 By Andrew G. Heydinger Department of Civil.
Flow through Soils (ch7)
Values from Table m -3. Other values…. Thermal admittance of dry soil ~ 10 2 J m -2 s -1/2 K -1 Thermal admittance of wet saturated soil ~ 10 3 J m -2.
z = -50 cm, ψ = -100 cm, h = z + ψ = -50cm cm = -150 cm Which direction will water flow? 25 cm define z = 0 at soil surface h = z + ψ = cm.
1 Miller Similarity and Scaling of Capillary Properties How to get the most out of your lab dollar by cheating with physics.
Water Flow in Saturated Soils Darcy’s Law
Field Hydrologic Cycle Chapter 6. Radiant energy drives it and a lot of water is moved about annually.
Soil Physics 2010 Outline Announcements Where were we? Archimedes Water retention curve.
Infiltration Introduction Green Ampt method Ponding time
PP04010.jpg.
Soil Water ContentSoil Moisture Content Water that may be evaporated from soil by heating at C to a constant weight Gravimetric moisture content.
Elementary Fluid Dynamics: The Bernoulli Equation
1 Permeability and Theta K varies as a function of moisture content in the vadose zone Williams, Modified after Selker,
1 Miller Similarity and Scaling of Capillary Properties How to get the most out of your lab dollar by cheating with physics.
Hydrodynamics in Porous Media
1 Horizontal Infiltration using Richards Equation. The Bruce and Klute approach for horizontal infiltration.
Groundwater 40x larger than lakes+rivers
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Infiltration ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
1 Steady Evaporation from a Water Table Following Gardner Soil Sci., 85: , 1958 Following Gardner Soil Sci., 85: , 1958.
1 The Characteristic Curves Now for the real excitement: putting the solid and fluid together! Courtesy of John Selker (Oregon State University)
Diffusion:  C s  X - D s J s = difference in concentration distance diffusion coefficient flux of a solute in solution = (mass/surface area/time)
PHYSICS 231 Lecture 24: Walking on water & other ‘magic’
Infiltration into Soils
1 Steady Evaporation from a Water Table Following Gardner Soil Sci., 85: , 1958 Following Gardner Soil Sci., 85: , 1958.
How do changes in the components of  w affect each other and the total value of  w ?
1 Horizontal Infiltration using Richards Equation. The Bruce and Klute approach for horizontal infiltration.
Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney
Soil Water Topics –Soils –Soil water properties –Soil water balance Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 4.3 and 4.4 (Green-Ampt method)
Heat Pipes Heat Exchangers P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Heat Exchange through Another Natural Action….
8. Permeability (Das, chapter 7)
Soil physics Magnus Persson. Surface tension   2·R·cos  R 2·r P1P1 P2P2 z Due to surface tension water can be held at negative pressure in capillary.
Toby’s & Jake’s notes combined
Soil Water Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 4.1 and 4.2 Topics
Resistance In Fluid Systems 4.2. Define Drag For a solid object moving through a fluid or gas, drag is the sum of all the aerodynamic or hydrodynamic.
Soil water flow and Darcy’s Law. Laminar flow in a tube Poiseuille’s Law, ~1840: where: Q = volume of flow per unit time (m 3 s -1 ) r = radius of the.
CE 394K.2 Hydrology Infiltration Reading AH Sec 5.1 to 5.5 Some of the subsequent slides were prepared by Venkatesh Merwade.
Lecture Notes Applied Hydrogeology
CE 394K.2 Hydrology Infiltration Reading AH Sec 5.1 to 5.5 Some slides were prepared by Venkatesh Merwade Slides 2-6 come from
Soil Physics 2010 Outline Announcements Recharge Soil Structure (pores)
294-7: Effects of Polyacrylamide (PAM) Treated Soils on Water Seepage in Unlined Water Delivery Canals Jianting (Julian) Zhu 1, Michael H. Young 2 and.
Soil Water Tension Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Surface Water Hydrology: Infiltration – Green and Ampt Method
Subsurface Water unit volume of subsurface consists of soil/rock, and pores which may be filled with water and/or air total porosity= volume voids/total.
CE 394K.2 Hydrology Infiltration Reading for Today: AH Sec 4.3 and 4.4 Reading for Thurs: AH Sec 5.1 to 5.5 Subsequent slides prepared by Venkatesh Merwade.
Lecture 15 Soil Water (2) Soil Water Movement (1) Concept of Hydraulic Head Soil moisture Characteristics Darcy’s Law Infiltration.
ATM 301 Lecture #7 (sections ) Soil Water Movements – Darcy’s Law and Richards Equation.
A cylindrical tank is initially filled with water to a depth of 16 feet. A valve in the bottom is opened and the water runs out. The depth, h, of the.
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 21: Groundwater Hydrology Concepts – Part 1 1.
OC FLOW: ENERGY CONCEPTS, CHANNEL ANALYSIS
Infiltration Reading AH Sec 4.3 to 4.4.
4.6 INTRODUCING ‘SWAM’ (SOIL WATER ACCOUNTING MODEL)
Soil Water Balance Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 4.3 and 4.4
CHAPTER 3 SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE THEORY
Redistribution. the continued movement of soil water after infiltration ends rate decreases over time influences plant available water influences solute.
Groundwater Review Aquifers and Groundwater Porosity
Darcy’s Law and Richards Equation
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
Methods Used to Determine Hydraulic Conductivity
Philips Equation Recall Richard’s Equation Solution S – Sorptivity
Next adventure: The Flow of Water in the Vadose Zone
Green and Ampt Infiltration
Hydrodynamics in Porous Media
Soil Water Topics Soils Soil water properties Soil water balance
INFILTRATION The downward flow of water from the land surface into the soil medium is called infiltration. The rate of this movement is called the infiltration.
Presentation transcript:

1 Next adventure: The Flow of Water in the Vadose Zone The classic solutions for infiltration and evaporation of Green and Ampt, Bruce and Klute, and Gardner

2 The Green & Ampt model for Infiltration Conceived of in the framework of a capillary tube bundle concept:  Media is modeled as a bundle of capillary tubes oriented in the direction of infiltration.  Tubes fill in parallel to the same depth (i.e., the wetting front is at a well- defined position, the same in all tubes). Conceived of in the framework of a capillary tube bundle concept:  Media is modeled as a bundle of capillary tubes oriented in the direction of infiltration.  Tubes fill in parallel to the same depth (i.e., the wetting front is at a well- defined position, the same in all tubes).

3 Goals May be employed in calculating the infiltration into soils which proceed at any angle relative to vertical by simply adjusting the magnitude of gravity. May be employed in calculating the infiltration into soils which proceed at any angle relative to vertical by simply adjusting the magnitude of gravity. We will carry out some 1-dimensional calculations  Calculate the horizontal rate of infiltration into a dry soil.  Solve for ponded vertical infiltration.  Solve for falling head vertical infiltration. Note: This conceptual approach can be applied to multidimensional problems. May be employed in calculating the infiltration into soils which proceed at any angle relative to vertical by simply adjusting the magnitude of gravity. May be employed in calculating the infiltration into soils which proceed at any angle relative to vertical by simply adjusting the magnitude of gravity. We will carry out some 1-dimensional calculations  Calculate the horizontal rate of infiltration into a dry soil.  Solve for ponded vertical infiltration.  Solve for falling head vertical infiltration. Note: This conceptual approach can be applied to multidimensional problems.

4 The basic idea: Infiltration is driven by two forces:  Force of gravity acting on the water.  Pressure drop produced by a sharp wetting front Infiltration is driven by two forces:  Force of gravity acting on the water.  Pressure drop produced by a sharp wetting front Assumptions:  Wetting front is completely “sharp”  Soil is saturated behind wetting front

5 The wetting front potential term Where does this term come from and what is its magnitude?  Let’s take the case of soil made up capillary tubes of N sizes,  Each of the sizes makes up a fraction a i of the total cross-sectional pore area. The porosity n is Where does this term come from and what is its magnitude?  Let’s take the case of soil made up capillary tubes of N sizes,  Each of the sizes makes up a fraction a i of the total cross-sectional pore area. The porosity n is

6 Continuing on the wetting front potential  Part of the potential gradient is generated by the capillary contacts.  Pressure due to capillary contacts will result in a force per unit area.  The force is proportional to the length of solid/liquid contact per unit area. For a unit of cross-sectional area, total length, l a, of water/solid contact is  Part of the potential gradient is generated by the capillary contacts.  Pressure due to capillary contacts will result in a force per unit area.  The force is proportional to the length of solid/liquid contact per unit area. For a unit of cross-sectional area, total length, l a, of water/solid contact is

7 Assume a contact angle of  fAssume a contact angle of  f The pressure per unit area, P f, at the water/solid interface isThe pressure per unit area, P f, at the water/solid interface is Resistance to flow? Poiseuille capillary flow! For the i th tube, we have the flow per unit area, q i, ofResistance to flow? Poiseuille capillary flow! For the i th tube, we have the flow per unit area, q i, of Where  P is the pressure drop across a capillary tube of length L with a fluid flowing with viscosity . Assume a contact angle of  fAssume a contact angle of  f The pressure per unit area, P f, at the water/solid interface isThe pressure per unit area, P f, at the water/solid interface is Resistance to flow? Poiseuille capillary flow! For the i th tube, we have the flow per unit area, q i, ofResistance to flow? Poiseuille capillary flow! For the i th tube, we have the flow per unit area, q i, of Where  P is the pressure drop across a capillary tube of length L with a fluid flowing with viscosity .

8 Computing flux For our capillary bundle the total flux would be If the flow is horizontal, then the driving force is simply the surface tension, so the pressure drop in the tubes is P f and the flux into the system is given by For “convenience,” let’s define the system constant For our capillary bundle the total flux would be If the flow is horizontal, then the driving force is simply the surface tension, so the pressure drop in the tubes is P f and the flux into the system is given by For “convenience,” let’s define the system constant

9 We recognize K as the saturated hydraulic conductivity. In the customary units of pressure head  gh f =P f [3.8] is Now hang on there! That looks like Darcy’s Law! If we have a soil with wetting front potential h f and conductivity K, then the flux would be: So we have just found Darcy and seen how the terms relate to capillary properties. We recognize K as the saturated hydraulic conductivity. In the customary units of pressure head  gh f =P f [3.8] is Now hang on there! That looks like Darcy’s Law! If we have a soil with wetting front potential h f and conductivity K, then the flux would be: So we have just found Darcy and seen how the terms relate to capillary properties.

10 So Solving for infiltration The soil is going from dry to saturation, we can relate the flux to the rate of movement of the sharp wetting front Combining [3.10] and [3.11] we obtain a differential equation for the position of the wetting front in time The soil is going from dry to saturation, we can relate the flux to the rate of movement of the sharp wetting front Combining [3.10] and [3.11] we obtain a differential equation for the position of the wetting front in time

11 Wait, we can solve this! integrate to find that or, solving for the length of infiltration  the wetting front advances with the square root of time.  the total infiltration is also proportional to the square root of time. integrate to find that or, solving for the length of infiltration  the wetting front advances with the square root of time.  the total infiltration is also proportional to the square root of time.

12 We may now compute flux Recall So we may put in the result for L and take the derivative where S GA (referred to as the sorptivity) is a constant dependent on the media, and equal to (2nKh f ) 1/2. Key observation: Horizontal flux decreases proportionally to one over the square root of time. Recall So we may put in the result for L and take the derivative where S GA (referred to as the sorptivity) is a constant dependent on the media, and equal to (2nKh f ) 1/2. Key observation: Horizontal flux decreases proportionally to one over the square root of time.

13 Let’s look at effects of soil texture Plugging in our previous results To help “see” how S GA relates to soil characteristics, make the vastly simplifying assumption that the soil has only one pore radius. S GA becomes where C is a constant which depends only on the fluid. This then tells us that for our simplified soil that the infiltrating flux will be given by Plugging in our previous results To help “see” how S GA relates to soil characteristics, make the vastly simplifying assumption that the soil has only one pore radius. S GA becomes where C is a constant which depends only on the fluid. This then tells us that for our simplified soil that the infiltrating flux will be given by

14 Let’s look at this...  Infiltrating flux goes with the square root of the radius.  Compared to conductivity which goes with r 2. Why the difference?  The larger surface area of the particles in the finer soil provides a large capillary “pull” into the soil, which is almost enough to overcome the lower hydraulic conductivity.  Infiltrating flux goes with the square root of the radius.  Compared to conductivity which goes with r 2. Why the difference?  The larger surface area of the particles in the finer soil provides a large capillary “pull” into the soil, which is almost enough to overcome the lower hydraulic conductivity.

15 Next stop: Vertical infiltration Essentially as easy as solving for horizontal infiltration. Ponded infiltration: Darcy's law for the system is simplified by the fact that the wetting front is assumed to be sharp, with saturation behind the front The head loss across the system is the sum of the potential at the wetting front, h f, the depth of ponding, d, plus the depth of infiltration, L, while the length of travel is L Essentially as easy as solving for horizontal infiltration. Ponded infiltration: Darcy's law for the system is simplified by the fact that the wetting front is assumed to be sharp, with saturation behind the front The head loss across the system is the sum of the potential at the wetting front, h f, the depth of ponding, d, plus the depth of infiltration, L, while the length of travel is L

16 Vertical, constant head infiltration Separating variables Separating variables which may be integrated to obtain  Square root of time behavior for horizontal infiltration replaced with logarithmic relationship.  Note: taking Taylor expansion at short time, the horizontal and vertical results become identical Separating variables Separating variables which may be integrated to obtain  Square root of time behavior for horizontal infiltration replaced with logarithmic relationship.  Note: taking Taylor expansion at short time, the horizontal and vertical results become identical

17 Vertical falling head... Same procedure can solve for infiltration under falling head. In this case, we replace the depth of ponding, d, with this depth minus the depth of water which has infiltrated, nL (where nL<d, after which the pond is gone). Using (3.20) as before, we obtain Same procedure can solve for infiltration under falling head. In this case, we replace the depth of ponding, d, with this depth minus the depth of water which has infiltrated, nL (where nL<d, after which the pond is gone). Using (3.20) as before, we obtain

18 Typical Results Green and Ampt model predictions for infiltration in a soil with 30% pore space, K s = 0.03 cm/sec, h f = 25 cm and d = 20 cm.

19 Field Measurement of G&A Parameters Bouwer Infiltrometer  Get K s by falling head  Get h f by shutting valve and measuring the vacuum created by the wetting front pressure  Measured K s about 1/2 fully saturated K s  Measured h f really the air entry pressure which is 2 times water entry pressure Bouwer Infiltrometer  Get K s by falling head  Get h f by shutting valve and measuring the vacuum created by the wetting front pressure  Measured K s about 1/2 fully saturated K s  Measured h f really the air entry pressure which is 2 times water entry pressure