Academic Planning and Budget Building Meeting 3. * The current model we use must change to meet current as well as new and emerging client and community.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PORTFOLIO.
Advertisements

STUDENT SUCCESS CENTERS : WORKING BETTER TOGETHER TO ENSURE STUDENT SUCCESS.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
COE Office of Assessment and Accreditation Department of Elementary and Middle Grades Education COE Office of Teacher Education College of Education East.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.
Implementing the ASCA National Model
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
WHAT’s A STATE TO DO? TO BUILD SCHOOL/EDUCATION LEADERSHIP CAPACITY Betty Hale.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Standards for Education and Rehabilitation of Students who are Blind and Visually Impaired A general overview of accepted standards for Teachers of the.
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
WELCOME. AGENDA  LCFF/LCAP Review  LCAP Process  Community Input/Findings  2014/15 LCAP  Plan Alignment- LEAP/LCAP/SPSA  Planning and Input.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Morristown Central School District Strategic Plan Board of Education Meeting February 13, 2008.
Collaborative Model of Social Work Education with Strong University – Agency Partnerships Michael A. Patchner, Ph.D. Indiana University School of Social.
1 Presenter: Angela Ward Intro. to Culturally Responsive Pedagogy Student –Focused Dialogue.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
RESULTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS 2013 Statewide Test Data.
A Faculty Development Workshop for New PT/PTA Faculty Portland, OR 2015 Beginning with the End in Mind Guided Discussions Around Student Success and Career.
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
Re-envisioning Teacher Preparation: Stage II September 16, 2011.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Status Report Goal #1 100% of RIT students will: a.Develop global knowledge and intercultural competency through course work and experiences.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
MHC at its Best MHC at its Best.
Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) Professional Development Clusters 2010–2012.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
ML evi ne CP ED Co nv en in g Ju ne  The Purpose  The People  The Process.
Think Academics: Academic Visioning David Marker Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
The Higher Education Academy - enhancing the student experience Teaching, learning and the disability agenda Yvonne Dickinson Adviser: Disability NADO.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Information Literacy Dr. Nancy J. Becker LIS 205 Spring 2004.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
1 GOAL: Provide students with a quality educational experience that enables them to complete their educational goals in a timely fashion. Review and restructure.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Implementing the ASCA National Model The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 7 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom use.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
NJCU College of Education
Synthesising Graduate Qualities in the LLB Curriculum
The Public Schools of Dover and Sherborn
February 21-22, 2018.
Minnesota State University, Mankato
to Sustainably Develop Nurse Leaders in Targeted Areas of Excellence
Woodson Park Academy (Douglas Cluster)
Presentation transcript:

Academic Planning and Budget Building Meeting 3

* The current model we use must change to meet current as well as new and emerging client and community needs, align with the direction of professional literature and organizations, respond to the changing professional expectations, and balance with available resources. Change efforts identified must result in a more effective and efficient model.

Faculty and staff dialogues identified major change efforts in “what” and “how” we achieve a more effective and efficient model.

What we do…. * Common Foundations * Core How we do it….. * Interdisciplinary Focus * Clinically-Based Programs * College Structure

* Develop Common COE Foundations Establish a set of common foundational competencies for ALL COE graduates. What is distinctive about SDSU COE graduates? What sets our graduates apart from other programs?

Graduates are proficient in: * Their expertise in interdisciplinary practice * Their cultural competence in serving and engaging diverse communities/clients * Their ability to engage in change through understanding systems * Their use of information/data to inform decisions

* Embedded throughout all program curriculum and clinical placements * Are “foundational” to all aspects of student, staff, and faculty work * Are monitored and assessed to ensure the quality of the COE “brand” * Are College-wide and across all programs

* CORE addresses essential knowledge within and across disciplines and programs * CORE identifies what is at the center and central to professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions * CORE is taught and learned “deep” * CORE is the anchor * CORE is what doesn’t get cut or treated superficially * CORE is what matters most * CORE requires making choices and assigning greater importance and impact

* Learning theory * Human development * Ethics * History * Multi-Cultural Education

* Interdisciplinary Focus * Clinically-Based Programs

* Programs within the COE will establish an interdisciplinary focus. This focus will be embedded throughout the scope and sequence of our programs.

* Three strategies proposed to accomplish this focus will be to: a) Implement a problem based learning approach that uses interdisciplinary Case Studies b) Implement a Design Studio model with faculty across disciplines. c) Cluster clinical experiences in settings that cut across programs

Programs within the COE will establish and support clinically-based programs in which content and pedagogy are woven around clinical experiences throughout preparation in coursework, laboratory-based experiences, and in school, agency, organization, and community- embedded practice.

* The core experience of the program is clinical practice * Student learning and positive client outcomes is the focus * Clinical preparation is integrated throughout every fact of the program in a dynamic way * Programs prepare innovators, collaborators, and problem solvers

* Learning occurs in an interactive professional community * All supervisors, coaches, guides, etc. are rigorously selected and prepared * State of the art technologies promote enhanced productivity, greater efficiencies, and collaboration through learning communities

* A powerful R & D agenda and systematic gathering and use of data supports continuous improvement * Strategic Partnerships are imperative

The COE will implement a college structure that supports the new direction of the COE and is focused on the effectiveness of our graduates, best practices, and preparation program performance to support continuous improvement. (Includes improving procedures, support for faculty development, and admissions.)

* TE 930 (Rdg/LA) integrate SPED/TE * ED 690 * COE Advisory Board * Project Connect * Case Studies * Design Studio * Expand PACT and eSupervision * Interdisciplinary MA * Hobsons On-line applications * Qualtrics

* Ability to continue providing the programs we now offer * Ability to maintain high quality * Being in position to create our own destiny “Change or be changed” * Address systemic issues that have developed over time * Maintaining our place in “making a difference” through research, service and teaching.

* Morning: PTLC Groups * Afternoon: Framework for Action Groups