Lecture slides to accompany Leland Blank and Anthony Tarquin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP V-ANNUAL WORTH ANALYSIS CE ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS.
Advertisements

Rate of Return Multiple Alternatives Lecture slides to accompany
Engineering Economy Practice Problems
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-5 Comparison of Alternatives Annual Worth Analysis.
Lecture 7 Evaluating a Single Project PW, FW, AW IRR
13-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 13 Breakeven and Payback Analysis © 2012 by McGraw-Hill.
EGR Evaluation Alternatives Present Worth Analysis Companies constantly evaluate whether or not to pursue projects. Mutually Exclusive Projects.
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project and Comparing Alternatives
Nominal and Effective Interest Rates Lecture slides to accompany
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 4-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008 © 2008 by McGraw-Hill All Rights Reserved Basics of Engineering Economy.
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-5 Comparison of Alternatives Annual Worth Analysis.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 3-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
8/25/04 Valerie Tardiff and Paul Jensen Operations Research Models and Methods Copyright All rights reserved Economic Decision Making Decisions.
Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008 © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Lecture slides to accompany Basics.
Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008 © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Lecture slides to accompany Basics.
Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008 © 2008 McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Lecture slides to accompany Basics.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, Lecture slides to accompany Basics.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics.
Chapter 2 Factors: How Time and Interest Affect Money
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 6 Authored by: Dr. Don.
Engineering Economic Analysis - Ninth Edition Newnan/Eschenbach/Lavelle Copyright 2004 by Oxford University Press, Inc.1 Engineering Economic Analysis.
Lecture slides to accompany
Rate of Return One Project Lecture slides to accompany
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill All Rights Reserved 11-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 11 Replacement.
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Lecture slides to accompany
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 7-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
14-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 14 Effects of Inflation © 2012 by McGraw-Hill All.
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fifteenth Edition By William.
The second objective today is to evaluate correctly capital investment alternatives when the time value of money is a key influence.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
Present Worth Analysis Chapter 5 Types of Economic Alternatives Mutually Exclusive Alternatives: –Only one of the viable projects can be selected. –The.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Developed.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 3-1 Developed.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 1-1 Developed.
Evaluating a Single Project
Copyright ©2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fourteenth Edition By William.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 5-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Developed.
Matakuliah: D0762 – Ekonomi Teknik Tahun: 2009 Annual Worth Analysis Course Outline 5.
Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
12-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 12 Independent Projects with Budget Limitation ©
8-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 8 Rate of Return Multiple Alternatives © 2012 by.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives.
Class # 7 Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 5-1.
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
Foundations of Engineering Economy
Lecture slides to accompany
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Evaluation Alternatives Present Worth Analysis
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
Lecture slides to accompany
Evaluation Alternatives Present Worth Analysis
Rate of Return One Project Lecture slides to accompany
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Engineering Economic Analysis
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Lecture slides to accompany
Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy, 8th edition
Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy, 8th edition
Lecture slides to accompany
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Lecture slides to accompany
Adopted and modified by Dr. W-.W. Li of UTEP, Fall, 2003
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
Presentation transcript:

Lecture slides to accompany Leland Blank and Anthony Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy by Leland Blank and Anthony Tarquin Chapter 5 Annual Worth Analysis © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Chapter 5 – Annual Worth Analysis PURPOSE Compare alternatives using an annual worth basis TOPICS AW calculations Alternative evaluation using AW AW of permanent investments Spreadsheet usage © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.1 – AW Advantage AW is also called AE – annual equivalent EAC – equivalent annual cost EUAC (or EUAW) – equivalent uniform annual cost (or worth) Compare alternatives over only one life cycle – no LCM to meet equal service assumption Same AW amount assumed for future cycles, and estimates change with inflation rate If this assumption not correct; use a study period and specific estimates for cash flows © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.1 – AW and Multiple Life Cycles AW of cycle 1 with i = 22% AW = -20,000(A/P,22%,3) -8000 = $-17,793 per year AW over 2 cycles AW = -20,000(A/P,22%,3) - 20,000(A/P,22%,6) -8000 Estimated costs over two life cycles Demonstrates that AW will be the same for any number of cycles © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.1 – Calculating Project AW Use project PW or FW to determine AW with n = LCM for equal service or length of study period AW = PW(A/P,i%,n) = FW(A/F,i%,n) AW is the sum of 2 separate components: Capital recovery (CR) Equivalent annual A of operating costs (A of AOC) AW = CR + A of AOC © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.1 – Capital Recovery (CR) What does CR mean? CR is the annual equivalent cost A incurred by initially spending an amount P on an asset (project) and using it for n years plus the return on the investment P at i% per year Example: Project costs P = $-13 million Estimated salvage S = $0.5 million Estimated life = 8 years Expected return i = 12% per year © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.1 – Capital Recovery = $-2,576M per year Return expected: S = $0.5M 0 1 2 6 7 8 0 1 2 6 7 8 Return expected: i = 12% Capital recovery: Find A per year P = $13M Capital recovery is the equivalent annual amount A to recover $13M at 12% per year if the salvage is $0.5M after 8 years CR = -13M(A/P,12%,8) + 0.5M(A/F,12%,8) = $-2,576M per year Conclusion: Project must develop revenue of at least $2.576M per year to recover P and make 12% on the investment © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.1 – Capital Recovery Formula General formula for CR CR = -P(A/P,i,n) + S(A/F,i,n) Alternative formula to calculate CR CR = -(P-S)(A/P,i,n) + Si For previous estimates, using alternate CR = -(13 – 0.5)(A/P,12%,8) + 0.5(0.12) = $-2,576M per year © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.1 – Calculating AW AW = CR + A of AOC AW: sum of CR plus A value of annual costs AW = CR + A of AOC If AOC estimate is same each year, add A to CR If AOC varies, find A value first, then add to CR Example: For previous project, estimate AOC at $0.9M each year. AW = -2.576M – 0.9M = $-3.476M per year Conclusion: Project must develop revenue of at least $3.476M per year to recover P, A and return 12% per year © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.1 – Example Cash Flows for AW S = $0.5M 0 1 2 6 7 8 0 1 2 6 7 8 AOC = $0.9M AW = $-3.476M per year P = $13M This is the AW for all future life cycles of 8 years each, provided costs estimates change at the inflation or deflation rate © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.2 – AW-based Evaluation Single project analysis Calculate AW at stated MARR Acceptance criterion: If AW ≥ 0, project is economically justified Multiple alternatives Calculate AW of each alternative at MARR over respective life or study period Selection criterion: Select alternative with most favorable AW value, that is, numerically largest AW value © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.2 – AW Evaluation – Example 1 To select the more economic alternative at i = 12%, compare AWX over 4 years with AW Y over 6 years AWX = -40,000(A/P,12%,4) + 10,000(A/F,12%,4) – 25,000 = $-36,077 AWY = -75,000(A/P,12%,6) + 7,000(A/F,12%,6) – 15,000 = $-32,380 Select Y © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.2 – AW Evaluation – Example 2 In the previous example, assume the selected equipment will be retained for a total of 8 years. Additionally, assume after 8 years S = 0 for X and Y; and AOCX continues at $25,000, but AOCY doubles starting in year 7 0 1 2 6 7 8 0 1 2 6 7 8 AOC = $25,000 AOC = $15,000 AOC = $30,000 P = $40,000 P = $75,000 Alternative X Alternative Y © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.2 – AW Evaluation – Example 2 Study period is n = 8 years AWX = -40,000(A/P,12%,8) – 25,000 = $-33,052 AWY = -75,000(A/P,12%,8) – 15,000 - 15,000(F/A,12%,2)(A/F,12%,8) = $-32,683 Still select Y as the cheaper choice; however the advantage of Y over X is now only 1/10 of the previous AW values © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.3 – AW of Permanent Investment AW of alternative that will last ‘forever’ This is the annual worth equivalent of capitalized cost (CC) Solve for AW in relation PW = AW(1/i) from chapter 4 AW = PW(i) = CC(i) Procedure: Regular interval cash flows – find AW over one cycle Non-regular intervals – find P, then calculate AW = P(i) for long-term AW value © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.3 – AW of Permanent Investment Example: How long must $10,000 remain invested at 5% per year so that $2000 per year can be withdrawn forever? P = A/i determines total in year n to generate $2000 forever P = 2000/0.05 = $40,000 F/P factor determines n if money grows at 5%, with no withdrawals 40,000 = 10,000(F/P,5%,n) n = 28.4 years © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.3 – AW of Permanent Investment Example 5.6 demonstrates comparison of short-lived and long-lived (forever) alternatives at i = 5% For each proposal, determine CR and AW values Prop P and S AOC Life CR and AW A P = $650,000 S = $17,000 A = $170,000 10 CR over 10; add AOC B P = $4 million A = $5,000 $30,000 every 5 years ‘forever’ CR over ∞; add AOC; add periodic repair over 5 years C P = $6 million A = $3,000 50 CR over 50; add AOC © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.3 – Example 5.6 (cont) AWA = - 650,000(A/P,5%,10) + 17,000(A/F,5%,10) - 170,000 = $-252,824 AWB = - 4,000,000(0.05) - 5,000 - 30,000(A/F,5%,5) = $-210,429 AWC = - 6,000,000(A/P,5%,50) - 3,000 = $-331,680 Select proposal B © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.4 – Spreadsheet Evaluation Using AW Analysis Use PMT function with n = life of alternative or study period = PMT(i%,n,P,-S) – A This provides sum of CR and A of AOC, if AOC is uniform Note signs on P, S and A to obtain correct sign on result n values are one life cycle for each alternative, since LCM is not necessary for AW-based evaluation If AOC is not uniform, enter annual estimates, find their P value, then use PMT. Or, use embedded NPV function = PMT(i%,n, P+NPV(i%,year_1_cell,year_n_cell)) © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.4 – Spreadsheet Evaluation Using AW Spreadsheet-based AW analysis in Example 5.6 – 3 alternatives with different lives AWA; n = 10: PMT(5%,10,650000,-17000) - 170,000 = $-252,826 AWB; n = ∞: -4,000,000*0.05 - 5,000 + PMT(5%,5,,30000) = $-210,429 AWC; n = 50: PMT(5%,50,6000000) - 3,000 = $-331,660 © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008

Sec 5.4 – AW Spreadsheet Evaluation – Sign Usage On the spreadsheet, note the careful use of minus signs to ensure a correct PMT function response. First costs and expenses have positive signs in PMT statement Alternatives A and C: = PMT(i%,n,P,-S) Alternative B periodic expense: = PMT(i%,n,,30000) PMT function is preceded by + sign © 2008, McGraw-Hill All rights reserved Slide to accompany Blank and Tarquin Basics of Engineering Economy, 2008