A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS Vasim Khan 17.07.09.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
Advertisements

Choke-mode Damped X-band Structure for CLIC Main Linac Hao ZHA, Jiaru SHI CERN Sep 27, 2011 Jiaru Shi, LCWS11 Workshop, Granada1.
Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
CLIC drive beam accelerating (DBA) structure Rolf Wegner.
CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner 1 Structures for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator Rolf Wegner.
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
ABSTRACT We report on the suppression of long-range wakefields in the main linacs of the CLIC collider. This structure operates with 2π/3 phase advance.
R.M. Jones, International Workshop on Linear Colliders, 18 – 22 Oct. 2010, CERN, Geneva 1 Status and Prospects for the CLIC DDS Roger M. Jones Cockcroft.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
July Alexej Grudiev, Improvement of CLIC structure. Possible improvement of the CLIC accelerating structure. From CLIC_G to CLIC_K Alexej.
T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G GHz measurements versus simulations A.Grudiev CERN
4th CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), 26 th - 28 th May Alternate Means of Wakefield Suppression in CLIC Main Linac Roger M. Jones, Vasim Khan,
MAIN LINAC DDS DESIGN Vasim Khan Bohr seminar series, HEP group, The University of Manchester.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, 18 – 22 Oct. 2010, CERN, Switzerland 1 Recent progress on CLIC_DDS Roger M. Jones Cockcroft Institute and The.
Vasim Khan 4th Annual X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting, CERN /36 CLIC_DDS & Test Structure V. Khan, A. D’Elia, R. Jones A.
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS Vasim Khan. 24 cells No interleaving 48cells 2-fold interleaving ∆fmin = 32.5 MHz ∆tmax =30.76 ns ∆s = 9.22 m 24 cells No interleaving.
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /13 CLIC_DDS study
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS DESIGN AND FORTCOMING Vasim Khan & Roger Jones V. Khan LC-ABD 09, Cockcroft Institute /14.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /21 CLIC_DDS_HPA study
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /24 CLIC_DDS study
WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN THE MAIN LINACS OF CLIC Vasim Khan The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and Technology, Daresbury, Warrington, WA4 4AD.
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
DDS limits and perspectives Alessandro D’Elia on behalf of UMAN Collaboration 1.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 28-Jan
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
Course B: rf technology Normal conducting rf Part 5: Higher-order-mode damping Walter Wuensch, CERN Sixth International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders.
Overview of CLIC main linac accelerating structure design 21/10/2010 A.Grudiev (CERN)
2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction to the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Design. I. Syratchev.
Higher-Order Modes and Beam-Loading Compensation in CLIC Main Linac Oleksiy Kononenko BE/RF, CERN CLIC RF Structure Development Meeting, March 14, 2012.
LLRF for EUCARD Crab Cavities Graeme Burt (on behalf of Amos Dexter) Paris May 2011.
ENGINEERING DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF X-BAND DAMPED DETUNED STRUCTURE V. Soldatov¹, D. Gudkov¹, A. Samoshkin¹, G. Riddone², A. Grudiev², S. Atieh², A.
Frequency-domain study of acceleration & beam loading based on a circuit model by raquel fandos.
CLIC crab cavity design Praveen Ambattu 24/08/2011.
WP 9.2 DDS Status, R.M. Jones, 25 th Oct 2010, WebEx Phone-in, Geneva 1 WP 9.2: DDS Status Roger M. Jones Cockcroft Institute and The University of Manchester.
Update on TCTP heating H. Day, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: L. Gentini and the EN-MME team.
Hybrid designs - directions and potential 1 Alessandro D’Elia, R. M. Jones and V. Khan.
Peak temperature rise specification for accelerating structures: a review and discussion CLIC meeting
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
1 Design and objectives of test accelerating structures Riccardo Zennaro.
CLIC Workshop 2008 TBTS status. PETS testing program and installation status. Igor Syratchev & Germana Riddone for the CLIC team.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
XB-10, ICFA Mini-Workshop, R.M. Jones, Cockcroft Inst., 30 th Nov-3 rd Dec Wakefields in Linacs Subjected to Detuning and Manifold Coupled Damping.
ELI and other things A. D’Elia 1. C-BAND STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-BUNCH RF LINACS: ELI_NP PROPOSAL Bunch charge 250 pC Number of bunches 40 Bunch distance.
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 18/06/2015 High Gradient work shop 2015.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Damped and Detuned Structures for CLIC The University of Manchester The Cockcroft Institute 4/10/2013I.Nesmiyan1 Acknowledgements to colleagues at CERN,
A. D’Elia 1,2,3, T. Higo 4, V. F. Khan, R.M. Jones 1,2, A. Latina 3, I. Nesmiyan 1,2, G. Riddone 3 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of.
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
Alternate Means of Wakefield Suppression in CLIC Main Linac
Vasim Khan & Roger Jones
A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS
Roger M. Jones Cockcroft Institute and The University of Manchester
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
RF Power Generation and PETS Design
CLIC_DDS study
Summary of the test structure design
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Progress in the design of a damped an
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Presentation transcript:

A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS Vasim Khan

Spectral function 96 cells 4-fold interleaving 192 cells 8-fold interleaving 24 cells No interleaving 48cells 2-fold interleaving

96 cells 4-fold interleaving 192 cells 8-fold interleaving 24 cells No interleaving 48cells 2-fold interleaving ∆fmin = 65 MHz ∆tmax =15.38 ns ∆s = 4.61 m ∆fmin = 32.5 MHz ∆tmax =30.76 ns ∆s = 9.22 m ∆fmin = MHz ∆tmax = ns ∆s = m ∆fmin = 8.12 MHz ∆tmax =123 ns ∆s = m

Corrected formula for effective pulse length [1] Unloaded [1] A. Grudiev, CLIC-ACE, JAN 08 Allowed limit = 260 MV/m Allowed limit = 56 K Results based on only 3 cell simulations.

7 cell simulations.

ParametersCLIC_G (Optimised) [1,2] CLIC_DDS (Non-optimised) Bunch space (rf cycles/ns)6/0.58/0.67 Limit on wake (V/pC/mm/m) Number of bunches312 Bunch population (10 9 ) Pulse length (ns) Fill time (ns) Pin (MW) Esur max. (MV/m) Pulse temperature rise (K) RF-beam-eff (for corrected pulse length: Eff.=26.6%) [1] A. Grudiev, CLIC-ACE, JAN 08 [2] CLIC Note 764 Updated

Considering 8 fold interleaved structure ParametersStructure # 1Structure # 8 f1, f24 (GHz) , , ∆f (GHz) a1, a24 (mm)4, , 2.3 /λ0.13 N (x10 9 particels/bunch)

Pin=76.5 MW Structure # 1

73.5 MW Structure # 8

Sum RMS wake-field of an 8-fold interleaved structure Amplitude wakeSumwake wake

Cell # Random error in f (MHz) Cell # f (GHz) Random error in frequencies +/- 3.5 MHz

8 fold interleaved structure Random error in frequencies +/- 3.5 MHz

Amplitude wakeSumwake wake

Dipole simulations with fillet and high mesh Cell # 13 Cell # 24 Geometry with fillet, solution is converged and average mesh = 400 k No fillet, solution is not converged (only 3 passes )and average mesh = 50 k Geometry with fillet, solution is converged and average mesh = 400 k No fillet, solution is not converged (only 3 passes )and average mesh = 40 k Cell # 1 No fillet, solution is not converged (only 3 passes )and average mesh = 50 k Geometry with fillet, solution is converged and average mesh = 400 k

24 cell structure Dashed curve : Unloaded condition Solid curve : Beam loaded condition ∆T (K) Pin (MW) Eacc (MV/m) Esur (MV/m) Allowable limit on Esur Avg. Eacc Allowable limit on ∆T

8 – fold interleaving Structure # 1 Dashed curve : Unloaded condition Solid curve : Beam loaded condition ∆T (K) Pin (MW) Eacc (MV/m) Esur (MV/m) Allowable limit on Esur Avg. Eacc Allowable limit on ∆T

8 – fold interleaving Structure # 8 Dashed curve : Unloaded condition Solid curve : Beam loaded condition ∆T (K) Pin (MW) Eacc (MV/m) Esur (MV/m) Allowable limit on Esur Avg. Eacc Allowable limit on ∆T