A Young Douglas-fir Plantation Growth Model for the Pacific Northwest Nick Vaughn University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Site and Stocking and Other Related Measurements.
Advertisements

EFIMED Advanced course on MODELLING MEDITERRANEAN FOREST STAND DYNAMICS FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT MARC PALAHI Head of EFIMED Office INDIVIDUAL TREE.
Predicting Sapling Recruitment Following Partial Cutting in the Acadian Forest: Using Long-Term Data to Assess the Performance of FVS-NE David Ray 1, Chad.
Modeling Tree Growth Under Varying Silvicultural Prescriptions Leah Rathbun University of British Columbia Presented at Western Mensurationists 2010.
The Effects of Site and Soil on Fertilizer Response of Coastal Douglas-fir K.M. Littke, R.B. Harrison, and D.G. Briggs University of Washington Coast Fertilization.
Growth Model Users Group Growth Model Run-Off January 2002.
Modeling Effects of Genetic Improvement in Loblolly Pine Plantations Barry D. Shiver Stephen Logan.
Examining Clumpiness in FPS David K. Walters Roseburg Forest Products.
Predicting Nitrogen Fertilizer Response in Douglas-fir Plantations Kim Littke Rob Harrison.
Modeling Branch Characteristics In Douglas-fir & Western Hemlock.
Brief History of Site Quality Estimation from a Forest Mensuration Perspective Eric C. Turnblom ESRM Forest Soils and Site Productivity - Autumn.
Forestry Measurements
The Rural Technology Initiative –“Better technology in rural areas for managing forests for increased product and environmental values in support of local.
Simulating growth impacts of Swiss needle cast in Douglas-fir: The blood, sweat and tears behind the ORGANON growth multiplier Sean M. Garber April 26,
Forestry Measurements Ms. Dombroski September 2005.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Materials and Methods Stand Management Cooperative (SMC) Type 1 Installations Research Plots Six 1 acre Douglas-fir plots per installation were examined.
First Measurements of 2005 GGTIV* Installations Eric C. Turnblom, SMC Keith Jayawickrama, NWTIC SMC Spring Policy Meeting, 25 – 26 Apr 2007 Vancouver,
Estimation and Application of Genetic- Gain Multipliers for Douglas-Fir Height and Diameter Growth Peter J. Gould 1, David D. Marshall 2, Randy Johnson.
 Discuss silvicultural principles related to restoration/fuels treatments  Compare conditions from the 1900 Cheesman Lake reconstruction to current.
DFC: Desired Future Condition Forest Practices Board March 31, 2009 Chuck Turley/Lenny Young.
West Virginia University Division of Forestry 3 rd Forest Vegetation Simulator Conference February 13-15, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado.
 Used by NRCS foresters  Simple and Quick way to determine  Average tree diameter  Range of tree diameters  Trees per acre  Stand composition 
FOR 274: Forest Measurements and Inventory
Adapting a Mortality Model for Southeast Interior British Columbia By - Temesgen H., V. LeMay, and P.L. Marshall University of British Columbia Forest.
Foliage and Branch Biomass Prediction an allometric approach.
Stem form responses to differing areas of weed control around planted Douglas-fir trees Robin Rose, Douglas A. Maguire, and Scott Ketchum Department of.
Comparing Stand Age 140 Basal Area per Acre Outputs from the DFC, FVS and ORGANON Models Steve McConnell Forest Integrity Spokane, WA Growth Model Users.
The Potential of the Alder Resource: Challenges and Opportunities David Hibbs and Andrew Bluhm Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative Department of Forest Science.
Tree Data National Manual Version 1.61 Section 5.0.
21 June 2004 Western Mensurationists Meeting Developing a Whole-stand Model for Douglas-fir Plantations Eric C. Turnblom Samuel D. Pittman.
Slide Number 1 of 31 Properties of a kNN tree-list imputation strategy for prediction of diameter densities from lidar Jacob L Strunk
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
Using the Gingrich (1967) Stocking Chart for Upland Hardwood forests in the Central States Gingrich, S. F Measuring and evaluating stocking and.
Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Harold E. Burkhart Virginia Tech.
Do stem form differences mask responses to silvicultural treatment? Doug Maguire Department of Forest Science Oregon State University.
Silvics Analytic Timing of Site Preparation and Post-Plant Weed Control to Optimize Pine Growth Integration of research results from three region-wide.
Critical Period Threshold Study Effects of up to Five Years of Consecutive Weed Control Relative to Growth Losses from Delaying Weed Control for Douglas-
Growth and Yield Lecture 6 (04/17/2015). Overview   Review of stand characteristics that affect growth   Basic Stand Growth Terminology Yield curve;
Thinning mixed-species stands of Douglas-fir and western hemlock in the presence of Swiss needle cast Junhui Zhao, Douglas A. Maguire, Douglas B. Mainwaring,
“The MB&G Silviculture Support System” Steve Fairweather Ellen Voth Reggie Fay Mason, Bruce & Girard, Inc. Portland, Oregon GMUG 12/15/05.
Comparisons of DFSIM, ORGANOIN and FVS David Marshall Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory PNW Research Station USDA Forest Service Growth Model Users.
Growth Model Users Group November 15, 2013 Greg Johnson Weyerhaeuser NR Company.
 Tier 1: Monitoring that will be done regardless of funding received:  Forest Service Preference is to focus on vegetation, e.g. Stand Structure including.
Imputating snag data to forest inventory for wildlife habitat modeling Kevin Ceder College of Forest Resources University of Washington GMUG – 11 February.
Projecting FIA Data With FVS and ORGANON Greg Latta Oregon State University College of Forest Resources.
Looking for the Plateau in Douglas-fir Annual Volume Increment
RAP-ORGANON A Red Alder Plantation Growth Model David Hibbs, David Hann, Andrew Bluhm, Oregon State University.
Modeling regional variation in the self-thinning boundary line Aaron Weiskittel Sean Garber Hailemariam Temesgen.
Estimation of Genetic Multipliers for Douglas-Fir Height- and Diameter- Growth Models Peter J. Gould, David D. Marshall, Randy Johnson and Greg Johnson.
SMC Silviculture Project Report Eric C. Turnblom Silviculture Project Leader, SMC SMC Spring Policy Meeting, 25 – 26 Apr 2007 Vancouver, WA.
Sustainable Production Forestry THE JOINT FORCES OF CSIRO & SCION Application of the New Zealand Douglas-fir stand-level growth model to data from the.
Understanding Site-Specific Factors Affecting the Nutrient Demands and Response to Fertilizer by Douglas-fir Center for Advanced Forestry Systems 2010.
Bruce E. Borders Yujia Zhang OVERVIEW Consortium for Accelerated Pine Production Studies (CAPPS) makes use of existing field sites and data from Acid.
Research Update Coastal Douglas-fir Fertilization Ian R. Cameron, RPF Kamloops BC Eleanor R.G. McWilliams, RPF North Vancouver BC.
Annualized diameter and height growth equations for plantation grown Douglas- fir, western hemlock, and red alder Aaron Weiskittel 1, Sean Garber 1, Greg.
Establishing Plots to Monitor Growth and Treatment Response Some do’s and don’ts A discussion.
Incorporating Genetics into Growth Models: Results from Block-Plot Trials of Douglas-Fir Peter Gould and Brad St Clair PNW Research Station Keith Jayawickrama.
Gary W. Miller USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Morgantown, West Virginia Intermediate Stand Management – The Crop Tree Approach.
GROWTH AND YIELD How will my forest grow? Dr. Glenn Glover School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences Auburn University.
Perspectives from a REIT Growth and Yield Modeling Architecture and Treatment Response Models – The Rayonier Approach J.P. MCTAGUE Western Mensurationists.
Leah Rathbun PhD Candidate, University of British Columbia
Joonghoon Shin Oregon State University
and Other Related Measurements
ln(CR) = HAB + b1BA + b2BA2 + b3ln(BA)
Cruise Summaries.
Other Cruise Methods.
Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON
Bob McGaughey Pacific Northwest Research Station
50 Essential Forestry Terms Afforestation All-aged (uneven-aged) Artificial Regeneration Basal Area Biomass Broadleaf Clear-cut Harvest Climax Forest.
Presentation transcript:

A Young Douglas-fir Plantation Growth Model for the Pacific Northwest Nick Vaughn University of Washington College of Forest Resources

Outline Current status of the model A review of the datasets Model details Predictive abilities Timeline

Current Status Have a model form for height growth –Base function with H 0 and SI as predictors –Modifiers for Density, Relative height and Veg Choosing between forms for DBH –Similar to the height growth function Can somewhat predict changes of Veg –Just started, still need to test

Data review Two datasets –SMC Type III (5/6 of the data) –RVMM project Different design, but similar measurements –All Conifers measured –Multiple measurements –Veg cover optically estimated on subplots –Both are missing a lot of data on Veg treatments

Data review Some differences –SMC data is from designed experiment –RVMM from real-world stands –Hardwoods treated different –RVMM data has only one remeasure (2-year) –RVMM veg measured in same year as trees

Data review Fitting model using data with associated Veg measures for each tree measurement Heights measured at both beginning and end of period Site Index computed on stands using last measurements, –Some < age suggested for such calculations (~10 years) Useable tree-growth observations –RVMM: 4591 –SMC: 24320

x RVMM Coastal x RVMM Cascade x SMC Type III

Data review Range of stand ages

Model Details Height growth model: where: is initial Height (ft) is Top-height of the plot (ft) is Site Index (Flewelling’s curves, base=30) is Trees per acre is plot Shrub cover (%) is 1-year Height growth (ft)

Model Details Height growth model – Veg. modifier: –At low Htop: More vegetation = less growth –As Htop increases, this effect goes to 0

Model Details Height growth model – Density modifier: –At low Htop: More density = more growth –As Htop increases, effect lessens. –After Htop reaches about 26 feet: More density = less growth

Model Details Height growth model – Relative height mod: –Relative height = height i /Htop –Lower relative ht. = less growth –As Htop and/or Density increase, this effect gets stronger

Model Details Diameter growth model: where: is initial Diameter (in) is Top-height of the plot (ft) is Site Index is Trees per acre is plot Shrub cover (%) is 1-year Diameter growth (in) is Basal Area per acre

Model Details Shrub vegetation dynamics model: where: is initial Shrub Vegetation cover (%) is Top-height of the plot (ft) is Site Index is Trees per acre is Basal Area per acre is 1-year Veg cover change (%)

Predictive Abilities Height growth model: R 2 = 0.578

Predictive Abilities Diameter growth model: R 2 = 0.590

Predictive Abilities

Timeline “Finish” modelling by June –Done = satisfied with results Write-up done and defend by August Coding is already underway.

Questions?