David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, 2008 1 Super B The Super Flavor Factory David Hitlin DOE Annual Review of Caltech July 10, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MSSM Precision tests of the flavours in the SM Model Indep. Analysis in  B=2 MFV, mainly high tan  scenarios Achille Stocchi (LAL-IN2P3/CNRS)
Advertisements

Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
1 SUSY and B physics observables Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii, April 20, 2005.
1 1 Babar TM and © Nelvana David Hitlin DOE Review Caltech July 21, 2004.
K. Kumar, W. Marciano, Y. Li Electroweak physics at EIC - Summary of week 7 INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider.
This is the last message in this gathering of North American PI’s with an interest in the INFN hosted SuperB project. I will try to deal with issues on.
David Hitlin DOE Annual Review June 29, Super B The Super Flavor Factory David Hitlin DOE Annual Review of Caltech June 29, 2009.
1 Physics Case of L=10 36 e + e - B Factory Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay Université Paris-Sud and IN2P3-CNRS.
Toward a B Factory at SLAC? L. Dixon (not a B expert!) for the SLAC Scenarios Study SLUO Annual Meeting, SLAC, 7/11/2003 B physics in 2003: The Standard.
David Hitlin Heavy Flavor Physics DPF July 29, Heavy Flavor Physics Experiment David Hitlin DPF 2009 July 29, 2009.
David Hitlin US/Canada SuperB Meeting July 25, Super B US/Canada Meeting Introduction David Hitlin July 25, 2008.
David Hitlin BEACH 2008 June 27, Super B The Super Flavor Factory David Hitlin BEACH 2008 June 27, 2008.
David Hitlin Aspen Winter Conference Jan. 22, Super B Factories: Motivation and Realization Super B Factories: Motivation and Realization David.
Energy and Luminosity reach Our charge asks for evaluation of a baseline machine of 500 GeV with energy upgrade to about 1 TeV. (the “about” came about.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
Future Accelerators at the energy frontier Peter Hansen february 2010 University of Copenhagen.
QCD 与强子物理研讨会, 2010 年 8 月 4 - 10 日,威海 Prospects of Flavor Physics at the LHC 高原宁 清华大学高能物理研究中心 2010/8/61Y. Gao, Prospects of flavor physics at the LHC.
SuperB The Super B Flavor Factory project Guy Wormser LAL Orsay INSTR08 conference February 29, 2008 
David Hitlin Fermilab Nov. 19, Searching for New Physics at Super B, The Super Flavor Factory David Hitlin Fermilab Colloquium November 19, 2008.
Future Accelerators at the High Energy Frontier
First of all, a very big “thank you” to Misha Danilov for thinking of this idea and bringing us here to share in these two days, and allowing us all to.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
BaBar physics, recent highlights and future prospects Owen Long, BaBar physics analysis coordinator U. C. Riverside & SLAC December 5, 2008.
Charm Physics at Super B Factories after BESIII, Belle and B A B AR David Hitlin The Future of Heavy Flavor Physics ITEP, Moscow July 24, 2006.
Guy Wormser, SuperB workshop, 25 July 2006 Super B Factory workshop Round Table Guy Wormser LAL Orsay.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central Injector complex.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
Status of the SuperB Project A major new European particle physics project Fergus Wilson, RAL/STFC On behalf of the SuperB Project Beauty 2011, April 8.
New Ideas for Super B Factories for Flavour Physics Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh, Future Directions, BEACH 2006 Lancaster, July 2006.
Yingchuan Li Electroweak physics at EIC Brookhaven National Lab Feb. 3rd 2011, BNL.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
David Hitlin Discrete 08 Dec. 13, Status of the Super Flavor Factory Super B David Hitlin Discrete 08 Valencia December 13, 2008.
Flavour Physics Speaker: Andreas Hoecker Convener: Ewa Rondio Sc.Secretary: Ulrik Egede Orsay, 31’th January 2006.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
2 nd workshop on SuperB 16.03,2006 LNF Marcello A Giorgi1 Marcello A. Giorgi Università di Pisa and INFN Pisa Status of the art 2nd Workshop on SuperB.
Glion Colloquium / June Accelerating Science and Innovation R.-D. Heuer, CERN HL-LHC, Aix-les-Bains, 1 Oct ECFA HL-LHC Experiments Workshop.
SuperB Adrian Bevan Recontres de Moriond XLIV, La Thuile, Italy 7-14 th March 2009.
2 nd workshop on SuperB 17.03,2006 LNF Marcello A Giorgi1 Marcello A. Giorgi Università di Pisa and INFN Pisa Closeout Remarks 2nd Workshop on SuperB FRASCATI.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
Super B Factories December 15, 2006 CKM Masa Yamauchi KEK.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Future Colliders Gordon Watts University of Washington/Seattle APS NW Meeting May 12-14, 2016.
The SuperB Project A major new particle physics centre Fergus Wilson, RAL/STFC On behalf of the SuperB Project STORI 2011, October 11 th 2011.
Physics activities toward the TDR will be coordinated by A. Bevan, D. Brown, M. Ciuchini and A. Stocchi A document, also in Italian is needed by the end.
Photon-Photon Colliders ( Photon-Photon Colliders (  C) Mayda M. Velasco.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Goals and organisation of the Warwick workshop Achille Stocchi LAL -Universite Paris Sud/IN2P3 Workshop on New Physics with SuperB 14th-17th April 2009.
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
Input to Strategy currently planned
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
SuperB Physics Elba 2011.
Super B Physics Opportunities
Super-KEKB Collaboration
Accelerator Systems Division
Status of Project Guy Wormser LAL Orsay Tsukuba, March 24,
Searching for SUSY in B Decays
New Physics from B decays
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK/Sokendai) October 18, 2007
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) FPCP 2004, Deagu, Korea October 7, 2004
Summary of Washington DOE Review
The Physics of SuperB - Experimental
SuperKEKB Proto-collaboration
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Organisation of the Physics activity toward the TDR
Presentation transcript:

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Super B The Super Flavor Factory David Hitlin DOE Annual Review of Caltech July 10, 2008

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Super B – the Super Flavor Factory  The Caltech group led the way in recognizing the importance of continuing flavor studies in e + e - substantially beyond the level achievable at B A B AR and Belle  The crucial role that flavor physics will play in understanding New Physics found at the LHC is becoming ever more clear to the community  Sensitivity to New Physics at scales accessible to the LHC requires ab -1 ⇒ luminosity of  Achieving this luminosity with reasonable power consumption and currents low enough to make the detector background problem tractable is not an easy problem  With SLAC and then Frascati colleagues, several approaches were tried  Scale up PEP-II in the existing tunnel– more bunches, more current  Revisit old idea of colliding linacs with high disruption- not attractive  Use very low emittance rings, like the ILC damping rings, but collide at an angle with a new final focus scheme – the crabbed waist  Several workshops have been held to investigate the physics capabilities of a Super Flavor Factory  Efforts are now centered on Super B, an international project hosted by INFN in Italy

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Primary physics objectives of a Super Flavor Factory  Perform measurements in the flavor sector such that:  If new particles are discovered at LHC we are able to study the flavor structure of the New Physics  If the New Physics scale is beyond the reach of the LHC, explore the New Physics scale More specifically  Is there charged lepton flavour violation (LFV) ?  Are there new CP -violating phases in b,c or  decay ?  Are there new right-handed currents ?  Are there new loop contributions to flavor-changing neutral currents  Are there new Higgs fields ?  Is there new flavor symmetry that elucidates the CKM hierarchy ?  We must also understand the requirements for a detector that can address these questions in a asymmetric e + e - environment ?

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Prospects for a Super Flavor Factory  The recent P5 report recommends, in Scenario B and above, US participation in an overseas Super B factory  There are two proposals on the market  SuperKEKB, an upgrade of KEKB, with an initial luminosity of 1-2 x and an upgrade path to 4-8 x by 2027, using 83 MW  Super B, a new low emittance collider, with an initial luminosity of using 17 MW, and an upgrade path to 4 x 10 36, to be built at Rome II University “Tor Vergata”, using many PEP-II components  This talk will concern Super B 320 signers 80 institutions INFN has now made a formal request to SLAC for PEP-II and B A B AR Components

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Super B One Pager  Super B is a Super Flavor Factory with very high initial luminosity, 10 36, which can be upgraded to 4x10 36 in a straightforward manner  It is asymmetric : 4 on 7 GeV  Most of the ring magnets can be reused from PEP-II, as can the RF systems, many vacuum components, linac and injection components – as well as B A B AR as the basis for an upgraded detector – the net in-kind value is $270M  The high energy beam can be linearly polarized to ~85%, using the SLC laser gun  This is particularly important for confronting New Physics in  decays  The primary E CM will be the  (4S), but Super B can run elsewhere in the  region, and in the charm &tau threshold regions as well, with a luminosity above  One month at the  (3770), for example, yields 10x the total data sample that will be produced by BEPCII  Super B will be built on the campus of the Rome II University at Tor Vergata  There is an FEL already in early stages of construction on the site  Tunneling will continue to dig the Super B tunnel, funded by Regione Lazio  Time scales  (Successful) conclusion of the European Roadmap process (INFN, ECFA, CERN Strategy Group) by the end of 2008, followed by INFN  Ministry  TDR effort is beginning: construction 5 years : luminosity in

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, INFN International Review Committee Report Members: H. Aihara, J.B. Dainton (chair), R. Heuer (to Nov 07), Y. K. Kim, J. Lefrançois, A. Masiero, S. Myers (for April 08), T. Nakada (RECFA from April 08), D. Schulte, A. Seiden Conclusions ● Strongly recommend continuation of work for cm -2 s -1 asymmetric e + e - collider ● Even more concerted effort to fully evaluate physics potential ↔ machine specifications ● Major design program to establish credibility of machine now critical ← showstoppers ? ● Machine Advisory Committee (MAC) now essential ● Preservation of detector and PEP2 components ● Increasing global involvement if timescale for a TDR is to be met

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10,

8 SuperB Experimental Hall & Transfer Line - +

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Super B arameters Beam-beam transparency conditions in red SuperKEKB (0.4) | | (24) IP beam distributions for KEKB IP beam distributions for SuperB (without transparency conditions)

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Crabbed waist beam distribution at the IP Crab sextupoles OFF Crab sextupoles ON waist is orthogonal to the axis of bunch waist moves to the axis of other beam All particles from both beams collide in the minimum  y region, with a net luminosity gain E. Paoloni

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Charm FCNC Charm mixing and CPV B Physics:  (4S)  Physics B s Physics:  (5S)

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, polarized e- beam: reduced background Very important order of magnitude  Complimentarity with    e  A Super Flavor Factory is also a  factory Lepton Flavor Violation

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, LFV in t decays: Super B capability Super B sensitivity directly confronts many New Physics models BABAR Super B sensitivity For 75 ab -1 We expect to see LFV events, not just improve limits

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Why do we need a very large sample ~75ab -1 ? Im (  13 ) LL Re (  13 ) LL SM Example: CPV in loop B decays Determination of coupling [in this case : (  13 ) LL ] with 10 ab -1 and 75 ab -1

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Caltech’s role in Super B and US the collaboration  We are clearly to engine behind US SuperB activities  Member of Steering Committee  Leading and actively working in the R&D group on EMC upgrade for the revised B A B AR detector  Contributing to development of Monte Carlo and reconstruction software to optimize the EMC in particular, and the overall detector  Working towards formation of a US contingent of the Super B Collaboration  Expect US collaborators  A meeting to inform potential US participants is scheduled for July 25  The proto-Collaboration has already produced an impressive CDR  The group is now entering the TDR phase  For the US to be well-positioned as TDR responsibilities are worked out over the next year or so, some actual resources will soon be needed  INFN is beginning to provide R&D funding for Italian groups  On the appropriate time scale and in the appropriate way, the US groups need support of this kind

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Ren-yuan Zhu, with ADR funds, has been for several years, working on the development of LYSO crystals for HEP Very attractive for the Super B endcap EMC and the CMS upgrade

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, x5 Projective LYSO array with CsI(Tl) surround A 7x7 array is best, but it can be approximated by a 5x5 array surrounded by CsI(Tl) to catch the outer few percent of shower CMS APD readout module 5mmx5mm APD (10x10mm APDs are now available) 16 spare BABAR CsI(Tl) crystals may be available

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10,  High statistics flavor physics (50-75 ab -1 ) at an e + e - collider will likely provide information crucial to the understanding of new physics found at LHC  Super B, with an initial luminosity of cm -2 s -1 can provide such a sample in the canonical five years  The achievable levels of sensitivity in rare b, c and t decays allow substantial coverage in the parameter space of new physics  Super B presents a strong physics opportunity for the US community  US participation in Super B would leverage $270M of PEP-II and B A B AR components through an in-kind contribution  New funding of $10-20M/year over the TDR and construction period would also be needed to allow US participation in design and construction of the collider and detector upgrade  Such participation in encouraged by P5 in Scenario B and above  We are working towards a turn-on date of 2015/16  The Caltech group will, as it did in PEP-II and B A B AR, play a central role in Super B, should it go forward  We propose to begin by transitioning from the current intense analysis phase of B A B AR into the TDR phase of Super B Conclusions

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10,

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10,

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10,

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10,

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, From the SuperKEKB web page

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Q&A  Is there a motivation to continue e + e - flavor physics studies with a Super B factory beyond the B A B AR /Belle/(LHC b ) era ?  Yes – provided that new measurements have sensitivity to New Physics in b, c and  decay  What size data sample is required to provide this sensitivity ?  ab -1 ( B A B AR +Belle total sample is <2 ab -1 )  What luminosity is required to gather a sample of this size in five years ?  At least cm -2 s -1  Can an asymmetric collider with this luminosity be built ?  Yes, using an innovative new approach: a low emittance collider, based on concepts developed for the ILC damping rings, and employing a new type of final focus – a “crabbed waist”. The machine is called Super B  Can a detector be built that can withstand the machine backgrounds ?  Yes. The beam currents are less than those at PEP-II and KEKB  In this era of increasing energy prices, can you pay the power bill ?  Yes. The wallplug power, 17MW, is less than half that of KEKB (40mw)

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, SuperB + Lattice improvements Interplay between metrology and New Physics sensitivity Today  = ±  = ±  = ±  = 0.344± Improving the precision of Unitarity Triangle measurements, along with reducing theoretical uncertainties, can provide evidence for New Physics

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, CMSSM :   e  vanishes at all SPS points MVF-NP extensions :   e  vanishes as s 13  0    is independent of s 13 LFV 2 5  disc B B

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, B (     M 1/2 SuperB SO(10) MSSM LFV from PMNS LFV from CKM Beyond MFV SUSY GUT now Super B Recent work : J.K.Parry, H.-H. Zhang hep-ph/ Allowed by  m s From B s phase now Super B

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Flipping the helicity of the polarized electron beam allows us to determine the chiral structure of dimension 6 four fermion lepton flavor-violating interactions Polarized t ’s can probe the chiral structure of LFV Dassinger, Feldmann, Mannel, and Turczyk JHEP 0710:039,2007; [See also Matsuzaki and Sanda arXiv: [hep-ph]

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, SPS4 is ruled out by exp value of B (B  s  ) SPS1a is the least favorable for flavor effects, but Super B and only Super B can observe 2  deviations in several observables Minimal Flavor Violation : SNOWMASS points

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Many channels can show effects in the range  S~( ) New Physics in CPV: sin2  from “s Penguins”… SuperB (*) theory limited dd s b W-W- B0dB0d t s s  K0K0 g s b b s ~ ~ ~ X

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10,  is measured with a significance >3  away from zero Arg(  23 ) LR =(44.5± 2.6) o = (0.026 ± 0.005) 1 10 g s b b s ~ ~ ~ New Physics contribution (2-3 transitions) MSSM + generic soft SUSY breaking terms Flavor-changing NP effects in the squark propagator  NP scale SUSY mass  flavor-violating coupling X

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, Exhibit B: SM Branching fractions: Current  10ab -1  75ab -1 Actual limit

David Hitlin DOE Annual Review July 10, CP Violation in charm NOW Super B