Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Pseudo-Dynamic Rupture Model Generator for Earthquakes on Geometrically Complex Faults Daniel Trugman, July 2013.
Advertisements

Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Earthquakes and Fractures.
1 – Stress contributions 2 – Probabilistic approach 3 – Deformation transients Small earthquakes contribute as much as large earthquakes do to stress changes.
Earthquake swarms Ge 277, 2012 Thomas Ader. Outline Presentation of swarms Analysis of the 2000 swarm in Vogtland/NW Bohemia: Indications for a successively.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Extreme Earthquakes: Thoughts on Statistics and Physics Max Werner 29 April 2008 Extremes Meeting Lausanne.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , EARTHQUAKE.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , EARTHQUAKE PREDICTABILITY.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Testing.
Simplified algorithms for calculating double-couple rotation Yan Y. Kagan Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles.
Earthquake spatial distribution: the correlation dimension (AGU2006 Fall, NG43B-1158) Yan Y. Kagan Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of.
Yan Y. Kagan, David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Statistical.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Statistical.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Full.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Statistical.
Epidemic Type Earthquake Sequence (ETES) model  Seismicity rate = "background" + "aftershocks":  Magnitude distribution: uniform G.R. law with b=1 (Fig.
Accelerating Moment Release in Modified Stress Release Models of Regional Seismicity Steven C. Jaume´, Department of Geology, College of Charleston, Charleston,
Earthquake predictability measurement: information score and error diagram Yan Y. Kagan Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California.
Yan Y. Kagan, David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Yan Y. Kagan, David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Forecast.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Global.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Rules of the Western.
New Earthquake Catalogs For Southern California And Their Use In Earthquake Forecasting Yan Y. Kagan, David D. Jackson and Yufang Rong, University of California,
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Statistical.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Earthquake.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , STATISTICAL.
Statistics of Seismicity and Uncertainties in Earthquake Catalogs Forecasting Based on Data Assimilation Maximilian J. Werner Swiss Seismological Service.
Patterns of significant seismic quiescence in the Pacific Mexican coast A. Muñoz-Diosdado, A. H. Rudolf-Navarro, A. Barrera-Ferrer, F. Angulo-Brown National.
Stability and accuracy of the EM methodology In general, the EM methodology yields results which are extremely close to the parameter estimates of a direct.
The Evolution of Regional Seismicity Between Large Earthquakes David D. Bowman California State University, Fullerton Geoffrey C. P. King Institut de Physique.
FULL EARTH HIGH-RESOLUTION EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS Yan Y. Kagan and David D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
Using IRIS and other seismic data resources in the classroom John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Tohoku.
Exploring the underlying mechanism of LURR theory Can Yin Supervisor: Prof. Peter Mora QUAKES, Department of Earth Sciences University of Queensland.
Characteristic earthquake model, 1884 – 2011, R.I.P. Y.Y. Kagan, D.D. Jackson, and R.J. Geller ESS/UCLA and University of Tokyo Abstract Unfortunately,
Random stress and Omori's law Yan Y. Kagan Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Abstract We consider two statistical.
Yan Y. Kagan & David D. Jackson Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Coulomb Stress Changes and the Triggering of Earthquakes
TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE: A SURPRISE? Yan Y. Kagan and David D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Abstract.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Evaluation.
2. MOTIVATION The distribution of interevent times of aftershocks suggests that they obey a Self Organized process (Bak et al, 2002). Numerical models.
GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS Yan Y. Kagan and David D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Abstract We.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Earthquake size distribution: power-law with exponent ? Yan Y. Kagan Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Abstract.
The influence of the geometry of the San Andreas fault system on earthquakes in California Qingsong Li and Mian Liu Geological Sciences, 101 Geol. Bldg.,
Does the Scaling of Strain Energy Release with Event Size Control the Temporal Evolution of Seismicity? Steven C. Jaumé Department of Geology And Environmental.
A proposed triggering/clustering model for the current WGCEP Karen Felzer USGS, Pasadena Seismogram from Peng et al., in press.
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
Plate-tectonic analysis of shallow seismicity: Apparent boundary width, beta, corner magnitude, coupled lithosphere thickness, and coupling in 7 tectonic.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , SHORT-TERM PROPERTIES.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , STATISTICAL SEISMOLOGY–
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
SHORT- AND LONG-TERM EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS FOR CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA Kagan, Y. Y. and D. D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of.
GNS Science Testing by hybridization – a practical approach to testing earthquake forecasting models David Rhoades, Annemarie Christophersen & Matt Gerstenberger.
Random stress and Omori's law Yan Y. Kagan Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles Abstract We consider two statistical.
Abstract The space-time epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is a stochastic process in which seismicity is classified into background and clustering.
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA ,
Statistical earthquake forecasts
Global smoothed seismicity models and test results
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , NEGATIVE.
Maximum Earthquake Size for Subduction Zones
Tohoku earthquake: A surprise?
Presentation transcript:

Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION EXPERIMENTS

Earthquake Occurrence – Stochastic Process Multidimensional marked (seismic moment, M) (or tensor-valued) point process in time, space, and 3-D orientation of double-couple focal mechanism -T x R 3 x SO(3). All the marginal distributions are power-law, i.e., they are fractal, heavy-tailed, stable (L-stable) distributions.

NEW STATISTICS – STABLE DISTRIBUTIONS Statistics development over last two centuries has been dominated by the Gaussian distribution – a special case of stable laws. Other stable distributions have completely different properties: mean, standard deviation, coefficient of correlation either does not exist or behaves erratically. The stable distributions theory started to be developed only 20 years ago and there are not enough statisticians who sufficiently know it. Zaliapin, Kagan, Schoenberg, PAGEOPH, 162, 2005.

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, GROUP THEORY Earthquake focal mechanisms sometimes undergo large random 3-D rotations. To describe a set of focal mechanisms we need to have a statistical theory of 3- D rotations. The group SO(3) is non-commutative (the sum of two rotations depends on its order), its theory is very complicated. We need to involve mathematicians to develop methods appropriate to handling random rotations and random tensors. See more in

Earthquake size distribution Tapered Gutenberg-Richter distribution of scalar seismic moment, survival function Moment threshold Exponent, similar to b-value Corner moment

Bird and Kagan, BSSA, 94(6), , 2004.

Review of results on spectral slope,  Although there are variations, none is significant with 95%-confidence. Kagan’s [1999] hypothesis of uniform  still stands.

Moment rate vs. tectonic rate By integrating the distribution of seismic moment we obtain relation between seismic moment rate, seismic activity rate, beta, and corner moment: Kagan, GJI, 149, , 2002; Bird and Kagan, BSSA, 94(6), , 2004; Boettcher & Jordan, JGR, 109(B12), B12302,

Relation between moment sums and tectonic deformation 1.Now that we know the coupled thickness of seismogenic lithosphere in each tectonic setting, we can convert surface velocity gradients to seismic moment rates. 2.Now that we know the frequency/magnitude distribution in each tectonic setting, we can convert seismic moment rates to earthquake rate densities at any desired magnitude. Kinematic Model Moment Rates Long-term-average (Poissonian) seismicity maps

De Mare, J., Optimal prediction of catastrophes with applications to Gaussian processes, Ann. Probability, 8, , Molchan, G. M., and Y. Y. Kagan, Earthquake prediction and its optimization, J. Geophys. Res., 97,

Earthquake Probability Forecasting The fractal dimension of earthquake process is lower than the embedding dimension: Time – 0.5 in 1D Space – 2.2 in 3D Focal mechanisms – Cauchy distribution This allows us to forecast probability of earthquake occurrence – specify regions of high probability, use temporal clustering for evaluating possibility of new event and predict its focal mechanism.

(b) Point process branching along magnitude axis, introduced by Kagan (1973a;b) (a) Earthquake catalog data (c) Point process branching along time axis (Hawkes, 1971; Kagan & Knopoff, 1987; Ogata, 1988) Phenomenological models:

Long-term forecast: 1977-today Spatial smoothing kernel is optimized by using the first, temporal, part of a catalog to forecast its second part.

Time history of long-term and hybrid (short-term plus 0.8 * long-term) forecast for a point at latitude N., E. northwest of Honshu Island, Japan. Blue line is the long- term forecast; red line is the hybrid forecast.

Short-term forecast uses Omori's law to extrapolate present seismicity. Red spot north of Kamchatka is a recent (2006/4/20) M7.6 earthquake

Kagan, Y. Y., D. D. Jackson, and Y. F. Rong, A testable five-year forecast of moderate and large earthquakes in southern California based on smoothed seismicity, Seism. Res. Lett., submitted.

Helmstetter, A., Y. Y. Kagan, and D. D. Jackson, Comparison of short-term and time-independent earthquake forecast models for southern California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 96(1),

Here we demonstrate forecast effectiveness: displayed earthquakes occurred after smoothed seismicity forecast was calculated.

Forecast Efficiency Evaluation We simulate synthetic catalogs using smoothed seismicity map. Likelihood function for simulated catalogs and for real earthquakes in the time period of forecast is computed. If the `real earthquakes’ likelihood value is within 2.5— 97.5% of synthetic distribution, the forecast is considered successful. Kagan, Y. Y., and D. D. Jackson, Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes, (Leon Knopoff's Festschrift), Geophys. J. Int., 143,

Molchan, G. M., and Y. Y. Kagan, Earthquake prediction and its optimization, J. Geophys. Res., 97,

Kossobokov, Testing earthquake prediction methods: ``The West Pacific short-term forecast of earthquakes with magnitude MwHRV \ge 5.8", Tectonophysics, 413(1-2), See also Kagan & Jackson, Tectonophysics, pp

Likelihood ratio – information/eq We approximate earthquake occurrence by Poisson cluster process and calculate the earthquake rate. Likelihood function is

Likelihood ratio – information/eq Similarly we obtain likelihood function for the null hypothesis model (Poisson process in time). Information content of a catalog : characterizes uncertainty reduction by use of a particular model. Kagan and Knopoff, PEPI, 1977; Kagan, GJI, 1991; Kagan and Jackson, GJI, 2000; Helmstetter, Kagan and Jackson, BSSA, 2006 (bits/earthquake)

Likelihood ratio – information/eq Because of power-law dependence of earthquake rate on time (Omori ’ s law), the likelihood function (l) approaches infinity when the prediction horizon is close to zero (i.e., for real-time earthquake prediction). Similarly, when spatial resolution of earthquake data increases, (l) again goes to infinity. Molchan diagram also approaches the ideal state for the prediction horizon close to zero, or if the location accuracy significantly increases..

Kagan, Y. Y., and H. Houston, Relation between mainshock rupture process and Omori's law for aftershock moment release rate, Geophys. J. Int., 163(3),

Branching Model for Dislocations (Kagan and Knopoff, JGR,1981; Kagan, GJRAS, 1982) Predates use of self-exciting, ETAS models which also have branching structure. A more complex model, exists on a more fundamental level. Continuum-state critical branching random walk in T x R 3 x SO(3).

Simulated source-time functions and seismograms for shallow earthquake sources. The upper trace is a synthetic source-time function. The middle plot is a theoretical seismogram, and the lower trace is a convolution of the derivative of source-time function with the theoretical seismogram. Kagan, Y. Y., and Knopoff, L., Stochastic synthesis of earthquake catalogs, J. Geophys. Res., 86,

Snapshots of fault propagation (intersection with a plane). Rotation of focal mechanisms is modeled by the Cauchy distribution. Integers in the frames # indicate the numbers of elementary events to which these frames correspond. Frames show the development of an earthquake sequence.

Kagan, Y. Y., and Knopoff, L., A stochastic model of earthquake occurrence, Proc. 8-th Int. Conf. Earthq. Eng., 1,

Conclusions Using universality of the distribution of earthquake size (seismic moment) we quantitatively describe plate tectonic deformation end evaluate long-term earthquake rate. Time-independent seismic hazard is evaluated by optimized smoothing of past seismicity.

Conclusions Temporal earthquake occurrence is modeled and forecasted by a multidimensional branching process. Finally, kinematic continuum-state critical branching process can be used to generate whole earthquake rupture process and obtain a randomized set of seismograms – extrapolation of the process.

End Thank you

Probabilistic vs. alarm forecasts A modern scientific earthquake forecast should be quantitatively probabilistic. In 1654 Pierre de Fermat and Blaise Pascal exchanged letters in which they founded the quantitative probability theory. Now more than 350 years later, any earthquake forecast without direct use of probability has a medieval flavor. This is perhaps the reason the general public and media are so attracted to yes/no forecasts. No probability – no prediction