US CMS Silicon Tracker : Overview J. Incandela University of California Santa Barbara US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Manager Fermilab PMG April 9, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
Advertisements

US CMS Silicon Tracker Project – Breakout session Overview - DOE/NSF Review Brookhaven - May 20, Incandela 1 CMS Si Tracker: Breakout Session Dept.
MEG Review at Brookhaven, Feb 5, 2004 : CMS Si Tracker Project: J. Incandela 1 US CMS Silicon Tracker US LHC Detector Maintenance and Operations Evaluation.
TEC Production in the US N. Bacchetta, J. Incandela,…and October 14, 2003.
Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – April 20, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara Dean White.
US Tracker Production Meeting, March 8, 2005 J. Incandela 1 Slides for the US Si Tracker Weekly Production Meeting J. Incandela March 8, 2005.
MEG Review at BNL, Jan. 18, 2006 : CMS Si Tracker Project: J. Incandela 1 US CMS Silicon Tracker US LHC Detector Maintenance and Operations Evaluation.
Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – July 20, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara UCSB Gantry Team: Andrea Allen Dave.
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 1 Slides for the US Si Tracker Institutional Group Leaders Meeting J. Incandela March.
US Production Report - September 4, Incandela 1 US Production Report CMS Tracker Steering Committee 4 September 2003 J. Incandela University of.
DOE REVIEW 1/20/04 – Dean White 1 Gantry Module Assembly TOB & TEC Dean White University of California, Santa Barbara.
US CMS Silicon Tracker : Schedule J. Incandela University of California Santa Barbara US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Manager Fermilab PMG April 9, 2004.
DOE/NSF Review, BNL, May 20, Incandela1 CMS Tracker: Cost, Schedule, Planning and M&O Joe Incandela, University of California Santa Barbara US CMS.
Slide 1CMS Database Issues-Derek BargeDOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database Issues Derek Barge.
The LHCb Inner Tracker Marc-Olivier Bettler SPS annual meeting Zürich 21 February 2007.
US CMS Silicon Tracker – PAC Meeting – FNAL - Nov 3, Incandela 1 US CMS Tracker Outer Barrel (TOB) Silicon Project Joe Incandela Fermilab Level.
MEG Review at FNAL, Jan. 28, 2005 : CMS Si Tracker Project: J. Incandela 1 US CMS Silicon Tracker US LHC Detector Maintenance and Operations Evaluation.
UCSB CDF Group, DOE Site visit, Jan 18, J. Incandela 1 Top Physics at CDF ++ Top Quark and New Physics with an eye toward the LHC Work completed.
4/25/2006 Puneeth Kalavase, UC, Santa Barbara On behalf of US Tracker Outer Barrel group Construction and Testing of CMS “Rods”
US Module Production Status Joe Incandela University of California Santa Barbara for the US CMS Silicon Tracker Group CERN Tracker Week July 2004.
US Module and Rod Production Overview and Plan For the US CMS Tracker Group.
CMS at UCSB Prof. J. Incandela US CMS Tracker Project Leader DOE Visit January 20, 2004.
US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Joe Incandela University of California Santa Barbara Status and schedule CMS Weekly Meeting Fermilab May 14, 2004.
Schedule & Plans Prof. J. Incandela US CMS Tracker Project Leader DOE Visit January 20, 2004.
US Module Production Prof. J. Incandela US CMS Tracker Project Leader For the US CMS Tracker Group Tracker Meetings - CERN Feb. 13, 2004.
US Tracker Group Status Sep. 1, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.
Slide 1Rod Production presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)April 9, 2004 Rod Production Rod Production, April , presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)
CMS Week – UCSB Gantry Status – June 8, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara UCSB Gantry Team: Andrea Allen Dave Staszak.
US CMS Silicon Electronics Testing – CMS Lehman Review - May 21, Affolder1 US CMS Silicon Electronics Testing US CMS Lehman Review BNL 5/21/03 A.
UCSB CMS Group, DOE Site visit, Jan 18, 2005 J. Incandela 1 UCSB in CMS.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 US Module Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group) Update.
US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Joe Incandela University of California Santa Barbara US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Manager DOE/NSF Review of CMS Detector.
Status of TOB Modules & Rods J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracking Group Tracker Week, Feb
Slide 1 Electrical Testing at UCSB -Anthony AffolderDOE review, January 18, 2005 Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids & Modules Anthony Affolder On behalf.
US Module Production June 2, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.
US Tracker Project – CERN - July 17, Incandela 1 US Production Readiness CMS Tracker Week 17/06/03 CERN J. Incandela University of California Santa.
H.J.Simonis, CMS Collaboration, Novosibirsk Feb.08 Status of the Silicon Strip Detector at CMS INSTR08 Novosibirsk, Feb08 Hans Jürgen Simonis Universität.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
Performance of ATLAS & CMS Silicon Tracker Alessia Tricomi University and INFN Catania International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics EPS.
March 20, 2001M. Garcia-Sciveres - US ATLAS DOE/NSF Review1 M. Garcia-Sciveres LBNL & Module Assembly & Module Assembly WBS Hybrids Hybrids WBS.
1 TEC pilot run status Goal : test TEC module production rate capabilities - 15 R6 modules assembled on Brussels Gantry and bonded in Aachen I - 15 R7.
Silicon Inner Layer Sensor PRR, 8 August G. Ginther Update on the D0 Run IIb Silicon Upgrade for the Inner Layer Sensor PRR 8 August 03 George Ginther.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Regina Demina KSU Florida State University May 11, 2002.
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
DOE Rev of Run IIb Sep 24-26, Detector Production WBS James Fast Fermilab.
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
U. Of Rochester DOE Review, July 15-16, 2002: P. de Barbaro, CMS1 CMS Project at UR Pawel de Barbaro University of Rochester DoE Review July 15-16, 2002.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
CMS Si Tracker Project - US CMS Meeting at Riverside – May 19, US CMS Tracker Outer Barrel (TOB) Silicon Project Tim Bolton (for Regina Demina)
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
Vertex ‘99, 6/21-25/1999 p. 1 CDF Run II SiliconAlan Sill, Texas Tech University CDF Run II Silicon Tracking Projects 8th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON VERTEX.
Rev of Run IIb, Nov 4-8, 2002, A. Bean 1 Silicon Management  Organization and Management  Schedule  Resources  Conclusions Alice Bean Univ. of Kansas.
The CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Carlo Civinini INFN-Firenze On behalf of the CMS Tracker Collaboration Sixth International "Hiroshima" Symposium on the Development.
Commissioning and performance of the CMS silicon microstrip detector
FNAL Production Experience
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
Silicon Strip Tracker MPR November 2004 CMS TRACKER COLLABORATION
US Module Production Status
Results from module testing
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
US Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group)
Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids, Modules, & Rods
Performance of ATLAS & CMS Silicon Tracker
TOB Module Production Overview and Plan
Current Necessary for CMN Problem
Presentation transcript:

US CMS Silicon Tracker : Overview J. Incandela University of California Santa Barbara US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Manager Fermilab PMG April 9, 2004

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 2 Squarks and Gluinos SUSY could be discovered in one good month of operation … The figure shows the q, g mass reach for various luminosities in the inclusive E T + jets channel. ~ ~

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 3 Gluino reconstruction M. Chiorboli ~ p p b b - l  l  l ~ Event final state:  2 high p t isolated leptons OS  2 high p t b jets missing E t ~ bb g pp   0 1 ~ (26 %) (35 %) (0.2 %)    llll ~ ~ (60 %)  ll

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 4 Tracking Efficient & robust Fine granularity to resolve nearby tracks Fast response time to resolve bunch crossings Radiation resistant devices Reconstruct high P T tracks and jets ~1-2% P T resolution at ~ 100 GeV Tag b jets Asymptotic impact parameter  d ~ 20  m

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 5 Silicon Strips 6 layers of 500  m sensors high resistivity, p-on-n 4 layers of 320  m sensors low resistivity, p-on-n Blue = double sided Red = single sided 9+3 disks per end Strip lengths range from 10 cm in the inner layers to 20 cm in the outer layers. Strip pitches range from 80  m in the inner layers to near 200  m in the outer layers

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 6 Some Tracker Numbers 6,136 Thin wafers 320 μm 19,632 Thick wafers 500 μm 6,136 Thin detectors (1 sensor) 9,816 Thick detectors (2 sensors) Thin modules (ss +ds) Thick modules (ss +ds) 10,016,768 individual strips and readout electronics channels 78,256 APV chips ~26,000,000 Bonds 470 m 2 of silicon wafers 223 m 2 of silicon sensors (thick = 175 m 2 + thin= 48 m 2 ) FE hybrid with FE ASICS Pitch adapter Silicon sensors CF frame

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 7 Our Responsibility 5.4 m 2.4 m Outer Barrel (TOB) ~105 m 2 NEW:End Caps (TEC) 50% Modules for Rings 5 and 6 and hybrid processing for Rings 2,5,6

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 8 Efficiency, Purity, Resolution

ROD INTEGRATION AachenKarlsruheStrasbourgZurichWien PETALS INTEGRATION Aachen Brussels Karlsruhe Louvain LyonStrasbourg Brussels Wien Lyon TECassembly TECassembly CERN Frames: Brussels Sensors: factories Hybrids: Strasbourg Pitch adapter: Brussels Hybrid: CF carrier TK ASSEMBLY At CERN Louvain Strasbourg Pisa PerugiaWien BariPerugia BariFirenzeTorinoPisaPadova TIB-TID INTEGRATION FNAL UCSB TOBassembly TIB-IDassembly At CERN PisaAachenKarlsruhe.--> Lyon Karlsruhe Pisa Sensor QAC Module assembly Bonding & testing Sub-assemblies FNAL US in the tracker Integration into mechanics KSU US carries roughly half of the total production load FNAL UCSB

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 10 Outer Barrel Production Outer Barrel Modules 4128 Axial (Installed) 1080 Stereo (“ “) Rods 508 Single-sided (“ “) 180 Double-sided (“ “) US Tasks All hybrid bonding & test All Module assembly & test All Rod assembly & test Joint Responsibilities with CERN Installation & Commissioning Maintenance and Operation ~20 cm Modules Built & Tested in US

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 11 Rods & Wheels 0.9 m 1.2 m

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 12 End Cap Construction Central European Consortium requested US help With consent of US CMS and DOE, we agreed to produce up to 2000 R5 and R6 modules After 10 weeks UCSB successfully built the R6 module seen above. We’re nearly ready to go on R5 First TEC Module Built at UCSB

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 13 The Group Fermilab (FNAL) M. Demarteau, A. Ronzhin, K. Sogut, L. Spiegel, S. Tkaczyk + technicians Kansas State University (KSU) T.Bolton, W.Kahl, R.Sidwell, N.Stanton University of California, Riverside (UCR) Gail Hanson, Gabriella Pasztor, Patrick Gartung University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) A. Affolder, S. Burke, C.Campagnari, D. Hale, (C. Hill), J.Incandela, S. Kyre, J. Lamb, S. Stromberg, (D. Stuart), R. Taylor, D. White + techs. University of Illinois, Chicago (UIC) E. Chabalina, C. Gerber, T. Ten University of Kansas (KU) P. Baringer, A. Bean, L. Christofek, X. Zhao University of Rochester (UR) R.Demina, R. Eusebi, E. Halkiadakis, A. Hocker, S.Korjenevski, P. Tipton Mexico:3 institutes led by Cinvestav Cuidad de Mexico Brown is also planning to join

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 14 Recap of this past year Problems continued to plague components US contributions have been critical US played major role in finding and fixing a series of flaws In some cases these problems would have been fatal Problems for module components have been addressed (see talks by R. Demina and E.Chabalina) Frames and hybrids: Yield and rates are high and rising Sensors and US involvement US identified CM Noise problem with STM sensors Advocated shifting order to HPK: Provided funds for procuring the masks Insisted order be placed with HPK by end of February – beyond which we would have delayed HPK deliveries CMS is Re-qualifying STM now Either STM quality reaches HPK standards or remainder of order will be shifted to HPK Upshot: no matter what, we achieve very high delivery rates by July

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 15 Adapting to Delays But these issues have meant that the schedule has slipped again! We have lost 6-8 months in FY04 due to this last round of problems In parallel with our work to resolve component problems We underwent a major upgrade of the US production lines in order to achieve significantly higher production capacity to allow us to recover lost schedule time. New and better methods More and better tooling and hardware Better software and Quality Control Both FNAL and UCSB production lines have demonstrated more than 100% increases in stable, high quality module production Our production capacity is unprecedented: CDF Run 2 silicon detector = 750k channels: We can produce this many channels in 10 weeks without overtime or extended working weeks. With overtime we could do this in 6 weeks

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 16 Productivity Enhancements (see talks by White and Spiegel) Gantry (robotic) module assembly Redesigned: more robust, flexible, easily maintained Surveying and QA Automated use of independent system (OGP) More efficient, accurate, fail-safe Module Wirebonding Fully automated wirebonding Faster and more reliable bonding Negligible damage or rework Taken together: Major increase in US capabilities Higher quality

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 17 Testing & QA (see talk by E. Chabalina) US has led in many respects US testing macros and test stand configurations now used everywhere Critical contributions Discovered and played lead role in solution of potentially fatal problems! Defective hybrid cables Vibration damage to module wirebonds Common Mode Noise problem - traced it to ST sensors Other Important contributions; Problem of Faulty pipeline cells Led to improved screening Taken together Averted a disaster Resulted in higher quality

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 18 Rod Assembly, Test, Transport ( See talks by P. Tipton and J. Lamb) US contributions Designed and built module installation tools Built single rod test stands Designed and built and multi- rod burn-in stands Will lead in the definition of tests and test methods Transportation boxes Production Will build and test ~350 rods (+10% spares) at each site

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 19 Summary CMS is designed to maximize LHC physics The tracker is one of the main strengths of CMS US is making critical contributions We have (unfortunately) proven to be far more essential to the success of the CMS tracker project than anticipated We have uncovered serious problems Huge US effort to help find good solutions as quickly as possible. Module component problems have been solved Sensor issue is dynamic but we have a solution We’ve accumulated more delays!

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 20 Upshot Schedule has slipped and the project has evolved: Increased US capacity from 15 modules per day to > 30 Complete all deliverable modules before the end of FY05 Delivery of parts crucial Rod assembly to keep pace with module assembly Final assembly of the wheels at CERN slipping into FY06. The costs of an unexpectedly prolonged module and rod production period are being partially offset by use of funds originally allocated for I&C in FY04-05 Parts are the issue

UCSB CMS Silicon Tracker PMG April 9, 2004, J. Incandela - Overview 21 Schedule of Presentations 1:00 pmProject Overview J. Incandela (UCSB) 1:15 pmFermilab Production Line L. Spiegel (FNAL) 1:35 pmUCSB Production Line D. White (UCSB) video 1:55 pmResults from Module Testing E. Chabalina (UIC) 2:20 pmModule Components R. Demina (U. Rochester) 2:50 pmCoffee Break 3:00 pmRods J. Lamb (UCSB) video 3:20 pmLong-term testing and transportation of rods P. Tipton (U. Rochester) video 3:40 pmScheduleJ. Incandela (UCSB) 4:00 pmExecutive SessionE. Temple 4:40 pmCloseout 5:00 pmAdjourn