Origins SERVQUAL IS SERVQUAL LibQual+. Theoretical Model Define services from the end user point of view Understand that end user expectations are shifting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

Information Technology Environmental Scan Information Sources State of Maryland, USM, MHEC IT Plans SU IT Plan,Tech Fluency Policy, and 2001 Tech survey.
IT Issues and Support Structures Simulation Education and Complex Technology Based Practice.
Leaders in Asset Management Managing by Metrics Valerie Rovine Sunflower Systems.
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Measuring Information Literacy from Third Grader to College Senior Carolyn Radcliff, M.L.S., SAILS Project Director Julie Gedeon, Ph.D., TRAILS Assessment.
126th Annual Meeting and Conference December 9, 2011 Discussion of Significant Findings and Aggregate Data Based on the Results of the Endicott College.
Measuring the Perceived Value of your IT Service Marin Stanek Director of Communications & Support A brief overview of TechQual+ Project
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
Technology Plan EDLD 5362 Casey Smith.
Race to the Top Technology and Innovation in Assessments Boston, MA Tony Alpert Oregon Department of Education.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
Developing a System for Web Based Data Dissemination CSO Experience Strategies for Web based Data Dissemination Ghusoon M. Hameed IRAQ.
Linda McCann, Director, Library Services Bucks County Community College, Newtown, PA
The ACCESS Project, Colorado State University Jesse Hausler, Assistive Technology Coordinator Craig Spooner, Project Coordinator The Universally Designed.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
{ Information Technology Services South Puget Sound Community College Joint Administrative Committee - December 2014.
Learning Centers Some Best (Promising?) Practices for Some Best (Promising?) Practices for Learning Support Centers in Higher Education 1.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Introduction IT Department at CEU Contribution to carry out CEU’s mission with appropriate: -Information technology tools and services -Hardware and software.
Name: Abdullah Mohammed Alhatmi ID:86497 Course: Quality &Assurance Name: Abdullah Mohammed Alhatmi ID:86497 Course: Quality &Assurance Start.
5. How to Amass Evidence (Evaluation) of Change and its Effects? How does assessment drive transformative change in the classroom, at the department level,
What DoIT Can Do for You What DoIT Can Do for You Presented By: Christine Lupton, M.S. Manager, Engage Division of Information Technology.
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
TECHNOLOGY AND THE BOND PROGRAM TECHNOLOGY PLAN
+ Navigating Campus Technology Presented by Stephanie Jasmin.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
Arlington Independent School District More Than A Remarkable Education Technology Overview Summer Leadership August 5, 2010.
ITS Communication Plan: Focus Group & Survey Findings Raechelle Clemmons November 25, 2008.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
1:1 Computing Initiative RttT Fidelity Check Spring 2013.
Faculty Information Needs: Online Survey at UCSF Gail Persily Janice Contini CNI, April 2007.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Engaging Student Affairs Professionals in Division-Wide Assessment Lisa Garcia-Hanson,University of Washington Tacoma Charlotte Tullos, Central Washington.
L643: Evaluation of Information Systems Week 11: March 17, 2008.
Mapping the Changing Technological Landscape: Faculty and Student Surveys on Educational Technology Cara Lane, Research Scientist Catalyst Research and.
Copyright Copyright University of Washington This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.
Weatherford ISD Technology Plan 2010 – 2013 Meeting the needs of our Students I am a 15 year old freshman. They say our parents have the biggest gap.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
IT Staff Survey Overview Over 1,300 responses were received. Staff across all faculties and support services were represented. 50 % of respondents.
Dr. Rhonda D. Blackburn Mr. Chris W. Bigenho How To Get Your Faculty Engaged!
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Utah State University Extension Civil Rights Compliance Self-Assessment Tool Dr Dallas L. Holmes Institutional Research 2005 National Diversity Conference.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
February 12, Continue to Develop New Professional Development Activities for Faculty, Classified Staff and Managers. SUB-COMMITTEES:  Teaching.
Improving IT Effectiveness with a Vista-based Training Program July 11, 2007 Beatriz Potter /Jon Sizemore Valdosta State University.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Learning Resource Center Carolyn C. Oakley, Director.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
Measurement, Evaluation, Analysis & Benchmarking Towards a CUCCIO Program Michael Ridley Chief Information Officer (CIO) and Chief Librarian University.
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
Webinar NGSS Earth and Space Science: Needs and a Call to Action April 9, pm Eastern | 3pm Central | 2pm Mountain | 1pm Pacific Dr. Ed Robeck, American.
Information Technology Assessment Findings Presented to the colleges of the State Center Community College District.
TECHNOLOGY MASTER PLAN Our Children, Our Schools, Our Future Technology Master Plan.
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
 Located in Jonesboro, AR  Grades 1-6  58 Staff Members (24 Core-Curriculum classroom teachers)  597 Students.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ ICT Support in International MDPs Tuning International Master’s Programmes Merja Ruuska Planning Officer Information.
Cumberland County College Patti Schmid, Head Librarian Valerie Gouse, Librarian.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
Distance Learning Benchmarking
Presentation transcript:

Origins SERVQUAL IS SERVQUAL LibQual+

Theoretical Model Define services from the end user point of view Understand that end user expectations are shifting dramatically Benchmarks for comparative purposes are possible

TechQual+ Approach

Assessment Questions When it comes to... –“Having adequate capacity (speed, bandwidth) on the wireless network” –My minimum service level is (1-9) –My desired service level is (1-9) –Perceived service performance is (1-9)

Premise Duplicate LibQual+ Success –Develop scientifically valid instrument –Develop web portal to administer instrument Remove the burden of survey research and reporting from end user institutions

Three Questions “What are IT services in higher education?” “What leads an end user to prefer one provider over another?” “How can we assess and measure these services in a general, comparative way?”

Social Scientific Approach Start with qualitative interviews Perform content analysis Develop instrument Conduct field tests Perform standard statistical tests Revise and start the cycle over Three year project

2006 TAMU Instrument Wired, Wireless Networking and Online Access to Resources Helpdesk, Support, Training, and the End User Experience Access, Support for Administrative Systems Campus Website, Web Publishing Tools, and Support Available Computing Hardware and Software Shared Governance, Opportunities for Feedback, and Inclusive Planning

Zones of Tolerance

Wired, Wireless Networking and Online Access to Resources When it comes to... –Having adequate capacity (speed, bandwidth) on the wired network –Having adequate capacity (speed, bandwidth) on the wireless network –Having wireless network coverage that covers all the areas in which I work and learn –Having access to critical campus resources from off-campus (at home, traveling) –Getting the training or support required to best take advantage of computing resources

Helpdesk, Support, Training and the End User Experience When it comes to... –Helpdesk staff who are willing to help and instill confidence in users –Helpdesk staff who are consistently courteous and ready and willing to respond to my request for assistance –Having my request assigned to the person who could best provide me with assistance –Helpdesk staff who really understand the problems I am experiencing –Having my helpdesk request resolved in a satisfactory amount of time

Access, Support for Administrative Systems When it comes to... –Access to the administrative systems that are necessary to be successful in my job –Training and support for my use of College Station-based administrative systems (e.g. FAMIS, SIMS, Library, MyRecord, Neo, etc.) –Having timely access to the information that I need to be successful in my job –Having mechanisms to provide feedback on the direction of College Station-based administrative systems –How easy it is to access and make use of College Station-based administrative systems

Campus Website, Web Publishing Tools, and Support When it comes to... –Having a website that represents the entire campus –Having access to web-based resources that provide up-to-date information that is helpful –Access to tools, training, and support to help me (or my department) engage in web publishing –Having someone available who handles all my (or my department’s) web publishing needs for me –Opportunity to provide feedback on the direction of the campus website

Available Computing Hardware and Software When it comes to... –Having a variety of software packages available that meet my needs –Having the latest and greatest desktop computing (or laptop) equipment available. –Classroom technology that enhances the presentation of my course materials –Getting adequate training and support for my use of classroom (or AV) technology/equipment –Having access to tools (videoconferencing, training, etc.) that help me stay connected to those abroad whom I need to work with

Shared Governance, Opportunities for Feedback, and Inclusive Planning When it comes to... –Opportunities to provide feedback to ITS –Programs, procedures, and processes that align the IT mission with the needs of the institution –Opportunities to participate in processes that drive the allocation of IT resources campus-wide –Dissemination of information regarding technology resources, initiatives, and programs –Participating in a community of end users seeking to make the best use of technology resources

Focus Areas Connectivity, Access End User Experience Administrative Systems, Online Processes Campus Website, Web Publishing Computing Shared Governance & Inclusive Planning Instructional Technology ??????

Plan moving forward Identify collectively what those twelve or thirteen focus areas should be Identify participating coordinator for each focus area, charged with “owning” the focus area and collaborating with everyone to develop the questions Ties, or disagreements will be broken by project directors Chester and Weber –“Are we seeing this from a technologists perspective or an end users perspective?”

Thanks for participating