The comparison of TransCom continuous experimental results at upper troposphere Takashi MAKI, Hidekazu MATSUEDA and TransCom Continuous modelers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AGU Dec 2008 Boundary Layer Ventilation by Convection and Coastal Processes Helen Dacre, Sue Gray, Stephen Belcher.
Advertisements

1 Trend and Year-to-year Variability of Land-Surface Air Temperature and Land-only Precipitation Simulated by the JMA AGCM By Shoji KUSUNOKI, Keiichi MATSUMARU,
Quantification of the sensitivity of NASA CMS-Flux inversions to uncertainty in atmospheric transport Thomas Lauvaux, NASA JPL Martha Butler, Kenneth Davis,
Experiments with Monthly Satellite Ocean Color Fields in a NCEP Operational Ocean Forecast System PI: Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Co-I: David Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC/GCWMB.
Data assimilation for validation of climate modeling systems Pierre Gauthier Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Université du Québec à Montréal.
Yoichi Ishikawa 1, Toshiyuki Awaji 1,2, Teiji In 3, Satoshi Nakada 2, Tsuyoshi Wakamatsu 1, Yoshimasa Hiyoshi 1, Yuji Sasaki 1 1 DrC, JAMSTEC 2 Kyoto University.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
CO 2 in the middle troposphere Chang-Yu Ting 1, Mao-Chang Liang 1, Xun Jiang 2, and Yuk L. Yung 3 ¤ Abstract Measurements of CO 2 in the middle troposphere.
Design and evaluation of the National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) transport model Dmitry Belikov and Shamil Maksyutov National Institute.
Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models Thanks to: GFDL-SKYHI model folks: J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L. Umscheid.. AFES folks: W.
Modelling Atmospheric CO2 Vertical Profiles TRANSCOM PARIS 2005 Christopher Pickett – Heaps  PhD Student (Univ. of Melbourne, AUS)  Supervisor:Dr. Peter.
SENSITIVITY OF OBSERVATIONAL DATA TO TIME DEPENDANT INVERSION Takashi Maki Senior Coordinator for Chemical Transport Modeling Atmospheric Environment Division.
Interannual variability in CO2 fluxes derived from 64-region inversion of atmospheric CO2 data Prabir K. Patra*, Shamil Maksyutov*, Misa Ishizawa*, Takakiyo.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Effect of Turbulence on Cloud Microstructure,
Compatibility of surface and aircraft station networks for inferring carbon fluxes TransCom Meeting, 2005 Nir Krakauer California Institute of Technology.
Prabir K. Patra, Shamil Maksyutov, A. Ito and TransCom-3 modellers Jena; 13 May 2003 An evaluation of an ecosystem model for studying CO2 seasonal cycle.
Upper-Air Inter-Comparison Experiment Update Presented By Philippe Peylin on behalf of Christopher Pickett – Heaps & Peter Rayner.
OBSERVATIONAL DATA SCREENING TECHNIQUE USING TRANSPORT MODEL AND INVERSE MODEL IN ESTIMATING CO2 FLUX HISTORY Takashi MAKI,Kazumi KAMIDE and Yukitomo TSUTSUMI.
Introduction. A major focus of SCOUT-O3 is the tropics and a key issue here is testing how well existing global 3D models perform in this region. This.
Stratosphere–Troposphere Exchange: Isabel RamosÁlvaro.
Tracer transport simulation by an icosahedral grid model Center for Climate System Research, Univ. of Tokyo Yosuke Niwa R. Imasu, M. Satoh, S. Maksyutov,
Assimilation of EOS-Aura Data in GEOS-5: Evaluation of ozone in the Upper Troposphere - Lower Stratosphere K. Wargan, S. Pawson, M. Olsen, J. Witte, A.
Coupled GCM The Challenges of linking the atmosphere and ocean circulation.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
ASSIMILATION OF GOES-DERIVED CLOUD PRODUCTS IN MM5.
Correlation properties of global satellite and model ozone time series Viktória Homonnai, Imre M. Jánosi Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary Data: LATMOS/CNRS.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Coupled Climate Models OCEAN-ATMOSPHEREINTERACTIONS.
Earth&Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Tech Modeling the impacts of convective transport and lightning NOx production over North America: Dependence on cumulus.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
Regional Inversion of continuous atmospheric CO 2 measurements A first attempt ! P., P., P., P., and P. Philippe Peylin, Peter Rayner, Philippe Bousquet,
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Operational sub-regional Long-Range Forecasting Unit at RA VI Regional Climate Center – South-East European Virtual Climate Change Center Vladimir Djurdjevic.
MJO simulations under a dry environment Marcela Ulate M Advisor: Chidong Zhang (… in a Nudging World)
Impact of global warming on tropical cyclone structure change with a 20-km-mesh high-resolution global model Hiroyuki Murakami (AESTO/MRI, Japan) Akio.
A direct carbon budgeting approach to study CO 2 sources and sinks ICDC7 Broomfield, September 2005 C. Crevoisier 1 E. Gloor 1, J. Sarmiento 1, L.
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
1 JRA-55 the Japanese 55-year reanalysis project - status and plan - Climate Prediction Division Japan Meteorological Agency.
MAP MODELING EFFORTS MAP: Building Integrated Earth System Analysis (Modeling): IESA CTM work funded by MAP will be seen as part of the overall Earth System.
Ocean modelling activities in Japan (some of activities in China and Korea are included in the report) report to the CLIVAR Working Group for Ocean Model.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
Investigating Land-Atmosphere CO 2 Exchange with a Coupled Biosphere-Atmosphere Model: SiB3-RAMS K.D. Corbin, A.S. Denning, I. Baker, N. Parazoo, A. Schuh,
Attempts to improve distribution of boundary layer clouds in AFES Akira Kuwano-Yoshida, Takeshi Enomoto and Wataru Ohfuchi Earth Simulator Center, JAMSTEC,
Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.
ICDC7, Boulder September 2005 Estimation of atmospheric CO 2 from AIRS infrared satellite radiances in the ECMWF data assimilation system Richard.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
Simulation Experiments for TEMPO Air Quality Objectives Peter Zoogman, Daniel Jacob, Kelly Chance, Xiong Liu, Arlene Fiore, Meiyun Lin, Katie Travis, Annmarie.
Observing and Modeling Requirements for the BARCA Project Scott Denning 1, Marek Uliasz 1, Saulo Freitas 2, Marcos Longo 2, Ian Baker 1, Maria Assunçao.
List of the measurements performed at Mace Head:
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
Modeling the emission, transport, and optical properties of Asian dust storms using coupled CAM/CARMA model Lin Su and Owen B. Toon Laboratory for Atmospheric.
Implementation of a boundary layer heat flux parameterization into the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System Erica McGrath-Spangler Dept. of Atmospheric.
Transport Simulation of the April 1998 Chinese Dust Event Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel And Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend.
Synthesis of work on Budget of Water Vapor and Trace gases in Amazonia Transport and Impacts of Moisture, Aerosols and Trace Gases into and out of the.
CO 2 Mixing/Advection by Fronts Aaron Wang Colorado State University.
Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation with a Variational Approach (“4-D Var”) David Baker CGD/TSS with Scott Doney, Dave Schimel, Britt Stephens, and Roger Dargaville.
Tropical Convection and MJO
Transport Working Group
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT: CONCENTRATIONS AND FLUXES
GOMOS measurements of O3, NO2, and NO3 compared to model simulations
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
Dynamical downscaling of ERA-40 with WRF in complex terrain in Norway – comparison with ENSEMBLES U. Heikkilä, A. D. Sandvik and A.
CarboEurope Open Science Conference
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Extratropical stratoshere-troposphere exchange in a 20-km-mesh AGCM
Diurnal Variation of Nitrogen Dioxide
A CASE STUDY OF GRAVITY WAVE GENERATION BY HECTOR CONVECTION
Frontier Research System for Global Change,
Vladimir S. Platonov, Mikhail I. Varentsov
Presentation transcript:

The comparison of TransCom continuous experimental results at upper troposphere Takashi MAKI, Hidekazu MATSUEDA and TransCom Continuous modelers

Motivation 1.To improve tracer transport model, we need to know transport processes in detail. 2.Vertical transport process could affect tracer distributions (global, regional). 3.Aircraft observational data are good indicator for vertical transport. 4.We have tried to use aircraft observational data to check vertical transport.

Comparison method Experiment: TransCom Continuous (Rachel, et al, 2005) Period: 2002 – 2003 Observation: Tokyo - Sydney aircraft (Matsueda, et al, 2002) Model output: hourly snap shot (at observational time) Indicators: Suitable Offset : Standard deviation of (model – observation) in the suitable offset

Observational Data Difference from Jan. 2003, equator Days from 1 Jan. 2002

TransCom results 7 Jan 2003 values are subtracted from each result. Fossil 98 + Takahashi Ocean (2002) + SiB hourly conc.

TransCom results (2) Add suitable (minimize standard deviation of (model – observation )) offset.

TransCom results (3) Add suitable (minimize standard deviation of (model – observation )) offset.

TransCom Models Results Do we need vertically less mixed model?? less mixed ? Fit to observations Outlier??

Sensitivity Test 1.We prepare On-line (directly coupled with GCM) transport model with several vertical coordinates. 2.We adopt surface fluxes by TransCom continuous experiment and compare CO2 concentrations. 3.We assimilate (nudging) re- analysis meteorological field to drive On-line transport model. 4.We also prepare a tuned off-line CDTM (less mixed in PBL and more mixed in troposphere).

Transport Model (GCM) Model Name: MJ-98 (Shibata et al.) Dynamics: Global spectral model Resolution: T42L45 Time step: 300s Convection: Arakawa-Schubert Radiation: Shibata Land surface: SiB Diffusion: Mellor-Yamada (L2) Gravity wave drag : Iwasaki

Transport Model (CDTM) Name: CDTM (Sasaki et al.) Resolution: Same as GCM (T42L45) (changed from 2.5 x 2.5 deg. L32) Time step: Same as GCM (300s) Transport: 3D Semi-Lagrange (changed from 2D Semi-Lagrange) Diffusion: Convection, Turbulent, Shallow convection Mass fixer: Simple mass fixer Tracers: Same as Continuous exp. Current stage, we simply introduce our CDTM vertical mixing into MJ-98.

Off-line VS On-line Main difference is vertical advection. Off-lineOn-line Meteorology JRA-25 (6 hourly) JRA-25 (6 hourly, nudging) Vertical velocity Averaged diabatic heating From GCM (every time step) Horizontal advection 2D Semi-Lagrange 3D Semi-Lagrange Vertical advection Upwind Differencing Scheme Time step 300s

Meteorological field We adopt Japanese 25-year Reanalysis Project (JRA-25) to assimilation. We could use precise and uniform quality meteorological field (same as Off-line CDTM).

Vertical Coordinate We have tested 4 vertical coordinates. L: Operational forecast model based H: Stratospheric ozone model based C: CDTM based (attend TransCom) C2: CDTM based (divide lowest layer)

Experimental Results On-line models can reduce the offset. Vertical coordinates do not affect the offset. Vertical mixing tune is useful in hourly case. less mixed Fit to observations

Summary We have compared our experimental results against aircraft data. The result shows our models could almost reproduce upper troposphere CO2 concentrations. We have prepared On-line transport model nudging with re-analysis wind. The On-line model could reduce the standard deviation (and the offset) this means that the model has good potential to tracer transport. For hourly biosphere flux, turning of vertical mixing process could reproduce upper observational data well.

Future Plan At this stage, we simply introduce our transport model into GCM. In On-line model, we could use several GCM parameters without spatial and temporal interpolation (cumulus convection, planetary boundary layer diffusion, etc) We have a plan to attend Upper-air and satellite inter-comparison project with these models to understand vertical transport process in detail.

References JRA-25 : Law, R., W. Peters, C. R ö denbeck 2005: Protocol for TransCom continuous data experiment. Matsueda, H., H. Y. Inoue, and M. Ishii 2002: Aircraft observation of carbon dioxide at 8-13 km altitude over the western Pacific from 1993 to Tellus, 54B, Sasaki. T, T. Maki, S. Oohashi and K. Akagi, 2003: Optimal sampling network and availability of data acquired at inland sites. GLOBAL ATMOSPHERIC WATCH REPORT SERIES, No. 148, Shibata, K., H. Yoshimura, M. Ohizumi, M. Hosaka and M. Sugi, 1999: A simulation of troposphere, stratosphere and mesosphere with MRI/JMA98 GCM. Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics., 50,

Thank you for your attention!