QCD Meeting July 23, 2004 Is it due to the hard collision? Is it due to fragmentation? Strong polarization seen in fixed-target experiments where jet NOT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QCD Meeting June 25, 2004 Is it due to the hard collision? Is it due to fragmentation? Strong polarization seen in fixed-target experiments where jet NOT.
Advertisements

Sampling Distributions (§ )
NA60 results on charm and intermediate mass dimuon production in In-In 158 GeV/A collisions R. Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon) on behalf of the NA60 collaboration.
Di-electron Continuum at PHENIX Yorito Yamaguchi for the PHENIX collaboration CNS, University of Tokyo Rencontres de Moriond - QCD and High Energy Interactions.
P hysics background for luminosity calorimeter at ILC I. Božović-Jelisavčić 1, V. Borka 1, W. Lohmann 2, H. Nowak 2 1 INN VINČA, Belgrade 2 DESY, Hamburg.
QCD Meeting October 1, 2004 Is it due to the hard collision? Is it due to fragmentation? Strong polarization seen in fixed-target experiments where jet.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Evidence for Narrow D s  0 and D s   0 states Jianchun Wang 05/09/03 Directly involved: Dave Cinabro Selina Li Sheldon Stone Jon Urheim Jianchun Wang.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
QCD Meeting July 1, 2005 Is it due to the hard collision? Is it due to fragmentation? Strong polarization seen in fixed-target experiments where jet NOT.
Measurement of R at CLEO - Jim Libby1 Measurement of R at CLEO Jim Libby University of Oxford.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Analysis work by: Marina Artuso Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/dompi.ps Study of B  D   Jianchun Wang 05/12/00.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
Analysis work by: Rachid Ayad Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/ds4pi.ps Status of B  D  (4  )   analysis Jianchun.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Confidence Intervals: Estimating Population Mean
Resonances in decay for 400fb -1 DC Meeting April 10th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D.
Small-Scale Anisotropy Studies with HiRes Stereo Observations Chad Finley and Stefan Westerhoff Columbia University HiRes Collaboration ICRC 2003 Tsukuba,
R Value at BESIII Haiming Hu Workshop on Future PRC-US Cooperation in High Energy Physics Beijing, China June 11, 2006.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction At Threshold Energies.
G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 3 page 1 Lecture 3 1 Probability (90 min.) Definition, Bayes’ theorem, probability densities and.
I. Ravinovich Di-electron measurements with the Hadron Blind Detector in the PHENIX experiment at RHIC Ilia Ravinovich for the PHENIX Collaboration Weizmann.
1 Introduction to Dijet Resonance Search Exercise John Paul Chou, Eva Halkiadakis, Robert Harris, Kalanand Mishra and Jason St. John CMS Data Analysis.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
Confidence intervals and hypothesis testing Petter Mostad
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
K charged meeting 10/11/03 K tracking efficiency & geometrical acceptance :  K (p K,  K )  We use the tag in the handle emisphere to have in the signal.
14-18 November, PrahaECFA/DESY Linear Collider Workshop 1 TRILINEAR GAUGE COUPLINGS AT PHOTON COLLIDER - e  mode DESY - Zeuthen Klaus Mönig and Jadranka.
Observation in BaBar of a narrow resonance in the D + s  0 system at 2317 MeV Roger Barlow Manchester University For the B A B AR Collaboration.
1 TTU report “Dijet Resonances” Kazim Gumus and Nural Akchurin Texas Tech University Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab Jan. 26, 2006.
Martin White – Cambridge ATLAS UK ATLAS Physics Meeting, May 2004.
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
PHENO 2008 April 29th Tom Schwarz University of California Davis Measurement of the Forward-Backward Asymmetry In Top Production with 1.9 fb -1.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
12004, TorinoAram Kotzinian Monte Carlo Event Generators The basic lepton-quark scattering processes have well defined cross section formulae within the.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING class of “Experimental Methods of Physics” Mikhail Yurov Kyungpook National University May 9 th, 2005.
Photoproduction of the  (1385) resonance at LEPS K. Hicks & D. Keller, Ohio U. LEPS Collaboration Meeting May 1, 2008.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
MAT 4830 Mathematical Modeling 04 Monte Carlo Integrations
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
1 NCC Task Force Richard Seto NCC Task Force Meeting Jan 8, 2007 BNL.
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
Polarisation transfer in hyperon photoproduction near threshold Tom Jude D I Glazier, D P Watts The University of Edinburgh.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
Elliptic flow of D mesons Francesco Prino for the D2H physics analysis group PWG3, April 12 th 2010.
G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 10 page 1 Statistical Data Analysis: Lecture 10 1Probability, Bayes’ theorem 2Random variables and.
E. Robutti Enrico Robutti I.N.F.N. Genova HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference July 17-23, Aachen, Germany Recent BABAR results in Charmonium and Charm Spectroscopy.
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Taikan Suehara, 15 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/05/15 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
Session 10 on Standard-Model Electroweak Physics Combined Abstract 845 on Mass of Top: Abstract 169: Measurement of Mass of Top Quark in Lepton+Jets Abstract.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Ayumi Yamamoto, Akimasa Ishikawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto (Tohoku University) Keisuke Fujii (KEK)
1 Exotic States 2005 E.C. Aschenauer The search for Pentaquarks at on behalf of the HERMES Collaboration E.C. Aschenauer DESY.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Debojit Sarkar VECC,KOLKATA
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Background understanding and detector inefficiency
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

QCD Meeting July 23, 2004 Is it due to the hard collision? Is it due to fragmentation? Strong polarization seen in fixed-target experiments where jet NOT observed.  Polarization Tom Devlin Rutgers/CDF _

Asymmetry plots in beam-  and beam-K system (ignores jets) Polarization allowed under parity conservation is in the y-direction (second from top). Solid lines: Data Dashed lines: 20 hybrid MC-events/real-event scaled by 1/20

Fits Without and With Mass Constraints

How Do We Get Polarization From This? These cos(  ) plots contain: 1.The Signal:  and  2.K s Background 3.Background from random 2-track crossings. __ Monte Carlo Simulation  and  and K s are straightforward and in place Now working on random 2-track crossings __

Work in Progress and Planned: Summer-Fall, Mass-constrained fits: 2- , 2-K s, 1-ee. 2. Sum of weights over solutions = 1.0 per event. 3.Mix MC events for events with both K and  solutions as in the data, weighted by relative P(  2)*P(Decay). 4.Further study of sailor-cowboy problem. 5. Add fits with mass constraints displaced by  20 MeV. 6.Background subtraction. 7.Decide whether analysis is viable or not. 8.If so, do polarization in the other two coordinate systems. Additional Tasks 9. Use   2 =  2 (MassConstraint) -  2 (NoMassConstraint) 10. Random 2-track crossings.

 2 4 : Fit with mass-constraint – 4 deg. freedom  2 3 : Fit without mass-constraint – 3 deg. freedom Irrelevant Fluctuations in  2 e.g. deviations from exact 3-D intersection at vertex tend to cancel. Strong deviations from correct mass DO NOT cancel in  2.

Repeat for Mass Constraint = M   20 MeV (Note that p  threshold is only 38 MeV below M  )

Subtract sum of two sidebands from Signal+Background (Sideband normalization used here is from previous graphs.)

Problem: The backgrounds from sidebands populate the cos  plots at different values from real backgrounds. Alternate Approach: Generate hybrid MC backgrounds For each real event, generate 20 MC events at same decay vertex as real event parent mass from background mass distribution random angles in CM system apply standard acceptance cuts apply tight cuts in  2

Fit with no Mass Constraint: Assume Daughters are p  Subtract  signal, Smooth Remainder (5-bins)

Normalize Probability Distribution P(M) to Unit Area. Numerically Integrate. Find values of M(p  ) at intervals of 0.01 in the integral and form a table of its integral. Choose a random number R(0:1) Table Lookup and Interpolate to get M(p  )

Status and Plans Three known contributions to dataset: --  Signal -- K s Background -- Continuum 2-track background MC code exists to generate first two. Coding in progress for the third. Plan: Generate 20 MC of each type for each real event. Mix three MC samples, in appropriate proportions to produce 20 MC events for each real event. Adjust proportions of each and assumed polarization of MC  ’s to fit data.