Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 PLASMA-ENHANCED AERODYNAMICS – A NOVEL APPROACH AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL Thomas C. Corke Clark Chair.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PIV Measurements and Computational Study around a 5-Inch Ducted Fan for VTOL UAV Ali Akturk, Akamol Shavalikul & Cengiz Camci VLRCOE (Vertical.

Advertisements

Active flow control by plasma actuators for drag reduction Romain Futrzynski, Julie Vernet KTH School of Engineering Sciences.

Project 2: Study of Separated Flow in a Low- Pressure Turbine* Joshua Combs, Aerospace Engineering, Junior, University of Cincinnati Devon Riddle, Aerospace.

Order of Magnitude Improvement of SDBD Actuator Effect

Phased Plasma Arrays for Unsteady Flow Control Thomas C. Corke Martiqua L. Post Ercan Erturk University of Notre Dame Sponsors: Army Research Office.

NON-THERMAL ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE PLASMAS FOR AERONAUTIC APPLICATIONS Richard B. Miles, Dmitry Opaits, Mikhail N. Shneider, Sohail H. Zaidi - Princeton.

On-Set of EHD Turbulence for Cylinder in Cross Flow Under Corona Discharges J.S. Chang, D. Brocilo, K. Urashima Dept. of Engineering Physics, McMaster.

Marcello Tobia Benvenuto

Numerical Benchmarking of Tip Vortex Breakdown in Axial Turbines Eunice Allen-Bradley April 22, 2009.

Separation Control with Nanosecond Pulse Driven Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators Lucio Cota Advisor: Jesse Little Department of Aerospace.

Lecture 101 Introduction to Energy Storage Elements: The Capacitor.

A Primary Agent Due to Engineering Creation… P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Force System Generated/Needed by Viscous.

MODELING OF H 2 PRODUCTION IN Ar/NH 3 MICRODISCHARGES Ramesh A. Arakoni a), Ananth N. Bhoj b), and Mark J. Kushner c) a) Dept. Aerospace Engr, University.

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF WAVE EFFECTS IN HIGH-FREQUENCY CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS* Yang Yang and Mark J. Kushner Department of Electrical and Computer.

Boeing - St.Louis March 7, 2006 Plasma Actuators for Landing Gear Noise Control* F. O. Thomas, A. Kozlov, T.C. Corke * Supported by NASA Langley NAG

60 th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Salt Lake City, Utah Control and Scaling of Radius-Vectored Turbulent Boundary Layers Using.

STREAMER DYNAMICS IN A MEDIA CONTAINING DUST PARTICLES* Natalia Yu. Babaeva and Mark J. Kushner Iowa State University Department of Electrical and Computer.

Using a Microplasma for Propulsion in Microdevices David Arndt Faculty Mentors: Professor John LaRue and Professor Richard Nelson IM-SURE 2006.

INVESTIGATIONS OF MAGNETICALLY ENHANCED RIE REACTORS WITH ROTATING (NON-UNIFORM) MAGNETIC FIELDS Natalia Yu. Babaeva and Mark J. Kushner University of.

MODELING OF MICRODISCHARGES FOR USE AS MICROTHRUSTERS Ramesh A. Arakoni a), J. J. Ewing b) and Mark J. Kushner c) a) Dept. Aerospace Engineering University.

Center for Flow Physics and Control College of Engineering University of Notre Dame.

MODELING OF MICRODISCHARGES FOR USE AS MICROTHRUSTERS Ramesh A. Arakoni a), J. J. Ewing b) and Mark J. Kushner c) a) Dept. Aerospace Engineering University.

Dr. Xia Wang Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering Tel: Fax: Contact.

Janusz Podliński, Artur Berendt, Jerzy Mizeraczyk Centre for Plasma and Laser Engineering The Szewalski Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery Polish Academy.

Chapter 22 Alternating-Current Circuits and Machines.

Time-Dependent Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuator Modeling Ben Mertz, Thomas Corke Center for Flow Physics and Control University of Notre Dame,

Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.

Chapter 6 Photodetectors.

Design Process Supporting LWST 1.Deeper understanding of technical terms and issues 2.Linkage to enabling research projects and 3.Impact on design optimization.

Control of Wind Turbine Flows using Vortex Generators Clara Velte Martin O. L. Hansen Dalibor Cavar Knud Erik Meyer MEK/Section of Fluid Mechanics DTU.

Jean-Charles Matéo-Vélez, Frédéric Thivet, Pierre Degond * ONERA - Centre de Toulouse * CNRS - Mathématiques pour l'Industrie et la Physique, Toulouse.

DUWIND, Delft University Wind Energy Institute 1 An overview of NACA 6-digit airfoil series characteristics with reference to airfoils for large wind turbine.

Steady control of laminar separation over airfoils with plasma sheet actuators Sosa Roberto Artana Guillermo Laboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Universidad.

Pharos University ME 253 Fluid Mechanics II

Study of Oscillating Blades from Stable to Stalled Conditions 1 CFD Lab, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow 2 Volvo Aero Corporation.

Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:

Point Source in 2D Jet: Radiation and refraction of sound waves through a 2D shear layer Model Gallery #16685 © 2014 COMSOL. All rights reserved.

Fluid Mechanics Laboratory University of Kentucky Active Control of Separation on a Wing with Conformal Camber David Munday and Jamey Jacob Department.

Cascade Flow Research Capability Following figures present experimental results dealing with the measurement of boundary layer development along the suction.

Study of Separated Flow Over Low-Pressure Turbine Blades and Automobiles Using Active Flow Control Strategies Michael Cline Junior Mechanical Engineering.

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF WIND TURBINE AERODYNAMICS Jean-Jacques Chattot University of California Davis OUTLINE Challenges in Wind Turbine Flows The Analysis.

School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Computational Analysis of Stall and Separation Control in Axial & Centrifugal Compressors Alex Stein Saeid NiaziLakshmi.

Tim Fletcher Post-doctoral Research Assistant Richard Brown Mechan Chair of Engineering Simulating Wind Turbine Interactions using the Vorticity Transport.

2D Airfoil Aerodynamics

Simulation of Plasma Actuator on Arbitrarily Shaped Surface Ben Mertz Center for Flow Physics and Control University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN Graduate.

Alexey V. Kozlov, Flint O. Thomas †

1 Fluidic Load Control for Wind Turbine Blades C.S. Boeije, H. de Vries, I. Cleine, E. van Emden, G.G.M Zwart, H. Stobbe, A. Hirschberg, H.W.M. Hoeijmakers.

Control of Flow Separation for Automobiles and Low-Pressure Turbine (LPT) Blades Michael Cline Mechanical Engineering – ACCEND Class of 2014 Our first.

Compressor Cascade Pressure Rise Prediction

Investigation of effects associated with electrical charging of fused silica test mass V. Mitrofanov, L. Prokhorov, K. Tokmakov Moscow State University.

Laser Energy Deposition for Control of Turbulent Mixing Layers Liliana Saldana University of Arizona Advisor: Dr. Jesse Little Assistant Professor, Department.

CE 1501 Flow Over Immersed Bodies Reading: Munson, et al., Chapter 9.

Characterization of Laser Energy Deposition for Active Flow Control Clark Pederson University of Arizona Advisor: Dr. Jesse Little, Assistant Professor,

Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:

School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Simulation of Centrifugal Compressor Stall and Surge Saeid NiaziAlex SteinLakshmi N. Sankar School of Aerospace.

CFD predictions of transition and distributed roughness over a wind turbine airfoil ESTEBAN FERRER XABIER MUNDUATE 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting.

53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah 5-pin Langmuir probe configured to measure the Reynolds.

FEASIBILITY ANALYS OF AN MHD INDUCTIVE GENERATOR COUPLED WITH A THERMO - ACOUSTIC ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM S. Carcangiu 1, R. Forcinetti 1, A. Montisci.

1/50 1 Effect of Trailing Edge Geometry on the Flow Behavior through Rectilinear Turbine Cascades By: Mahmoud M. El-Gendi Supervisor: Prof. Yoshiaki Nakamura.

Control of Boundary Layer Separation and the Wake of an Airfoil Using ns-DBD Plasma Actuators Kenneth Decker Project Advisor: Dr. Jesse Little Department.

Electronics & Communication Engineering

Braden Hancock Brigham Young University B.S. Mechanical Engineering

Visit for more Learning Resources

Partnerwise presentation

SIMULATIONS OF HIGH-PRESSURE CATHODIC

Off-design Performance of A Rotor

Dynamic Controllers for Wind Turbines

Experimental study of the wake regions in wind farms

Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M

Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M

Presentation transcript:

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 PLASMA-ENHANCED AERODYNAMICS – A NOVEL APPROACH AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL Thomas C. Corke Clark Chair Professor University of Notre Dame Center for Flow Physics and Control Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Dept. Notre Dame, IN Ref: J. Adv. Aero. Sci., 2007.

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Presentation Outline: Background SDBD Plasma Actuators – Physics and Modeling – Flow Control Simulation – Comparison to Other FC Actuators Example Applications – LPT Separation Control – Turbine Tip-gap Flow Control – Turbulent Separation Control Summary

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Single-dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) Plasma Actuator High voltage AC causes air to ionize (plasma). Ionized air in presence of electric field results in body force that acts on neutral air. Body force is mechanism of flow control. Ref: AIAA J., 42, 3, 2004 exposed electrode dielectric AC voltage source covered electrode substrate The SDBD is stable at atmospheric pressure because it is self-limiting due to charge accumulation on the dielectric surface.

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Flow Response: Impulsively Started Plasma Actuator Phase-averaged PIV Long-time Average t

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Example Application: Cylinder Wake, Re D =30,000 OFFON Video

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Physics of Operation Electrostatic Body Force D - Electric Induction ( Maxwell’s equation ) ( given by Boltzmann relation ) solution of equation - electric potential  Body Force Y YY  (x,t)

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Current/Light Emission ~  ( t )

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Current/Light Emission ~  ( x,t ) Voltage t/T dx/dt x max

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 More Optimum Waveform Electron Transport Key to Efficiency a b c d

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Steps to model actuator in flow Space-time electric potential,  Space-time body force Flow solver with body force added

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Space-Time Lumped Element Circuit Model: Boundary Conditions on  (x,t) Electric circuit with N-sub-circuits (N=100) exposed electrode dielectric AC voltage source covered electrode substrate Ref: AIAA

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Space-time Dependent Lumped Element Circuit Model (governing equations) Voltage on the dielectric surface in the n-th sub-circuit Plasma current air capacitor dielectric capacitor

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 dx/dt x max Model  I p (t)  Experiment Illumination Model Space-time Characteristics

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Plasma Propagation Characteristics Effect of V app dx p /dt vs V app (x p ) max vs V app Model

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Plasma Propagation Characteristics Effect of f a.c. dx p /dt vs f a.c. (x p ) max vs f a.c. Model

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Numerical solution for  (x,y,t) Model provides time-dependent B.C. for 

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Body Force, f b ( x,t )  Normalized f b (x,t) t/T a.c.=0.2 t/T a.c.=0.7

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Example: LE Separation Control Computed cycle-averaged body force vectors NACA 0021 Leading Edge

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Example: Impulsively Started Actuator t= sec Velocity vectors 2 = countours

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Example: AoA=23 deg. Base Flow Steady Actuator U ∞ =30 m/s, Re c =615K

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Comparison to Other FC Actuators? SDBD plasma actuator is voltage driven,  f b  ~V 7/2. For fixed power (I·V), limit current to maximize voltage. Low ohmic losses. Flow simulations require body force field (not affected by external flow, solve once for given geometry). “Zero-mass Unsteady Blowing” generally uses voice-coil system. Current driven devices, V~I. Losses result in I 2 R heating. Flow simulations require actuator velocity field (flow dependent).

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Material  Quartz 3.8 Kapton 3.4 Teflon 2.0 I max Maximizing SDBD Plasma Actuator Body Force At Fixed Power All previous SDBD flow control

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Sample Applications LPT Separation Control Turbine Tip-Clearance-Flow Control Turbulent Flow Separation Control A.C. Plasma Anemometer

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 LPT Separation Control Span = 60cm Span = 60cm C=20.5cm C=20.5cm Plasma Side Flow Pak-B Cascade Ref: AIAA J. 44, 7, 51-58, 2006 AIAA J. 44, 7, , 2006

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Plasma Actuator: x/c=0.67, Re=50k Actuator Location Steady Actuator Sep. Ret.

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 f L s /U fs =1 Plasma Actuator: x/c=0.67, Re=50k Deficit Pressure Loss Coeff. vs Re 200% 20% Base FlowUnsteady Plasma Act.

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Document tip gap flow behavior.Document tip gap flow behavior. Investigate strategies to reduce pressure- Investigate strategies to reduce pressure- losses due to tip-gap-flow. losses due to tip-gap-flow. Passive Techniques: How do they work?Passive Techniques: How do they work? Active Techniques: Emulate passive effects?Active Techniques: Emulate passive effects? Turbine Tip-Clearance-Flow Control Approach: Reduce losses associated with tip-gap flow Objective: Ref: AIAA

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Experimental Setup Flow Pak-B blades: 4.14” axial chord

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Under-tip Flow Morphology t/g =2.83 t/g =4.30 g/c=0.05 Separation line: Receptive to active flow control. Tip-flow Plasma Actuator

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Re=500k y/pitch No Plasma z/span Unsteady Excitation Response Shear Instability: 0.01<F+<0.04, U = maximum shear layer velocity, l = momentum thickness Viscous Jet Core: 0.25<F+<0.5, U = characteristic velocity of jet core, l = gap size, g

Honeywell Seminar July 19, y/pitch No Plasma z/span F+F+ = 0.03, (f = 500 Hz) F+F+ = 0.07, (f = 1250 Hz) Cp t Unsteady Excitation Response: Selected F + C pt /C ptbase =0.95C pt /C ptbase =0.92

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 g/ct/gF+F+ C pt Δη No Squealer5%2.83N/A Squealer5%2.83N/A % Winglet5%4.30N/A % No Actuator4%3.52N/A Actuator4% % C pt and Loss Efficiency

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Turbine Tip-Clearance-Flow Control Future Directions “Plasma Roughness” Rao et al. ASM GT “Plasma Winglet” “Plasma Squealer” Active Casing Flow Turning Suction-side Blade “Squealer Tip”

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Turbulent Flow Separation Control Wall-mounted hump model used in NASA 2004 CFD validation. Ref: AIAA

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Baseline: Benchmark C p and C f k- SST best up to x/c=0.9 k- best for (x/c) ret S S R

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 SDBD Plasma Actuator Simulation and Experiment ΔR x/c

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Turbulent Separation Control: Future Applications Flight control without moving surfaces Miley Simulation Plasma Actuator Low-Speed Separated Flow Region Reattached Flow Region BWB Inlet with 30% BLI Aggressive Transition Ducts AIAA , AIAA

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Plasma Flow Control Summary The basis of SDBD plasma actuator flow control is the generation of a body force vector. Our understanding of the process leading to improved plasma actuator designs resulted in 20x improvement in performance. With the use of models for ionization, the body force effect can be efficiently implemented into flow solvers. Such codes can then be used as tools for aerodynamic designs that include flow control from the beginning, which holds the ultimate potential.

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 A.C. Plasma Anemometer Flow transports charge-carrying ions downstream from electrodes. Loss of ions reduces current flow across gap- increases internal resistance – increases voltage output. Mechanism not sensitive on temperature. Robust, no moving parts. Native frequency response > 1 MHz. Amplitude modulated ac carrier gives excellent noise rejection. Originally developed for mass-flux measurements in high Mach number, high enthalpy flows. Flow Principle of Operation:

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Plasma Sensor Amplitude Modulated Output Velocity Fluctuations at frequency, f m ac carrier at f c = ~2 MHz Plasma Sensor RF Amplifier electrode Amplitude Modulated Output fcfc f c + f m f c - f m Frequency Domain Output

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Real Time Demodulation FPGA-based digital acquisition board allows host based demodulation in real time. GnuRadio Modulated signal recovered

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Real-time Measurement of Blade Passing Flow Video f=1-2kHz Jet

Honeywell Seminar July 19, 2007 Plasma Anemometer Future Applications Engine internal flow sensor: - Surge/stall sensor - Casing flow separation sensor - Combustion instability sensor T.C. wire forms electrode pair with gap = ~0.005”