KEK Beam Test Koji YOSHIMURA KEK MICE Collaboration Meeting 2004.10.28 Koji YOSHIMURA KEK MICE Collaboration Meeting 2004.10.28.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.

Advertisements

MICE the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Emilio Radicioni, INFN EPS-HEP Aachen 2003.

KEK Test Beam Phase II Plan Makoto Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE FT Daresbury 2005/8/30.

KEK beam test H. Sakamoto. Purpose To optimize a concentration of the second dopant for scintillating fibers KEK beam test to study light yields for various.

Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.

KEK Analysis Report Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2006/06/10 MICE CM15.

TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.

Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.

Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.

1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.

1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.

2005/10/22 MICE CM at RAL, Tracker Parallel, Makoto Yoshida 1 KEK test beam - introduction - M. Yoshida MICE CM tracker parallel 2005/10/ /10/22.

MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.

Software parallel session summary MICE collaboration meeting INFN, Frascati 27/6-05.

1 KEK Beam Test Analysis Hideyuki Sakamoto 15 th MICE Collaboration Meeting 10 st June,2006.

Prototype Performance in D0 test stand & fiber intrinsic performance with KEK test beam M.Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) Osaka.

Tracking Detectors Working Group MICE Collaboration Meeting March 30, 2004 A. Bross.

MICE tracker meeting Prototype TOF test for tracker KEK Osaka university Atsushi Horikoshi.

Analysis mtng. 29 th April 2008Measuring pz using the KEKSlide 1 TOF momentum reconstruction for the KEK data Analysis meeting, 15 April 2005 Mark.

1 G4MICE Analysis of KEK Test Beam Aron Fish Malcolm Ellis CM15 10th June 2006.

6 th April 2005 Malcolm Ellis, Imperial College London 1 Sci Fi Status & KEK Test.

SciFi Tracker Beam Test outline The performance TOF which is needed to Beam Test & Guide7 Simulation TOF calculation TOF ACC estimation test for Beam Test.

Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.

MICE Collaboration Meeting 8th Octorber KEK Beam Test Analysis Hideyuki Sakamoto 16 th MICE Collaboration Meeting 8 th October 2006.

TOF/ACC test Overview M. Yoshida Osaka Univ.. TOF / ACC in the prototype test For the prototype test in May, we will need PID: –TOF counter Distinguish.

1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.

Update on the Gas Ring Imaging Cherenkov (GRINCH) Detector for A 1 n using BigBite Todd Averett Department of Physics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg,

Zhihong Ye Hampton University Feb. 16 th 2010, APS Meeting, Washington DC Data Analysis Strategy to Obtain High Precision Missing Mass Spectra For E

Tracker Summary Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 28 th, 2005.

Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.

HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,

HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents SksMinus status –SKS magnet trouble –Magnetic field study.

24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk2 24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk3 CKOV – Threshold Cherenkov detectors (aerogel) TOF – Three Time.

Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.

Measurement of 'intrinsic' properties of scintillating fibers H. Sakamoto Osaka University, Japan A.Sato M. Yoshida Y. Kuno Osaka Univ. K. Yoshimura KEK.

Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.

Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.

Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.

1 SciFi Results and Comparison Malcolm Ellis, for the MICE Scintillating Fibre Group Abingdon, 31 st October 2003.

1 MICE Tracking Detectors Malcolm Ellis NFMCC Meeting 12 th March 2006.

MICE : the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) for the MICE Collaboration Osaka - Overview and Status -

ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, 7 July 2012 Paul Soler on behalf of the MICE Collaboration The MICE Beam Line Instrumentation (Trackers and PID) for precise Emittance.

Sci-Fi Tracker: Progress Report Malcolm Ellis, MICE Video Conference Wednesday 6 th October 2004.

TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.

Status of cosmic-ray test of the SciFi prototype and SciFi software in G4MICE M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.)

MICE Phase 1 Koji Yoshimura KEK June

Controls for Particle ID/tracking in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Needed for particle ID/tracking M. A. Cummings May.

KEK beam test in May 2005 Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 27 th, 2005.

SksMinus status Hyperball collaboration meeting 2009/3/11 K. Shirotori.

ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting

M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Thursday 28th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.

2005/10/24 MICE CM at RAL, KEK test beam, Makoto Yoshida 1 KEK Beam Test for MICE SciFi Tracker - KEK-PS T585 - M. Yoshida MICE 2005/10/ /10/24.

Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.

KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.

Low Momentum dE/dx Testbeam H.P. 7/24/98. Goals for Spectrometer are based on tracking and PID –Multiparticle correlation –production of particle species.

T585 analysis status /2/2 HIDEYUKI SAKAMOTO Contents On small light yield problem checked by Aron’s information Tracking status Transverse and Longitudinal.

1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.

Calorimeter design & simulations for Stage I Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE PID phone conference

18 th March 2008Measuring momentum using the TOFsSlide 1 Measuring momentum using TOF0 and TOF1 Progress report Mark Rayner (Oxford/RAL) Analysis Meeting,

Tracker Summary M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE 2005.Feb.12 th.

M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.

Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.

MEASUREMENT OF EMITTANCE AND OTHER OPTICS QUANTITIES V. Blackmore 01/19.

(one of the) Request from MPB

Muons, Inc. Feb Yonehara-AAC AAC Meeting Design of the MANX experiment Katsuya Yonehara Fermilab APC February 4, 2009.

MEASUREMENT OF EMITTANCE AND OTHER OPTICS QUANTITIES V. Blackmore MICE Optics Review 14 th January, /22.

TOF Software and Analysis Tools

Design of the MANX experiment

LHCb Particle Identification and Performance

The Detector System of the MICE Experiment

Presentation transcript:

KEK Beam Test Koji YOSHIMURA KEK MICE Collaboration Meeting Koji YOSHIMURA KEK MICE Collaboration Meeting

Review and updated information TBD Items Tracker Configuration Plane interval Compatible Phase 2.5??? Beamline Layout Trigger Mechanical (base, rotator, etc.) PID TOF (Atsushi Horikoshi) Aerogel Software (Katsuya Yonehara) Review and updated information TBD Items Tracker Configuration Plane interval Compatible Phase 2.5??? Beamline Layout Trigger Mechanical (base, rotator, etc.) PID TOF (Atsushi Horikoshi) Aerogel Software (Katsuya Yonehara) Contents

Perfomance check to finalize design Light yield, Efficiency, Noise Pattern Recognition Momentum measurement Calibration (alignment) Mesurement Emittance prove to determine by 0.1% accuracy Perfomance check to finalize design Light yield, Efficiency, Noise Pattern Recognition Momentum measurement Calibration (alignment) Mesurement Emittance prove to determine by 0.1% accuracy Objective

S-JACEE Magnet B=1T 1 week life Beam B=1T

π 2 Beamline

Slow extracted 2 sec Flat top 10 mm R.M.S Yield of Pion10^5 1 GeV/c 0.4 GeV/c Slow extracted 2 sec Flat top 10 mm R.M.S Yield of Pion10^5 1 GeV/c 0.4 GeV/c BEAM Condition Two Beam Periods 2005 May 1week 2005 Jul 1week Two Beam Periods 2005 May 1week 2005 Jul 1week

Longer than BESS Mag Bottle-neck shaped bore restrict acceptance Longer than BESS Mag Bottle-neck shaped bore restrict acceptance Jacee Magnet

Stray Field

Basic performance check Confirmation of cosmic-ray run with new VLPC cryostat light yield comparison of fiber concentration VLPC vs PMT Minimum ionizing - Defocus beam position resolution (Alignment error) Minimum ionizing - Defocus beam Inclined beam (detector be tilted) multiple scattering - material thickness momentum/angle dependence various momentum Basic performance check Confirmation of cosmic-ray run with new VLPC cryostat light yield comparison of fiber concentration VLPC vs PMT Minimum ionizing - Defocus beam position resolution (Alignment error) Minimum ionizing - Defocus beam Inclined beam (detector be tilted) multiple scattering - material thickness momentum/angle dependence various momentum 1st Phase High intensity beam

1st Phase beam

1st Phase Trigger

Plane spacing? Curvature resolution Spiral Angle 41degree for 1T 1m Field Uniformity

L=96cm w/ MS Pt distribu tion vs L L=72cm w/ MS L=48cm w/ MS L=96cm w/o MS L=72cm w/o MS L=48cm w/o MS

Precision Measurement w/ magnetic field Track finding/Pattern recognition relatively low p beam (0.3 ~ 0.6 GeV/c) Inclined beam Generate Pt using degrader/diffuser Momentum resolution Evaluated with 4 identical station External Momentum measurement TOF hodoscope? Lpath = 12 m, σ TOF=50ps dp/p = 1%? Better if PID is available Position calibration during DAQ w/B field Precision Measurement w/ magnetic field Track finding/Pattern recognition relatively low p beam (0.3 ~ 0.6 GeV/c) Inclined beam Generate Pt using degrader/diffuser Momentum resolution Evaluated with 4 identical station External Momentum measurement TOF hodoscope? Lpath = 12 m, σ TOF=50ps dp/p = 1%? Better if PID is available Position calibration during DAQ w/B field 2nd Phase Good quality Low p beam?

2nd Phase Beam

2nd Phase Trigger

2nd Phase

Momentum by TOF muon pion

Requirement of high timing resolution to PID PID of sigma=50ps ・ ~700MeV/c PID>3σ ( >99.7% ) To reject π σ<50ps needed Atushi Horikoshi

Simulation of TOF Timing resolution of shorter light guide is better ・ Evaluation of timing resolution to the length of light guide ・ Scintillator n=1.58 ・ Light guide n=1.52 ・ Fine mesh PMT (R6504S)

2.5” Finemesh PMT could be borrowed from BESS Group? 20 PMT’s for TOF, 16 PMT’s for Aerogel 2.5” Finemesh PMT could be borrowed from BESS Group? 20 PMT’s for TOF, 16 PMT’s for Aerogel Possible Detectors 5x5 hodoscope

Aerogel N=1.034 Pthd 403 MeV/c for mu 530 MeV/c for pi to be used for electron possibly some fraction of pi Aerogel N=1.034 Pthd 403 MeV/c for mu 530 MeV/c for pi to be used for electron possibly some fraction of pi PID?

Scenario should be confirmed. Tracker configuration Beam line detectors Mechanical issues VLPC Electronics DAQ Scenario should be confirmed. Tracker configuration Beam line detectors Mechanical issues VLPC Electronics DAQ Summary