Effects of Biomass Production and Harvesting on Environmental Quality Erik B. Schilling National Council for Air & Stream Improvement Southern Regional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pine Silviculture Site Preparation and Planting Longleaf Pine
Advertisements

Drainage Management to Improve Water Quality and Enhanced Agricultural Production Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL by.
Returns and Yields 2005 AFA Landowner Clinic April 9, 2005 Magnolia, Arkansas Matthew H. Pelkki University of Arkansas-Monticello School of Forest Resources.
Preparing Cutover Woodland for Longleaf Establishment By Larry J. Such NC Division of Forest Resources.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
INFLUENCE OF INTENSIVE MANAGEMENT ON CANOPY TRANSPIRATION IN LOBLOLLY PINE Thomas A. Stokes, Lisa Samuelson, Greg Somers, and Tom Cooksey School of Forestry,
Cogongrass update John Byrd Mississippi State University Mobile, AL.
Alabama Best Management Practices for Forestry Alabama’s Best Management Practices for Forestry “… are voluntary guidelines to help maintain and protect.
Practice – CP-39 Farmable Wetland Program Constructed Wetland.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.
Biodegradation of organic pollutants in a composting environment in Mauritius Vijayalaxmi Jumnoodoo PhD Candidate Department of Chemical and Environmental.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Cogongrass: Research results from competition and herbicide studies C. Ramsey, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST National Weed Management Lab Fort Collins, CO.
SPONSOR of 4R Nutrient Stewardship Program. The Nature Conservancy Teaming with the Florida agriculture industry to increase farmer profitability and.
Morgan Fagan. Agriculture Industrialized Uses machines Chemical Fertilizers Chemical Pesticides Focus on maximum yield Use of GMOs
Impact of Forest Fertilization on Health of the Hood Canal Watershed Cindy Flint Advisor: Rob Harrison, UW April, 2007 Funded by: Green Diamond Resource.
Feeding the world involves soil and water resources, food production, social and cultural issues, food distribution and environmental impacts.
Why evaluate nitrate losses from watersheds?   Potential health risks to public and private water supplies   Eutrophication   Hypoxia - Deficiency.
The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Nutrient Cycling and Forest Productivity By: Eric Sucre.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Reasons for decline in soil fertility
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Environment and Natural Resources Stewardship: Opportunities and Issues Jim Pease and Matt Helmers.
Module #1 Economic Considerations Pine Silvopasture in the Southeast.
Columbia Lake, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Soil Nutrient Availability Following Application of Biosolids to Forests in Virginia. Eduardo C. Arellano and Thomas R. Fox Department of Forestry, Blacksburg,
1 Nutrient Cycling and Retention Chapter 19 nitro/biggraph.asp.
Non-pollutant ecosystem stress impacts on defining a critical load Or why long-term critical loads estimates are likely too high Steven McNulty USDA Forest.
Impacts of Land Development on Oregon’s Waters 2001.
Safe and Effective Use of Herbicides for Melaleuca Control Ken Langeland UF/IFAS Agronomy Department Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir Forestry Operations Edie Sonne Hall University of Washington College of Forest Resources USDA.
Ecological responses of streams to urbanization: A review of results from the U.S. Geological Survey's urban streams studies North Carolina Water Science.
1 Drainage and Environment, Results of the Monitoring of Non Point Source Pollution Viesturs Jansons Department of Environmental Engineering and Water.
Reasons for decline in soil fertility.  As crop yields have increased over the years due to the technological changes, many soils are unable to supply.
Seifu A Tilahun School of Civil & Water Resources Engineering,BDU Storm Runoff and soil erosion processes on the Ethiopian highland.
Objective: Have a working knowledge of the relationship between the vegetative cover in a watershed and water yield and water quality.
A New Effort to Study Intensively Managed Pine Plantations CAPPS - Consortium for Accelerated Pine Production Studies.
Silvics Analytic Timing of Site Preparation and Post-Plant Weed Control to Optimize Pine Growth Integration of research results from three region-wide.
Effects of Intensive Fertilization on the Growth of Interior Spruce Presentation to: Interior Fertilization Working Group February 5/13 (revised March.
Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River
CENTRAL MUSCATATUCK WATERSHED. BMPs Cost-Shared by Central Muscatatuck Watershed Project.
Cogongrass Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. Poaceae.
Buffer Width Tool In Table A select the reference line number that most closely resembles the field conditions and the type of pollutant the buffer will.
Freshwater Discharges to Central Coast Marine Protected Areas and the Nearshore Environment Karen R. Worcester David M. Paradies Central Coast Ambient.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
Department of Forestry University of Kentucky John M. Lhotka (University of Kentucky) John M. Lhotka Wood Energy Harvesting and Woodlands.
Watersheds and Wetlands CHAPTER 1. Lesson 1.5 Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds Human Activities Watershed Quality Health of U.S. Watersheds.
16.3. Bellringer The Environmental Impacts of Mining Because of the potential environmental impact of mining on a large scale, mining is one of the most.
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
Forest Certification Part 2 Certification Schemes Descriptions & Comparisons.
Center for Advanced Forestry Systems 2014 Meeting Do Below Ground Processes Explain Differences in Growth, Productivity and Carrying Capacity of Loblolly.
Introduction to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations CAFOs Christina Richmond West Virginia Department of Agriculture.
Riparian Buffers for Water Resource Protection Michael R. Burchell II Associate Professor and Extension Specialist Department of Biological and Agricultural.
Reasons for decline in soil fertility
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
What is water Erosion..
Forestry – Logging Methods
Andrine Stanhope*, Cassel Gardner and Larry Robinson
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Objectives Describe seven important potential environmental consequences of mining. Name four federal laws that relate to mining and reclaiming mined land.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Objectives Describe seven important potential environmental consequences of mining. Name four federal laws that relate to mining and reclaiming mined land.
Reasons for decline in soil fertility
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
Presentation transcript:

Effects of Biomass Production and Harvesting on Environmental Quality Erik B. Schilling National Council for Air & Stream Improvement Southern Regional Center Newberry, FL

General Facts  Currently 32M acres of plantation forests in SE US Predominately Loblolly Pine, lesser extent Slash Pine Predominately Loblolly Pine, lesser extent Slash Pine  SE US average growth rate of 5 tons ac -1 yr -1 This is much less than many forest plantations throughout the world This is much less than many forest plantations throughout the world  Models, field trials, etc. indicate that growth rates exceeding 10 tons ac -1 yr -1 are biologically feasible.

Increasing Growth Rates  Genetics Improve desired ecophysiological traits Improve desired ecophysiological traits Leaf area, water and nutrient use efficiency, etc.Leaf area, water and nutrient use efficiency, etc.  Fertilize  Reduce competition Traditionally, mechanical site preparation Traditionally, mechanical site preparation Costs can be high, potential for environmental impactsCosts can be high, potential for environmental impacts Today, industry relying heavily on chemical site preparation – herbicides Today, industry relying heavily on chemical site preparation – herbicides

Literature on ‘Intensive’ Forestry Disking Bedding Subsoiling Combination Herbicides Fertilization

Mechanical Site Preparation

Soils and Sediment

Sediment and Intensive Forestry Temple Inland Alto Watersheds McBroom 2005 Blackburn et al. 1986

Sediment and Intensive Forestry International Paper Southlands Forest Summer 2006

Fertilization, Herbicides and Water Quality

Forest Fertilization  Over 1.5M acres fertilized with P or N+P in 2002  Mid-rotation fertilization (stand age 8-15 yrs) 85% of FNC stands respond to fertilization 85% of FNC stands respond to fertilization lbs N + 25 lbs P acre most common lbs N + 25 lbs P acre most common Costs - $100 per acre Costs - $100 per acre Fox et al. 2006

Fate of N in SE Streams  High rates of fertilization in both agriculture & forestry in the SE, however DON is the major component of Total N in streamwater.  Dissolved organic-N thought to be largely inactive biologically, with little impact on aquatic systems

Forest Fertilization and Water Quality  NCASI Technical Bulletin #782 National review of forest fertilization studies National review of forest fertilization studies  Forest fertilization commonly leads to moderate increases in streamwater nutrient concentrations  Greatest nutrient increases come from: Direct application to streams Direct application to streams Ammonium nitrate forms of fertilizer Ammonium nitrate forms of fertilizer Excessive application rates Excessive application rates Repeated applications Repeated applications  Even in these situations, impacts are too small to degrade water quality

Carteret 7 Study  Loblolly pine (15-yr-old stand) 170 kg N + 28 kg P ha -1, as urea and DAP 170 kg N + 28 kg P ha -1, as urea and DAP Ground application Ground application Nutrient concentrations Nutrient concentrations NO 3 increased from 0.6 mg/L to 1.2 mg/LNO 3 increased from 0.6 mg/L to 1.2 mg/L NH 4 increased from 0.06 mg/L to 3.8 mg/LNH 4 increased from 0.06 mg/L to 3.8 mg/L P increased from 0.04 mg/L to 0.18 mg/LP increased from 0.04 mg/L to 0.18 mg/L Returned to baseline levels ~ 3wks Returned to baseline levels ~ 3wks Important to note that streams were avoided Important to note that streams were avoided Campbell 1989

Carteret 7 Study II  Loblolly pine (6-yr-old stand) Poorly drained loam soil Poorly drained loam soil 215 kg N + 35 kg P ha -1, as urea and DAP 215 kg N + 35 kg P ha -1, as urea and DAP Aerial application Aerial application Peak nutrient concentrations ~ 1 wk Peak nutrient concentrations ~ 1 wk NO 3 – 0.12 mg/LNO 3 – 0.12 mg/L NH 4 – 3.7 mg/LNH 4 – 3.7 mg/L Total P – 1.11 mg/LTotal P – 1.11 mg/L Baseline levels returned after 12wks Baseline levels returned after 12wks Direct input of fertilizer to streams accounted for 70-80% of nutrients exported Direct input of fertilizer to streams accounted for 70-80% of nutrients exported Herman and White 1996

Why Interest in Herbicides?   Herbicide applications reduce competition for: Light Water Nutrients   Increased productivity   Reduce site preparation costs   Questions on the fate of herbicides: Water quality Aquatics Wildlife Haywood et al. 2003

Common Commercial Forestry Herbicides  Glyphosate - Accord  Hexazinone - Velpar  Imazapyr - Arsenal, Chopper  Metsulfuron - Escort  Sulfometuron - Oust  Triclopyr - Garlon

Herbicide Response Temple Inland Alto Watersheds NCASI 2006

Herbicide Response International Paper Southlands Forest NCASI 2006

Herbicide Toxicity  Maximum measured concentrations Hexazinone - 30 ppb Hexazinone - 30 ppb Imazapyr - 40 ppb Imazapyr - 40 ppb  Detection levels below 1 ppb generally less than 150 days after application  Imazapyr and Hexazinone Published LC 50 values = 10 6 ppb Published LC 50 values = 10 6 ppb NCASI 2006a, NCASI 2006b

Watershed Studies in the South  Consistent trends observed Small, temporary changes in stream hydrology Small, temporary changes in stream hydrology Small, temporary changes in stream water chemistry following fertilization Small, temporary changes in stream water chemistry following fertilization Extremely low levels of herbicide residues Extremely low levels of herbicide residues  Disturbance events can be more significant than ‘intensive’ management prescriptions using fertilization and herbicides Tropical and summer storm events significant Tropical and summer storm events significant

Harvesting

Forestry BMP Efficacy in the SE Figure from M. Miwa, International Paper

BMPs Simplified to Five Principles  Minimize bare ground and soil compaction  Separate bare ground from surface waters  Separate fertilizer and pesticide application from surface waters  Provide a forested buffer around streams  Engineer stable road surfaces and stream crossings Jackson and Olzewski 2005

Roads and Stream Crossings  Harvesting does not result in declines in environmental quality Soils and Water Soils and Water  Roads & Stream Crossings are the greatest threats to water quality when… BMPs not utilized BMPs not utilized BMPs installed improperly BMPs installed improperly  State BMP compliance reports point this out

Thank You…