FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club Emergence of Small-Scale Magnetic Loops in the Quiet Sun Internetwork R. Centeno, H Socas-Navarro, B. Lites, M. Kubo High Altitude.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evolution of Magnetic Setting in Flare Productive Active Regions Yixuan Li Space Weather Research Lab New Jersey Institute of Technology.
Advertisements

2006/4/17-20 Extended 17 th SOT meeting Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz M. Kubo (ISAS/JAXA), K. Shimada (University of Tokyo), K. Ichimoto, S.
Small-scale solar surface fields M. J. Martínez González Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias.
Study of Magnetic Helicity Injection in the Active Region NOAA Associated with the X-class Flare of 2011 February 15 Sung-Hong Park 1, K. Cho 1,
Science With the Extreme-ultraviolet Spectrometer (EIS) on Solar-B by G. A. Doschek (with contributions from Harry Warren) presented at the STEREO/Solar-B.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the photosphere we can observe flux.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the photosphere we can observe flux.
The Sun’s Dynamic Atmosphere Lecture 15. Guiding Questions 1.What is the temperature and density structure of the Sun’s atmosphere? Does the atmosphere.
Solar-B 5, Tokyo, November 2003 J. Sánchez Almeida Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Spain.
Emerging Flux Simulations Bob Stein A.Lagerfjard Å. Nordlund D. Benson D. Georgobiani 1.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
1 Chromospheric UV oscillations depend on altitude and local magnetic field Noah S. Heller and E.J. Zita, The Evergreen State College, Olympia, WA
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Detection of Emerging Sunspot Regions in the Solar Interior Stathis Ilonidis, Junwei Zhao, and Alexander Kosovichev Stanford University LoHCo Workshop.
Direct Evidence of Emergence of a Helical Flux Rope under an Active- Region Prominence Joten Okamoto Kyoto Univ. / NAOJ JSPS Research Fellow Saku Tsuneta,
Review of Conditions for the Formation and Maintenance of Filaments Paper by Sara F. Martin, 1998 Review presented by Samuel Tun October 13, 2005
Modeling and Data Analysis Associated With Supergranulation Walter Allen.
Statistical properties of current helicity and twist distribution in the solar cycle by high resolution data from SOT/SP on board Hinode K. Otsuji 1),
Seething Horizontal Magnetic Fields in the Quiet Solar Photosphere J. Harvey, D. Branston, C. Henney, C. Keller, SOLIS and GONG Teams.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the solar photosphere we can observe.
High Resolution Imaging and EUV spectroscopy for RHESSI Microflares S. Berkebile-Stoiser 1, P. Gömöry 1,2, J. Rybák 2, A.M. Veronig 1, M. Temmer 1, P.
Observational signatures for shocks in the solar photosphere – possible HINODE/SOT observations Jan Rybak and A. Kucera, A. Hanslmeier, H. Woehl Astronomical.
Micro-Flare and High-Speed Down-Flow observed with VTT R. Kano(1), Y. Katsukawa(1), Y. Kitakoshi(2), T. Shimizu(3), S. Tsuneta(1) and V. Martinez Pillet(4)
2005/11/086th Solar-B Science Supersonic downflows in the photosphere discovered in sunspot moat regions T. Shimizu (ISAS/JAXA, Japan),
Small scale magnetic energy release driven by supergranular flows Hugh Potts, Joe Khan and Declan Diver How to automatically detect and analyse supergranular.
Solar Atmosphere A review based on paper: E. Avrett, et al. “Modeling the Chromosphere of a Sunspot and the Quiet Sun” and some others [Alexey V. Byalko]
Magnetic Correspondence between Moving Magnetic Features and Penumbral Magnetic Fields M. Kubo and T. Shimizu ISAS/JAXA - The 6th Solar-B Science Meeting.
A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 1. A. Lagg - Abisko Winter School 2 Why Hinode?  spectra are easier to interpret than, e.g. CRISP (continuous WL coverage)
19 Oct 2005SPW41 Penumbral MMFs S Jaeggli (UHawaii) C Henney (NSO) S Luszcz (Cornell) S Walton (CSUN/SFO)
Helicity Observations by Huairou Vector Magnetograph Mei Zhang National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences Plan of the Talk: 1.Huairou.
Observations of Moreton waves with Solar-B NARUKAGE Noriyuki Department of Astronomy, Kyoto Univ / Kwasan and Hida Observatories M2 The 4 th Solar-B Science.
Nonlinear force-free coronal magnetic field extrapolation scheme for solar active regions Han He, Huaning Wang, Yihua Yan National Astronomical Observatories,
The multiscale magnetic pattern and the roots of solar activity F. Berrilli, S. Scardigli, D. Del Moro Department of Physics, University of Rome Tor Vergata,
Differences between central and peripheral umbral dots Michal Sobotka 1 Jan Jurcak 2,1 SXT seminar, 2008/10/10, NAOJ Astronomical Institute, Academy of.
Calibration of the Polarization Property of SOT K.Ichimoto, Y.Suematsu, T.Shimizu, Y.Katsukawa, M.Noguchi, M.Nakagiri, M.Miyashita, S.Tsuneta (National.
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
Using Realistic MHD Simulations for Modeling and Interpretation of Quiet Sun Observations with HMI/SDO I. Kitiashvili 1,2, S. Couvidat 2 1 NASA Ames Research.
Spectral Signature of Emergent Magnetic Flux D1 神尾 精 Solar Seminar Balasubramaniam,K.S., 2001, ApJ, 557, 366. Chae, J. et al., 2000, ApJ, 528,
Moving dipolar features in an emerging flux region P.N. Bernasconi et al. 2002, Sol. Phys., 209, 119 Junko Kiyohara 2003 Dec 22.
Magneto-Hydrodynamic Equations Mass conservation /t = − ∇ · (u) Momentum conservation (u)/t =− ∇ ·(uu)− ∇ −g+J×B−2Ω×u− ∇ · visc Energy conservation /t.
1. Twist propagation in Hα surges Patricia Jibben and Richard C. Canfield 2004, ApJ, 610, Observation of the Molecular Zeeman Effect in the G Band.
Valentina Abramenko 1, Vasyl Yurchyshyn 1, Philip R. Goode 1, Vincenzo Carbone 2, Robert Stein Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT, USA; 2 – Univ.
Valentina Abramenko, Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Philip R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT SH31C-18 06: Size and Lifetime Distributions of Bright Points.
Emerging Flux Simulations & semi-Sunspots Bob Stein A.Lagerfjärd Å. Nordlund D. Georgobiani 1.
High resolution images obtained with Solar Optical Telescope on Hinode
XRT and EIS Observations of Reconnection associated Phenomena D. Shiota, H. Isobe, D. H. Brooks, P. F. Chen, and K. Shibata
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Moving Magnetic Features as Prolongation of Penumbral Filaments The Astrophysical Journal, 632: , 2005 October 20. Sainz Dalda 1 Telescope Heliographique.
Nov. 8-11, th Solar-B science meeting Observational Analysis of the Relation between Coronal Loop Heating and Photospheric Magnetic Fields Y. Katsukawa.
Magnetic field oscillations all over the quiet Sun María Jesús Martínez González Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias.
Calibration of Solar Magnetograms and 180 degree ambiguity resolution Moon, Yong-Jae ( 文 鎔 梓 ) (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has continuously measured the vector magnetic field, intensity, and.
SHINE 2008 Vector Magnetic Fields from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager Steven Tomczyk (HAO/NCAR) Juan Borrero (HAO/NCAR and MPS)
Review: Recent Observations on Wave Heating S. Kamio Kwasan and Hida Observatories Kyoto University.
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17 th SOT meeting M. Kubo (JAXA/ISAS), K. Ichimito, Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ), and SOT-team Comparison of FG and SP data from Sun test.
Champ magnétique dans la photosphère et la Couronne solaires: I - observations Véronique Bommier LERMA Paris-Meudon Observatory THEMIS SEMHD-ENS, 24 avril.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Studies on Twisted Magnetic Flux Bundles
Examinations of the relative alignment of the instruments on SOT
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Magnetic Flux Ropes in the Solar Photosphere: The Vector Magnetic Field under Active Region Filaments B.W.Lites the Astrophysical Journal, 622: ,2005,
T. J. Okamoto (NAOJ/Kyoto Univ.)
Scientific Collaboration of NAOC Facilities & Solar-B
Observations of emerging and submerging regions with ASP and Solar-B
Magnetic Configuration and Non-potentiality of NOAA AR10486
Magnetic connection between the photosphere and the corona
Downflow as a Reconnection Outflow
Model of solar faculae А.А. Solov’ev,
Presentation transcript:

FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club Emergence of Small-Scale Magnetic Loops in the Quiet Sun Internetwork R. Centeno, H Socas-Navarro, B. Lites, M. Kubo High Altitude Observatory (NCAR), Boulder CO 80301, USA K. Ichimoto, S. Tsuneta, Y. Katsukawa, Y. Suematsu National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Tokyo, Japan T. Shimizu Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Tokyo, Japan S. Nagata Kwasan and Hida Observatories, Kyoto University, Japan Presented by Angelo P. Verdoni C enter for S olar- T errestrial R esearch Fall 2007 The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 666, Issue 2, pp. L137-L140. Z. Frank, R. Shine, T. Tarbell, A. Title Lockheed Martin Space and Astrophysics Laboratory, Palo Alto, CA, USA

FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club09/27/07 Introduction Presented in this paper is clear evidence of the emergence and temporal evolution of a small-scale InterNetwork (IN) magnetic loop in the quiet Sun photosphere. The nature of InterNetwork (IN) magnetic fields is currently a hot topic of debate: 1.Strong kG field strengths associated with small filling factors a 2.Predominance of weak magnetic fields (~300 – 500 G) b Lites c, using the Advanced Stokes Polarimeter (ASP), reports Horizontal Internetwork Fields (HIFs) with typical sizes of 1” and lifetimes of ~ 5 minutes, suggesting small magnetic loops are being advected towards the surface by the upward motion of the plasma inside the granule. Measurement of the full topology of a magnetic loop requires accurate 2-D spectropolarimetric maps of the four Stokes parameters, with high S/N ratio (~ continuum intensity), high spatial resolution and good consistent seeing conditions. The Spectro-Polarimetr (SP) of the Solar Optical Telescope (SOT) on board Hinode d meets all of these requirements.

FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club09/27/07 Figures taken from: Observations: Hinode SP / SOT Figure taken from: Shimizu, T. SolarB Solar Optical Telescope (SOT), The Solar-B Mission and the Forefront of Solar Physics, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 2004, Vol. 325

FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club09/27/07 March 10, hour long time series of 4’’ X 82’’ spectropolarimetric maps Cadence of 2 minutes 25 positions on spectrograph 4.8 s per position. (I, Q, U, every position 0.16’’ step size resulting in 4’’ wide maps with a spatial resolution of 0.32’’ Spectral region contains Fe I λ = Å and Å with 21.5 mÅ sampling Noise level in continuum polarization ~ 1.2 X I c Figure shows 4 consecutive snapshots ( 4’’ X 4’’ ) of the data set Δt = 125 sec Background shows integrated continuum intensity revealing photospheric granulation. Contours show the non-negligible polarization signals. Red: positive circular polarization Green: negative circular polarization Orange: net linear polarization (Q 2 + U 2 ) 1/2 Observations

FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club09/27/07 Magnetic Flux Density and Field Topology To quantify the magnetic flux density and its topology, full Stokes LTE inversions ( using LILIA e ) of pixels with non-negligible linear or circular polarization signals. LTE inversions should give reliable magnetic flux density values. However, some of the signals are marginally above noise level. By adjusting various parameters ( one example, keeping field height constant or allowing linear variation in height ) different values of the flux density were calculated. So, the apparent transverse and longitudinal flux densities were computed from the integrated polarization signals f and the LTE inversion e was used to determine the field topology (which remained consistently independent of parameter variation).

FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club09/27/07 Figure shows ( for the 4’’ X 4’’ region ) the time sequence of the longitudinal and transverse flux density ( 1 st and 2 nd row respectively ). The bottom row shows the field orientation with color-coded pixels representing inclination values and arrows representing the direction of positive polarity. Magnetic Flux Density and Field Topology

FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club09/27/07 Magnetic Flux Density and Field Topology t = 0, barely any magnetic signal present in the granular region centered at approximately (1’’,2’’) t = 2 min, new concentration of mostly horizontal ( transverse ) flux density appears. The field is parallel to the surface and azimuth makes angle ~ 60 degrees with E-W direction t = 4 min, magnetic feature has “stretched” in the linear direction. Magnetic poles now apparent. t = 6 min, transverse flux is not detectable with vertical dipoles visibly drifting towards granule boundary.

FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club09/27/07 Magnetic Flux Density and Field Topology Due to the azimuth ambiguity there are two possible topology configurations for the magnetic loop seen at t = 6 min.

FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club09/27/07 Conclusions Observational evidence is presented of an emergent magnetic loop structure at quiet sun disk center. The flux emerges within granular region showing strong horizontal magnetic signal flanked by traces of two vertical opposite polarities. This event brings ~ Mx of apparent longitudinal magnetic flux and does not seem to have any major influence on the shape of the underlying granulation pattern. In agreement with simulations g where small scale magnetic loop structures with less than Mx of longitudinal flux are not sufficiently buoyant to rise coherently against the granulation, and produce no visible disturbances. The convective motions carry the vertical magnetic flux towards the intergranular lanes, where it stays confined for longer times. This could explain why transverse magnetic flux (observed at disk center) is in general co-spatial with granules while longitudinal flux tends to be concentrated in the intergranular lanes.

FALL 2007CSTR Journal Club09/27/07 References a.Sanchez Almeida, J., Lites, B.W., ApJ, 532, 1215 b.Lin, H, 1995, ApJ, 446, 421 Lin, H., Rimmele, T., 1999, ApJ, 514, 448 c.Lites, B.W., Leka, K.D., Skumanich, A., Martinez Pillet, V., Shimizu, T., 1996, ApJ, 460, 1019 d.Kosugi, T. et al, 2007, Solar Physics, submitted e.Socas-Navarro, H., 2001, in Advanced Solar Polarimetry-Theory, Observation and Instrumentation, edited by M. Sigwarth, 236, 487 f.Lites, B.W. et al, 2007, ApJ, submitted g.Cheung, M.C.M., et al, 2007, A&A, 467, 703