 Presentation Objective: To provide an easy to understand school finance overview outlining the information necessary for one to draw factual conclusions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEPTUNE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Advertisements

School Finance –A Region One Overview Synopsis of Finance Update by Lynn Moak at Region One By Jesus Amezcua, CPA, LISD CFO.
Copyright©2007 Education Service Center Region XIII 1 Region 17 Summer School Finance Conference School Finance Update Presented by Omar Garcia Region.
Tax Rate Adoption North East ISD August 11, 2008.
School Finance 101 Midland Independent School District December 10, 2008.
Session V – February 26,  Texas ranks second behind California in the number of students enrolled in public schools.  With a 21.6% increase over.
Michael DeBakey PTA Meeting March 8, HISD HISD will face a $171 million state funding shortfall. Several alternative were presented to.
LTISD Legislative Priorities 84 th Regular Session, 2015 Session V – February 26, 2015.
Budget Hearing and Annual Meeting Monday, August 20,
2011 PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX RATE Funding the 2011/12 General Fund Budget Public Hearing – August 9, 2011.
AUSTIN Independent School District Overview AISD Budget Challenges  Unprecedented and permanent state cut to AISD revenue of nearly $50 million net of.
Maner Costerisan  There are 882 Public School Districts within the State of Michigan as of ◦ Intermediate School Districts – 56 ◦ Local Education.
What is the proposed ballot issue? Referred measure 3B: Increased funding for education in School District 51 only Shall taxes on peoples’ property (house,
Orange County Property Tax Reform Summary June 26, 2007 Board of County Commissioners.
Budgeting in Minnesota A St. Cloud Perspective. Key Players in Budgeting - Responsibility to present budget to City Council - What role do you play? Clarify.
A Guide To Texas School Finance Module #2. Sources of Revenue Funding for Texas public school district budgets comes from 3 sources: local funds, primarily.
School District of Waupaca Budget Hearing Tax Levy Certification October 29, 2013.
Fridley Public Schools ISD #14 Public Hearing for Taxes Payable in 2012.
District Planning And Advisory Committee Budget and Financial Overview Tuesday, May 20, 2014.
1 LISD Budget & Tax Hearing August 23, 2004 Presentation by: R.J. Barber, Ed.D. Superintendent Jesus J. Amezcua, CPA Chief Financial Officer Rudy Sanchez,
1 McKinney isd PROPOSED budget June 22, 2009.
1 Patterson Unified School District Presentation to staff Governor’s proposed Budget for Presented by Esther Corral-Carlson Superintendent & Steve.
BRYSON ISD Public Hearing Budget and Tax Rate Prepared by David Stout.
Buffalo State 2013/14 State Purpose Budget Overview Finance and Management September 20, 2013.
BRYSON ISD Proposed Budget and Tax Rate Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent.
Module # 1 Basic Orientation to Texas School Finance.
Lufkin ISD Tax Ratification Election (TRE) Lufkin ISD’s Plan to generate an additional $3,000,000 without a tax rate increase.
HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
BRYSON ISD Adopted Budget and Tax Rate Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent.
Preliminary Budget Projections March 25, 2013.
Savoy ISD Tax Ratification Election (TRE) What is it and why it is needed.
Budget Message Fiscal Year Presented by Kelly Muzzey.
2013 Tax Levy Hearing Board of Education Meeting December 16,
Budget 101 How a School Budget is Put Together A presentation by John Serapiglia Business Administrator.
2015 Tax Levy Board of Education Meeting December 21,
East Lansing Public Schools Financial Strategies Past, Present and Future.
School Finance 101 Your Name Your School District Contact Information Date:
School Finance 101 NALEO Education Leadership Initiative March 8, 2014 San Diego, California.
School Finance 101 Your name Your school district Date Contact Information.
School Districts III April 7, State Tax Caps Before 2006 Before 2006, the legislature limited the M & O rate to $1.50 per $100 valuation. It capped.
Thornton Township High School District 205 Presentation of Final Budget Preparing Today for the Challenges of Tomorrow September
MCSD 5-YEAR FORECAST PRESENTED MAY 19, 2016 BY RANDY BERTRAM, TREASURER BOARD APPROVAL MAY 23, 2016.
Texas School Finance Johnny W. Hill, CPA Asst
Recapture: Purchasing Attendance Credits vs. Detachment
Proposed Budget August 21, 2017.
FACTS ABOUT SCHOOL FINANCE
(This slide should be on the screen 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting while participants arrive and take their seats at their assigned tables.)
Proposed Budget Public Hearing
The Basics of School Finance
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
Mott Community College Budget Update
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues
CALIFON School District
Proposed Budget Public Hearing
December 3, 2018 Presented By: Ann-Marie Foucault Superintendent
Bradley Beach Board of Education
Financing the Future Five-Year Financial Forecast
2008 TASBO Annual Conference
This report was posted on the District’s website on January 31, 2019.
CALIFON School District
Town Hall on Budget & Taxes
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
Woodbridge School District
Proposed Preliminary Budget
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
Bradley Beach Board of Education
K-W Public Schools Revoke & Replace Operating Levy November 5, 2019
Presentation transcript:

 Presentation Objective: To provide an easy to understand school finance overview outlining the information necessary for one to draw factual conclusions and provide valuable feedback regarding school finances.

 Maintenance and Operations (M&O)  Debt Services or Interests and sinking (I&S)  Together equal the effective school property tax.  This presentation will focus on Maintenance and Operations (M&O) costs and tax rates.

 Legislation mandated property tax compression of the current effective rate in  As a result of the HB 1 and later HB 3646 legislation, Hamilton ISD M&O rates in 2006 ($1.31) were reduced to $1.04 in  Since 2007 the M&O rate has remained $1.04.

 Meant to be a “stop-gap” for a short time to equalize state funding.  The system has only slightly changed since  School Districts have been forced to provide educational services with no additional state aid or less aid state subsidy in some cases.  Often referred to Robin Hood or Wealth Equalization.

 What is it?  Hamilton ISD Target Revenue- $4912  Viewed as funding level per student  Adequacy vs. Equity Debate  Developed to ensure districts received the funding equal to that received prior to 2006  The Target Revenue system was never intended to be the school finance plan through 2010.

 Simply stated, the more students enrolled in a district, the more funding received per weighted average daily attendance or (WADA).  The funding system becomes increasing difficult to manage for districts with decreasing enrollments.

 The graph depicts the past 10 year enrollment trend for HISD.  Current trend lines indicate an average 20 student/year decrease through year Enrollment Trend for HISD

 Daily Attendance plays an important role in how school districts are funded.  The higher the ADA or attendance rate, the more money received.  HISD Current ADA is 772.

 Weights are given to special programs such as special education, career technology programs etc.  Weights are currently used as multipliers to provide a WADA  HISD WADA is currently

 If property appraisals increase, the State subsidizes less.  Inflationary costs continue to rise (fuel, insurance, related services)  Payrolls increase each year according to adopted salary schedules.  Yet no additional funding is provided to schools unless enrollment increases or more revenue is generated.

 Personnel is the arguably the single most important factor having the greatest impact on a child’s education.  Personnel accounts for approximately 71% of the Hamilton ISD operating budget.

 Expenses have continually increased.  Revenues have actually dropped as a result of decreased enrollment.  The HISD budget has been balanced each year without additional state funding and decreasing enrollment trend.

 Estimates show 60% of school districts adopted deficit budgets in  Fund balances or district savings were used to survive.  3 months operating expenses are recommended by school auditors and TEA and are utilized by school districts until state funding is received at the beginning of each year.  These funds will dry up eventually forcing districts to make cuts eventually.

 Increase enrollment  Raise taxes above the current $1.04 M&O rate.

 I&S- Currently $.17.  M&O- $1.04 and has remained at this level since the implementation of HB 1 in  State law currently set the cap at $1.17.  A maximum of $.13 could be proposed through a tax ratification election or TRE.  Any action to raise M&O taxes will require voter approval.

 The first 8 of the 13 pennies (silver pennies) will generate approximately $43,000.00/penny under the current funding system.  The next 5 of the 13 available pennies (copper pennies) will generate approximately $27,000.00/penny under the current funding system  Thus an additional $.13 will generate an additional $479, (approximate) to be used for future operating costs.

 $.01 increase will costs the average homeowner $6.30/annually  The increase of $.05 would raise the average homeowner’s property taxes by $31.50 annually. A $.13 increase would result in $81.90/year increase. (Assuming the average home in Hamilton remains approximately $63, )  Homestead exemption for 65 years and older.

 The Economic Climate  The idea of raising taxes could not be discussed/proposed at a worse time.  The second presentation will provide a general outline of cost savings strategies being implemented/explored without calling at Tax Ratification Election.