RockSat-C 2011 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.

Advertisements

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.

Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.

Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.

Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.

Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.

Comments on this template -Leave time for questions -Leave time for demonstration (at the final LRR) -Use your actual hardware in the presentation -Practice.

RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University/Institution Team Members Date.

Univ. of XXXXXXXXX 1 Things To Include: Team Photo Team Logo/Name.

Team Name Conceptual Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A

Full Mission Simulation Test Report UPR-R(river) P(rock) University of Puerto Rico Río Piedras Campus May 14, 2010.

RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.

RockSat-C 2011 Final Presentation RockSat-C 2011 Team: RocketSat VII University of Colorado-Boulder June 22, 2011 Kirstyn Johnson Jared Yenzer Andrew Broucek.

Individual Subsystem Testing Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.

Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.

Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A

RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.

Team Name Conceptual Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A

Team Name Critical Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A

Full Mission Simulation Test Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.

Comments on this template -Leave time for questions -Leave time for demonstration -Use your actual hardware in the presentation -Practice your presentation.

Launch Readiness Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.

Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Rev

RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Team Name School Date 1 Team Members

Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.

Testing - an Overview September 10, What is it, Why do it? Testing is a set of activities aimed at validating that an attribute or capability.

Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Team Name 1 Team Name 2 Team Name N Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.

Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley

Launch Readiness Review MinnSpec University of Minnesota Bryce Schaefer, Chris Woerhle, Art Graf

Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.

LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.

LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.

Miscellaneous Notes: This is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here. Basically this.

New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.

Team Name Flight Readiness Review (this is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here)

Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.

User notes: –Please use this template to create your Proposal Analysis Review –You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information.

Team Parro Project HUSP. Team Members Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Shawn Mullins.

User notes: –The purpose of the flight readiness review is to determine if your experiment is ready to fly. If it is not ready – it will not fly –You must.

BTEC Creative Media Production UNIT: 2 TASK 3. Learning Intentions To understand the principles of written communication To know how to make an effective.

RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Minnesota Sound Wreckers University of Minnesota 2/13/12 1 Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine.

THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.

RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report Harding University William Waldron, Joshua Griffith, Drew Cancienne, Edmond Wilson, David Stair 22 April.

RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson 4/23/2012.

Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.

Skeye The post report. Overview Original Plan Original Plan Results Results Possible Reasons for results Possible Reasons for results Resolutions for.

Launch Readiness Review

Northwest Nazarene University Chad Larson, Ben Gordon, Seth Leija, David Vinson, Drew Johnson, Zach Thomas June 1 st, 2012.

RockSat-C 2013 FMSTR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.

A Relevant and Descriptive Title Your Name and Your Partner’s Name Mrs. Ouellette, Honors Biology Licking Heights High School A Relevant and Descriptive.

Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.

Status Update Instructions (Required by NASA/Wallops) These completed slides are due to no later than Wednesday, March 6 th, 2013,

RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University of Minnesota Alex Richman, Jacob Schultz, Justine Topel, Will Thorson 5/27/2012.

RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Harding Flying Bison RockSat-C 2012 Rocket Team Harding University 13 February Team Members.

Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.

Notes on this template You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information requested in this template. Presentations should.

2016 FMSR Team Name Full Mission Simulation Review (FMSR) University/Institution Team Members Date 1.

2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.

Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.

Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.

Science Fair Project Type your project title here Your name Your teacher’s name Your school.

RockSat-C 2013 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.

Individual Subsystem Testing Report

Launch Readiness Review

Launch Readiness Review

Team Name Conceptual Design Review

Team Name Conceptual Design Review

Team Members (Full Names) Institution Date

FRIDAY SLIDES TEMPLATE

<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here

Presentation transcript:

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date

RockSat-C 2011 SITR User Notes Please follow this template as closely as possible Deviations from the template will make it hard to assess your flight, and we need to be able to do this to be sure your payload is ready and safe to fly

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Mission Overview

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Mission Overview State your mission goals/technical requirements, noting any modifications since ISTR (having to change instrumentation, memory, motor, damper, etc may effect your goals in the accuracy or ability of the payload) 4

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Subsystem Overview You should be including, but are not limited to: Mechanical/Structure Electrical/ CDH Power (EPS) Software Science … 5

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Mechanical/Structure Has the structure been fit-tested? Did everything fit? Describe the tests conducted –Run time –Purpose –How you determine if it was successful Are you making any modifications? Why? Will you need ballast to reach the 20 +/- 0.2 requirement (this should be almost finalized at this point in testing) For paired teams: What is the plan for integrating with your partner? –What will you use to connect to their payload? At what height? –What is your combined weight? –Where is your combined CG? 6

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Electrical/CDH Are the electronics working? Is the memory working? Have you retrieved data from memory that makes sense? Describe the tests conducted –Run time –Purpose –How you determine if it was successful Have boards and sensors been combined and tested? Results? 7

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Power (EPS) Have you tested power? Describe the tests conducted –Run time –Purpose –How you determine if it was successful What is your activation design? Has it been tested? 8

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Software Is your software written? Have you tested it with the electrical systems? What were the results? Are the sampling rates correct? 9

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Interfaces Summary Did integration of subsystems go as planned? What are modifications that need to be made? What still needs to be tested? What are major issues? How will they be resolved? How will you ensure you stay on schedule? 10

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Pictures You don’t need to put all pictures here, this is just a note to please include as many payload pictures and graphs of testing results as possible! Explain what the results of integration and testing imply for your payload. 11

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Test Summary Did everything work as planned? Did all electronics communicate –Did the software work with subsystems –Did the sensors return reasonable data Will the sensors need calibration? What needs to change before flight? Action Items 12

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Canister Integration What is the plan for integration? Do you have a general idea for procedure? –Don’t need a super detailed procedure yet, but start thinking about it for the Full Mission Sim, because you will need it then 13

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Conclusions Issues and concerns? Closing remarks 14

RockSat-C 2011 SITR Appendix Extra/additional data plots Additional data not immediately relevant to presentation