Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College October 3, 2011 Conceptual Design Review RockSat- C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Design Review ….. Royal Ordnance,Summerfield 17 th February 2001 National Rocketry Competition 2001 Open Rocketry Association Slide 1/14.
Advertisements

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Title: Intro to Water Bottle Rockets
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
Eric Marz Joe Mozloom Swati Maini Linda Mclaughlin Swapnil Mengawade Advisor: Jin Kang, PhD June 22, 2011 Drexel University RockSat1.
Stevens Institute of Technology - New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Critical Design Review Mike Giglia, Ethan Hayon Robert Hopkins.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
Team R3D3 Final Presentation Devon Campbell Greg McQuie Kate Kennedy Henk Wolda Marisa Antuna Nicole Ela Tyler Smith 12/1/11.
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Rock Sat-C Conceptual Design Review The New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Mike Giglia, Ethan.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
University of Wyoming Dorin Blodgett, Kevin Brown, Heather Choi, Ben Lampe Eric Robinson, Michael Stephens, Patrick Weber October 7,
NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR Harding Flying Bison ROCKSAT-C Team Conceptual Design Review Harding University Ed Wilson, Mentor, Will Waldron, Student 2, Student.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College November 30, 2011 Critical Design Review RockSat- C.
Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011 Individual Subsystem Testing Report.
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Speed of Sound Team BalloonWorks. Table of Contents Mission Goal and Objectives Science and Technical Backgrounds Mission Requirements Payload Design.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College October 26, 2011 Preliminary Design Review RockSat- C.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Hy-V.1 Skin Friction Sensor Experiment Presenters: Ryan F. Johnson Mitchell Foral-Systems November 24, 2008 University of Virginia.
UCF USLI Organization Team Development Proposal Requirements September 17 th, 2009.
MinnRock Design and Canister Layout Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-
The BRASS Project University of North Dakota Matthew Voigt Nathan Ambler Ron Fevig John Nordlie Tim Young Nirmal Patel (University of North Florida) Baike.
Neelam Patel David Wade Brian Reyes TITLE IN PROGRESS.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Launch Readiness Review
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Neelam Patel David Wade Brian Reyes TITLE IN PROGRESS.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
SENSOR SELECTION CALIBRATION OVERVIEWOVERVIEW DESIGN ROADMAP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project would not have been possible without the extensive.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
SOAREX VII Mission Design, construct, test, and fly an ultralight (
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
JASMM Conceptual Design Review
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Launch Readiness Review
Final Readiness Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Electrical traditional Chinese Instrument - Xun
Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College October 3, 2011 Conceptual Design Review RockSat- C

Mission Description and Project Scope Design - Mechanical Design - Electrical Layout and Data Flow Design - Test Sequences Pr oject Management and Plan Control Conclusion Outline of Presentation

Mission Overview Goal Statement:  Our goal is to design and implement various generators to passively collect energy for possible use for space based instrumentation. We expect to harvest energy from the flight of the rocket, solar, magnetic and other various sources.

Mission Overview Theory and Concepts:  Electromagnetic transducers will utilize Faraday’s Law.  Solar transducers will utilize Photoelectric effect.  Thermal transducers will utilize the Seebeck and Peltier effect.  Sound transducer(s) will utilize electromagnetic induction or the piezoelectric effect.

Mission Overview Mission Requirements  Payload Will:  Harvest electrical energy from various sources during flight.  Measure electricity generated and then dispose/store of excess energy.  Measure various environmental factors throughout flight such as humidity, magnetic field and acceleration.

Mission Overview Concepts of Operations

Mission Overview Expected Results  Photovoltaic transducers will produce a maximum of 3.3 volts.  Electromagnetic transducer output will range from millivolts to volts.  Electromagnetic induction transducers will output a maximum of 10 volts.  Output of all sensors will be recorded and measured.  A current off-the-shelf (COTS) data sensing package will measure environmental variables and the power used will be recorded.

Mission Overview Expected Results  Measurable current from all transducers will be produced throughout the flight profile, with the peak output from some sensors occurring during engine burn.  Thermo-electric transducer output will be in the microvolt range.  Piezoelectric transducers output will be measured in volts, proportional to strain on piezoelectric material.

Design Overview

Mechanical Designs

Design Overview Mechanical Designs

Design Overview Mechanical Designs

Design Overview Mechanical Designs

Design Overview Mechanical Designs

Design Overview Mechanical Designs

Design Overview Mechanical Designs

Design Overview Electrical Functional Block Diagram

Design Overview Electrical Designs  The electrical system will be triggered by a G-Switch, indicating rocket launch.  An internal countdown program will begin counting down from our expected flight time delta.  Master Arduino will come out of sleep mode and start the analog read loop.  The slave Arduino will begin receiving and recording data from the balloon board sensors.  After end of flight profile, the Arduino countdown timer reaches zero.  The Arduino saves all data in buffer and shuts down.

Design Overview Electrical Designs  Arduino provides 10 bit integer measurements at 1000 Hz for analogRead() command.  The analog reference voltage allows measurement from 0 – 5 V DC.  Amplification will increase noise, reducing measurement resolution.  Further design and testing will address this issue.

Design Overview Electrical Designs  We will use a microSD flash card to store all data from generators and sensors.  Pending further testing, we will decide between the OpenLog and the Arduino microSD shield. OpenLogmicroSD Shield

Design Overview Software Flowchart

Design Overview Functional Project Testing  Testing will utilize a shake table and rocket test flights to functionality of components and full payload.  Shake table is currently in design.  Will perform component testing with a small scale rocket.  Will perform full scale mock up canister test with a high power rocket.  More test will occur as needed.

 Length – 46 inches  Diameter – 4 inches  Cesaroni – H 400 Motor  Max Acceleration – 26 (gees) (approx.)  Max Altitude – 1600 ft (approx.) Component Rocket Specs Design Overview

Full Scale Test Rocket Specs  Length – 93 inches  Diameter – 10 inches  Cesaroni – J 1520 Motor  Max Acceleration – 25 (gees) (approx.)  Max Altitude – 1900 ft (approx.) Design Overview

RPP Mock Up Canister Full Scale Mock Up Rocket Flight + Canister Specs Full Scale Mock Up Payload Design Overview

RockSat-C User’s Guide Compliance  Project PEGASIS will use half a canister and require a partner.  Useable payload space = 9.3” Diameter x 4.75” high.  Center of gravity  Payloads must conform to a center of gravity that lies within a 1x1x1 inch envelope of the geometric centroid of the integrated RockSat payload canister.  Approximate weight < 3.45 lbs without cap head screws.  Total weight of canister = 20+/- 0.2 lb.  Cannot modify canister.  Must be able to pass vibration test.

Design Overview Shared Canister  Project PEGASIS will use half a canister and require a partner.  The optic port will be used, but pressure port shall remain available.  Center of mass and all other requirements shall be fulfilled in compliance with RockSat-C Payload Canister User’s Guide.

Management Organization Chart

Management Safety  Electrical - rubber insulated gloves, safety goggles, make sure all switches are off for connect wire.  Mechanical - gloves, safety goggles, using common sense and caution around sharp tools, turn off power tools after use.  Safety officer will train team members on safe guidelines and practices.  Test-  Materials- use non-flammable material.  Motors- use certified motors.  We will strictly follow the TRIPOLI HIGH POWER SAFETY CODES.

Management Timeline 10/7 – RockSat-C meeting 10/14 – RockSat-C meeting 10/17 – Payment and online progress report due 10/26-10/27 – PDR and PDR teleconference 10/28 – RockSat-C meeting November to May – Open for Rocket Flight Testing 11/4 – RockSat-C meeting 11/7-11/11 – Component testing (shake table) 11/14 – Online progress report due 11/18 – Rock-Sat meeting 11/30-12/1 – CDR and then CDR teleconference 12/2 – RockSat-C meeting, begin legacy equipment testing 12/9 – RockSat-C meeting

Management Test Total: $ Electrical Total: $ Mechanical Total: $ Total Available Funds: $2,000 Equipment Budget Department MechanicalEquipment Estimated Cost Cost Description Makrolon $ Mounting Plates for Sensors and Generators Bolts $ 16.75Mounting Wire $ 19.00Generators Magnets $ 33.50Generators Rubber Bushings $ 19.75Shock Absorbtion for Plates and Hardware Piezoelectric speaker element $ 52.50Generator Electrical Micro SD Card $ 30.00Data Storage G - Switches $ 42.00Electronic Activation Op Amps $ 23.50Voltage Output Amplification Blank Printable Circuit Board $ 21.50Electronics Various Resistors $ 24.25Electrical System Etchant $ 48.00Cicrcuit Board Arwdino Atmega $ 83.00Program Controller Data Loggers ( Micro SD Shield of Open Log ) $ 42.00Data Collection Test Plywood $ 22.25Shake Table t $ Shake Table and Test Rocket Construction Assorted hardware $ 40.00Shake Table and Test Rocket Construction Cardboard tube $ 26.25Test Rocket Epoxy resisn $ 14.00Test Rocket Fiberglass $ 20.50Test Rocket Motors & Propellent $ Test Rocket Tubular Nylon $ 32.50Test Rocket Nose Cone $ 23.00Test Rocket Ignitors $ 32.25Test Rocket Kevlar Sheeting $ 42.00Test Rocket Rocket Electronics $ 85.25Test Rocket Parachute $ 22.00Test Rocket Table for shake test $ 35.25Test Rocket Vibration electronics and sensor $ 50.50Test Rocket Total MechanicalElectricalTest $ 1, $ $ $ Budget Overview

Management Mentor Doug Knight Ph.D  B.S. in physics, M.S. Applied Physics, Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering with Precision Engineering Concentration  Former Senior Test Engineer, Digital Optics Corporation  Mentor to winning TARC team, 2006  NASA SLI and USLI mentor,  Physics instructor, Mitchell Community College  TRA Level 2 Certified, high powered rocketry

CNC Machine Shop Facilities Electronics Lab Rapid Prototype Machine

Further Research and Considerations Further Research  Electromagnetic generators  Efficient Solar cells  Voltage amplification and noise reduction  Programming completion  Update Budget  Writing to Micro SD flash card Considerations Electricity generated be stored or dumped. Specific equipment for electrical transduction.

Conclusion  This project will measure and record the output of various transducers passively collecting energy during flight profile of a sounding rocket.  The design, manpower, and facilities necessary to make this project feasible have been presented and are sufficient to complete the mission.