1 CERCLA/EPCRA Administrative Reporting Exemption for Air Releases of Hazardous Substances from Animal Waste at Farms Covers for Manure Storages: Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INCIDENT NOTIFICATION WHO YOU GONNA CALL? Environmental Conference June 4, 2012.
Advertisements

Rules for the Control of Ammonia from Dairy Farms in Idaho September 26, 2006 WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Boise, ID Martin Bauer.
Key Federal Reporting Requirements Material/ Statute RegulationsIncidentReport to/byReporting Air Emissions (Clean Air Act) 40 CFR 63.10(d)Start up, shutdown.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Authorizes EPA to identify hazardous wastes and regulate their generation, transportation, treatment, storage and.
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
Air Quality Legislations in OR and WA Pius Ndegwa Animal Waste Nutrients and Air Quality Specialist, Biological Systems Engineering Washington State University.
EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Suzanne Powers
Superfund Amendments & Reauthorization Act (SARA TITLE III) OR Emergency Planning & Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) Presented by Ian Ewusi IERC Field.
Hazardous Materials Incidents by Chris Hawley
Jack Harrah Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Risk Management Program Quality Assurance Program Plan David R. Taylor US EPA Region 9 Quality Assurance Office.
USEPA Mandatory Reporting of GHGs for Manure Management Systems Covers for Manure Storages: Workshop and Field Day October 29, 2009 Goodwins and Miedema.
Erika White September 11,  1984: Methyl isocyanate release at Union Carbide in Bhopal, India - 2,000 immediate fatalities  1985: M ethylene chloride.
WELCOME: EPA PUBLIC MEETING
Hazardous Materials Spill/Release Notification Presented by County of Riverside Transportation Department.
Dairies and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Environmental Concerns and Research Needs USEPA, Region 9 March 2004.
Update on Dairy Air Quality Regulations Frank Mitloehner, PhD Associate Air Quality CE Specialist Animal Science UC Davis.
EPCRA1 The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
Oregon State Police Office of State Fire Marshal Emergency Planning & Response Section An Overview of the Superfund Ammendment & Reauthorization Act (SARA)
Regulations / Definitions
EPCRA BACKGROUND EPCRA 301 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)(Form R)/ RMP (Risk Management Program) Federal Forms Tier Two Oreg on has HSIS.
Hot Topics in CAA – 112(r) Federal Program Update GA AWMA REGULATORY UPDATE CONFERENCE Adam G. Sowatzka April 16, 2013.
ISAT 422: Environmental Management Disasters and Right to Know n Unlike OSHA, focus is on non-employees – Neighbors in community – Emergency responders.
1 E-Plan Web-Based Tier II Reporting System Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
Overview of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Southern Plains Area USDA/ARS.
Regulatory Controls PBT Strategy Team Great Lakes Regional Collaboration February 22, 2005.
State Emergency Response Commission SERC January 5, 2009 TENNESSEE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY.
By Jessica Shi Period 3. the Emergency Planning & Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) was enacted by Congress in 1986 as the national legislation on community.
Solid Waste Laws. Federal Legislation RCRA (1976)- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) CERCLA (1980) –The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Overview of the Final EPA Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) Regulations April 1, 2003.
Who? What? Why? How? Each year, more than 1400 hazardous chemical emergencies are reported in Missouri.
2008 CAFO Roundtable October 16,2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
IDEM and Agricultural Organizations Meeting February 17, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Presented to Georgia Airports Association Conference October 21, 2009 EPA Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures – Update Also – What’s Coming with.
2009 LEPC CONFERENCE Pulse of the LEPCs Challenges for LEPC Compliance Ian Ewusi IERC Field Representative.
EMS in Agriculture and Agribusiness - United Egg Producers XL Project.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act Sammy Johnson.
CFO and CAFO Regulatory Issues IN Pork Producers January 30, 2007.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
Denise Imbler, Program Administrator Florida Hazardous Materials Planning and Prevention Program
Animal Feeding Operation Air Emission Exemption: Final Rule Summary Greg Bazley EPA, Region VIII, Denver, CO
Confined and Concentrated Animal Feeding Permitting Indiana Soybean Alliance December 12, 2006.
Animal Feeding Operations Status of the AFO Air Emissions Consent Agreement and Final Order February 9, 2006.
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act Tier II Inventory Form Preparing to Submit Part 1 of 2 October
Michelle Merrington Kelsey Bardsley. What is EPCRA?  Gives the public the right to know and receive information on chemical spills or accidental releases.
TIER 2 REPORTING Bernardine Zimmerman TIER 2 CHEMICAL REPORTING PROGRAM or
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act Regulatory Overview Course.
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-know Reporting Kathleen LeGreid - Environmental Protection Agency EPA EPCRA (Emergency Planning Community Right-to-know.
27 Hazardous Materials: Overview. 27 Objectives (1 of 2) Define a hazardous material. Describe the different levels of hazardous materials training: awareness,
Hazardous materials awareness Chapter 1, intro to hazardous materials.
Status Report to the President under EO EPA ACTIONS 1 Executive Order: Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security.
REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM NOVEMBER 5, Executive Order: Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security.
Hazardous Materials: Overview 1. Objectives (1 of 2) Define a hazardous material. Define weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Describe the levels of hazardous.
Hazardous Materials Incidents by Chris Hawley CHAPTER 1: Laws Regulations and Standards.
CO Chemical Safety Workshops for Regulated Facilities
Department of Environmental Quality
Hazardous Materials: Overview (Fire Fighter I)
Hazardous Materials: Ch01
Environmental Awareness
McMullen County Local Emergency Planning Committee
The Emergency Planning & Community Right-To-Know Act
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
EPCRA: Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Old v. New Congress Old Congress: Few environmental hearings, dominated by industry lawyers and lobbyists New Congress: 19 environmental hearings so far,
Presentation transcript:

1 CERCLA/EPCRA Administrative Reporting Exemption for Air Releases of Hazardous Substances from Animal Waste at Farms Covers for Manure Storages: Workshop and Field Day October 29, 2009 Goodwins and Miedema Dairy Farm Circleville, OH Lynn M. Beasley, U.S. EPA

2 Overview CERCLA/EPCRA Reporting Basics Summary of Significant Rule Provisions Key Issues Associated with Rule Development Post Rule

3 CERCLA/EPCRA Reporting Basics Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) CERCLA section 103 Notification Requirements Episodic Reporting Continuous Release Reporting Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) EPCRA section 304 Emergency Reporting Requirements Emergency Reporting Continuous Release Reporting EPCRA section 324 Public Availability of Plans, Data Sheets, Forms, and Followup Notices Followup emergency notice submitted under EPCRA section 304(c) is to be made publicly available. Exemptions and Exclusions

4 Summary of Significant Rule Provisions The final rule was published on December 18, 2008, and became effective on January 20, Final rule is a balance between the unlikelihood that the Federal government would respond to CERCLA notifications and comments from those who are concerned with releases of hazardous substances from such farming operations, particularly larger farming operations. Exempts all farms from the notification requirements of CERCLA section 103 for releases of hazardous substances from animal waste to the air. Notification to the National Response Center (NRC) when a reportable quantity (RQ) or more is released from a facility into the environment. Provides a limited EPCRA reporting exemption for releases of hazardous substances from animal waste into the air at farms that have animals which are stabled or confined (e.g., barns or feedlots) in numbers below those for a large concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO), as adopted from the NPDES program regulations. Farms that exceed the threshold number of animals for a large CAFO will still be required to report under EPCRA 304, and state and local authorities will receive reports and communities will have access to information about releases.

5 Summary of Significant Rule Provisions (Cont.) The rationale for the rule was based on the purpose of notifying the NRC, SERCs and LEPCs when a hazardous substance is released—the unlikelihood that a response to that release would be taken by any government agency. The final rule does not create any new reporting requirements under CERCLA and EPCRA, and the exemption did not apply to other sources at farms (e.g., tanks) or releases from animal waste to other media. Enforcement Does not prevent the Agency from enforcing any of the CERCLA liability provisions, nor any other statutory authorities. Does not prevent the federal government from taking a response to the release. State or local governments could request federal assistance in any necessary response.

6 Key Issues Associated with Rule Development EPA Federal on-scene coordinators are unlikely to respond to notifications from farms to the NRC. To date, EPA has not initiated a response to any NRC notification of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, or any other hazardous substances released to the air where animal waste at farms is the source of that release. EPA does not foresee a situation where the Agency would initiate a response action as a result of such notification. State and Local Governments Several have indicated that such response actions are unlikely to be taken as a result of a notification of releases of hazardous substances from animal waste at farms.

7 Key Issues Associated with Rule Development (Cont.) Environmental and Citizen Groups Concern that air emissions of hazardous substances from animal waste may pose a risk, particularly at the largest animal feeding operations. Provided health studies regarding exposure to ammonia and hydrogen sulfide from farms. The public has a right to know what is released into their communities. Reporting releases of hazardous substances increases the visibility of farms to the communities.

8 Post Rule Interest from Capitol Hill EPA briefed House and Senate Agriculture Committee staff in 2008 and House Agriculture staff in 2009 No legislation has been introduced to exclude manure from CERCLA in 2009 (111 th Congress). Continuous Release Reporting Forms EPA is developing forms and guidance for farms to submit their release information.

9 Contact Information Lynn M. Beasley