Collection Understanding Michelle Chang, John J. Leggett, Richard Furuta, Andruid Kerne Texas A&M University Michelle Chang, John J. Leggett, Richard Furuta,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recuperação de Informação B Cap. 10: User Interfaces and Visualization 10.1,10.2,10.3 November 17, 1999.
Advertisements

Support.ebsco.com Tutorial. Welcome to EBSCOs Hobbies & Crafts Reference Center (HCRC) tutorial. HCRC is a comprehensive database that provides detailed.
Natural Visualization Steve Haroz & Kwan-Liu Ma University of California at Davis.
Web Search Results Visualization: Evaluation of Two Semantic Search Engines Kalliopi Kontiza, Antonis Bikakis,
1 CS 501 Spring 2002 CS 501: Software Engineering Lecture 11 Designing for Usability I.
Information Retrieval: Human-Computer Interfaces and Information Access Process.
CG & GIS Lab: Igor Antolović Vladan Mihajlović Dejan Rančić SEEVCCC: Dragan Mihić Vladimir Đur đ ević Republic Hydrometeorologica l service of Serbia 12th.
Current tools: Graphing libraries / CMS database: data summarization / aggregation / graphing –MySQL database: over 15 million sensor data and image capture.
Galia Angelova Institute for Parallel Processing, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Visualisation and Semantic Structuring of Content (some.
LensBar – Visualization for Browsing and Filtering Large Lists of Data Toshiyuki Masui Proceedings. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 1998 元智資工所.
Information Retrieval Concerned with the: Representation of Storage of Organization of, and Access to Information items.
Instructional Information in Adaptive Spatial Hypertext Luis Francisco-Revilla and Frank Shipman Presented By : Ananda Man Shrestha.
River Campus Libraries Metadata That Supports Real User Needs David Lindahl Director of Digital Library Initiatives University of Rochester Libraries.
JCDL 2005 – June 8 th, 2005 User Perceptions of Digital Image Similarity Unmil Karadkar, Richard Furuta, Jeevan Joseph John Center for the Study of Digital.
Information Retrieval: Human-Computer Interfaces and Information Access Process.
© Anselm SpoerriInfo + Web Tech Course Information Technologies Info + Web Tech Course Anselm Spoerri PhD (MIT) Rutgers University
THE UHLE BERKELEY Presented by Shelby, Kelly, Cecilia May 5th, 2005 SIMS 213.
River Campus Libraries Metadata That Supports Real User Needs Jennifer Bowen Head of Cataloging University of Rochester Libraries David Lindahl Director.
THE VISUALIZATION OF DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS Introduction: Edward Tufte describes the visual presentation of quantitative data as “envisioning information.”
Chapter 2: The Visual Studio.NET Development Environment Visual Basic.NET Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program Design.
SiS Technical Training Development Track Technical Training(s) Day 1 – Day 2.
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 digital libraries and human information behavior Tefko Saracevic, Ph.D. School of Communication, Information and.
ECDL 2006 An Exploration of Space-Time Constraints on Contextual Information in Image-based Testing Interfaces Unmil Karadkar, Marlo Nordt Richard Furuta.
Collection Understanding Through Streaming Collage Michelle Chang John Leggett Center for the Study of Digital Libraries Texas A&M University.
1 SIMS 247: Information Visualization and Presentation Marti Hearst Oct 3, 2005.
Everyday inclusive Web design: an activity perspective CS575 MADHAVI L NIDAMARTHY.
Component-based Authoring of Complex, Petri net-based Digital Library Infrastructure Yung Ah Park, Unmil P. Karadkar, and Richard Furuta Department of.
Visual Search. Main Goals of Visual Search 1.0: –Allow users to explore search results and understand their relationships without forcing users to read.
Chapter : 13 WebApp Design
Faculty of Informatics and Information Technologies Slovak University of Technology Personalized Navigation in the Semantic Web Michal Tvarožek Mentor:
William H. Bowers – Designing Look and Feel Cooper 19.
Document (Text) Visualization Mao Lin Huang. Paper Outline Introduction Visualizing text Visualization transformations: from text to pictures Examples.
Teaching with Multimedia and Hypermedia
Unitedstreaming New Features New and easy interface Professional Development Animations and audio files Daily video content New and enhanced tools Customized.
Visual User Interfaces David Rashty. “Grasping the whole is a gigantic theme. Arguably, intellectual history’s most important. Ant-vision is humanity’s.
Creating, Visualizing, Analyzing, and Comparing Series of Artworks Carlos Monroy, Richard Furuta, and Enrique Mallen.
Support.ebsco.com EBSCOhost Visual Search Tutorial.
Information Retrieval Evaluation and the Retrieval Process.
Hao Wu Nov Outline Introduction Related Work Experiment Methods Results Conclusions & Next Steps.
Document management (aka ‘digital libraries’) The Greenstone Group: Professor Ian Witten (leader); David Bainbridge, Dave Nichols, S.J. Cunningham, Steve.
Optimizing Resource Discovery Service Interfaces in Statewide Virtual Libraries: The Library of Texas Challenge William E. Moen, Ph.D. Texas Center for.
© 2008 by Andrew Webb, Interface Ecology Lab. meta-metadata: an extensible semantic architecture for multimedia metadata definition, extraction, and presentation.
Chapter 6 Interface Design and Usability. Interactivity Interactivity:  A defining characteristic of multimedia interfaces  Implies both interaction.
MS Access: Introduction 1Database Design. MS Access: Overview MS Access A Database Management System (DBMS) designed to create applications that organize,
Directions for Hypertext Research: Exploring the Design Space for Interactive Scholarly Communication John J. Leggett & Frank M. Shipman Department of.
Faculty of Informatics and Information Technologies Slovak University of Technology Personalized Navigation in the Semantic Web Michal Tvarožek Mentor:
Personalized Interaction With Semantic Information Portals Eric Schwarzkopf DFKI
Project ECLIPSE.  The convergence of media and technology in a global culture is changing the way we learn about the world.
MOVIE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM INFORMATION VISUALIZATION & PROPOSING NEW INTERFACE IAT 814 Adrian Bisek.
User Interface Components Lecture # 5 From: interface-elements.html.
ResultMaps: Search Result Visualization for Hierarchical Information Spaces Danielle H. Lee.
Visualization in Text Information Retrieval Ben Houston Exocortex Technologies Zack Jacobson CAC.
Overviews of the Library of Texas & ZLOT Project Dr. William E. Moen Principal Investigator.
A Resource Discovery Service for the Library of Texas Requirements, Architecture, and Interoperability Testing William E. Moen, Ph.D. Principal Investigator.
Web Content Development Dr. Komlodi Class 1: Introductions, Elements of Web Design.
User Interface Design Patterns: Part 1 Kirsten McCane.
Toward Semantic Search: RDFa based facet browser Jin Guang Zheng Tetherless World Constellation.
Collaborative Query Previews in Digital Libraries Lin Fu, Dion Goh, Schubert Foo Division of Information Studies School of Communication and Information.
Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen HAZAS – Hazard Assessment ECCAIRS Technical Course Provided by the Joint Research Centre - Ispra.
Generalized Formal Models for Faceted User Interfaces Edward Clarkson, Sham Navathe and Jim Foley College of Computing, Georgia Tech.
Usability and Human Factors Cognition and Human Performance Lecture c This material (Comp15_Unit3c) was developed by Columbia University, funded by the.
XP Creating Web Pages with Microsoft Office
WHIM- Spring ‘10 By:-Enza Desai. What is HCIR? Study of IR techniques that brings human intelligence into search process. Coined by Gary Marchionini.
WP5: Semantic Multimedia
Connecting Interface Metaphors to Support Creation of Path-based Collections Unmil P. Karadkar, Andruid Kerne, Richard Furuta, Luis Francisco-Revilla,
Everyday inclusive Web design: an activity perspective
User Interface Components
Your digital sharing library of resources!
Designing for the World Wide Web
5.02 Understand database queries, forms, and reports.
Presentation transcript:

Collection Understanding Michelle Chang, John J. Leggett, Richard Furuta, Andruid Kerne Texas A&M University Michelle Chang, John J. Leggett, Richard Furuta, Andruid Kerne Texas A&M University J. Patrick Williams, Samuel A. Burns, Randolph G. Bias University of Texas at Austin

Introduction Large collection of digital artifacts Actual contents difficult to perceive Image retrieval methods are insufficient Large collection of digital artifacts Actual contents difficult to perceive Image retrieval methods are insufficient

Collection Understanding Understand the essence of the collection by focusing on the artifacts Comprehensive view Not locating specific artifacts Understand the essence of the collection by focusing on the artifacts Comprehensive view Not locating specific artifacts

Collection Understanding (CU) vs. Information Retrieval (IR) Find specific artifacts Prior knowledge of metadata Define queries Find specific artifacts Prior knowledge of metadata Define queries

Related Work Collages Photo Browsers Image Browsers Ambient Displays Collages Photo Browsers Image Browsers Ambient Displays

Collage combinFormation Collaborage Notification Collage Aesthetic Information Collages Video Collage combinFormation Collaborage Notification Collage Aesthetic Information Collages Video Collage

Photo Browsers Calendar Browser Hierarchical Browser FotoFile PhotoFinder PhotoMesa Calendar Browser Hierarchical Browser FotoFile PhotoFinder PhotoMesa

Image Browsers Zoomable Image Browser Strip-Browser Flamenco Image Browser Zoomable Image Browser Strip-Browser Flamenco Image Browser

Ambient Displays Dangling String Tangible Bits Informative Art Dangling String Tangible Bits Informative Art

Problems with Querying by Metadata Currently the most used method Two levels: collection, artifact Creator/maintainer/collector defines metadata Time-consuming Vague Currently the most used method Two levels: collection, artifact Creator/maintainer/collector defines metadata Time-consuming Vague

Problems with Browsing Pre-defined and fixed structure Requires large amount of navigation (pointing and clicking) Narrows a collection Pre-defined and fixed structure Requires large amount of navigation (pointing and clicking) Narrows a collection

Problems with Scrolling Limited screen space Entire result set not visible Requires large amount of pointing and clicking Limited screen space Entire result set not visible Requires large amount of pointing and clicking

Visualization Streaming Collage Ambient Slideshow Variably Gridded Thumbnails Streaming Collage Ambient Slideshow Variably Gridded Thumbnails

Streaming Collage Collage is “an assembly of diverse fragments” Streaming – constructed dynamically in time Collage is “an assembly of diverse fragments” Streaming – constructed dynamically in time

Metadata Filtering Modifying metadata fields and values Expand result set Constrain result set Modifying metadata fields and values Expand result set Constrain result set

Connecting Streaming Collage with Metadata Filtering Continuous Process of: Interactively filtering metadata Generating dynamic collage Temporal and Spatial Continuous Process of: Interactively filtering metadata Generating dynamic collage Temporal and Spatial

Demonstration: Metadata Filtering

Demonstration: Streaming Collage

Demonstration: Subcollections

Ambient Slideshow Peripheral Display Chance encounters Slowly reveals artifacts in the collection Peripheral Display Chance encounters Slowly reveals artifacts in the collection

Demonstration: Ambient Picasso

Demonstration: Variably Gridded Thumbnails

Variably Gridded Thumbnails Relevance measure Full-text search Grid of thumbnails Grid element’s background color varies Relevance measure Full-text search Grid of thumbnails Grid element’s background color varies

Evaluation Independent evaluation Usability study gauged intuitiveness of interface 15 graduate students: UT at Austin Independent evaluation Usability study gauged intuitiveness of interface 15 graduate students: UT at Austin

No Directed Tasks Users “queried the database” Didn’t right-click on any images Didn’t use metadata filtering Users “queried the database” Didn’t right-click on any images Didn’t use metadata filtering

Directed Tasks Successfully created collages Right-clicked on images Used metadata filtering Successfully created collages Right-clicked on images Used metadata filtering

Conclusions from study Improvements for intuitive interface –Initial engagement –Metadata Filtering form & controls –Help menu –Hint for no results Improvements for intuitive interface –Initial engagement –Metadata Filtering form & controls –Help menu –Hint for no results

Summary Collection understanding shifts the traditional focus of image retrieval Inspire users to derive their own relationships by focusing on artifacts Collection insight increases Collection understanding shifts the traditional focus of image retrieval Inspire users to derive their own relationships by focusing on artifacts Collection insight increases

Acknowledgments Dr. Enrique Mallen, The On-Line Picasso Project The Humanities Informatics Initiative, Telecommunications and Informatics Task Force, Texas A&M University. Dr. Enrique Mallen, The On-Line Picasso Project The Humanities Informatics Initiative, Telecommunications and Informatics Task Force, Texas A&M University.