September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Liquid Wall Ablation under IFE Photon Energy Deposition at Radius of 0.5 m A. René Raffray and Mofreh Zaghloul University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Member of the Helmholtz Association Takeshi Hirai | Institute of Energy Research | Association EURATOM – FZJ Cracking of a tungsten material exposed to.
Advertisements

September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.
October 2, 2002/ARR 1 1. Liquid Wall Ablation 2. FLiBe Properties A. R. Raffray and M. Zaghloul University of California, San Diego ARIES-IFE Meeting.
Two-Phase: Overview Two-Phase Boiling Condensation
Lesson 25 TWO-PHASE FLUID FLOW
Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.
DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 1 Results from parametric studies of thin liquid wall IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. Fusion Technology Institute University.
May 27, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., IFE Chamber Walls: Requirements, Design Options, and Synergy with MFE Plasma Facing Components 1 IFE Chamber Walls:
April 6-7, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber 1 Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi, Z. Dragojlovic,
DAH, RRP, UW - FTI ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 1 Thin liquid Pb wall protection for IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. and R. R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute.
Vapor Conditions Including Ionization State in Thick Liquid Wall IFE Reactors Presented by D. A. Haynes, Jr. for the staff of the Fusion Technology Institute.
December 5-6, 2002 HAPL Program Workshop, NRL, Washington, D.C. 1 Enhancing Target Survival Presented by A.R. Raffray Other Contributors: M. S. Tillack,
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley C.S. Debonnel 1,2, S.S. Yu 2, P.F. Peterson 1 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department.
The Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Preliminary Dust and Debris Clearing Studies in an IFE Chamber David Petti J. Phillip Sharpe.
A. R. Raffray, B. R. Christensen and M. S. Tillack Can a Direct-Drive Target Survive Injection into an IFE Chamber? Japan-US Workshop on IFE Target Fabrication,
February 3-4, nd US/Japan Target Workshop, GA, San Diego, CA 1 Heating and Thermal Response of Direct- Drive Target During Injection Presented by.
November th TOFE, Washington, D.C. 1 Thermal Behavior and Operating Requirements of IFE Direct-Drive Targets A.R. Raffray 1, R. Petzoldt 2, J. Pulsifer.
June 18, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., ARIES-IFE Chamber Engineering Activities, IAEA Meeting, San Diego 1 ARIES-IFE Chamber Engineering Activities A. R.
May 5-6, 2003/ARR 1 1. Liquid Wall Ablation under IFE Photon Energy Deposition 2. Flibe Properties from EoS A. René Raffray and Mofreh Zaghloul University.
September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 ARIES-IFE ARIES Project Meeting Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia September 3-4, 2003 Summary of Issues, Results,
Advanced Energy Technology Group Mechanisms of Aerosol Generation in Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.
October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Target Survival During Injection Presented by A.R. Raffray Other Contributors: K. Boehm, B. Christensen, M. S.
April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,
Overview of US Power Plant Studies: A) Results from ARIES-IFE Study B) Plans For Compact Stellarator Farrokh Najmabadi US/Japan Workshop October 9-11,
November 20, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Thin Liquid Wall Behavior under IFE Cyclic Operation 1 Thin Liquid Wall Behavior under IFE Cyclic Operation A.
May 28-29, 2008/ARR 1 Thermal Effect of Off-Normal Energy Deposition on Bare Ferritic Steel First Wall A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
April 10, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Dynamic Chamber Armor Behavior in IFE and MFE 1 Dynamic Chamber Armor Behavior in IFE and MFE A. R. Raffray 1, G.
June7-8, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Completion of Assessment of Dry Chamber Wall Option Without Protective Gas, and Initial Planning Activity for Assessment.
July 1, 2002/ARR 1 Scoping Study of FLiBe Evaporation and Condensation A. R. Raffray and M. Zaghloul University of California, San Diego ARIES-IFE Meeting.
April 22, 2002/ARR 1 1. Concluding Sacrificial Liquid Film Activities 2. Starting Thick Liquid Wall Activities A. R. Raffray, J. Pulsifer, M. Zaghloul.
Action Items For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Project Meeting June 19-21, 2000 University of Wisconsin, Madison Electronic copy:
May 5-6, 2003/ARR 1 Town Meeting on Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics ARIES Town Meeting Hilton Garden Inn, Livermore, CA May 5-6, 2003 Background and Goals.
Findings and Recommendations from Wetted-Wall IFE Designs Jeff Latkowski Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory March 9, 2001 Work performed under the.
October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.
ARIES-IFE Assessment of Operational Windows for IFE Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
Progress Report on Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark S. Tillack, John Pulsifer, Zoran Dragovlovic (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein.
Laser IFE Program Workshop –5/31/01 1 Output Spectra from Direct Drive ICF Targets Laser IFE Workshop May 31-June 1, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory Robert.
December 12-13, 2007/ARR 1 Power Core Engineering: Design Updates and Trade-Off Studies A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 1. Pre-Shot Aerosol Parameteric Design Window for Thin Liquid Wall 2. Scoping Liquid Wall Mechanical Response to Thermal Shocks.
Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Advanced Chamber Concept with Magnetic Intervention: - Ion Dump Issues - Status of Blanket Study A. René Raffray UCSD.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
January 1, 2002/ARR 1 1. “Overlap” Design Regions for IFE Dry Wall 2. Scoping Analysis of Condensation for Wetted Wall A. R. Raffray, D. Blair, J. Pulsifer,
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Update on IFE Aerosol Analysis J.P. Sharpe INEEL Fusion Safety Program.
Design Considerations for Thin Liquid Film Wall Protection Systems S.I. Abdel-Khalik and M.Yoda Georgia Institute of Technology ARIES Project Meeting,
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
1 MODELING DT VAPORIZATION AND MELTING IN A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
RRP:10/17/01Aries IFE 1 Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Aries Electronic Workshop October 17, 2001 Robert R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute University.
ARR/April 8, Magnetic Intervention Dump Concepts A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from: A. E. Robson, D. Rose and J. Sethian HAPL Meeting.
1 4/22/2002 ARIES1 Fusion Technology Institute 4/22/2002 Dynamics of Liquid Wall Chambers R.R. Peterson, I.E. Golovkin, and D.A. Haynes University of Wisconsin.
G.S.Pisarenko Institute for Problems of strength National Academy of Sciences, Ukraine G. V. Stepanov Decrease of residual stresses in structure elements.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
Liquid-Vapor Equilibrium Section 17.1 (AHL). Vaporization You have a container with a volatile liquid in the bottom Molecules of the liquid will escape.
BNL E951 BEAM WINDOW EXPERIENCE Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Neutrino Working Group Brookhaven National Laboratory.
The tungsten/F82H sample was impinged at 6 different locations with 6 different laser fluence energies to determine the critical energy that would result.
Temperature Response and Ion Deposition in the 1 mm Tungsten Armor Layer for the 10.5 m HAPL Target Chamber T.A. Heltemes, D.R. Boris and M. Fatenejad,
HEIGHTS Integrated Models for Liquid Walls in IFE A. Hassanein and HEIGHTS Team Presented at the ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002, Madison, WI.
Russian Research Center” Kurchatov Institute” Shock wave propagation near 450 GeV and 7 TeV proton beams in LHC collimator materials Alexander Ryazanov.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.
May 5-6, 2003/ARR 1 1. Liquid Wall Ablation under IFE Photon Energy Deposition 2. Flibe Properties from EoS A. René Raffray and Mofreh Zaghloul University.
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 6 Introduction to convection.
Liquid Walls Town Meeting May 5, 2003, Livermore, CA Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.
Action Items from ARIES IFE Meeting, GA, July 1-2, 2002 (DRAFT)
University of California, San Diego University of Wisconsin
UNIT - 4 HEAT TRANSFER.
IFE Wetted-Wall Chamber Engineering “Preliminary Considerations”
University of California, San Diego
Aerosol Production in Lead-protected and Flibe-protected Chambers
Action Items from ARIES IFE Meeting, UW, April 22-23, 2002 (DRAFT)
D. V. Rose, T. C. Genoni, and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corp.
Presentation transcript:

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Liquid Wall Ablation under IFE Photon Energy Deposition at Radius of 0.5 m A. René Raffray and Mofreh Zaghloul University of California, San Diego ARIES Project Meeting Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA September 3-4, 2003

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 2 From the ARIES Town Meeting on Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Liquid wall ablation due to explosive boiling and spalling presented then: -Overview of mechanisms -Estimates for specific cases with R=3.5 and 6.5 m -These cases are more representative of a wetted wall design -Action item to investigate a case simulating HYLIFE with thick liquid jets at ~0.5 m from the microexplosion -Such a case has been analyzed and is presented here

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 3 Physical Processes in X-Ray Ablation Energy Deposition & Transient Heat Transport Induced Thermal- Spikes Mechanical Response Phase Transitions Stresses and Strains and Hydrodynamic Motion Fractures and Spall Surface Vaporization Heterogeneous Nucleation Homogeneous Nucleation (Phase Explosion) Ablation Processes Expansion, Cooling and Condensation Surface Vaporization Phase Explosion Liquid/Vapor Mixture Spall Fractures Liquid Film X-Rays Fast Ions Slow Ions Impulse yy xx zz

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 4 Analysis Based on Photon Spectra for 458 MJ Indirect Drive Target High photon energy for indirect drive target case (25% compared to 6% ion energy)) More details on target spectra available on ARIES Web site: (25%) (1%)

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 5 Photon Energy Deposition Density Profile in Flibe Film and Explosive Boiling Region (for R chamber =0.5m) Cohesion energy (total evaporation energy) 0.9 T critical Explo. boil. region Evaporated thickness

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 6 Summary of Explosive Boiling Results for Different R chamber ’s Explosive Boiling Ablated Thickness/Total Mass for: FlibePb R chamber = 6.5 m 4.1  m/4.2 kg 2.5  m/13.8 kg R chamber = 3.5 m 10.9  m/3.4 kg 3.83  m/6.2 kg R chamber = 0.5 m 127  m/0.79 kg

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 7 Mechanical Response to Induced Shock Rapid increase in internal energy due to x-ray energy deposition and ablation impulse creates high pressure within the material -The induced shock wave propagates through the liquid: If there is a stiff back wall, the shock wave gets reflected back to the free surface(as a pressure wave) where a rarefaction wave is produced (creating tensile stresses) and propagates back through the material. The process is repeated until the wave is dampened out. For the realistic case of a non-perfectly stiff wall, the reflected wave (pressure or rarefaction) depends on the shock impedances of the two materials. If there is a free surface at the back of the jet, a rarefaction wave is created there, propagating back through the liquid. The extent of this process and of its repetition depends on the dampening (or decaying) of the shock. -If the magnitude of the rarefaction wave is greater than the tensile strength of the material, fracture or spall will occur establishing a new surface. Evolution of spall in a body subject to transient stresses is complex - Material dependent: brittle, ductile or liquid -Affected by perturbations -Upper bound theoretical spall strength derived from intermolecular potential

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 8 Temperature-Dependent Spall Strengths of Example Materials T (K)Pb (GPa)Li (GPa)Flibe (GPa) Gas

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 9 Parameters of Different IFE Reactor Design Studies & Pressure Pulse Profile ParametersPrometheus-LOsirusHiballPresent Study Liquid/StructurePb/SiCFlibe/C Pb- 17Li/SiC Pb/SiCFlibe/SSFlibe X-ray yield (MJ)31129 * Closest distance from target (m) Vaporized mass (kg/m 2 ) Reactive impulse** (Pa-s) * X-ray and debris The pressure wave is steady (no change in shape) Parameters of different IFE reactor design studies and the present study are comparable Osirus profile scaled according to the relative impulses and used for the present analysis. ** Ablated material velocity ~ sonic velocity ~ 586/2094 m/s for Pb/Flibe at T crit (~5100/4500 K)

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 10 Illustration of Spalling Following a Pressure Wave Propagation in a Thin Flibe Layer on a Perfectly Stiff Wall   2000 kg/m3, C s  3300 m/s, T in = K, P th = GPa Spalled Thickness  2.1 µm & Spall Time (t 3 – t 1 )  16.9 ns Spall time from the beginning of the pressure pulse = 2 L/C s + (t 3 -t 1 )  200 ns for a 0.3 mm flibe layer 1. For a perfectly stiff wall, the pressure wave is reflected from the wall and returns to the free surface as a pressure pulse 2. P free-surface = P chamber and the pressure pulse arriving at the free boundary must be reflected back as a tensile wave 3. If the net tensile stress > the spall strength of the material, rupture occurs establishing a new surface

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 11 Illustration of Spalling in the Case of a Thick Free Jet at R=0.5 m from Microexplosion From Janatzen & Peterson (*), the peak pressure in the wave would decay rapidly over the first few mm’s of depth. Accordingly, for thick liquid jets, only a small fraction of the total thickness would experience high stresses. However, the theoretical spall strength of flibe is about 2 orders of magnitude lower than the magnitude of the initial shock for this case and even a “dampened” shock could result in spalling depending on the conditions (jet thickness,…) As an illustration, a conservative estimate of spalling was made under a worst case scenario of a steady pressure wave (i.e. no change in shape as assumed before) for a liquid jet with no back wall (*) C. Janatzen, P. F. Peterson, “Scaled impulse loading for liquid hydraulic response in IFE thick-liquid chamber experiments,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 464 (2001)

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 12 Summary of Ablation Results FlibePb Explosive boiling thickness (µm) R=0.5 m127 R=3.5 m R=6.5 m Spallation thickness (µm) (for a wetted wall assuming a perfectly stiff wall except for R=0.5 m which is for a thick free jet case) R=0.5 m28 from free surface at rear of jet R=3.5 m R=6.5 m Total fragmented thickness (µm) R=3.5 m R=6.5 m6.23.6

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 13 Summary The energy deposition density is increased substantially for the R=0.5 m case (compared to the previous R=3.5 and 6.5 m cases) The resulting  expl.boil. for flibe is 127  m for the case analyzed corresponding to an ablated specific mass (kg/m 2 ) and impulse (Pa-s) more than one order of magnitude higher than the 3.5 m case The resulting shock wave through the thick liquid jet could decay relieving the spalling concern. The extent of the shock dampening and the possibility of spalling depend on the conditions (impulse, jet thickness, local spall strength…). For the conservative assumption of a steady pressure wave through the jet to the rear free surface, the rarefaction wave generated would cause local spalling at about 28  m from the rear surface This could affect the formation and behavior of aerosols in the chamber if this fractured layer at the back of the jet finds a way out of the pocket However, the dynamic processes occurring are quite complex and should be further assessed through a combination of modeling and scaled experiments