1 How to develop departmental PBL models? Patrick Lai Educational Development Centre The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Problem.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

Problem- Based Learning in STEM Disciplines Saturday, November 10, 2007 JHU/MSU STEM Initiative.
Performance Assessment
Enquiry as a Pedagogical Approach within the Context of Primary Geography Wendy Garner Senior Lecturer in Geographical and Historical Education University.
School/Centre: Reflecting on the effectiveness of Self-Evaluation Resource The levels on the board are as in How Good Is Our school? Above the board, type.
Department of Mathematics and Science
What makes effective questioning? How can you use questioning to differentiate? Questioning.
Jack Holbrook Inquiry-based Teaching/Learning (IBSE)
Problem Based Learning and Teacher Technology Training.
1 Before we start……. Do not logon to the computer. Turn off your mobile phone.
Problem-Based Learning. What is PBL? Curriculum development and delivery system that recognizes the need to develop problem solving skills and help students.
1 Tutorials To enhance Critical Thinking Student Tutor Training.
University of Delaware Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs. Instructor-Centered Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George.
The Learning Cycle Lesson
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Underagraduate Program in Dokuz Eylül University School of Nursing Problem-Based Learning Curriculum.
Formulating objectives, general and specific
Goal Understand the impact on student achievement from effective use of formative assessment, and the role of principals, teachers, and students in that.
Queensland University of Technology The Use of Assessment Strategies to Develop Critical Thinking Skills in Science. Dr Megan H. Hargreaves.
Authentic Learning Contexts for Action-based Problem-solving Dr Lindsey Conner University of Canterbury New Zealand.
PHASE 1 PHILOSOPHY AND DESIRED OUTCOMES Problem Based Learning.
Course materials with a student-centred case-based design Paul Lam Daniel Ong 25 October, 2006.
Why Problem-Based Learning Works: Theoretical Foundations Authors: Rose M. Marra, David H. Jonassen, Betsy Palmer, Steve Luft Presented by Sterling McLeod.
11/07/06John Savery-University of Akron1 Problem-Based Learning:An Overview John Savery The University of Akron.
CriteriaExemplary (4 - 5) Good (2 – 3) Needs Improvement (0 – 1) Identifying Problem and Main Objective Initial QuestionsQuestions are probing and help.
Rethinking Computers and Instruction.  2007 report released by ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education).  Indicates ALL students, regardless.
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
Centre for Educational Development ORHEP Project 1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported.
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
STUDY SKILLS COURSE MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE.
PBL in the clinic Hong Kong 2004 Associate Professor Liz Farmer Co chair PBL Expert Advisory Group Flinders University.
By: Courtney, Pablo, Kathy, Jorge, & Katie.  Student-centered- rather than sitting in a lecture, students are encouraged to solve problems set in a real.
Problem based learning (PBL) Amal Al Otaibi CP, MME.
Problem-Based Learning
The 5 E’s Science Lesson Inquiry-Based Instruction.
Who is Benjamin Bloom? Bloom developed the “Taxonomy of Cognitive Objectives.” In the 1950’s, the taxonomy was developed by Benjamin Bloom, a professor.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
Understanding Problem-Based Learning. How can I get my students to think? Asked by Barbara Duch This is a question asked by many faculty, regardless of.
Wilkes County Schools Tracee McManus & Nikki Patrick.
Welcome Science 5 and Science 6 Implementation Workshop.
Scientific Inquiry by:. Icebreaker “Scientific Inquiry refers to the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations.
Problem-Based Learning in Research Education Md. Shahidul Islam, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Clinical Sciences and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
Facilitate Group Learning
TEACHING MEDICAL STATISTICS TO HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: A MODIFIED PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING APPROACH BURWALLS 2015 Abdel Douiri.
Problem-based Learning Cherdsak Iramaneerat Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital 1PBL.
111 MakingConnections Focus on Assessment. 222 Facilitator/s: Date:
BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER Use of Rich Tasks. What is a Rich Task? Accessible to all levels Provides an opportunity to explore mathematics Involves testing,
STUDY SKILLS COURSE MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE.
Standards-Based Science Assessment. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
Google Earth INTEGRATING GLOBAL THINKING. Why Use Virtual Tours? Flexible Tool: History, Science, Math, English, etc. An Interactive Way to Explore Supports.
Instructor: Dr. Debra Chester Lisa Godding Jaymee Henderson Alan Herman Elizabeth Kent.
HOW TO WRITE HISTORICALLY INTRODUCTION TO HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE AND WRITING.
Introduction to Concepts and Principles of Learning ( Medical Education) (CMD 211) Dr. Muhammad Ghauth Qureshi Dr. Muhammad Nour-El-din Saleh Dr. Khadija.
Using Problem Based Learning: from classroom to clinical practice Dr Dawn Goodwin, January 2015.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 1 Research: An Overview.
PROBLEM BASED LEARNING Rhonda Kiedinger Ashley McManus Jody Schmidt Jane White November 16, 2009 Educ 782 Instructional Analysis UW-Stout.
Problem Design in Problem-based Learning: Evaluating Students’ Learning and Self- directed Learning Practice Yeung, E., Au-Yeung, S., Chiu, T., Mok N.,
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Physics IA Spring 2015 It is important to remember that the formulation of the research question is the student’s responsibility and is assessed within.
Jeopardy Game Template This template was created because most Jeopardy games available online aim at the lowest level of Bloom’s taxonomy – that of simple.
Active Learning in an Interactive Classroom Kurt O’Connor IDT 600 Spring 2012.
Session 2 Challenges and benefits of teaching controversial issues
Enquiry Based Learning (EBL) and Human Rights
Making learning active
Making Thinking Visible
Presentation transcript:

1 How to develop departmental PBL models? Patrick Lai Educational Development Centre The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Problem Based Learning Curriculum

2 Why use PBL?  Engages students in learning information in ways that are similar to the ways in which it will be recalled and employed in future situations  Promotes self-regulated learning  Assesses learning in ways which demonstrate understanding and not mere acquisition PROBLARC Materials

3 Why use PBL?  Motivation  Relevance and Context  Higher order thinking  Learning how to learn  Authenticity  PROBLARC Materials

4 Comparison with other approaches  Lecture-based: a lecturer presents students with information in lectures and then uses a case or two to demonstrate the relevance of this information.  Case-based lecturers: case histories are given before the lecture. Cases highlight the material to be covered. Students analyse the case using prior knowledge before any new information is given in the lecture.  Case method: students are given a complete case for study and research in preparation for class discussion. The lecturer facilitates its discussion by combining both student-directed and teacher-directed learning. (Barrows, 1986)

5 ….Comparison with other approaches  Problem-based: Students are presented with the problem in simulation formats that allow for free enquiry. They can develop their own data base and hypothesis - usually under guidance of teacher.  Closed loop problem-based: This is an extension of problem-based. Students return to the problem to evaluate their use of resources, how they could have tackled the problem differently, and to improve their reasoning process and gain better understanding. (Barrows, 1986)

6 Comparison of approaches  Structuring knowledge for use in clinical contexts - Knowledge  Developing an effective clinical reasoning process - Reasoning  Development of self-directed learning skills - Self directed  Increased motivation for learning - Motivated  Ranked 0-5 where 0 is low and 5 is high (Barrows, 1986)

7 Know Reas Self-dir Mot Lecture-based cases1101 Case-based lectures2202 Case method3334 Problem-based4445 Closed loop problem-based5555 Barrows, H.S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical education, 20, ……Comparison of approaches

8 Premises of PBL 1.The problem comes first; it is the context for learning 2.The problem is ill-structured and real-world like 3.Students are the problem solvers; their teachers are their tutors and coaches 4.Reasoning is characterized by a reiterative process involving observation, hypothesis, inquiry, critical thinking and conclusion (decision) 5. Assessment is an authentic companion to the problem and the process. (Biggs,1999)

9 The processes of the tutorial: Return to the problem 1. Ill-structured Problem 2. Clarifying concept 3. Defining the problem 4. Analysing the problem/brainstorming 5. Problem analysis / systematic classification 6. Formulating and proioritizing learning objectives 7. Self study 8. Reporting Assessment

10 Clarifying concepts  To avoid confusion, concepts used in the task are first clarified  To enable all participants to start from a common starting point –recognizing concepts lacking clarity –recognizing confusing concepts –asking for an explanation –giving an explanation (van Til & van der Heijden,1998)

11 Defining the problem  The essence of the task is determined in order to determine the boundaries of the topics –putting forward proposals for a definition –translating the essence of the task into a defined problem –clearly formulating a concrete problem (van Til & van der Heijden,1998)

12 Analysing the problem  Ask students to list out what they know about the task, with relevant explanations  Give additional information about listed aspects and alternative explanations  asking more detailed questions  asking questions regarding matters students do not know  listing alternatives (van Til & van der Heijden,1998)

13 Problem Analysis/Systematic classification  Creating links between listed aspects and explanations  Using diagrams  noting any unclarity and gaps in the classification (van Til & van der Heijden,1998)

14 Formulating learning objectives  Formulating learning objectives on topics they do not know  creating a link with the problem analysis (van Til & van der Heijden,1998)

15 Self Study  Scheduling –effective use of available time  Selecting sources of information –relevance and appropriateness  Studying sources –objective-based and application  Preparing reports –linkage to objectives (van Til & van der Heijden,1998)

16 Reporting  Presenting what has been studied briefly  creating links with learning objectives  supporting presentation with diagrams and /or examples  quoting sources  asking questions in case of unclarity  giving additional information  testing the new knowledge (van Til & van der Heijden,1998)

17 Various forms of PBL  Degree the problem is structured –case study given in detail, with information to solve it –Open or ill-structured - no data; students do research  Extent of teacher direction – teacher controls flow and amount of information – case studies presented to students before the lecture depends on what they are required to do prior to, and then during, the following class that determines the kind of PBL (Biggs, 1999)

18 Template pilot PBL Model (Tang et al., 1997) Initial session - setting the scene Group Discussion Follow-up session(s) Presentation Concluding session - solution Repeat

19 Common Features of the PBL Models in HK PolyU Problem Group Discussion Student Presentation Answer prepared questions get by lecturers Generate issues List suggestions Report findings Lecture (Tang et al., 1997)

20 PBL Models  To view samples of PBL models of Electrical Engineering, School of Design, Health Sciences, please click here.click here

21 References  van Til C. & van der Heijden, F. (1998). PBL Study Skills – an overview. Vakgroep O & O, Maastricht.  Tang, C. & 12 others (1997). Developing a context-based PBL model. In J. Conway, R., Risher, L. Sheridan-Burns and G. Ryan (eds). Research and Developing in problem-based learning. Volume 4: Integrity, innovation, integration. Newcastle: Australian Problem Based Learning Network

22 References  Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning in university. London: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.  Barrows, H.S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem- based learning methods. Medical Education, 20,  PROBLARC Materials