BehavioralCmpE196G1 Behavioral Patterns Chain of Responsibility (requests through a chain of candidates) Command (encapsulates a request) Interpreter (grammar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chain of Responsibility Pattern Gof pp Yuyang Chen.
Advertisements

GoF State Pattern Aaron Jacobs State(305) Allow an object to alter its behavior when its internal state changes. The object will appear to change its class.
UMBC Some Additional Patterns CMSC 432. UMBC More Patterns2 Introduction Over the next few lectures we’ll have an introduction to a number of patterns.
Amirkabir University of Technology, Computer Engineering Faculty, Intelligent Systems Laboratory 1 Mediator Abbas Rasoolzadegan.
Observer Method 1. References Gamma Erich, Helm Richard, “Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object- Oriented Software” 2.
Matt Klein 7/2/2009.  Intent  Avoid coupling the sender of a request to its receiver by giving more than one object a chance to handle the request.
Reza Gorgan Mohammadi AmirKabir University of Technology, Department of Computer Engineering & Information Technology Advanced design.
Observer Pattern Fall 2005 OOPD John Anthony. What is a Pattern? “Each pattern describes a problem which occurs over and over again in our environment,
What is the Chain? It’s a behavioral design pattern. It deals with how objects make requests and how they are handled.
Observer Pattern Tu Nguyen. General Purpose When one object changes state, all the dependent objects are notified and updated. Allows for consistency.
Zaki Alasadi Supervisor:Dr noorhosseini.
Copyright © Active Frameworks Inc. - All Rights Reserved.More On Behavioral Patterns - Page L9-1 PS95&96-MEF-L16-1 Dr. M.E. Fayad Creationa l.
Algorithm Programming Behavioral Design Patterns Bar-Ilan University תשס " ו by Moshe Fresko.
ECE 355 Design Patterns Tutorial Part 2 (based on slides by Ali Razavi) Presented by Igor Ivković
PRESENTED BY SANGEETA MEHTA EECS810 UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS OCTOBER 2008 Design Patterns.
1 An introduction to design patterns Based on material produced by John Vlissides and Douglas C. Schmidt.
Behavioral Patterns C h a p t e r 5 – P a g e 128 BehavioralPatterns Design patterns that identify and realize common interactions between objects Chain.
BY VEDASHREE GOVINDA GOWDA
Behavioral Patterns  Behavioral patterns are patterns whose purpose is to facilitate the work of algorithmic calculations and communication between classes.
MVC pattern and implementation in java
BDP Behavioral Pattern. BDP-2 Behavioral Patters Concerned with algorithms & assignment of responsibilities Patterns of Communication between Objects.
Design Patterns.
A Behavior Object Pattern
Software Design Refinement Using Design Patterns Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
02 - Behavioral Design Patterns – 2 Moshe Fresko Bar-Ilan University תשס"ח 2008.
05 - Patterns Intro.CSC4071 Design Patterns Designing good and reusable OO software is hard. –Mix of specific + general –Impossible to get it right the.
Case Studies on Design Patterns Design Refinements Examples.
An Introduction to Design Patterns. Introduction Promote reuse. Use the experiences of software developers. A shared library/lingo used by developers.
Design Patterns Part two. Structural Patterns Concerned with how classes and objects are composed to form larger structures Concerned with how classes.
Observer Behavioral Pattern. Intent Define a one-to-many dependency between objects so that when one object changes state, all its dependents are notified.
Mediator Pattern and Multiuser Protection Billy Bennett June 8 th, 2009.
Programming in C# Observer Design Pattern
Behavioral Design Patterns Morteza Yousefi University Of Science & Technology Of Mazandaran 1of 27Behavioral Design Patterns.
Design Patterns CSCI 5801: Software Engineering. Design Patterns.
ECE450 - Software Engineering II1 ECE450 – Software Engineering II Today: Design Patterns IX Interpreter, Mediator, Template Method recap.
Software Design Patterns (1) Introduction. patterns do … & do not … Patterns do... provide common vocabulary provide “shorthand” for effectively communicating.
Unit 4 Object-Oriented Design Patterns NameStudent Number CAI XIANGHT082182A KYAW THU LINHT082238Y LI PENGFEIHT082220L NAUNG NAUNG LATTHT082195L PLATHOTTAM.
Design Patterns CSIS 3701: Advanced Object Oriented Programming.
Where Do Surrogates Fit into This Proxy Pattern Observer Pattern Visitor Pattern By Kurt Rehwinkel.
ECE450 - Software Engineering II1 ECE450 – Software Engineering II Today: Design Patterns VIII Chain of Responsibility, Strategy, State.
Proxy, Observer, Symbolic Links Rebecca Chernoff.
Behavioural Design Patterns Quote du jour: ECE450S – Software Engineering II I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. - Thomas Edison.
DESIGN PATTERNS -BEHAVIORAL PATTERNS WATTANAPON G SUTTAPAK Software Engineering, School of Information Communication Technology, University of PHAYAO 1.
Behavioral Patterns CSE301 University of Sunderland Harry R Erwin, PhD.
OBSERVER DESIGN PATTERN. Behavioral Patterns  Behavioral patterns are those patterns that are most specifically concerned with communication between.
CSE 332: Design Patterns Review: Design Pattern Structure A design pattern has a name –So when someone says “Adapter” you know what they mean –So you can.
Manali Joshi1 The Observer Design Pattern Presented By: Manali Joshi.
Behavioral Patterns1 Nour El Kadri SEG 3202 Software Design and Architecture Notes based on U of T Design Patterns class.
Using Software Design Patterns Bill Anderson. About me Fox developer since 1987 Fox developer since 1987 Program Director, Los Angeles Visual Foxpro Developers.
BEHAVIORAL PATTERNS 13-Sep-2012 Presenters Sanjeeb Kumar Nanda & Shankar Gogada.
SOFTWARE DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE LECTURE 31. Review Creational Design Patterns – Singleton Pattern – Builder Pattern.
The Mediator Pattern (Behavioral) ©SoftMoore ConsultingSlide 1.
The State Pattern (Behavioral) ©SoftMoore ConsultingSlide 1.
The Observer Pattern (Behavioral) ©SoftMoore ConsultingSlide 1.
CSE 332: Design Patterns (Part II) Last Time: Part I, Familiar Design Patterns We’ve looked at patterns related to course material –Singleton: share a.
The Chain of Responsibility Pattern (Behavioral) ©SoftMoore ConsultingSlide 1.
An object's behavior depends on its current state. Operations have large, multipart conditional statements that depend on the object's state.
The State Design Pattern A behavioral design pattern. Shivraj Persaud
OBSERVER PATTERN OBSERVER PATTERN Presented By Presented By Ajeet Tripathi ISE
The Observer Design Pattern Author :Erich Gamma, et al. Source :Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software Speaker : Chiao-Ping Chang Advisor : Ku-Yaw.
Overview of Behavioral Patterns ©SoftMoore ConsultingSlide 1.
CLASSIFICATION OF DESIGN PATTERNS Hladchuk Maksym.
Mediator Design Pattern
Chapter 10 Design Patterns.
Behavioral Design Patterns
Observer Design Pattern
object oriented Principles of software design
Mediator Design Pattern (Behavioral)
Behavioral Design Pattern
Informatics 122 Software Design II
Presentation transcript:

BehavioralCmpE196G1 Behavioral Patterns Chain of Responsibility (requests through a chain of candidates) Command (encapsulates a request) Interpreter (grammar as a class hierarchy) Iterator (abstracts traversal and access) Mediator (indirection for loose coupling) Memento (externalize and re-instantiate object state) Observer (defines and maintains dependencies) State (change behaviour according to changed state) Strategy (encapsulates an algorithm in an object) Template Method (step-by-step algorithm w/ inheritance) Visitor (encapsulated distributed behaviour)

BehavioralCmpE196G2 Observer Define a one-to-many dependency between objects so that when one object changes state, all its dependents are notified and updated automatically. –A common side-effect of partitioning a system into a collection of cooperating classes is the need to maintain consistency between related objects –You don't want to achieve consistency by making the classes tightly coupled, because that reduces their reusability. –a.k.a. Publish-Subscribe –Common related/special case use: MVC Model-View-Controller pattern

BehavioralCmpE196G3 Motivation Separate presentation aspects of the UI from the underlying application data. –e.g., spreadsheet view and bar chart view don't know about each other they act as if they do: changing one changes the other.

BehavioralCmpE196G4 Subject –knows its observers –any number of Observers may observe one subject Observer –defines an updating interface for objects that should be notified of changes to the subject Structure

BehavioralCmpE196G5 Concrete Subject –stores the state of interest to ConcreteObservers –send notification when its state changes Structure Concrete Observer –maintains a reference to the ConcreteSubject objects –stores state that should remain consistent with subject's –implements the Observer updating interface

BehavioralCmpE196G6 Collaborations subject notifies its observers whenever a change occurs that would make its observers' state inconsistent with its own After being informed, observer may query subject for changed info. –uses query to adjust its state

BehavioralCmpE196G7 Applicability When an abstraction has two aspects, one dependent upon the other –e.g., view and model Encapsulating these aspects into separate objects lets you vary them independently. when a change to one object requires changing others, and you don't know ahead of time how many there are or their types –when an object should be able to notify others without making assumptions about who these objects are, –you don't want these objects tightly coupled

BehavioralCmpE196G8 Consequences abstract coupling –no knowledge of the other class needed supports broadcast communications –subject doesn’t care how many observers there are spurious updates a problem –can be costly –unexpected interactions can be hard to track down –problem aggravated when simple protocol that does not say what was changed is used

BehavioralCmpE196G9 Implementation Mapping subjects to observers –table-based or subject-oriented Observing more than one subject –interface must tell you which subject –data structure implications (e.g., linked list) Who triggers the notify() –subject state changing methods > 1 update for a complex change –clients complicates API & error-prone can group operations and send only one update –transaction-oriented API to client

BehavioralCmpE196G10 Implementation dangling references to deleted subjects –send 'delete message' –complex code must ensure subject state is self-consistent before sending update push versus pull –push: subject sends info it thinks observer wants –pull: observer requests info when it needs it –registration: register for what you want when observer signs up, states what interested in ChangeManager –if observing more than one subject to avoid spurious updates Can combine subject and observer

BehavioralCmpE196G11 Chain Of Responsibility Avoid coupling the sender of a request to its receiver by giving more than one object a chance to handle the request. –Chain the receiving objects and pass the request along the chain until an object handles it.

BehavioralCmpE196G12 Motivation Context-sensitive help –User can obtain information on any part of a UI by clicking on it. –If no help available (e.g., for a button), system should display a more general help message about the context (e..g, the dialog box containing the button).

BehavioralCmpE196G13 Motivation Objects forward the request until there is one that can handle it. The key is that the client does not know the object that will eventually handle the request.

BehavioralCmpE196G14 Applicability More than one object may handle a request, and the handler isn't known a priori. –The handler should be ascertained automatically. You want to issue a request to one of several objects without specifying the receiver explicitly. The set of objects that can handle a request should be specified dynamically.

BehavioralCmpE196G15 Structure

BehavioralCmpE196G16 Structure Handler –defines an interface for handling requests –implements the successor list (optional) ConcreteHandler –handles requests for which it is responsible –can access its successor –forward to successor if it can't handle the request Client –initiates the request to the first ConcreteHandler in the chain.

BehavioralCmpE196G17 Consequences reduced coupling –receiver and sender have no explicit knowledge of each other –can simplify object interactions added flexibility –can add or change responsibilities by changing the chain at run- time. receipt is not guaranteed. –request may fall off the end of the chain

BehavioralCmpE196G18 State Allow an object to alter its behavior when its internal state changes. –The object will appear to change its class.

BehavioralCmpE196G19 Motivation A TCPConnection object that responds differently to requests given its current state. All state-dependent actions are delegated.

BehavioralCmpE196G20 Applicability An object's behavior depends on its state, and it must change its behavior at run-time depending on that state. Operations have large, multipart conditional statements that depend on the object's state. –This state is usually represented by one or more enumerated constants. –Often, several operations will contain this same conditional structure. –The State pattern puts each branch of the conditional in a separate class. –This lets you treat the object's state as an object in its own right that can vary independently from other objects.

BehavioralCmpE196G21 Structure Context –defines the interface of interest to clients. –maintains an instance of a ConcreteState subclass that defines the current state. State –defines an interface for encapsulating the behavior associated with a particular state of the Context. ConcreteState subclasses –each subclass implements a behavior associated with a state of the Context.

BehavioralCmpE196G22 Consequences It localizes state-specific behavior and partitions behavior for different states. –The State pattern puts all behavior associated with a particular state into one object. –Because all state-specific code lives in a State subclass, new states and transitions can be added easily by defining new subclasses. It makes state transitions more explicit –State is represented by the object pointed to. It protects the object from state-related inconsistencies. –All implications of state changed wrapped in the atomic change of 1 pointer. State object can be shared –if no data members they can be re-used across all instances of the Context

BehavioralCmpE196G23 Mediator Defines an object that encapsulates how a set of objects interact. –promotes loose coupling by keeping objects from referring to each other explicitly –lets you vary their interaction independently

BehavioralCmpE196G24 Motivation A collection of widgets that interact with one another. –e.g., certain families may not have certain weights disable ‘demibold’ choice

BehavioralCmpE196G25 Motivation Create a mediator to control and coordinate the interactions of a group of objects.

BehavioralCmpE196G26 Motivation e.g., –list box selection moving to entry field –entryField now calls WidgetChanged() and enables/disables –entry field does not need to know about list box and vice-versa

BehavioralCmpE196G27 Motivation

BehavioralCmpE196G28 Applicability A set of objects communicate in a well-defined but complex manner reusing an object is difficult because it refers to and communicates with many other objects a behavior that's distributed between several classes should be customizable without a lot of subclassing

BehavioralCmpE196G29 Structure

BehavioralCmpE196G30 Structure Mediator –defines an interface for communicating with Colleague objects ConcreteMediator –knows and maintains its colleagues –implements cooperative behavior by coordinating Colleagues Colleague classes –each Colleague class knows its Mediator object –each colleague communicates with its mediator whenever it would have otherwise communicated with another colleague

BehavioralCmpE196G31 Consequences limits subclassing –localizes behaviour that otherwise would need to be modified by subclassing the colleagues decouples colleagues –can vary and reuse colleague and mediator classes independently simplifies object protocols –replaces many-to-many interactions with one-to-many –one-to-many are easier to deal with abstracts how objects cooperate –can focus on object interaction apart from an object’s individual behaviour centralizes control –mediator can become a monster