Action Planning Spring 2008 Statewide Coaches’ Meeting Oregon Reading First.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Oregon Reading First: Three-Year Report Preliminary Impact Evidence Oregon Reading First Center LLSSC Meeting, November 29, 2006.

Advertisements

Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,

1 Module 2 Using DIBELS Next Data: Identifying and Validating Need for Support.

Cohort A Project-wide Data “Our goals can only be reached through a vehicle of a plan, in which we must fervently believe, and upon which we must vigorously.

1 Achieving a Healthy Grade- Level System in Beginning Reading Content developed by Carrie Thomas Beck.

Oregon Reading First IBR V - Cohort B Introduction to Lesson Progress Reports (LPRs)

1 Data-Based Leadership Cohort B March 2, 2006 (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Oregon Reading First Leadership Session October 20, 2005 (Cohort B) October 21, 2005 (Cohort A) Erb Memorial Union University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon.

1 Next Steps District/School Expectations and Support Needs (C) 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

1 Cohort B Q2: How are we doing?. 2 Reviewing Outcomes  What percent of students are reaching benchmark goals in each grade level?  What percent of.

Oregon Department of Education Sustaining K-3 Literacy Momentum Forum Salem, Oregon September 28, 2007.

1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,

1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort B.

Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Webinar Data-based Action Planning Winter 2009.

What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.

1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.

1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading.

1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.

Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.

1 National Reading First Impact Study: Critique in the Context of Oregon Reading First Oregon Reading First Center May 13, 2008 Scott K. Baker, Ph.D. Hank.

Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.

Oregon Reading First (2008)1 Oregon Reading First Conference Call Data-based Action Planning Winter 2008.

1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.

1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading VII: Evaluating and Planning Institute on Beginning Reading VII: Evaluating and Planning.

Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.

Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Overview of Advanced DIBELS Applications Institute on Beginning Reading II.

1 Oregon Reading First: Cohort B Leadership Session Portland, Oregon May 27, 2009.

1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.

1 Q2: How are we doing? Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Oregon Reading First (2007)1 Oregon Reading First Coaches’ Meeting Spring 2007 IBR Preparation April 25 and 26th, 2007.

1 Application of Model to Sample Data Set / Data Review and Analysis Breakout Sessions © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and.

From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf

Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring

Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings

Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf

Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS The District Data Team Meeting Blending Behavioral and Academic Multi-tiered Systems of Support Oregon.

The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS

100 % Data Meetings 100% Data Meetings turn data into ACTION FOR ALL students.

9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.

Grade-level Data Team Meetings.

Creating, Monitoring and Evaluating a Master Schedule That supports student learning.

B-ELL Leadership Session May 26, 2009 Jorge Preciado University of Oregon © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.

“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.

Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,

Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.

State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.

RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School

1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,

Cohort 4 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring

Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.

Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.

Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring

Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.

Oregon Reading First Leadership Session October 20, 2005 (Cohort B) October 21, 2005 (Cohort A) Erb Memorial Union University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon.

1 Linking DIBELS Data to Differentiated Instructional Support Plans 32 nd Annual COSA Seaside Conference June 23, 2006 Hank Fien, Ph.D. Center for Teaching.

1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.

RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.

Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.

Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.

Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.

Data-Based Leadership

Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)

Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.

Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A

Systems Problem Solving

Oregon Reading First Leadership Session

Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) (C) 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.

Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.

Presentation transcript:

Action Planning Spring 2008 Statewide Coaches’ Meeting Oregon Reading First

Overview GLTs Review grade level data Identify systems that need support Plan instructional support ERT Review schoolwide data Create action plan

Planning Ahead Cohort A: Ongoing Opportunities Cohort B: Draft of Calendar

Materials GLT Spring Action Planning Module ERT Spring Action Planning Module Spring 2007 Percent Low Risk/At-Risk Table Data DIBELS Histograms, Distribution Report, Cross Year Box Plots Summary of Effectiveness Report Action Plan Template

Pop Quiz! How do we define adequate progress in the summary of effectiveness reports?

Outcomes-Driven Model 1. Identify A System/Group of Students that Needs Additional Support Distinguish between systems level and individual student-level concerns 2. Plan and Implement Level of Support Implement instructional support to address systems-level or individual-level concern 3. Evaluate and, if necessary, Modify the Support Plan 4. Review Outcomes Examine Benchmark Data (Winter and Spring) and In Program Assessments

Role of the Coach Support teams as they: Review data Identify systems that need support Prioritize systems that need support Plan support Write actions

Things to Keep in Mind… Unless a grade level has a very high percentage of students reaching the goals, the grade level system needs support Resource allocation depends on prioritization Who will do what and by when?

What if… There will be a new teacher next year and so it is difficult to write an action for that grade level? “Why are we comparing year to year? Aren’t these different students?” While filling out the “Healthy System Checklist”, teachers only want to work on their own group (I.e., benchmark, strategic, intensive)?

Upcoming Deliverables DeliverableDue DateCohort Action Plan Progress NotesJune 27th, 2008A, B Action PlanJune 27th, 2008A, B Principal “How are We Doing?” Report June 27th, 2008A, B District “How are We Doing?” Report/Action Plans July 11th, 2008A, B Literacy PlanJune 29th, 2008 B ( Continuation )