Humboldt University Berlin, University of Novi Sad, University of Plovdiv, University of Skopje, University of Belgrade, University of Niš, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course evaluation Global Project Management Spring 2013.
Advertisements

College Algebra Course Redesign Southeast Missouri State University.
John Hurley Cal State LA
A seminar on e-business – Was it worthwhile? Zoran Budimac, Zoran Putnik.
M. George Physics Dept. Southwestern College
Jonas Ole Langner An online grammar course for students of German LLAS e-learning symposium, 24./
Experience with the Course in Novi Sad Zoran Budimac.
2nd course on “Advanced eBusiness” and collected “textbook” Z. Putnik & Z. Budimac.
Organization of the New Course on Complier Construction in Novi Sad Vladimir Kurbalija, Mirjana Ivanović Department of Mathematics and Informatics University.
Experience from using JCSE topics in student projects V. Ajanovski, B. Jakimovski Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics Skopje, Macedonia.
Humboldt University Berlin, University of Novi Sad, University of Plovdiv, University of Skopje, University of Belgrade, University of Niš, University.
Humboldt University Berlin, University of Novi Sad, University of Plovdiv, University of Skopje, University of Belgrade, University of Niš, University.
Supported by: Joint MSc curriculum in software engineering European Union TEMPUS Project CD_JEP Module SE-C-01 Requirements Engineering Experiences.
Introduction, Zagreb, Croatia, Introduction Klaus Bothe 4th Workshop Software Engineering Education and Reverse Engineering, Zagreb, Croatia, 2004.
DAAD Project “Joint Course on Software Engineering” Humboldt University Berlin, University of Novi Sad, University of Plovdiv, University of Skopje, University.
Joint MSc studies in Software Engineering students’ point of view Gordana Rakic Silvia Feher.
Evaluation of courses by student feedback forms Kay Schuetzler.
On the concept of the course on software project management Mirjana Ivanović (Zoran Budimac) Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics and Informatics.
ELessons in JCSE – status report Zoran Putnik, Zoran Budimac.
DAAD workshop, Zagreb, Sept The Tempus project: “ Joint M.Sc. Curriculum in Software engineering” Zoran Budimac DMI, Univ. of Novi Sad.
Two e-Learning elective seminars in Novi Sad Putnik Z., Komlenov Ž., Budimac Z. DMI, Faculty of Science University of Novi Sad.
The use of a computerized automated feedback system Trevor Barker Dept. Computer Science.
This year's experience in System integration master course Ivan Pribela, Zoran Budimac.
Concept of a Multilingual Virtual Classroom Network for Software Engineering Module Katerina Zdravkova Institute of Informatics, Skopje
Statistical Methods in Computer Science Course Introduction Ido Dagan.
Humboldt University Berlin, University of Novi Sad, University of Plovdiv, University of Skopje, University of Belgrade, University of Niš, University.
DAAD Project “Joint Course on Software Engineering” Humboldt University Berlin, University of Novi Sad, University of Plovdiv, University of Skopje, University.
Copyright policy DAAD Project Joint Course on Software Engineering Contributors K. Bothe, D. Bojić, Z. Budimac, K. Schützler, S. Stoyanov, K. Zdravkova.
A short report on Tempus project Zoran Budimac. Reminder “Joint MSc Curriculum in Software Engineering”. On September 1, started the last year of the.
Review Reports: a means to Collect Experience and Feedback1 Review Reports: a Means to Collect Experience and Feedback Klaus Bothe 3rd Workshop Software.
Mirjana Ivanović, Zoran Budimac Aleksandra Klašnja-Milićević, Boban Vesin, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences Novi Sad, Serbia Possibilities to.
1 OO Java, Baile Herculane, Romania, 2005 OO Java Requirements Specification - Produce highly adaptable teaching materials - 1 st step: collect all useful.
Discussion examples Andrea Zhok.
Humboldt University Berlin, University of Novi Sad, University of Plovdiv, University of Skopje, University of Belgrade, University of Niš, University.
A Student View of the simulated learning experience Austin Cooke Strategic Management.
Clickers in the Classroom Monday Models Spring 08 source:
Tempus Workshop Zagreb pag. 1 Quality Assurance Procedures and Activities at Ghent University Student questionnaires.
New experiences with teaching Java as a second programming language Ioan Jurca “Politehnica” University of Timisoara/Romania
Mixed-level English classrooms What my paper is about: Basically my paper is about confirming with my research that the use of technology in the classroom.
Using cases in UG Lectures Retail Marketing John Pal MBS
DAAD project “Joint Course on OOP using Java” Design Patterns in the course ‘OOP in Java’ - first experiences Ana Madevska Bogdanova Institute of informatics.
A Blended Learning Model for "Multimedia Systems" Course Natasa Hoic-Bozic, Division of multimedia systems and e-learning Odjel za informatiku, Sveučilište.
Corner Work advantages + problems / dangers. advantages the ‘fun’ part: very pupil-centered!! pupils can choose themselves! »topic: e.g. Hobbies – either.
Lessons learnt and changed understanding: Can Machine Dynamics students survive without my lectures? Ian Howard Mechanical Engineering.
SE-308 Software Engineering-II 7th Term SE University of Engineering & Technology Taxila, Pakistan Software Engineering Department.
SEE&REZagreb, On the course architecture and course homepage Mirjana Ivanovic Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics and Informatics Trg.
Introduction 11 th Workshop Software Engineering Education and Reverse Engineering Ohrid, Macedonia 22 th – 27 th August 2011 Klaus Bothe Institute of.
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW SC 2005 cte1 Career/Technical Education: Doing the Right Thing and Getting High Student Achievement Gene Bottoms.
Final experiences with the course "Computer Ethics" on under-graduate level Mirjana Ivanović, Zoran Putnik.
DAAD project “Joint Course on OOP using Java” Humboldt University Berlin, University of Novi Sad, ‘Polytehnica’ University of Timisoara, University of.
1 6th Workshop "SEERE", Ravda, September 2006 OOJava course materials – what happened during last year? M. Ivanovic, K. Bothe.
UKNARIC conference Understanding IELTS scores
Delphi Evaluation Results PBA Back-End development, Autumn 2012.
1 Prerequisites, Baile Herculane, Romania, 2005 Prerequisites of 1 st semester students at HU Klaus Bothe 5th Workshop Software Engineering Education and.
Us and Them – The Story of Joint Venture in eLearning of Teachers and Students PUTNIK,Z.*, IVANOVIĆ, M.*, BUDIMAC,Z.*, BOTHE, K.** * Department of Mathematics.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
COP4020 INTRODUCTION FALL COURSE DESCRIPTION Programming Languages introduces the fundamentals of the design and implementation of programming languages.
DAAD project “Joint Course on OOP using Java” Humboldt University Berlin, University of Novi Sad, ‘Polytehnica’ University of Timisoara, University of.
Unit 3, Chapters: 5, 6, 8 Amanda Lewis. Chapter 5: The Curriculum- Selecting & Setting Learning Expectations 1.Defining Curriculum and Instruction 2.Planning.
Supporting Active Learning by Introducing an Interactive Teaching Tool in a Data Structures and Algorithms Course Tommy Färnqvist 47th ACM Technical Symposium.
THE ROLE OF THE INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA AMONG YOUNG POPULATION IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETIES Nevena Ristova, MSc MIT University - Skopje.
2016 Fall OpenStax class ABAC : EUNKYUNG YOU.
Course Evaluation Title of the Course Code of the Course
Introduction to the 3rd year
Informatics 291S Literature Survey in Software Engineering
Delivering new Enhanced Assessments
Stella Kakavouli & Panagiotis Metaxas Computer Science Department
Experiment with course materials concerning ‘Threads’
CS a-spring-midterm-survey
Presentation transcript:

Humboldt University Berlin, University of Novi Sad, University of Plovdiv, University of Skopje, University of Belgrade, University of Niš, University of Kragujevac Version: Oct. 23, 2003 (D Sep. 22, 2003) DAAD Project “Joint Course on Software Engineering” Project management course - Experience from the first year Mirjana Ivanović, Zoran Putnik, University of Novi Sad

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 2 Course Organization  IV year students of Business Informatics, 14 students  VIII semester, 2 hrs lecture, 1 hr exercises  Exam and final mark: Practical assignment in MS Project Questionnaire of 20 different kinds of questions (multiple-choice, short answers, …) 4 Thematic questions (detailed description and explanation expected)

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 3 Content of Course Lectures  Introduction (117 slides)  IT management ( )  CMM and process improvement (51)  Cost estimation and COCOMO (71)  Software measurement and metrics (51)  Planning (43+36)  Using tools - Microsoft project (65, Exercise)  Ethical issues (87)

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 4 Organization of Exercises  Haven’t start at the beginning of the semester (a month later). Why? We were promised a complete free version of CA PM software (CA, Budapest) Mentioned software is complete, high-quality, “project management software system”  Having no information about CA software, we switched to MS Project. It was first presented theoretically at a 3-hour class On another 3-hour class, it is presented “practically” (using representative examples) After that, students had 4 hours of practical work, to gain experience with MS Project  Finally, students were given a software project that they have to manage using MS Project, in a classroom, or at home  This project served as written part of the exam

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 5 Final Exam Results  Of 14 students, 12 successfully finished their practical assignment.  Marks: 7 – once 8 – eight times 9 – three times  Of 12 students eligible for oral part of exam, 11 attended examination, each one passing both tests, marks 6 – 10.  Each of 11 students accepted offered final mark.

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 6 Students Opinion – Questionnaire  Effort:  Attendance % %  Postprocessing [lectures] Hours  Postprocessing [assignments] Hours  Contents:  Amount of knowledge 5 - Too much 1- Too few  Contents 5 - Too easy 1 - Too difficult  Course well structured 5 - Very well 1 - Unstructured

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 7 Students Opinion – Questionnaire  Needed pre-knowledge?:  SE + English.  Experience.  Not too much - just basics of everything  Which topics in Serbian?:  Lectures in Serbian slides in English  All  None

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 8 Students Opinion – Questionnaire  Style of the lectures:  Lecturer familiar 5 -Very well 1 -Not so much  Lectures well prepared 5 -Very well 1 -Not so much  Lecturer engaged 5 -Very well 1 -Not so much  Willingness to answer students' questions 5 -Very well 1 -Not so much  Presentation 5 -Too fast 1 -Too slow  Presentation style encourage to follow the lecture 5 -Very well 1 -Not so much  Remarks

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 9 Students Opinion – Questionnaire  Using media  Amount of info on 5 - Very well 1 - Not so much slides adequate  Slides well structured 5 - Very well 1 - Not so much and clearly organized  Remarks

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 10 Students Opinion – Questionnaire  Benefit of the course:  New things learned 5 – Much 1 -Not so much  Contents useful 5 –Completely 1 -Not so much  Overall rank of the course 5 - Very well 1 - Bad  Remarks  Assignments:  Difficulty 5 -Too high1 -Too low  Motivating 5 -Very much1 -Not so much  General remarks

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 11 Students Opinion – Questionnaire Results  Effort:  Attendance % %  Postprocessing [lectures] Hours  Postprocessing [assignments] Hours Students attended 50% of the lectures on the average, and it took them ½ hour post-processing time for lecture and 2 hours for the assignment.

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 12 Students Opinion – Questionnaire Results  Contents:  Amount of knowledge 5 - Too much 1- Too few  Contents 5 - Too easy 1 - Too difficult  Course well structured 5 - Very well 1 – Unstructured Students assessed that they received “perfect amount” of knowledge, “almost perfect” content, but the structure of the course was just “average”.

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 13 Students Opinion – Questionnaire Results  Needed pre-knowledge?:  SE + English (5x)  Experience.  Not too much - just basics of everything Needed pre-knowledge was assessed usually as “nothing”, “a little bit of everything”, “experience”, and with 40% of students as “Software Engineering + English language”

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 14 Students Opinion – Questionnaire Results  Which topics in Serbian?:  Lectures in Serbian slides in English  All  None Even more – 75% of students said that they would prefer ALL of the lectures in Serbian.

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 15 Students Opinion – Questionnaire Results Considering the style of the lecture, marks were (ranging from 5 – very well, to 1 – not so much): Lecturer familiar with lessons4.00(3.77) Lecturer well prepared3.50(3.36) Lecturer engaged3.64(3.54) Willing to answer questions4.92(4.93) Speed of presentation3.33(3.21) Style encouraging2.92(2.64) Marks given in brackets are average marks, including 2 students with a veeeery looow attendance rate. Yet – those 2 students gave only written comments: “…lectures were easier to follow while given on a blackboard” and “monotonous and difficult to follow. Need for translations required too many stops.”

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 16 Students Opinion – Questionnaire Results  Usage of slides as media received average marks “amount of info adequate” = 3.14 “slides well structured and clearly organized” = 3.29  So did the assignments “difficulty to solve” = 2.36 (5 – too difficult, 1 – to easy) “motivating” = 3.14 (5 – very much, 1 – not so much) The only written comment was that “there was too much text, and important things were not stressed visibly enough”

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 17 Students Opinion – Questionnaire Results  Considering the overall comments of the course, they were usually of the following type: “Everything OK. Everything according to curriculum. Good and useful. Very useful” but also: “Pure theory, not connected to real life. Lack of practical lessons evident. Not connected to students’ experiences (?)”  Average marks 5 = Very well 1 = Bad New things learned3.25(3.07) Contents useful3.75(3.57) Overall rank3.83(3.57)

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 18 Lecturer’s Opinion Positive  Good and representative material (topics) selected and prepared  Prepared slides, Acceptable quality  Acceptable level of familiarity Negative  A lot of different sources – overlapping parts of different units, further (maybe better) topic selection and refinement is needed  Static structure of slides, too much text, important things could be better emphasized  More assignments are needed, deeper involvement of students

DAAD project „Joint Course on Software Engineering“ © 19 Conclusion  Prepared presentations for most important topics in SPM domain  Further improvement is (needed) expected  Questionnaire results are satisfied (even extremely positive, for the first time)  Better and more student-oriented organization of practical work and exercises (work in real environment)  More assignments