Faculty Council Student Enrollment Dr. Bernadette Gray-Little, Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost September 15, 2006 The University of North Carolina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Advertisements

Enrollment Management Vision, Ideas on Issues, Approach and Outlook Laura Stoll Interim Vice Provost and Dean of Enrollment Management Missouri University.
CEMR 2010 Enrollment Plan Report Prepared for the Undergraduate Academic Affairs Committee and Graduate Program and Research Committee.
The Impact of Raising Admissions Requirements on Entering Freshmen Class Diversity at California State University, Long Beach Presented by Vincent A. (Van)
1 State University System Tuition and Fees. 2 Florida Tuition Within proviso in the General Appropriations Act and law, each board of trustees shall set.
The University Budget Debora Obley Associate Vice President
The Center for Personal Transformation 1 A Sample SWOT Analysis - Case I STRENGTHS Excellent regional reputation Excellent value for the money Student-centered.
2007 African American Status Report Highlights Marcia Gumpertz Assistant Vice Provost for Faculty and Staff Diversity April 2008
Latino/Hispanic Status Report Marcia Gumpertz Interim Vice Provost for Diversity and Inclusion September 2009
The Impact of Tuition and Student Aid on College Access, Affordability and Success: A Practitioner’s View Shirley A. Ort Office of the Provost – Scholarships.
The CSU at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Meeting the Needs of the People of California.
Enrollment Management Overview Faculty Senate Fall 2009.
Kresge Library Key to a University of Distinction.
Just Think State of the University Address Presented by Chancellor Thomas F. George September 17, 2003.
Undergraduate Persistence and Graduation Rates Bernadette Gray-Little Faculty Council September 15, 2006.
2011 – 2013 BIENNIUM BUDGET POLICY PAPER Committee Members Gene Awakuni Helen Cox Reed Dasenbrock Linda Johnsrud John Morton Howard Todo.
The Role of the Office Institutional Research and Program Assessment at Baruch College Presented by: John Choonoo, Director Jimmy Jung, Assistant Director.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Arkansas Higher Education Financial Condition Report A Report to the Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board October 30, 2009.
Increasing Capacity and Efficiency in Programs Leading to RN Licensure in Texas Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board July 2004 Full report available.
Strategically Internationalizing Your Campus Using Trends and Data Jim Crawley, Director University Recruitment and Advising Services – ELS Educational.
IUPUI Institutional Scholarship Program Used for High-ability In-State Student Recruitment 12/16/14 Dr. Rebecca Porter Executive Director, Enrollment Management.
Lois Douglass Financial Aid Counselor, UNC-Chapel Hill Julie Rice Mallette Assoc. Vice Provost & Dir. OSFA NC State Emily Bliss, Director OSFA UNCW.
The Collision of Two Worlds : Does K-12 + College = K-16? Or Does K-12+ College =Does K-12+ College = Chaos?
Strategic Plan Update November Purdue Calumet Strategic Vision Student Success Retain and graduate more students Grow enrollments to 10,500 Preferred.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute Presentation to the Advisory Boards October 13, 2006.
TOP 25 A summary of the plan. An update on the progress that’s been made. A challenge for faculty. FEBRUARY 2011.
Macalester College Summary: Proposed Operating Budget April 2009.
Board of Regents Meeting March 2006 Chancellor Doug Hastad University of Wisconsin-La Crosse: A Growth and Access Agenda.
MCCVLC Distance Learning Administrators Survey Results & Discussion.
Nancy Cooley Academic Affairs Director SHEEO Professional Development August 15, 2002 STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION FOR VIRGINIA ADVANCING VIRGINA.
INTO Oregon State University Update. OSU Provost & Executive Vice President INTO OSU Center Director INTO OSU Board of Advisors INTO Managing Director,
UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 Legislative Appropriations.
BUILDING THE VISION Gregory G. Dell’Omo FACULTY CONVOCATION August 26, 2005.
 Historical Review of External Impacts On the University - Vision III Funding Plan MHEC Accountability Report Maryland Higher Education.
Ron Strauss Lynn Williford Jim Dean Office of the Provost.
UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MARYLAND FY 2009 BUDGET William E. Kirwan, USM Chancellor February 1, 2008.
From a galaxy far, far away... The Compact Process A View from 40,000 feet Laura Coffin Koch Associate Vice Provost University of Minnesota.
University of Massachusetts Boston FY11 Budget Process February 25, 2010.
Kenyon College 2008 Financial Aid Optimization Analysis Prepared October 2008.
Enrollment Projections 2008 – 2018 Faculty Senate Meeting February 19, 2008 Dr. Terrence Curran Associate Provost for Enrollment Management Faculty Senate.
Right-Sizing Academic Affairs The New Normal at Appalachian State University Board of Trustees Retreat March 22, 2012.
Enrollment and Intersession Office of Senior Vice Provost for Academic Affairs presented to UB Information Technology February 26, 2013.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
University of Louisville Tuition Recommendation to CPE April 30, 2008.
Carolina BEST PLACE TO TEACH, LEARN, AND DISCOVER REPORT Trustees John Ellison and J.J. Raynor OLD WELL PHOTO  SAM KITTNER.
ACADEMIC PLAN REPORT Faculty Council March 16, 2012 Bruce W. Carney Executive Vice Chancellor & Provost.
3/19/2012 Proposed Admissions Guideline Modifications Academic Year: 2013/14 Public Hearings March 2012
Supporting Our Students Presentation to the Wake County Board of Commissioners and Board of Education April 16, 2008.
NAROPA UNIVERSITY Strategic Plan As Voted On By Naropa’s Board of Trustees “Deliver Distinction With Excellence” September 19, 2008.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Undergraduate Enrollment Growth Study Interim Report Presented to the Board of Trustees March 27, 2008.
Business Practices Seminar Evolving Higher Education Business Environment M. Dwight Shelton, Jr. October 26, 2015.
Dr. Les Wong, President Mr. Gavin Leach, Vice President for Finance and Administration.
Winter Symposium January 20, Why are we here today? To discuss ways that we can take control of our future and make the outcomes we desire more.
1 Budget Overview Budget Information Committee February 26, 2007.
December Town Hall Tuition Planning Presentation FY17- FY20 December 3, 2015.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
The CSU at the Beginning of the 21st Century: Meeting the Needs of the People of California.
Dyson/Johnson Advisory Council 26th April 2017
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Budget Overview 2016 New Department Chairs Workshop
Strategic Plan Update November 2005.
The Size of Campus – Considerations and Analyses
FY 2014 Budget Review & FY 2015 Budget oUTlook
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Board of Trustees
George A. Smathers Libraries
The City University of New York Performance Management Process (PMP)
ACHIEVING 2020 ENROLLMENT GOALS
Equity Strategic Framework
Competition for Top Students
Presentation transcript:

Faculty Council Student Enrollment Dr. Bernadette Gray-Little, Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost September 15, 2006 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Exploring Enrollment Trends: Current Status and Projections Fall 2005 total enrollment was 27,276. Current long-range plan, submitted to GA in Dec. 2005, projects 29,447 students by Fall This plan exceeds all previous projections. The Scholarship Provision increased the 10-year projected growth in undergraduates by 683.

Concerns with the Present Enrollment Plan Ability to maintain selectivity and quality of entering first year class; Availability of space for classrooms, offices, laboratories, etc., which lags behind projected enrollment growth by months.

Analyses of the Effects of Enrollment Growth In considering growth beyond the current projection of 29,477 by 2015, we analyzed the potential effects of two expanded models: A 30,000 model that represents incremental, but consequential, growth above the current plan; and, A 35,000 model that represents rapid growth above the current plan. We considered and then discarded this model because of its profound implications for the academic, fiscal, and operational environment at Carolina.

Principles of Enrollment Growth Sustain quality. No enrollment growth without faculty growth. No enrollment growth without appropriate level of staff growth. Maintain commitment to our historical balance of undergraduate, graduate, and professional education. No enrollment growth without space provided in advance. Maintain the residential character of campus – “a bed for every new (undergraduate) head.” Improve the five-year graduation rate. Maintain a commitment to diversity. * Developed by the Provost’s Enrollment Policy Advisory Committee and presented to the Board of Trustees in 2003.

Planning Assumptions (continued) Main campus will absorb enrollment growth. Revenue from contracts and grants will increase in proportion to the size of the faculty, but not at the same rates observed in the past decade. The State of North Carolina will continue to fund 100% of projected enrollment increases. The Campus Master Plan will govern development.

UNC-Chapel Hill Total Students Historical and Projected

UNC-Chapel Hill Total Faculty and Staff Historical and Projected

UNC-Chapel Hill First Year Students Historical and Projected

Implications of Expanded Enrollment Growth on: Academic Quality of Entering Classes Non-Academic Areas

Effects of Enrollment Growth on the Quality of Entering Undergraduate Students

Current Admission Outcomes Fall 2006 baseline: 19,733 applications 34.1% admission rate 56.9% yield rate Our current admission and yield rates are exceptionally good in comparison to other large research institutions.

Effects of Enrollment Growth on Yield Rate Yield Rate = Percentage of admitted students who enroll. Results of recent survey* suggest that larger enrollments would make Carolina less attractive to admitted students and that a significant percentage would choose not to enroll. Predicted net loss of 159 (4% of admitted class) would occur with a total enrollment of 30,000. Students who said that they would not come to Carolina if it grows to those levels tended to be those at the top of the admitted class. *Source: 2006 UNC-Chapel Hill Admitted Student Survey

Effects of Enrollment Growth on Class Quality Indicators As a result of lower yields of the top students, entering class quality indicators are likely to decline: Average SAT score Average high school GPA Average rank in high school class

Potential Effects of Enrollment Growth on Selectivity Selectivity = the percentage of applicants accepted for admission. To maintain our current selectivity (34%), we would need to increase the number of applications received from 19,733 in 2006 to 21,331 in 2015 at a total enrollment of 30,000 Additional applicants would come from the academically weaker portion of the applicant pool, because the majority of the top North Carolina high school students already apply to Carolina: 69% of those with SAT scores of % of those in the top 5% of their high school class

Potential Effects of Enrollment Growth on the Diversity of the Entering Class Enrollment increases may limit efforts to strengthen diversity in the entering class: Inequities in the quality of K-12 preparation continue to constrict the pipeline of highly competitive students from underrepresented groups. Carolina’s share of this pipeline is already large: For example, this year all but 15 African-American students statewide with SAT scores of 1300 and higher applied to Carolina. Under an expanded growth model, minority presence, measured as a percentage of total enrollment, is likely to decrease.

Effects of Enrollment Growth on Research

Importance of the ratio of faculty to students: With more students, faculty have less time to devote to scholarly/scientific activities. Maintaining the current faculty-student ratio, a guiding principle for UNC-Chapel Hill enrollment growth, has been a challenge in recent years. Although we have received enrollment growth funding, budget cuts have eroded these resources and limited their intended use in expanding the faculty to teach the additional students. Improving Improving the faculty-student ratio, a measure of institutional quality, becomes even more difficult as we increase the number of students.

Effects of Enrollment Growth on Student Affairs

Student Affairs: Implications of Growth Plan to 29,447 or 30,000 Housing capacity will be adequate to supply a “bed for every new undergraduate head.” Campus Health Services facilities will need to be expanded to meet increased demand for services. The existing ratio of staff to students in several service areas is already is unfavorable compared to peers, and will get worse. Lack of meeting space has been identified by student leaders as the greatest problem facing student groups and organizations, and this too will worsen.

Summary

The University has exceeded its enrollment growth commitments, increasing by 13% over the past ten years. Current enrollment plans will add 2,201 students by This represents an additional 8% growth over the next ten year period. The current growth plan (29,447) presents challenges with classroom and office space, the number of faculty and staff required to serve students according to our standards, and possibly infrastructure and town issues. The 30,000 growth model would add 553 additional students to the current plan. This would represent a 10% growth over the next ten year period.