SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CONVOCATION REPORT March 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why self-archive? Elizabeth Harbord Head of Collection Management.
Advertisements

Growing Repositories The role of advocacy and support in growing repositories and achieving the DRIVER vision Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager, University of.
1 Whats All This Fuss About Promotion & Tenure? Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine.
Empowering Authors Sharon Wang and Andrea Kosavic Scholarly Communications Retreat December 12, 2007.
ENGAGING FACULTY AROUND NEW MODELS Sarah Shreeves & Joy Kirchner ACRL Workshop: Scholarly Communication 101.
Throwing Open the Doors: Strategies and Implications for Open Access Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC October 23, 2009 Educause Live 1.
Scholarly publishing distribution models In traditional model, libraries/others serve as mediators between information and researchers by buying books.
E-prints: the Nottingham Experience Stephen Pinfield and Mike Gardner.
Survival in Uncertain Times Library Materials Costs Exploding Lois Schultz April 22, 2003.
The Future Ain’t What It Used To Be UKSG Conference 2004 and Exhibition Manchester, UK 29 March 2004.
Andrea Eastman-Mullins, Information & Technology Coordinator, UNC TLTC Dr. Ray Purdom, Director of the University Teaching and Learning Center, UNC Greensboro.
IT Task Force Report Recommendation 4.b Create Open Access models and policies for CSU scholarship and other information. The Libraries should: –Work with.
Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.
SC in UC July Cynthia Shelton UCLA’s Scholarly Communication Program Talk at One; Walk at Two.
Scholarly Communication Issues: Raising Awareness on Many Fronts June 2007 ASEE ELD James Van Fleet.
Institutional Repositories: Defining Local Needs & Developing Local Implementation Strategies Susan Gibbons Digital Initiatives Librarian University of.
Faculty Rights and Other Scholarly Communication Practices Denise Troll Covey Principal Librarian for Special Projects Carnegie Mellon DLF Forum – Boston,
WIT Libraries. WIT Institutional Repository Update David Kane, WIT.
Institutional or Subject Repositories Les Carr. Academic Colleagues A group of academics or researchers of the same discipline who work together at the.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Faculty Participation in Open Archives: A Discussion John Schumacher SUNY System Administration Office of Library and Information Services.
Committee Charges Identify and implement local actions in response to the scholarly communications issues raised by the committee. Consider actions that.
SUNY and Ongoing Changes to Scholarly Communication John Schumacher SUNY Office of Library and Information Services.
Renaissance Computing Institute Scholarly Communication in a Digital World: Some Thoughts Dan Reed
Course Portfolio: Making Pedagogy Visible Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) Queensborough Community College, CUNY Spring 2008.
Scholarly communication in Japan: Open access etc as of 2005 Yuko Nagai (The Zoological Society of Japan)
ROLE OF SUBJECT LIAISON LIBRARIANS Scholarly Communication and Publishing Issues Jennifer Laherty, Digital Publishing Librarian, IUScholarWorks: Indiana.
Developing Effective Scholarly Communication Advocates: A Case Study Pam Brannon Sara Fuchs Electronic Resources & Libraries 2008 March 19, 2008.
Copyright Management for Scholarship Julia Blixrud, Association of Research Libraries/SPARC Rodney Petersen, EDUCAUSE John Vaughn, Association of American.
Z A Authors and Zealots: Transforming Scholarly Communication Mary E. Youngkin, Valeri Craigle, Joan M. Gregory, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library,
Encouraging Scholarly Communication OSU Oregon Library Association Conference, April 6, 2006 ******************************* Michael Boock.
Libraries and the Communication of Scholarship: Changing Times, Changing Roles David Ruddy.
Library Publishing Services: Strategies for Success Charleston Library Conference November 3, 2011.
Science Case Network Welcome RCN-UBE Project #
26 June 2002JISC CNI Conference SPARC Open Access to Scholarship New Solutions.
The Future of Scholarly Communication | UC Berkeley Academic Values and Scholarly Communication Practices: An Analysis of Faculty Choice and Opinion in.
TAKING ACTION IN A CRITICAL MOMENT Katherine Skinner, PhD 24 th Annual NC Serials Conference, March 6, 2015 Chapel Hill, NC from innovation to impact.
Engaging Faculty with New Models: Openness in Practice Presenter Host Institution Date ACRL Scholarly Communications Roadshow: From Understanding to Engagement.
Next Steps???. Funding Agencies/Foundations Agencies and foundations that provide financial support to scholars should require that the projects they.
SAON Data Management Workshop Report June 7-8, 2010, Norway Recommendations (Extracted by Jan René Larsen, 25 September 2012),
Libraries in the Knowledge Society P R Goswami Director,NASSDOC ICSSR,New Delhi.
AIAA New Event Model January Why the New Event Model? Our profession is evolving and AIAA must change with it  More emphasis in the industry.
Creating Change in Scholarly Communications Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC September 21, 2009 TCAL, Austin, TX.
POLS 2300: Introduction to Library Research Timothy Bristow Research & Instruction Librarian, Scott Library.
UW Faculty Retention Toolkit Joyce W. Yen, ADVANCE Program/Research Manager.
Biology Scholars Program Amy Chang American Society for Microbiology Goal: Develop faculty expertise in evidenced-based science education reform Seven.
Dartmouth College Library COL 1 Scholarly Communication: Threats, Problems and Opportunities Presentation to the Council on Libraries Dartmouth.
Science Case Network Welcome RCN-UBE Project #
PPT 下载: What Is this? Promotion and Tenure: Exploring the Guidelines of Journalism, Mass Communication and PR Departments in a Digital.
What are libraries doing? What can you do? LIBRAS Annual Meeting: Scholarly Communication May 22, 2008 Caroline Sietmann, Dominican University.
From Topics to Questions. Engaging Your Audience Topics can have large audiences E.g. demography topics Disciplines – sociology, geography, economics,
Open access isn’t just for the sciences: Digital scholarship in the humanities and social sciences UF Open Access Week, October 2012 Dr. Sophia Krzys.
California Digital Library Managing and Federating e-Print Repositories: UC’s eScholarship Initiatives CNI Fall Task Force Meeting December 1999 John Ober.
DAEDALUS - An ePrints Case Study William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Organizing a Conference.
Scholarly Communications, Open Access and Institutional Repositories Andrew Revelle – Social Sciences Librarian and Working Group on Scholarly Communications.
Overview Presentation Mary Lynn Realff Co-PI and Project Director NSF Site Visit June 8, 2004 GT NSF ADVANCE – taking an integrated approach to institutional.
26 June 2002JISC CNI Conference Creating Change in Scholarly Communication Chris Bailey Director of Library Services University of Glasgow.
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
Institutional Repository “A university-based institutional repository is a set of services that a university offers to the members of its community for.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Publishing from the Library: New Roles for Libraries in Scholarly Communications David Ruddy Cornell University Library September, 2004.
The New Now: Institutional Repositories and Academia Institutional Repository USM April 17, 2015 Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian.
Resolution Concerning Scholarly Publishing Alternatives and Authors’ Rights Passed by the UW Faculty Senate, April WHEREAS, the primary mission of.
Andrew Revelle | Jennifer Bazeley Miami University Libraries
Promoting Faculty Scholarship through the USFSP Digital Archive
Scholarly Communication Issues: Raising Awareness on Many Fronts
SSarah The Value of Scholarly Communications Programming: Perspectives from Three Settings Sarah Beaubien • Scholarly Communications.
Information Practices of Interdisciplinary Research Teams (Digging Into Data Challenge Round 3, humanities + computational science) Inter-institutional.
Presentation transcript:

SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CONVOCATION REPORT March 2005

PURPOSE OF CONVOCATION To examine scholarly communications issues broadly To identify problem areas To recognize the difference in the problems from discipline to discipline To identify areas in which UNC-CH can offer local solutions

IS THERE A CRISIS? Yes Serials costs continue to escalate out of control – especially in the sciences & now the social sciences Scholarly monograph publishing is on the decline In order to publish their research, faculty often lose control of the copyright

BUT IT IS NOT HOPELESS! Open source publishing offers solutions Open archives are a complementary solution Low-cost electronic alternative journals such as those through SPARC Working with our scholarly societies

PLANNING COMMITTEE Appointed over the summer to begin work to plan and offer a convocation to address these issues Bring together faculty, librarians, IT professionals & administrators to focus on these issues Advanced readings – white papers

WHITE PAPERS White papers – general interest Two on the problems: serials costs & copyright concerns Two on solutions: institutional repositories & tenure & promotion policies Disciplinary papers – unique Anthropology Biology Computer Science Music Spanish

THE CONVOCATION Difficult to convey the excitement & interest of participants Key note speaker to the summary! 4:30 on Friday afternoon, audience still present, alert & engaged Discuss some of the issues with you through the recommendations