E-109: Environmental Politics Section Meeting 2 October 7, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXERCISE IN MITIGATION DECISIONS MODULE 2 THE MULTI-HAZARD ENVIRONMENT.
Advertisements

The Department of Energy Enterprise Risk Management Model
OPEN:EU Initial Seminar Scenarios and Policy Analysis Katy Roelich - Stockholm Environment Institute Doris Knoblauch - Ecologic Institute.
Tax Risk Management Keeping Up with the Ever-Changing World of Corporate Tax March 27, 2007 Tax Services Bryan Slone March 27, 2007.
Consistency of Assessment
Risk Assessment and Management Katie Matthews GEOG 350 November 8, 2007.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Module 1: Key concepts in data demand & use
Projmgmt-1/33 DePaul University Project Management I - Risk Management Instructor: David A. Lash.
E-109: Environmental Politics Section Meeting 5 October 28, 2008.
E-109: Environmental Politics Section Meeting 7 November 18, 2008.
Risk Management and Strategy Prioritisation Intelligence Step 8 - Risk Management and Strategy Prioritisaiton Considering the risks associated with action.
10/1/08 ESPP-781 Risk Definition, Typology, Examples Probability of harm X magnitude of harm Types of risk –low-probability, high-consequence risks nuclear.
E-109: Environmental Politics Section Meeting 3 October 14, 2008.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
MRA basic awareness course Overview – Basic awareness course on microbiological risk assessment Overview Basic Awareness Course on Microbiological Risk.
Managing Risk to Reduce Construction Claims (And Improve Project Success) Presented by Laurie Dennis, PE, CVS-Life, FSAVE.
LIMITLESS POTENTIAL | LIMITLESS OPPORTUNITIES | LIMITLESS IMPACT Copyright University of Reading IMPACT AND THE SCIENCES Anthony Atkin (Research Impact.
Mentor Briefing Workshop
NITROGEN TRACKING AND REPORTING TASK FORCE A Summary Agricultural Expert Panel Public Meeting #1 May 5, 2014 Amrith Gunasekara, PhD Science Advisor to.
AquaAdvantage Salmon Lisa Danielson. Outline Introduction Explanations Significance Research Question Methodology My approach Literature Review Problems.
Richard J.T. Klein Stockholm Environment Institute and Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University.
Environmental Risk Analysis
Involving the Whole Organization in Creating or Restructuring a Volunteer Program Louise DeIasi DeCava Consulting.
9 Closing the Project Teaching Strategies
Classroom experiences are consistently characterized by surprising, emergent behavior and high quality discussions. Issues concerning leadership, transparency,
Sociology 3322a. “…the systematic assessment of the operation and/or outcomes of a program or policy, compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards.
Knowledge Translation: putting research and training into policy Hung Nguyen Viet Hanoi School of Public Health (HSPH) Swiss TPH and Sandec/Eawag EcoZD-FBLI.
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Environmental and technology ethics Uncertainty, risk and precaution.
Advocacy. Definitions Advocacy is a strategy that is used around the world by non-governmental organizations (NGOs), activists, and even policy makers.
What works? Student Retention and Success Team Summit meeting 20 January 2010.
Recap and Synthesis of National and Regional Research MK21 Inception workshop for local research projects Yangon, June 2015.
Introduction to Workplace Safety
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT. The Benefits of Risk Management Reduction in Material and Property Damage. Effective Mission Accomplishment. Reduction in.
Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
SECTION 1 THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
Mentoring in the workplace Capability development through collaborative learning.
Risk Management (I) Jeffrey Gilbert EcoZD coordinator EcoHealth Workshop, CENPHER, Hanoi 2013 Ecosystem Approaches to the Better Management of Zoonotic.
Introduction to risk management Jouni Tuomisto, Mikko Pohjola THL.
Methodological Framework for the Assessment of Governance Institutions P. Diaz and A. Rojas PFRA Workshop, March 17, 2006.
Project Stakeholder Management
Mentoring in the workplace Capability development through collaborative learning.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
An Update of COSO’s Internal Control–Integrated Framework
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making Mikko V. Pohjola, Nordem Oy, (THL)
Research Needs to Support FDA Risk Communication Nancy M. Ostrove, Ph.D. Director for Risk Communication May 1, 2009.
Module One: Governance for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
 Advantages  Context-independent, hence applicable regardless of source, medium, location, affected interests (“risk science”)  Calculable, hence comparable.
IB: Language and Literature
Stakeholder Analysis and Engagement Katy Koenen June 2013.
Program Assessment User Session Experts (PAUSE) Information Sessions: RSS & Subscription Services October , 2006.
1 Task 2 – High Tier Source Categories  Overall goal of Task 2 is to identify high-tier source categories and present detailed methodologies to estimate.
Five Risk Management Best Practices Scott Moss, CIS P/C Trust Director ERM – ISO
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
Seminar on early warning systems October 2008 Aix-en-Provence Summary of outcomes.
HRBA Project Planning Steps Understanding the Structure.
Chapter 1 Toward Accountability. The Faces of Accountability Professional Accountability.Service Delivery Accountability.Coverage Accountability.Cultural.
Communicating Actionable Regulatory Intelligence João Duarte Regulatory Intelligence Strategy Leader H. Lundbeck A/S.
Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risk
By Dr. Talat AnwarAdvisor Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad
true potential An Introduction to the First Line Manager Programme’s CMI Qualifications.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making
Collective scientific expertise on eutrophication
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Presentation transcript:

E-109: Environmental Politics Section Meeting 2 October 7, 2008

Administrative Further Section/Discussion Board Questions? Teaching Staff will be discussing Group Project on Wednesday Close-Reading Exercise? Section on November 4 – HUCE Librarian Video Section on November 11—Veteran’s Day

Assignments Please label all Drop Box files using the format: Last Name_Section Assignment_#.doc Please submit Microsoft Word files only No PDFs

Key Concepts Risk NRC “Red Book” Categories of Risk “Lay” v. “Expert” Knowledge “Actual” Risk v. “Perceived” Risk Probability of Harm X Magnitude of Harm Research Hazard identification Exposure assessment Risk characterization Risk communication Risk management

Background “Formal” Risk Assessment/Analysis Framework

Background Analytic-Deliberative Framework

Decision Makers Experts Laypeople Learning and Feedback Decision Analysis and Deliberation Problem Formation Process Design Selecting Options and Outcomes Information Gathering Synthesis ImplementationEvaluation Analytic-Deliberative Framework

Background Another Risk Assessment Framework?

Background GMO Controversy: What is a GMO? Current Regulations? Potential Benefits? Potential Risks?

Topic #1: Actors In the models of RA presented by the NRC:  Who are the relevant actors?  Where are they in the process?  What is their designated role? Who should be involved in the RA process? Why? How? What is the relationship between “lay” knowledge and “expert” knowledge?

“Formal” Risk Assessment/Analysis Framework

Decision Makers Experts Laypeople Learning and Feedback Decision Analysis and Deliberation Problem Formation Process Design Selecting Options and Outcomes Information Gathering Synthesis ImplementationEvaluation Analytic-Deliberative Framework

Topic #1: Actors in the GMO Controversy Who are the relevant actors/ stakeholders in the GMO controversy? Does “Expert Knowledge” and “Lay Knowledge” exist in this case? Are the NRC Risk Assessment Frameworks applicable?

Topic #2: Risk Perception In the models of RA presented by the NRC: How are different perceptions of risk accounted for in the process? How and why do different groups perceive risk differently? What factors shape risk perception?

“Formal” Risk Assessment/Analysis Framework

Decision Makers Experts Laypeople Learning and Feedback Decision Analysis and Deliberation Problem Formation Process Design Selecting Options and Outcomes Information Gathering Synthesis ImplementationEvaluation Analytic-Deliberative Framework

Topic #2: Risk Perception in the GMO Controversy What are the various perceptions of risk associated with GMOs? Who holds these different views? Why might perceptions of GMO risk differ across groups?

Topic #3: Values In the models of RA presented by the NRC: How are non-scientific factors accounted for in each model of risk assessment? Do non-scientific factors affect risk assessment? If yes, how?

“Formal” Risk Assessment/Analysis Framework

Decision Makers Experts Laypeople Learning and Feedback Decision Analysis and Deliberation Problem Formation Process Design Selecting Options and Outcomes Information Gathering Synthesis ImplementationEvaluation Analytic-Deliberative Framework

Topic #3: Values in the GMO Controversy What values are implicated in the controversy surrounding genetically engineered products? How do Miller, the NY Times, the Christian Science Monitor and the Wall Street Journal depict the role that these values play in the GMO controversy?

Topic #4: Summary What are the benefits and flaws of the RA Frameworks presented by the NRC? How could each be improved?

“Formal” Risk Assessment/Analysis Framework

Decision Makers Experts Laypeople Learning and Feedback Decision Analysis and Deliberation Problem Formation Process Design Selecting Options and Outcomes Information Gathering Synthesis ImplementationEvaluation Analytic-Deliberative Framework

Topic #3: Risk in the GMO Controversy Can the controversies surrounding GMOs be adequately addressed by either of the RA Frameworks presented by the NRC? How could risk analysis, assessment, and/or communication about GMOs be improved? What framework would you propose for RA to address these issues?

Wrap-Up Questions? Comments?