Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay Larry Atkinson Teresa Garner Jose Blanco.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teresa Garner Larry Atkinson. Introduction to HFRADAR Sites & Data Circulation in the Bay Tidal Sub-tidal Quality Control Efforts Instrument Comparisons.
Advertisements

Measuring Two-Dimensional Surface Velocity Distribution
L. K. Shay, J. Martinez-Pedraja , A. B. Parks
Surface Current Observations with Drifting Buoys in the Philippines Archipelago Carter Ohlmann University of California, Santa Barbara DRI Objective: Provide.
Lynn K. Shay 1, J. Martinez-Pedraja 1, M. Powell 2, B. Haus 1, and J. Brewster 1 1 Division of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography, RSMAS 2 Hurricane.
Influence of Antenna Pattern Distortions on Surface Current Data collected by a CODAR HF-Radar System Josh T. Kohut Scott M. Glenn Donald E. Barrick.
IOOS, NOAA and HF Radar QA/QC and Standards Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services QARTOD
Wave Measurements from SeaSondes. Measurements Significant Wave Height Wave Period Peak Wave Direction Wind Direction.
Success Stories – Making a Difference Optimizing HF Radar for SAR using USCG Surface Drifters Art Allen U.S. Coast Guard Josh Kohut, Scott Glenn Rutgers.
QARTOD 2: Remote Currents Working Group Definitions: Level 1 – refers to radials Level 2 – refers to total vectors Level 3 – refers to higher level data.
Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras: ~1000 km Coastline Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network Hugh Roarty, Ethan Handel, Erick Rivera, Josh.
Remote Sensing: John Wilkin Active microwave systems (4) Coastal HF Radar IMCS Building Room 214C ext 251 Dunes of sand.
Remote Sensing: John Wilkin Active microwave systems Coastal HF Radar IMCS Building Room 214C ph: Dunes of sand and seaweed,
Jay Titlow Can the private sector help fund the academic and public sectors?
SeaSonde Overview.
Remote Currents: HF Radar QA/QC and Standards Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services QARTOD
National High Frequency Radar Network Jack Harlan, Ph. D. NOAA IOOS Program Office Project Manager: HF Radar DHS Training 21 Apr 2010 Washington, DC.
Modeling study of the coastal upwelling system of the Monterey Bay area during 1999 and I. Shulman (1), J.D. Paduan (2), L. K. Rosenfeld (2), S.
Ligurian Sea Mid-Atlantic Bight Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network Radar Network Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn, Josh Kohut, Erick Rivera,
SCM 330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
CODAR Ben Kravitz September 29, Outline What is CODAR? Doppler shift Bragg scatter How CODAR works What CODAR can tell us.
U.S. IOOS ® HF Radar Network 10 Years of Experience Measuring Ocean Surface Currents Jack Harlan, Ph.D. U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS ®
Surface Current Mapping with High Frequency RADAR.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay.
0 0 Figure 3. Near real-time comparisons of 6 minute NOAA ADCP data (blue) and hourly CODAR data (red) at (YS) York Spit (CH) Cape Henry and (TS) Thimble.
L. K. Shay 1, J. Martinez-Pedraja 1, B. K. Haus 1, Brad Parks 1, Peter Vertes 1, Lew Gramer 2, and J. Brewster 1 1 Division of Meteorology and Physical.
IOOS National HF Radar Update Jack Harlan IOOS National HF Radar Project Manager GCOOS Annual Meeting September 2012 Corpus Christi.
CONRAD BLUCHER INSTITUTE ACTIVITIES SUPPORTING TEXAS PORTS AND WATERWAYS OPERATIONS Two Inter-related Services to the Port Community: 1. The Texas Coastal.
InvestigatorAffiliationInvestigatorAffiliation A. AllenU.S. Coast GuardL. AtkinsonOld Dominion University A. F. BlumbergStevens Institute of Technology.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay INTRODUCTION High frequency RADAR antennas are used to observe the surface circulation patterns in.
Automated Weather Observations from Ships and Buoys: A Future Resource for Climatologists Shawn R. Smith Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies.
SCCOOS Web Site Training Surface Currents and Wave Conditions.
DATA QUALITY CONTROL Julie Thomas Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) Scripps Institution of Oceanography CI Design Workshop October 2007 La.
AWIPS-2 HF Radar Sea-Surface Current Product By Ross Van Til Contributions by: Nicole Kurkowski, OS&T Dr. Pablo Santos, WFO Miami Dr. Jack Harlan, NOAA.
Sang-Ho Lee*, Hong-Bae Moon, Chang-Soo Kim Dept. Oceanography, BK21 Team, Kunsan Nat’l Univ., Korea Accuracy of currents measured by HF radar in the coastal.
The VIEW antenna is located on an open beach and is more isolated from structures which can cause distortion; therefore, its pattern shape is similar to.
CALYPSO Project FINAL MEETING PROJECT SEMINAR University of Malta, Valletta Campus, Old University Building, St Paul Street, Valletta 29 August 2013 Beyond.
Application of Radial and Elliptical Surface Current Measurements to Better Resolve Coastal Features  Robert K. Forney, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn 
Hindcast Simulations of Hydrodynamics in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Using the FVCOM Model Zizang Yang 1, Eugene Wei 1, Aijun Zhang 2, Richard Patchen.
Laboratory of Oceanography & Geosciences, Wimereux, France
Ocean Surface Current Observations in PWS Carter Ohlmann Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
Near-surface recirculation over Georges Bank Author: Richard Limemurner and Robert C. Beardsley Author: Richard Limemurner and Robert C. Beardsley.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Satellite Observation and Model Simulation of Water Turbidity in the Chesapeake.
Figure 2. Near real-time comparisons of 6 minute NOAA ADCP data (blue) and hourly CODAR data (red) at (YS) York Spit (CH) Cape Henry and (TS) Thimble Shoals.
CO-OPS Expands Meteorological Sensor Network and Quality Control Kathleen Egan, Tom Landon NOAA/NOS/Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services.
Project Update and 2014 Plans Jack Riley and Bryan Murray, HSTP.
NOAA and HF Radar FY05 and Beyond Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services SCCOOS Meeting 18 October.
CODAR Surface Current Maps Improve Coast Guard Search And Rescue Nearest Coastal Site CODAR Currents SLDMB Drifter SAROPS NowSAROPS w/ HFR Surface Currents.
Haskoning Australia Determining Circulation of the Great Barrier Reef Lagoon Using ADCP Data AiAiA – Gold Coast 2015 Heiko Loehr.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay INTRODUCTION High frequency RADAR antennas are used to observe the surface circulation patterns in.
Measuring Surface Currents off the Outer Banks of North Carolina Luke Stearns 1, Harvey Seim 1, Mike Muglia 2 1 UNC Chapel Hill 2 UNC Coastal Studies Institute.
CASE #3: Floating Away The Situation: While entering New York Harbor, several boxes of rubber ducks fell off their cargo ship. Using the data provided,
Real-Time Beyond the Horizon Vessel Detection
QA/QC Methods for 13 MHz Brant Beach (BRNT) Test Case
Validation of an ultra high frequency radar (River sonde) for current mapping in the urbanized Hudson River estuary 2010 summer research institute at.
Results from the Mid Atlantic High Frequency Radar Network
Evaluation of Three Antenna Pattern Measurements for a 25 MHz SeaSonde
National High Frequency Radar Network
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay
A Closer Look at CODAR HF Radar Spectra
Bistatic Systems: Preparing for Multistatic
Mapping Technology.
Robert K. Forney, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn March 5th, 2015
Quality Assurance Measures for High Frequency Radar Systems
Recognizing First and Second Order Features
October 27, 2011 New Brunswick, NJ
LCDR George Wright, USN OC 3570 – Winter 2008 Friday, March 14th 2008
A Multi-static HF Radar Network for the
Coastal Ocean Dynamics Radar (CODAR) Mapping of
COMPARISON OF COASTAL CURRENTS FROM HF RADAR AND ADCP DATA
Presentation transcript:

Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay Larry Atkinson Teresa Garner Jose Blanco

Two sites - one at Norfolk City beach and one at Bay Bridge Tunnel Island #4

The whole lower Bay is covered. Addition of a NOAA site at CPHN will provide coverage offshore and redunancy inside The whole lower Bay is covered. An additional NOAA site at CPHN will provide coverage offshore and redundancy inshore

Average for Time period: May 24 22:00 – Aug 23 19:00 (2007) CBBTVIEW Range (km) Noise Floor, Monopole (dBm) Signal To Noise, Monopole (dB) Radial Vector Count (measured pattern)

S/N varies diurnally

Current and Future Data Coverage

Initial Products - Hourly vectors, 50 hour subtidal means, tidal ellipses, 6 hour trajectory

Data Quality and Validation

Measured and Ideal Beam Patterns View – On Beach CBBT – on Island Ideal

Baseline comparisons improved significantly using the measured beam patterns

The radial speed should be the same from each antenna at the middle of the baseline.

NOAA PORTS has 3 ADCP’s on Coast Guard ATON buoys in the area CPHN

Time series of absolute speed for hourly averaged NOAA ADCP data (blue) and CODAR data (red) and their difference (black line).

Means and standard deviations of the speed differences (absolute value of ADCP data – CODAR data). SiteMean (cm/s) Standard Deviation (cm/s) Search Radius (km) Cape Henry Thimble Shoals York Spit

Product development for specific users – Navigation channels, sewage effluent, Navy special ops.

Wave and wave steepness – NWS and Weatherflow. CODAR wave product to be tested with NOAA/NWS and Weatherflow. Probably only good during southward winds.

Trajectory mapping and optimal interpolation for hazmat

Future work We plan to tow an ADCP for further data comparisons focusing on key areas where we will collect data within a few radial footprints for at least four hours to compare with radials. Other comparisons will be possible using ADCP transects from routine monthly Bay Mouth cruises.

Comments ROW-G is critical to success of this RESEARCH to OPERATIONS program Creating products users can use is critical – this is usually not a vector map.

Contacts and Information Project website: National HFRADAR Network Gateway: Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA Teresa Garner Jose Blanco Larry Atkinson

References Lipa, B.J., B.Nyden, D.S. Ullman, and E. Terrill, “SeaSonde Radial Velocities: Derivation and Internal Consistency,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.,vol. 31, no.4, pp , Oct NOAA Ocean Systems Test and Evaluation Program (OSTEP), "Test, Evaluation, and Implementation of Current Measurement Systems on Aids-To-Navigation", NOAA Technical Report NOS CO- OPS 043, Silver Spring, MD, Yoshikawa,Y., A. Masuda, K. Marubayashi, M. Ishibashi, and A Okuno, “On the accuracy of HF radar measurement in the Tsushima Strait,” J. Geophys. Res., 111, C04009, doi: /2005JC