SECCHI Consortium Meeting, Paris - March 2007 Heliospheric Imagers – Instrument Status Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department (RAL) Richard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced CCD Workshop Arne A. Henden
Advertisements

K2 Kepler’s Second Mission 1 K2 - a 2-wheel Kepler mission; The second highest peak in the world, a worthy ascent Steve B. Howell NASA Ames Research Center.
Instrument Checkout / Performance Verification for XRT & Control of XRT Observation R. Kano for the XRT Team.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.
SECCI/COR2 Status Report SECCHI CONSORTIUM MEETING D. Socker, S. Plunkett, A. Vourlidas.
CStCyr—SECCHI Paris-Mar #1 STEREO SECCHI COR1 Status O. C. St. Cyr for J.M. Davila and COR1 science team Heliophysics Science Division – Code 670.
SPD/AAS Poster May 2007 Mark Weber Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory On-Orbit Measurement of the Hinode / XRT Point Response Function.
J.P. Halain – Centre Spatial de Liège
SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission.
CIRSGSFC April 2004 dej-1 CIRS Instrument Overview CIRS Team Meeting Observatoire de Paris - Meudon April 26 – CIRS Instrument Group presented.
5 th SECCHI Tam Meeting.1 COR2 Status Angelos Vourlidas.
2007 March 51 EUVI Instrument and Calibration Status Jean-Pierre Wuelser James Lemen Markus Aschwanden Nariaki Nitta.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars Thierry Appourchaux for the PLATO Consortium
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
Stargazing on Mars Stargazing on Mars Cover Page Environment Constellations Polar Axis Observing Moons Observing Mars Moon to Moon Solar Eclipses Earth.
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Site Selection Workshop Oct , 2006 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California LCROSS Orbital.
METHOD OF DEM ESTIMATION 1.Generating “true” model observations. We start with the XRT temperature response functions R c (T) and a coronal emission model.
AST3 detector properties
1 Interpreting SECCHI White Light Images: FOV Sensitivity & Stereo Viewing Paulett Liewer, JPL; Russ Howard & Dennis Socker, NRL SECCHI Consortium Meeting.
Printed by ACS 2 Gyro Mode Data Analysis Cheryl Pavlovsky, Marco Sirianni, Ken Sembach, ACS Instrument Team and the 2 Gyro Mode Team.
Galactic Bulge Time On Target May These charts examine the compatibility of a 500 day microlensing program with a 6 month SNe observing program.
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.
Heliospheric Imager – Scientific Operations  HI Operations Document – R. Harrison  HI Image Simulation – C. Davis & R. Harrison  HI Operations Scenarios.
SECCHI Status Russell A. Howard 27 MAR 2007 STEREO SWG.
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 Roger Hunter (Ames Research Center) & Kepler Team March 26, 2010.
6/11/2012 Building on NEAT concept - M. Gai - INAF-OATo 1 Building on NEAT concept M. Gai – INAF-OATo (a) Extension of science case (b) Payload implementation.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
Solar-B SOT/FPP 1 SOT April 2006Ted Tarbell FPP CCD Camera Performance Ted Tarbell 17-Apr-2006.
Heliospheric Imager – Scientific Operations  HI Operations Document – R. Harrison (presented by Dave Neudegg – SciOps for Cluster, Mars Express, Double.
XRT’s Observational Parameters R. Kano (NAOJ). Contents FOV & Full Disk Imaging Time Cadence & Observation Table New Items as Solar X-ray Telescopes –Pre-flare.
PACS Spectrometer Spatial Calibration plan in PV phase A.Contursi D. Lutz and U. Klaas.
CDE CDR, September 14, 2004 Your Position, Your Name 1 GATS AIM Science Team Meeting January 23-24, 2007 CIPS Calibration Review, Aimee Merkel, Bill McClintock.
1 WB/lct CCD OVERVIEW Kepler will have 42 CCDs 2,200 column x 1,024 row full frame CCDs Field of View (FOV) > 100 square degrees (113 w/ vignetting)
Advances in Space Imaging Russell A. Howard Naval Research Laboratory NSF Workshop on Small Missions, May 2007.
2007 March 261 SECCHI-EUVI Status and First Observations Jean-Pierre Wuelser Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Lab And The SECCHI Team.
Two-Gyro Science Impact and Observer Information Ken Sembach STUC Meeting 18-November November-2004.
SECCHI Status Russell A. Howard & The SECCHI Team 3 Feb 2009 STEREO SWG - Pasadena.
Determination of the photometric calibration and the large-scale flatfield of the STEREO Heliospheric Imagers: I. HI-1 Danielle Bewsher 1,2,3, Daniel Brown.
PVPhotFlux PACS Photometer photometric calibration MPIA PACS Commissioning and PV Phase Plan Review 21 st – 22 nd January 2009, MPE Garching Markus Nielbock.
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission SECCHI Calibration Activities Simon Plunkett SECCHI Operations Scientist Naval Research Laboratory.
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
Michael L. Kaiser STEREO Project Scientist NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO May 2, 2008 STEREO at 1.25 years.
STEREO HI Post-Launch Support Chris Davis October 2009.
1 John Nousek & David Burrows (Penn State University) Alberto Moretti (Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera) X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Performance after Five.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
Status of MOBY and Future Plans Dennis Clark Carol Johnson, NIST Steve Brown, NIST Mark Yarbrough, MLML Stephanie Flora, MLML Mike Feinholz, MLML.
SECCHI Status Russell A. Howard & The SECCHI Team March 2010 STEREO SWG – Trinity College, Dublin.
The STEREO Heliospheric Imager (HI): How to detect CMEs in the Heliosphere Richard Harrison, Chris Davis & Chris Eyles.
STEREO SWG COR1 CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PLANS Joseph Davila 1, O. C. St. Cyr 1 William Thompson 2 1 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 2 Adnet Systems,
Three-Dimensional Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections From LASCO Polarization Measurements K. P. Dere, D. Wang and R. Howard ApJL, 620; L119-L
CCD Calibrations Eliminating noise and other sources of error.
OSIRIS operation summary
OSIRIS operation summary
Lessons learnt from the STEREO Heliospheric. Imagers: Tracking
Miscellaneous results of flight calibration analysis
OSIRIS operation summary
in-orbit operations and achievements
Mission Planning Updates
COR1 Current Status and Future Plans
VIRTIS Operations at Lutetia
On-Orbit Performance and Calibration of the HMI Instrument J
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Observational Prospect of NIREBL
UVIS Calibration Update
Space Weather and HI Richard A. Harrison, RAL
Presentation transcript:

SECCHI Consortium Meeting, Paris - March 2007 Heliospheric Imagers – Instrument Status Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department (RAL) Richard Harrison, Chris Davis, Danielle Bewsher, Steve Crothers and Jackie Davies (RAL) Jean-Philippe Halain (Centre Spatiale de Liege) Dan Moses and Jeff Newmark (Naval Research Laboratory)

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI Design Requirements Geometrical requirements: –To view the Sun-Earth line with unbroken coverage from Corona to Earth orbit –Opening angle of 45º governed by average CME width over equator Brightness levels: –Need to achieve rejection to < 3x and < B/Bo to detect CME signal –Have to contend with contributions from the F-Corona, planets, stars, the Earth and Moon

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI Specifications HI-1HI-2 Direction of centre of FOV13.98º53.68º Angular field of view20º70º Angular range3.98º – 23.98º18.68º – 88.68º CCD pixel size35 arcsec2 arcmin Image array (2x2 binning)1024x1024 Image bin size70 arcsec4 arcmin Spectral bandpass nm nm Nominal exposure time12-20 s60-90 s Nominal exposures per image7050 Nominal image cadence60 min120 min Brightness sensitivity (B o = solar disk)3 x B o 3 x B o Straylight rejection (outer edge)3 x B o B o

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department Early Mission Summary (1) Launched on 25 Oct 2006 –Decontamination Heaters switched on few hours later SECCHI Electronics and HI Cameras switched on 27 Oct –Electronics checks, dark images, Cal LED images Outgassing until 22 Nov –Decontamination Heaters switched off –CCD cooling curves and dark charge measurements (see later) –Cal LED and dark images HI-A Door deployment and first light on 13 Dec First Lunar swing-by and heliospheric insertion of STEREO-A on 15 Dec –HI-2A images of Moon !!!

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI-A First Lights

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI-A Lunar Swingby

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department Early Mission Summary (2) HI-B Door deployment and first light on 11 Jan –HI-1B images of Comet McNaught !!! Second Lunar swing-by and heliospheric insertion of STEREO-B on 21 Jan A reduced synoptic observing programme began late-Dec (for HI-A) –Summed sequences of 25 x 24 sec exposures for HI-1 and 50 x 50 sec exposures for HI-2, both every 2 hours –Interspersed with various calibration activities, including S/C off-points and rolls Various calibration and commissioning activities over period Dec – date –HI straylight off-point calibrations (see later) –SCIP stepped calibration rolls –Open Door exposure time linearity sequences –Open Door Cal LED images (LED + sky; sky only)

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department Comet McNaught (HI-1A Jan 2007)

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department SCIP-B Stepped Calibration Roll

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department Early Mission Summary (3) Just starting routine synoptic observing programme (see later) HI-A/B calibration rolls planned for 13 and 15 Mar –90/270 deg simultaneous rolls; spacecraft are rolled so that HI-A and HI-B view same area of sky to North and South of ecliptic –180 deg rolls; each spacecraft in turn rolled so that HI-A and HI-B view same area of sky centred on ecliptic

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI CCD Cooling and Dark Charge Dark Charge (DN/pixel/sec) HI-1AHI-2AHI-1BHI-2Be2v value* +20ºC ºC Fitted dark charge vs T relationship - I dark = A T  3 exp(  6400/T) (T in deg K) * Based on e  /pixel/sec and 1 DN = 15 e 

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI Thermal Status HI-AHI-B Structure-70 to -23ºC-68 to -29ºC S/C Interface-1ºC0ºC0ºC HI-1 CCD-83ºC-80ºC HI-2 CCD-80ºC-76ºC HI-1 Lens Barrel-15ºC-29ºC HI-2 Lens Barrel-15ºC CEB Internal-13ºC Wax Actuator-72ºC-71ºC All temperatures are well within operating limits HI-1B Lens Barrels stabilized at -29ºC with Operational Bus Heater CCD temperatures are very satisfactory

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI-A Straylight Off-Point Calibration (HI-1) Spacecraft off-pointed in steps in HI pitch: –0.25º, 0.5º, 0.75º, 1.0º and 1.5º towards Sun –0.5º and 1.0º away from Sun Stars removed with median filter, then measured F-corona intensity at a number of points across centre-line of FOV Values plotted against angle from Sun centre allowing for off-point R  n profile fitted to nominal pointing values 1 DN/sec ~ 1.2 x B/B O for HI-1 –Straylight rejection better than 2 x B/B O over most of FOV Margin of at least 0.5º in off-pointing from Sun

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI-A Straylight Off-Point Calibration (HI-2) R  n profile fitted to nominal pointing values –Value of n is very different for HI-1 and HI-2, 2.38 and 1.85 respectively, difference in spectral response? 1 DN/sec ~ 2 x B/B O for HI-2 –Straylight rejection better than 2 x B/B O over most of FOV Margin of at least 0.5º in off-pointing from Sun

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department Synoptic Observing Programme (1) HI-1HI-2 Exposure Time24 sec50 sec Exposure Cadence30 sec60 sec Number of Images in Summed Sequence5099 Duration of Exposure Sequence25 min99 min Summed Sequence Cadence40 min2 hr Observing Duty Cycle50%67% In addition take full-resolution single images at regular intervals –One every 2 days for HI-1 –One every 4 days for HI-2

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department Synoptic Observing Programme (2) Exposure times selected on dynamic range considerations –24 sec exposure for HI-1 gives maximum F-corona signal ~ 60% of dynamic range; very few saturated stars in HI-1 (~ 0 – 1) –50 sec exposure for HI-2 gives ~ 3 – 6 saturated stars Exposures at multiples of 30 sec simplifies scheduling Duration of exposure sequence results in drift of stars by ~ 1 bin –Minimal smearing of star images Summed sequence cadences constrained by telemetry allocation but matched to respective plate scales and typical velocity of coronal ejecta

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI Instrument Health and Status The HI instruments are performing superbly HI CEB and other electronics performance entirely nominal Thermal performance nominal –All temperatures within operating temperature limits –CCDs operating at ~ -80ºC; dark charge negligible, high tolerance against radiation damage effects No new issues or problems since launch Calibrations of flat fields, pointing offsets, etc proceeding well

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI Instrument Issues Three issues were known about pre-launch: Thermal leak in HI-1B Lens Barrel –Very minor, requires operating set-point of HI-1B Optics to be -29ºC rather than -15ºC –No impact on performance whatsoever Off-axis PSRF of HI-2B inferior to HI-2A –Also minor, issue was found late in programme –No significant impact on Level 1 science; star removal from images will be more challenging Bright Earth in HI-B –Issue arises from fundamental orbital mechanics and the consequent (and inevitable) mission design. –Dynamic range of cameras is excellent

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department First solutions from fitting to star-fields show plate-scales, distortion parameters, etc consistent with pre-launch values PSFs consistent with pre-launch values Values in pixels – Tests during AIV showed that HI-2B PSF problem is not a simple focus setting error –No significant impact on Level 1 science –Star subtraction more challenging; stellar photometry may be somewhat compromised –Images not so photogenic HI Imaging Performance Pre-Launch PSFOn-Orbit PSF FWHMHEWFWHM est HI-1A3 – 4 ~ 3 – 4 HI-2A3 – 6 ~ 3 – 8 HI-1B3 – 4 ~ 3 – 4 HI-2B3 – 103 – 12~ 3 – 12

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI-B Bright Earth Issues (HI-1) Earth first produced significant stray light effect on HI-1B on day 98 (Jan 30) –Sun-Earth angle was 34.5º Earth will leave HI-1B FOV (Sun-Earth angle 24º) around day 150 (Mar 23) Sun-Earth angle will return to 34.5º around day 169 (Apr 11) –Guarantees that Earth will cease to be an issue for HI-1B by mid-Apr –In fact will be significantly earlier because Earth irradiance is more than an order of magnitude lower than on day 98 A recent HI-1B image (25 Feb): Surface brightness < 10% of F-corona locally

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI-B Bright Earth Issues (HI-2) Earth signal is ~ 5 x photoelectrons per pixel (in 10 sec) –~ 2.5 x 10 5 x CCD full-well depth!!! –Also ~ 2.5 x 10 5 x system dynamic range By mid-June Earth irradiance will be order of magnitude lower –Spacecraft separation still only 13º –Success of on-going modeling and background subtraction studies will determine how much earlier Earth will cease to be an issue. HI-2B image (10 sec exposure) from 6 Feb: Surface brightness < 10% of F-corona locally

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department The Lunar Transit in HI-B 19 Feb UT (full-res image) 28 Feb UT (full-res image)

Chris Eyles Space Science & Technology Department HI Instrument Status Conclusions The performance of the instruments is excellent No new issues or problems since launch The Bright Earth will cease to be an issue for HI-1B by mid-April or earlier and for HI-2B by mid-June or earlier Excellent progress with calibrations –First flat-fielding results –First star-field fitting results –Pointing information being implemented in FITS headers (CRPIX, CRVAL, PCj_i, PV2_1, initially with nominal off-points, soon with updated values from star fields) HI is well placed for start of mission science phase