2009.02.11 - SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2009 Next-Generation Description: FRBR and RDA University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future of Cataloging RDA and other innovations Pt. 2.
Advertisements

RDA Test Train the Trainer Module 2: Structure [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
FRBR – A Refresher Course Marjorie E. Bloss RDA Project Manager April 9, 2008.
Bibliographic Relationships and Bibliographic Families.
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Resource Description and Access (RDA): a new standard for the digital world Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT.
Developing catalogues for customers (not cataloguers) Gordon Dunsire Presented at Branch/Group Day, CILIP in Scotland 5 th Annual Conference, 13 th June.
FRBR Functional requirements for bibliographic records (IFLA, 1998) Don Thornbury, RBSC Technical Services April 5, 2005.
FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records it is the Final Report of the IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic.
RDA and libraries Gordon Dunsire Presented at a College Development Network webinar, 13 June 2013.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
RDA Terminology: A Summary Atoma Batoma. RDA Terminology RDA Vocabularies: Controlled Vocabularies -Closed – Open –
RDA: A New Standard Supporting Resource Discovery Presentation given at the CLA conference session The Future of Resource Discovery: Promoting Resource.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History 2 University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Uniform Titles; FRBR University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization of Information.
Cambridge University Library RDA - Hugh Taylor, 7 Jan 09 RDA: Past, Present, Future Hugh Taylor CILIP Representative, Joint Steering Committee for Development.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Presented by Dr. Barbara Tillett Chief, CPSO Library of Congress 2004.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
Revising AACR: RDA Stuart Hunt CILIP/BL Committee on AACR/RDA Oslo, January 2006.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
The European Manuscript & Hand Press Book Heritage The role of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) Manuscript Collection in the National.
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
Cornell CS Bibliographic Concepts CS 502 – Carl Lagoze – Cornell University Acks to H. Van de Sompel.
Music Library Association SDC Open Meeting Feb. 18, 2005 AACR3: Summary of Part I Draft ( and a glimpse into Parts II and III) Kathy Glennan University.
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data.
Moving Cataloguing into the 21 st Century Presentation given at the CLA pre-conference Shaping Tomorrow’s Metadata with RDA June 2, 2010 by Tom Delsey.
Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program New Developments in Cataloging.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Introduction to Description and AACR II University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
Entity Relationships for the Bibliographic Universe Jacquie Samples September 7,2010 FRBR.
Resource Description and Access Since We Last Met… Marjorie E. Bloss RDA Project Manager 1.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: FRBR and Millennium
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen RDA Forum ALA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, June 24,
Implementation scenarios, encoding structures and display Rob Walls Director Database Services Libraries Australia.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
1 herbert van de sompel CS 502 Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Cornell University – Computer Science Herbert Van de Sompel
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
10/12/98Organization of Information in Collections Form of Names -- Personal Names (cont), Corporate Names and Uniform Titles University of California,
APPLYING FRBR TO LIBRARY CATALOGUES A REVIEW OF EXISTING FRBRIZATION PROJECTS Martha M. Yee September 9, 2006 draft.
Linked Data by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress For Texas Library Association Conference April 12, 2011.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
What Does FRBR Mean To You? Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program
Cataloguing Code and Cataloguing Process. What is a Catalog(ue)?  A list of library materials contained in a collection, a library, or a group of libraries.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA, the Next Phase Joy Anhalt Marjorie Bloss Richard Stewart.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
 NOTSL/ALAO-TEDSIG Joint Spring Meeting, May 14, 2010 FRBR Family FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records FRAD: Functional Requirements.
RDA Update Background Implementation plan Basics FRBR New MARC fields in CruzCat UCSC training plan (A number of slides are from Lori Robare’s “RDA For.
Intellectual Works and their Manifestations Representation of Information Objects IR Systems & Information objects Spring January, 2006 Bharat.
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
Chris Oliver May 4 th, 2009 for MLA RDA and AACR2.
AACR2 versus RDA Presentation given at the CLA Pre-Conference Session From Rules to Entities: Cataloguing with RDA May 29, 2009 by Tom Delsey.
FRBR: Cataloging’s New Frontier Emily Dust Nimsakont Nebraska Library Commission NCompass Live December 15, 2010 Photo credit:
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
AACR 2 –Rules for Descriptive Cataloguing
RDA: an introduction Gordon Dunsire Presented to the Workshop on Conceptual Modelling for Archives, Libraries and Museums Jan 2010, National Gallery,
LIS512 lecture 2: FRBR reading International Federation of Library Association “Fundamental Requirements for Bibliographic Records”, revised.
RDA: a new cataloging standard for a digital future RDA Update Forum ALA Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 13, 2008 John Attig ALA Representative.
RDA: history and background Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT ACOC Seminar, Sydney, 24 October 2008.
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Introduction to FRBR Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records GACOMO Oct. 16, 2008.
Form of Names -- Personal Names
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data
Metadata - Catalogues and Digitised works
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2009 Next-Generation Description: FRBR and RDA University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization of Information In Collections

SLIDE 2IS 257 – Fall 2009 Overview Review: –Description and AACRII –Choice and Form of Headings Next-Generation Description –FRBR –RDA

SLIDE 3IS 257 – Fall 2009 Introduction to Description Description (or descriptive cataloging) is concerned with indentification of an item and recording information about the item so that it may be identified exactly and cannot be confused with another item. (From Wynar/Taylor)

SLIDE 4IS 257 – Fall 2009 Structure of AACRII Part I: Description –Chap 1: General –Chap 2: Books, pamphlets and printed sheets –Chap 3: Cartographic Materials –Chap 4: Manuscripts –Chap 5: Music –Chap 6: Sound recordings –Chap 7: Motion Pictures and videorecordings –Chap 8: Graphic Materials –Chap 9: Computer Files –Chap 10: Three-Dimensional Artefacts and Realia –Chap 11: Microforms –Chap 12: Serials –Chap 13: Analysis

SLIDE 5IS 257 – Fall 2009 Structure of AACRII Part II: Headings, Uniform Titles, and References –Chap 21: Choice of Access Points –Chap 22: Headings for persons –Chap 23: Geographic Names –Chap 24: Headings for Corporate Bodies –Chap 25: Uniform Titles –Chap 26: References

SLIDE 6IS 257 – Fall 2009 Organization of the Description Title and statement of responsibility Edition Material specific details Publication, distribution, etc. Physical description Series Notes Standard numbers and terms of availability

SLIDE 7IS 257 – Fall 2009 Choice of Access Points Chapter 21 of AACRII is concerned with how to choose the elements of a description that will be made searchable – AKA “Access Points” We will look a bit at the sort of rules that are used to decide what does and doesn’t get made searchable in (conventional) paper and online catalogs (and why)

SLIDE 8IS 257 – Fall 2009 Choice of Access Points General Rule –21.1A -- Personal authorship -- enter works by one or more persons under the heading for personal author. –21.1B2 -- Corporate Body -- may be chosen as the main entry for an item if it falls into one or more of 6 categories.

SLIDE 9IS 257 – Fall B2 Corporate Author Categories a) The work deals with the body itself, such as a financial report or operations report, staff listing, or a catalog of the body’s resources. b) Certain legal, governmental, or religious types of works listed in the rule: –laws; decrees of the chief executive that have force of law; administrative regulations; constitutions; court rules; treaties, etc.; court decisions; legislative hearings; religious laws (e.g. canon law); liturgical works

SLIDE 10IS 257 – Fall B2 Corporate Author Categories c) Those that record the collective thought of the body –reports of commissions or committees, official position statements, etc. d) Those that report the collective activity of a conference (e.g.: proceedings, collected papers), an expedition (e.g.: results of exploration, investigation), or of an event falling within the definition of a corporate body -- provided that the conference, etc. is prominently named in the item

SLIDE 11IS 257 – Fall B2 Corporate Author Categories e) Those that result from the collective activity of a performing group as a whole where the responsibility of the group goes beyond that of mere performance, execution, etc. –Includes sound recordings, films, videorecordings, and written records of performances. f) Cartographic materials emanating from a corporate body other than a body that is merely responsible for their distribution and publication

SLIDE 12IS 257 – Fall B3 If a work falls outside the categories, treat it as if no corporate body was involved. Added entries are made for prominently named corporate bodies.

SLIDE 13IS 257 – Fall C Entry Under Title If there is no personal author, personal authorship is diffuse, and the work is not eligible under 21.1B2, when the work is a collection with multiple authorship or produced under editorial direction, or when the work is a text that a religious group accepts as sacred scripture.

SLIDE 14IS 257 – Fall 2009 Headings for Persons Once you decide (via the Chapter 21 rules) that entries are to be made for a person or persons, you must then choose the form that the name will appear in.

SLIDE 15IS 257 – Fall 2009 General Rule Choose, as the basis of the heading for a person, the name by which he or she is commonly known. This may be a person’s real name, pseudonym, title of nobility, nickname, initials, or other appellation. –Treat a roman numeral associate with a given name (as, for example, in the case of some popes, royalty, and ecclesiastics) as part of the name. –For authors using one or more psuedonyms or a real name and one or more psuedonyms, see 22.2b

SLIDE 16IS 257 – Fall 2009 Overview Review: –Description and AACRII –Choice and Form of Headings Next-Generation Description –FRBR –RDA

SLIDE 17IS 257 – Fall 2009 FRBR FRBR stands for “Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Data” (there is also a FRAD for authority data) It is a conceptual model of HOW bibliographic data should be considered It is a significant departure from the principles behind AACRII (the Paris Principles) by adopting the Work, instead of the Item as a key element of description

SLIDE 18IS 257 – Fall st century: AACR3 In 2001, JSC (Joint Steering Committee) decided that FRBR terminology should be incorporated into AACR. Since that time, rule revisions have been proposed to ensure that FRBR terms will be used in AACR. This will require introduction of new terms as well as redefinition of existing usage. The result is the new RDA (later) This and following slides are adapted from a talk by Don Thornbury (2005)

SLIDE 19IS 257 – Fall 2009 Development of FRBR Impetus 1990 –1) economic realities faced by libraries and the need to reduce the cost of cataloging; 2) importance of meeting user needs; 3) addressing the various types of material and the various contexts within which bibliographic records are used Aim of the project –produce a framework that would provide a clear, precisely stated, and commonly shared understanding of what it is that the bibliographic record aims to provide information about, and what it is that we expect the record to achieve in terms of answering user needs Drafting began 1995; published 1998 –

SLIDE 20IS 257 – Fall 2009 FRBR methodology “The methodology used in this study is based on an entity analysis technique that is used in the development of conceptual models for relational database systems. Although the study is not intended to serve directly as a basis for the design of bibliographic databases, the technique was chosen as the basis for the methodology because it provides a structured approach to the analysis of data requirements that facilitates the processes of definition and delineation that were set out in the terms of reference for the study.” (2.3) Translation: We need to figure out what things we’re talking about in cataloging, what there is to say about them, and how they relate to one another.

SLIDE 21IS 257 – Fall 2009 FRBR entities: 3 types Products of intellectual or artistic endeavor that are named or described in bibliographic records: work, expression, manifestation, and item. –Aggregate and Component entities: anthology, series, archival fond … [et al.]; chapter, article … [et al.] Entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, the physical production and dissemination, or the custodianship of such products: person and corporate body. Subjects of intellectual or artistic endeavour: the above entities, plus concept, object, event, and place.

SLIDE 22IS 257 – Fall 2009 Work : Expression : Manifestation : Item A “distinct intellectual or artistic creation.” An abstract entity: can be hard to define and delineate. Attributes: title, form, date … [et al.]

SLIDE 23IS 257 – Fall 2009 Work : Expression : Manifestation : Item The “intellectual or artistic realization of a work in the form of alpha-numeric, musical, or choreographic notation, sound, image, object, movement, etc., or any combination of such forms.” Reflects distinctions in intellectual or artistic content between one realization and another of the same work. Attributes: title, form, date, language, sequencing pattern (serial), type of score (musical notation), medium of performance (musical notation or recorded sound) … [et al.]

SLIDE 24IS 257 – Fall 2009 Work : Expression : Manifestation : Item The “physical embodiment of an expression of a work;” “all the physical objects that bear the same characteristics, in respect to both intellectual content and physical form.” Can be a set of items that result from a single act of production, or unique productions such as manuscripts, original oil paintings, etc. Attributes: title, statement of responsibility, edition/issue designation, place and date of publication/distribution, publisher/distributor, series statement, foliation (hand- printed book), publication status (serial), playing speed (sound recording), reduction ratio (microform), mode of access (remote access electronic resource) … [et al.]

SLIDE 25IS 257 – Fall 2009 Work : Expression : Manifestation : Item A “single exemplar of a manifestation.” Often a single physical object (e.g., a copy of a one-volume monograph), but can be more than one (e.g., a monograph issued as two separately bound volumes, a recording issued on three separate compact discs, etc.) Attributes: item identifier, provenance, marks/inscriptions, condition … [et al.]

SLIDE 26IS 257 – Fall 2009 Entity relationships Relationships are “the vehicle for depicting links between one entity and another, and thus as the means of assisting the user to ‘navigate’ the universe that is represented in a bibliography, catalogue, or bibliographic database.” Many kinds of relationships among entities: realization, embodiment, equivalence, whole-to-part, part-to-part … [et al.]

SLIDE 27IS 257 – Fall 2009 Entity relationships: Work … Item... many expressions of the work... Three manifestations of the expression ItemItem

SLIDE 28IS 257 – Fall 2009 Other entity relationships Work-to-Work: Successor, Supplement, Adaptation, Whole/Part … [et al.] Expression-to-Expression: Translation, Abridgement … [et al.] Manifestation-to-Manifestation: Reprint, Mirror site … [et al.] Item: Bound with … [et al.]

SLIDE 29IS 257 – Fall 2009 FRBR and MARC In LC’s action plan for bibliographic control of web resources (2001): Enhance MARC 21 to support display of hierarchical relationships among records for a work, its expressions and its manifestations (based on the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)) MARC to FRBR: 83 pages of element mapping (ca data elements in MARC) FRBR to MARC: 74 pages of element mapping

SLIDE 30IS 257 – Fall 2009 MARC 000cam a s 1912 gw ger d 035‚a (OCoLC)ocm ‚a ZIH ‚c ZIH ‚d PUL 041‚a ger ‚h eng 100‚a Shakespeare, William, ‚d ‚a Hamlet. ‚l German 24510‚a Hamlet, Prinz von Dèanemark / ‚c von William Shakespeare ;èubersezt von Heinrich Voss. 260 ‚a [Dèusseldorf : ‚b E. Ohle, ‚c 1912] 300 ‚a 145 p. ; ‚c 28 cm. 500 ‚a Number 141 of an edition of 200 copies. ‚5 NjP 563 ‚a Bound by Carl Sonntag jun. in Leipzig. ‚5 NjP 7001 ‚a Voss, Heinrich, ‚d ‚b ex ‚h ‚a

SLIDE 31IS 257 – Fall 2009 MARC: FRBR mapping 000cam a s 1912 gw ger d 035‚a (OCoLC)ocm ‚a ZIH ‚c ZIH ‚d PUL 0411‚a ger ‚h eng 1001‚a Shakespeare, William, ‚d ‚a Hamlet. ‚l German 24510‚a Hamlet, Prinz von Dèanemark / ‚c von William Shakespeare ;èubersezt von Heinrich Voss. 260 ‚a [Dèusseldorf : ‚b E. Ohle, ‚c 1912] 300 ‚a 145 p. ; ‚c 28 cm. 500 ‚a Number 141 of an edition of 200 copies. ‚5 NjP 563‚a Bound by Carl Sonntag jun. in Leipzig. ‚5 NjP 7001 ‚a Voss, Heinrich, ‚d ‚b ex ‚h ‚a Field data: Work Expression Manifestation Item Record

SLIDE 32IS 257 – Fall 2009 Resources FRBR: – Tillett: – MARC and FRBR: – analysis/frbr.html

SLIDE 33IS 257 – Fall 2009 From FRBR to AACR 3? FRBR has been very influential and has informed the development effort for updating AACRII…

SLIDE 34IS 257 – Fall 2009 RDA But, AACRII is on its last legs… The next generation is Resource Description and Access (RDA) –intended to be released in the third quarter of 2009 It is a new cataloguing standard to replace AACRII for ALL kinds of materials

SLIDE 35IS 257 – Fall 2009 RDA Overview STATEMENT OF PURPOSE FOR RDA –RDA - Resource Description and Access will be a new standard for resource description and access, designed for the digital world. –Built on foundations established by the Anglo- American Cataloguing Rules (AACR), RDA will provide a comprehensive set of guidelines and instructions on resource description and access covering all types of content and media. –RDA will enable users of library catalogues and other systems of information organization to find, identify, select, and obtain resources appropriate to their information needs. From

SLIDE 36IS 257 – Fall 2009 LONG TERM GOALS FOR RDA 1.The guidelines and instructions in RDA will be designed to: –Provide a consistent, flexible and extensible framework for both the technical and content description of all types of resources and all types of content. –Be compatible with internationally established principles, models, and standards. –Be usable primarily within the library community, but be capable of adaptation to meet the specific needs of other communities. 2.Descriptions and access points produced through the application of RDA guidelines and instructions will: –Enable users to find, identify, select, and obtain resources appropriate to their information needs. –Be compatible with those descriptions and access points devised using AACR2, and present in existing catalogues and databases. –Be independent of the format, medium or system used to store or communicate the data. –Be readily adaptable to newly-emerging database structures. 3.RDA will be developed as a resource description standard that is: –Optimised for use as an online tool (although a print edition will also be published). –Written in plain English, and able to be used in other language communities. –Easy and efficient to use, both as a working tool and for training purposes.

SLIDE 37IS 257 – Fall 2009 RDA Principles From proposed standard: RDA provides a set of guidelines and instructions on formulating data to support resource discovery. The data created using RDA to describe a resource are designed to assist users performing the following tasks: –find—i.e., to find resources that correspond to the user’s stated search criteria –identify—i.e., to confirm that the resource described corresponds to the resource sought, or to distinguish between two or more resources with similar characteristics –select—i.e., to select a resource that is appropriate to the user’s needs –obtain—i.e., to acquire or access the resource described.

SLIDE 38IS 257 – Fall 2009 Entity Description The data created using RDA to describe an entity associated with a resource (a person, family, corporate body, concept, etc.) are designed to assist users performing the following tasks:2 –find—i.e., to find information on that entity and on resources associated with the entity –identify—i.e., to confirm that the entity described corresponds to the entity sought, or to distinguish between two or more entities with similar names, etc. –clarify—i.e., to clarify the relationship between two or more such entities, or to clarify the relationship between the entity described and a name by which that entity is known –understand—i.e., to understand why a particular name or title, or form of name or title, has been chosen as the preferred name or title for the entity.

SLIDE 39IS 257 – Fall 2009 Relationship to other standards RDA is built on foundations established by the Anglo- American Cataloguing Rules (AACR) and the cataloguing traditions on which it was based Instructions derived from AACR have been reworked to produce a standard that will be easier to use, more adaptable, and more cost-efficient in its application. The need to integrate data produced using RDA into existing databases developed using AACR and related standards has been recognized as a key factor in the design of RDA. Other key standards used in developing RDA include the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD),8 the MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic Data,9 and the MARC 21 Format for Authority Data The RDA element set is compatible with ISBD, MARC 21, and Dublin Core.11 For mappings of the RDA element set to ISBD, MARC 21, and Dublin Core

SLIDE 40IS 257 – Fall 2009