Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Faculty Rights and Responsibilities David Dannenbring John Dugan Dennis Slavin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professionalism and Career Networking
Advertisements

Ethics in Teaching According to a study from the American
Promotion & Tenure Notes 1/2011 Resources – –
Maximizing Your Chances for Promotion and Tenure School of Medicine March 19, 2013.
QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi November 26, 2008.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
UNLV FACULTY SENATE TENURE & PROMOTION FORUM Oct. 2, 2012 Oct. 2, 2012 Thanks to the Past Chairs: Dr. John Filler Dr. Ceci Maldonado Dr. Nasser Daneshvary.
Carolyn M. Byerly, Ph.D., professor Department of Journalism and Graduate Program in Mass Comm & Media Studies TENURE: BASIC INFO AND ISSUES.
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
Integrity and impartiality
PHARMACIST CODE OF ETHICS
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Jenn Nichols, AAUP This PowerPoint Presentation was initially designed by long-time AAUP activist Glenn Howze ( ) Faculty Governance: Definitions.
Moral and Ethical Issues. Definitions Morals - concerned with principles of right and wrong or conforming to standards of behavior and character based.
Illinois Educator Code of Ethics Training
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
Ethics in Social Science Research and Experiments.
Research Assessment Exercise 2006 University Grants Committee.
Ethics CS-480b Network Security Dick Steflik. ACM Code of Ethics This Code, consisting of 24 imperatives formulated as statements of personal responsibility,
Getting the Word Out How to publicize and disseminate your work at NWIC.
Facilitators: Beth Smith - Doctor Greg Granderson – Nurse
Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Putting Professional Ethics into research and practice BASW.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Ethical Principles + Professional Practice = Public Trust Bill Myers University of Kansas 2003 ALADN Conference.
OCTOBER 4, 2012 Tenure and Promotion Workshop. Today’s Agenda Execution of Mission, Vision and Goals Criteria for Tenure and Promotion FAQ’s E-Faculty.
2014 SPE Engineering and Professionalism Committee.
The Scholarship of Civic Engagement Adapted from a presentation by Robert G. Bringle Director, Center for Service and Learning Indiana University-Purdue.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Ethical & legal of professional organization Outline Definition of profession. Characteristics of profession. Code of Ethical Principles and Standards.
Learning Goal: I can define and correctly use Anthropology, Psychology and Sociology terms and concepts. I can use ethical guidelines to develop a position.
1 How and Why to Share Governance at a College A Faculty Council of Community Colleges Presentation By Tina Good, FCCC President.
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
Ethics in pharmacy practice
Class One Stephen Tedesco EDUC-4138  24 hrs of Instruction (Fall Only)  6 hrs of Instruction focused on Technology Online Resources SMART Board ePortfolios,
1 Information session regarding tenure at McGill, 2007: general considerations Prof. Anthony C. Masi Provost Leacock 232, Robert Vogel Council Room 24.
POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,
National Honor Society Selection Criteria Fall 2015.
Ethics.
Matthew L. S. Gboku DDG/Research Coordinator Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute Presentation at the SLARI Annual Retreat 26 – 28 October, 2015.
Assessment Presentation Day For Faculty Cindy J. Speaker, Ph.D. Wells College August 21, 2006.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
Teaching Tips Chapters (23-24) Appraising and Improving your Teaching: Using students, Peers, Experts, and Classroom Research. Prepared By:Muhammed Bakir.
QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi December 20, 2010.
Competent educator. Competent teacher Every parent wants his child to be taught by the a super teacher 1. They want teachers who can inspire their children.
International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme IB MYP.
Middle Years Programme The unique benefits of the MYP.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Resolution on selection, duties, and term of Department Heads/Chairs Steering Committee Resolution Information Item.
Pre-ratification meeting to present the proposed Academic Freedom language for the Collective Agreement April 23, 2015 Faculty Association pre-ratification.
Academic and Professional Integrity: New Snake Oil in Old Bottles? Dr. Gordon A. Crews, President Southern Criminal Justice Association Atlantic Beach,
1 The Nature of Ethics Ethics is generally concerned with rules or guidelines for morals and/or socially approved conduct Ethical standards generally apply.
 Academic Freedom. Defining Academic Freedom  Belief that freedom to inquire and explore by students and faculty members is essential to the mission.
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
Principles of Good Governance
Code of Ethics for the Physical Therapist (APTA)
Peer Review in Evaluation and Promotion: The Linchpin of Faculty Governance Mary Reichel Ph.D. University Librarian & Carol Grotnes Belk Distinguished.
Philippine Institute of Chemical Engineers Code of Ethics

“Board Ethics” Mississippi Library Commission
Faculty Evaluations: Tenured, Tenure-Track, and Associate
Realize. A better world through research.
Resolution on selection, duties and term of Department Heads/Chairs
CS-480b Network Security Dick Steflik
Academic Freedom Primer New Faculty Orientation August 20, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Faculty Rights and Responsibilities David Dannenbring John Dugan Dennis Slavin

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Board Policies Historic tradition vests privileges and responsibilities for academic governance with college faculty Faculty are chiefly responsible for educational mission and academic standards

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Faculty Assumes Responsibility for Its Own Vitality Faculty sets standards for its own qualifications, ethics and performance Such authority must be responsibly and regularly exercised Willingness of faculty to judge itself rigorously determines its capacity to define institution’s mission and to maintain its standards

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Senior Faculty Have Special Responsibilities Peer evaluations of faculty, with special attention to their diligence in teaching and professional growth Orient their junior and newly-appointed colleagues Available for consultation and assistance in problems of both scholarship and teaching as junior faculty may require This mandate shall be considered part of the professional obligations of the permanent faculty

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Student Evaluations Mandated Board is committed to consideration of student evaluations in faculty personnel decisions Reappointment, promotion, and tenure All faculty required to participate

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Board Framework for Faculty Evaluation Teaching Effectiveness Scholarly and Professional Growth Service to the Institution Service to the Public

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Teaching Effectiveness Contractual teaching observations and peer judgements Evaluation should extend beyond the classroom, as obligation to students goes beyond normal class hours, to include other efforts such as academic advisement Assessment of student evaluations Assessment of efforts in developing new methods and materials suited to needs of students

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Scholarly and Professional Growth Evidence of new and creative scholarly contributions to discipline Evaluation of quality may be sought externally Includes professional journals, scientific reports, scholarly books and monographs, creative works, show and performance credit Improved instructional materials and methods Participation in activities of professional societies

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Service to the Institution All full-time faculty share broad responsibilities toward the institution Effective service on departmental, college, and university committees Participation in other administrative activities, such as governance, registration, advisement, library, and cultural activities Contributions to student welfare through committees or as advisor to student organizations

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Service to the Public Institutions of higher education are expected to contribute their services to welfare of community Service both in special capacity as a scholar and in areas beyond this when pertinent and significant Absence of this contribution should not work to the disadvantage of any candidate (for reappointment)

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/ Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure Result of a series of conferences begun in 1934 Agreed to by representatives of American Association of University Professors and Association of American Colleges

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Academic Freedom Teachers are entitled to full freedom in research and in the publication of the results, subject to the adequate performance of their other academic duties; but research for pecuniary return should be based upon an understanding with the authorities of the institution

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Academic Freedom Teachers are entitled to freedom in the classroom in discussing their subject, but they should be careful not to introduce into their teaching controversial matter which has no relation to their subject. Limitations of academic freedom because of religious or other aims of the institution should be clearly stated in writing at the time of appointment.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Academic Freedom College and university teachers are citizens, members of a learned profession, and officers of an educational institution. When they speak or write as citizens, they should be free from institutional censorship or discipline, but their special position in the community imposes special obligations.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Academic Freedom As scholars and educational officers, they should remember that the public may judge their profession and their institution by their utterances. Hence they should at all times be accurate, should exercise appropriate restraint, should show respect for the opinions of others, and should make every effort to indicate that they are not speaking for the institution.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Statement of Professional Ethics Revision of 1966 statement Endorsed by the AAUP

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Professional Ethics (Research) Professors, guided by a deep conviction of the worth and dignity of the advancement of knowledge, recognize the special responsibilities placed upon them. Their primary responsibility to their subject is to seek and to state the truth as they see it. To this end professors devote their energies to developing and improving their scholarly competence.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Professional Ethics (Research) They accept the obligation to exercise critical self-discipline and judgment in using, extending, and transmitting knowledge. They practice intellectual honesty. Although professors may follow subsidiary interests, these interests must never seriously hamper or compromise their freedom of inquiry.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Professional Ethics (Teaching) As teachers, professors encourage the free pursuit of learning in their students. They hold before them the best scholarly and ethical standards of their discipline. Professors demonstrate respect for students as individuals and adhere to their proper roles as intellectual guides and counselors.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Professional Ethics (Teaching) Make every reasonable effort to foster honest academic conduct and to ensure that their evaluations of students reflect each student’s true merit. Respect the confidential nature of the relationship between professor and student. Avoid any exploitation, harassment, or discriminatory treatment of students Acknowledge significant academic or scholarly assistance from them and protect their academic freedom.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Professional Ethics (Colleagues) As colleagues, professors have obligations that derive from common membership in the community of scholars. Professors do not discriminate against or harass colleagues. They respect and defend the free inquiry of associates.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Professional Ethics (Colleagues) In the exchange of criticism and ideas professors show due respect for the opinions of others. Professors acknowledge academic debt and strive to be objective in their professional judgment of colleagues. Professors accept their share of faculty responsibilities for the governance of their institution.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Professional Ethics (Institution) As members of an academic institution, professors seek above all to be effective teachers and scholars. Although professors observe the stated regulations of the institution, provided the regulations do not contravene academic freedom, they maintain their right to criticize and seek revision.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Professional Ethics (Institution) Professors give due regard to their paramount responsibilities within their institution in determining the amount and character of work done outside it. When considering the interruption or termination of their service, professors recognize the effect of their decision upon the program of the institution and give due notice of their intentions.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Professional Ethics (Community) As members of their community, professors have the rights and obligations of other citizens. Professors measure the urgency of these obligations in the light of their responsibilities to their subject, to their students, to their profession, and to their institution.

Baruch College Faculty Senate 3/6/03 Professional Ethics (Community) When they speak or act as private persons, they avoid creating the impression of speaking or acting for their college or university. As citizens engaged in a profession that depends upon freedom for its health and integrity, professors have a particular obligation to promote conditions of free inquiry and to further public understanding of academic freedom.