Economics of Human Systems Integration: The Pratt & Whitney F119 Engine Dr. Ricardo Valerdi 2ndLt. Kevin Liu, USMC Dr. Donna Rhodes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Railways Systems: Applications HSI beyond DoD Dr. Jen Narkevicius Jenius LLC Dr. Jen Narkevicius Jenius LLC Human Systems Integration.
Advertisements

Maintenance Planning and Control : Modeling and Analysis
Course Material Overview of Process Safety Compliance with Standards
International Course on Development and Disasters with Special Focus on Health February 10 – 21, 2003: St Anns, Jamaica CDERA Experience in Institutional.
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Continuous Value Enhancement Process
Ms. Nancy Dolan CNO N Human Systems Integration in DoD Acquisition.
Example © 2012 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved. October 2012 Proxy Estimation Costing for Systems (PECS) Reggie Cole Lockheed Martin Senior.
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
1 ISE Ch. 22 Managing an Ergonomics Program History of Ergonomics Programs  1993: OSHA Ergonomics Program Management Guidelines for Meatpacking.
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
R R R CSE870: Advanced Software Engineering (Cheng): Intro to Software Engineering1 Advanced Software Engineering Dr. Cheng Overview of Software Engineering.
1 Lecture 2.6: Organization Structures Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
System-of-Systems Cost Modeling: COSOSIMO July 2005 Workshop Results Jo Ann Lane University of Southern California Center for Software Engineering.
Towards COSYSMO 2.0: Update on Reuse Jared Fortune, USC Ricardo Valerdi, MIT USC ARR 2009 Los Angeles, CA.
COSYSMO Workshop Outbrief CSSE Annual Research Review Los Angeles, CA Mon March 16 & Tues March 17, 2009 Ricardo Valerdi.
Human Systems Engineering Concentration Amy Bayes 15 October 2014.
Management of a Training Program January 12 – 14, 2009.
Unit 3: Command & Control IC/IMT Interface
Managing a Training Program Why train? Who will attend the training? What are the learning objectives? Strategies? Coverage? How will the training program.
Chapter 11 – Team Leadership
Sustainability and Total Cost of Ownership Strategies for Higher Education.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Level 2 Unit 4 Producing Engineering Solutions Engineering Diploma Level 2 Unit 4 Producing Engineering Solutions An Approach to Unit Delivery and Assessment.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
1 Process Engineering A Systems Approach to Process Improvement Jeffrey L. Dutton Jacobs Sverdrup Advanced Systems Group Engineering Performance Improvement.
Inter Agency Technical Interchange Meeting (IATIM) December 7, 2010 Anaheim, California.
Foundations of Technology.  To familiarize students with the function, applications, and requirements of construction management.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Page 1 Designing for Health; A Methodology for Integrated Diagnostics/Prognostics Raymond Beshears Raytheon 2501 W. University McKinney, TX
Ergonomics and Human Factors LECTURE 1. HISTORY OF ERGONOMICS  In the early 1900’s, the production of industry was still largely dependent on human power/motion,
October 22, 2004 Holistic Asset Management – It’s Not an Isolated Function 2004 Urban Water Council US. Conference of Mayors.
PREPARED BY MS. ROSITA ARMAN MICHAEL ANNIAH MBA IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT (UTM) BA. ESTATE MANAGEMENT (UITM)
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Software Product Line Material based on slides and chapter by Linda M. Northrop, SEI.
DoD Logistics Human Capital Strategic Planning Overview June 26, 2007.
© Module 4—Hazard Prevention and Control Safety Management Worksite Analysis Management Commitment and Employee Involvement Hazard Prevention and.
NCSX Systems Engineering Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons May 15, 2003.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level TOOLBOX TALK MANAGING AIRSIDE SAFETY.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Project Management Why do projects fail? Technical Reasons
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
LOG 200 Curriculum Review 15 Apr 2011 Curriculum Review LOG 200 Intermediate Acquisition Logistics Presented to the Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) Functional.
Overview of Addressing Risk with COSYSMO Garry Roedler & John Gaffney Lockheed Martin March 17, 2008.
Dale Emmerson 75 FSS/FSD Chief, Force Development Flight I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Air Force Sustainment Center AFSC Way.
BUS OPERATOR WORKSTATION PROCUREMENT TEAM TRAINING T O ENHANCE BUS OPERATOR ERGONOMICS, HEALTH, AND SAFETY A TRAINING TEMPLATE FOR TRANSIT AGENCIES [ADD.
Alex Ezrakhovich Process Approach for an Integrated Management System Change driven.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
June 2007Office of Federal Environmental Executive Symposium a data standard for use with construction specifications Bill Brodt Facilities Engineering.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
LECTURE 5 Nangwonvuma M/ Byansi D. Components, interfaces and integration Infrastructure, Middleware and Platforms Techniques – Data warehouses, extending.
NDIA PMSC Baseline Stability Working Group February 2010 Neil Albert Pete Wynne.
Overview MRD Enterprise MRD Process
Advanced Software Engineering Dr. Cheng

DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL
Supportability Design Considerations
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
National Standards for Athletic Coaches
CS4311 Spring 2011 Process Improvement Dr
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
COSYSMO Delphi Round 2 Results
Towards COSYSMO 2.0: Update on Reuse
Process Safety Management
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

Economics of Human Systems Integration: The Pratt & Whitney F119 Engine Dr. Ricardo Valerdi 2ndLt. Kevin Liu, USMC Dr. Donna Rhodes

seari.mit.edu Background 1980s UK Ergonomics Research Society US Human Factors Society Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design Government Agency focus on safety and human factors Industrial Revolution - WWII Industrial Engineering Human Factors Engineering (HFE)

HSI in the Air Force seari.mit.edu3 Manpower — the number and mix of personnel (military, civilian, and contractor) authorized and available to train, operate, maintain, and support each system. Personnel — the human aptitudes, skills, and knowledge, experience levels, and abilities required to operate, maintain, and support a system at the time it is fielded. Training — the instruction and resources required providing personnel with requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities to properly operate, maintain, and support a system. Environment — the conditions in and around the system and the concepts of operation that affect the human ’ s ability to function as a part of the system as well as the requirements necessary to protect the system from the environment. Safety — hazard, safety and risk analysis in system design and development to ensure that all systems, subsystems, and their interfaces operate effectively, without sustaining failures or jeopardizing the safety and health of operators, maintainers and the system mission. Occupational Health — the consideration of design features that minimize risk of injury, acute and/or chronic illness, or disability, and/or reduce job performance of personnel who operate, maintain, or support the system. Habitability — factors of living and working conditions that are necessary to sustain the morale, safety, health, and comfort of the user population that contribute directly to personnel effectiveness and mission accomplishment, and often preclude recruitment and retention problems. Survivability — the ability of a system, including its operators, maintainers and sustainers to withstand the risk of damage, injury, loss of mission capability or destruction. Human Factors Engineering — the comprehensive integration of human capabilities and limitations into systems design, to optimize human interfaces to facilitate human performance in training operation, maintenance, support and sustainment of a system.

Economics of HSI DoDI , Operation of the Defense Acquisition System seari.mit.edu4 (Begins)

seari.mit.edu5 Research Questions How did Pratt & Whitney predict how much HSI effort would be needed? How much did HSI effort eventually cost? How did HSI fit into the larger systems engineering picture?

The F-22 Raptor Air Superiority Fighter Replaces F-15 Air dominance, multi-role fighter Dominance through stealth, speed, agility, versatility, supportability First Look – First Shot – First Kill seari.mit.edu6

The Pratt & Whitney F119 Engine Best practice of HSI Reliability & Maintainability emphasis from > -Air Force leadership New requirements introduced during Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) P&W F119 beat GE F120 because it demonstrated “least technical risk and lowest cost” Yankel, J. & Deskin, W. (2002). “Development of the F-22 Propulsion System.”

seari.mit.edu© 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology8 Engine Design for the Mechanic Integrated Product Development (IPD) Integrated master plan (IMP), Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), Integrated Product Teams (IPTs), Integrated Program Management Team (IPMT) Component IPTs (CPTs). Supportability Awareness “Blue Two” visit program. Internal presentations reiterated lessons learned. Supportability Reviews and Trade Studies Monthly reviews evaluated adherence to IMP and IMS. Over 200 studies weighed HSI features against cost, weight, and performance. Early Support Tool Involvement Tools annotated to design drawings Full-Scale Engine Mockup Full-scale engine mockups used to test reality of one-deep LRU - allowed engineers to simulate servicing parts. Held engineers accountable.

HSI Early in F119 Development AF Acquisition Community-led requirements definition studies 40% fewer parts than previous engines

Leadership and IPD seari.mit.edu10 …advances were intended to reduce operational level and intermediate level maintenance items by 75% and depot level tools by 60%, with a 40% reduction in average tool weight,” (Aronstein, et al. 1998).

F119 Successes Span Domains of HSI HSI DomainWork DoneCostBenefit Manpower -Fewer Maintainers -Men and Women could work on engines - Reduced man-hours spent on maintenance Personnel - All maintenance tasks designed to accommodate women maintainers -Improved understanding of procedures Training - Documentation- Effort spent preparing documentation Human Factors Engineering (HFE) -6 Tools total - 1 Tool/ LRU, One-Deep LRU's - Tools redesigned for easier handling - Weight Environment Safety - Captured Fasteners - Self-contained engine - Weight-Fewer reported mishaps Occupational Health - CBR Suits-Reduced exposure to harmful elements Habitability - Mock-Ups - "Blue Two" Visits -Funding for trips - $2M/ Mock-Up Survivability -Designed to contain fan blades - Single-engine mentality -Zero Scheduled Maintenance - Reduced engine failure rate - 75% reduced O&I time

seari.mit.edu12 Development of Cost Drivers The 10 Principles of Effective HSI (from the Handbook on HSI) 1. Top-level leadership 2. Focus on human-centered design (HCD) 3. Source selection policy 4. Organizational integration of all HSI domains 5. Documentation integration into procurement process 6. Quantification of human parameters 7. HSI technology 8. Test and evaluation=assessments 9. Highly qualified practitioners 10. Education and training program (Booher, 2003) Prioritized List of Critical Elements for Successful HSI (from The Art of Successfully Applying Human Systems Integration) 1. Management and Organizational Commitment 2. User/stakeholder involvement 3. Education and awareness of all 4. HSI process ownership 5. Holistic, enabled view 6. Funding support 7. Documented and technically sound processes 8. Qualified personnel 9. Open collaborative environment 10. Practical applications based on sound human factors research (Landsburg et. al., 2008)

Observations seari.mit.edu13 How did Pratt & Whitney predict how much HSI effort would be needed? How much did HSI effort eventually cost? How did HSI fit into the larger systems engineering picture? USAF Requirements-driven Competition, Business need Estimation by analogy “HSI Slice” unclear IPD, CICR, CCB, IPT, CIPT, etc. Emphasis in requirements, pre-milestone A/B

seari.mit.edu14 Development of Cost Drivers –Requirements Understanding –Architecture Understanding –Level of Service Requirements –Migration Complexity –Technology Risk –Documentation –# and diversity of installations/platforms Existing COSYSMO Cost Drivers: –# of recursive levels in the design –Stakeholder team cohesion –Personnel/team capability –Personnel experience/continuity –Process capability –Multisite coordination –Tool support

COSYSMO seari.mit.edu15 COSYSMO Size Drivers Effort Multipliers 195 Person Months of HSI effort 200 easy, 200 nominal, 50 difficult Requirements 2 easy, 3 difficult Interfaces 5 difficult Algorithms High Requirements Understanding High Technology Risk High Process Capability

Acknowledgments seari.mit.edu16