Preparing for the National Boards. What Do You Need to Do for Entry 2? 1. Instructional Context 3. Analysis of the Video Recording 2. Planning & Instruction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Stage 3
The Teacher Work Sample
Bringing it all together!
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre
PATHWISE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION SYSTEM
When the State Hands You Lemons: Making Lemonade Out Of the New APPR
The Profile of Professional Growth
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
1 Quick Write: Take about 10 minutes and address the following questions about Assessment: What is it? What is it for? What is the difference between formal.
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
Developing Classroom Assessments for the NGSS What evidence of student thinking is needed to determine if a student has met a PE (performance expectation)?
STARTALK: Preparing Russian Teachers for the 21st Century Day 4.
Template.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Orientation to the Social Studies 11 Integrated Resource Package (IRP) 2005.
Backward Design Lesson Planning Lyn Steed University of West Georgia.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
The big ideas of UbD UbD big idea Why important? If not… ‘Backward’
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Welcome to FACT #2 About Teacher Inquiry Article Quick SCAN Read
District Meeting # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Stages 1 and 2 Wednesday, August 4th, Stage 1: Step 5 National and State Standards.
Parent Learning Morning November 6th 2007 October 2009.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
Dimension IV of the EQuIP Rubric: Assessment Illinois State Board of Education Content Specialists Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons.
Understanding by Design From the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe The 3 Stages of UBD Developing a Common Language - What is a Unit.
1 Fall 2009 New Teacher Development Program. 2 Brown Bag Questions.
Understanding Our Learners: Teaching Mathematics for Inclusion & Equity February Bus Cluster Professional Development
Introduction to the Teacher Work Sample Portfolio Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Education 1.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Pennsylvania Standard J. Geometry Standard
What should we expect from 2 nd year students? A realistic approach. Tuesday 25 th February 2014 Tutor CPD Seminar.
Using UDL to Set Clear Goals and Support Every Student’s Learning.
Assessment Power! Pamela Cantrell, Ph.D. Director, Raggio Research Center for STEM Education College of Education University of Nevada, Reno.
Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD Copyright: 2002, Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Analysis of Literary Text: Understanding and Preparing for the PARCC LAT and NWT COLLEGE CAREER READY CONFERENCE 2015.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 1 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Performance Based Assessment. What is Performance Based Assessment? PBA is a form of assessment that requires students to perform a task rather than an.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Teaching to Diversity in the Regular Classroom. Learners learn best when… “Engagement” (active processing) for learning happens when … Need for collaboration.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Session 1 Holy Family Unit Plan Review. Holy Family Unit Plan Subject Area Grade Level Unit Title Estimated Time Student Population.
Incorporating Strategies into Lesson Plans How to build a Burke Question Driven Unit.
Candidate Support. Working Agreements Attend cohort meetings you have agreed upon. Start and end on time; come on time and stay for the whole time. Contribute.
MODULE 2 INTRODUCTION AND MODULE OVERVIEW INFORMATION STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS ASSIGNMENTS.
MODULE 3 INTRODUCTION AND MODULE OVERVIEW STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS ASSIGNMENTS.
Unit 306: Planning Essential Skills Learning - Literacy.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Entry 1 Designing Instruction Over Time. Entry 1: Standards I.Knowledge of Students III.Knowledge of Language IV.Knowledge of Culture V.Knowledge of Language.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
To Kill a Mockingbird Essential Questions DP Preparation: Written Assessment.
Adapted from ASCD Materials.  Is a framework for developing units  Begins with looking at the end.  What do we want students to know?  How will they.
Understanding by Design
“Unpacking” our modules-building modules that meet LDC criteria
Differentiated Instruction
3 Stages of Backward Design
National Board Cohort Meeting Six.
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for the National Boards

What Do You Need to Do for Entry 2? 1. Instructional Context 3. Analysis of the Video Recording 2. Planning & Instruction 4. Reflection -2-

How Will This Class Help? By focusing on planning a dynamic unit

A Dynamic Process Stage 1: Instructional Context Stage 1: Instructional Context Big Ideas Stage 3: Evidence of Student Learning Stage 3: Evidence of Student Learning Multiple Methods: Diagnostic Formative Summative Evaluation Criteria Design your Lessons Standards Stage 2: Big Ideas/ Enduring Outcomes Stage 2: Big Ideas/ Enduring Outcomes Community School Classroom Prior Knowledge Student Needs Learning Styles Stage 4: Design Your Instructional Blueprint Reflection Enduring Outcomes Press to advance through this slide Sequence & Flow Differentiation

STAGE 1 STAGE3 STAGE 2 Unit Planning Template A tool for organizing the Unit Plan Effectively Template embodies all 4 stages of the unit design This is not a NB template – Just a guide Prompts

-6- Stage 1: Instructional Context (Who Are Your Students?) Jump to Stage 2 Jump to Stage 3 Jump to Stage 4 Jump to Stage 1

Stage 1: Instructional Context (Classroom Community Profile) Prompt 1: Students: How many? Ages? Grades? Prompt 2: Relevant Characteristics: Ethnic, cultural, linguistic diversity? Range of abilities? Class personality? Prompt 3: Exceptional Needs & Abilities? Prompt 4: Relevant Features of Context that Influenced Selection of Learning Experience? Prompt 5: Particular Instructional Challenges of this Class? -7-

-8- Stage 2 Big Ideas/ Enduring Outcomes Jump to Stage 2 Jump to Stage 3 Jump to Stage 4 Jump to Stage 1

Stage 2 Big Ideas/ Enduring Outcomes Prompt 1: What Standards will this Unit Address? Prompt 2: What Big Ideas Characterize This Unit? Prompt 3: What Enduring Outcomes will Students Acquire? (Include a connected set of memory, analytical, creative and practical outcomes) -9-

-10- Stage 3 Evidence of Student Learning Jump to Stage 2 Jump to Stage 4 Jump to Stage 1

Stage 3 Evidence of Student Learning Prompt 1: What evidence and applicable tasks will indicate the outcomes have been met? (Complete the table) Identify which assessments are diagnostic (D), formative (F), and summative assessments(S). Prompt 2: Attach actual sample diagnostic, formative and summative assessments. Prompt 3: By what criteria should the assessment product be evaluated; and what levels of mastery should be used to determine quality, proficiency, performance, or understanding? -11-

-12- Stage 4 Design Your Instructional Blueprint Jump to Stage 2 Jump to Stage 3 Jump to Stage 1

-13- LessonsStudent Learning Object- ives Essential Questions Instructional Strategies/Tasks to Support Differentiation (Include a balance of analytical, creative, and practical activities) Formati ve Assess- ments 1 2 Etc

Select 1 Lesson and answer: 1. Knowledge/skill/concept/theme addressed? Why appropriate? 2. Overall instructional goal: Why did you choose it? How does it fit with overall goals for the year? 3. How does lesson fit with what came before & after in the unit? 4. Rationale for instructional materials? 5. Strategies/methods to foster fairness, equity, access? -14-