Innovation in target fabrication can reduce cost, schedule and risk of ignition and compensate for driver inflexibility US Japan IFE Workshop 3-22-05 Joe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development Paths for IFE Mike Campbell General Atomics FPA 25 th Anniversary Meeting December 13,2004.
Advertisements

Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
1 Monoenergetic proton radiography of laser-plasma interactions and capsule implosions 2.7 mm 15-MeV proton backlighter (imploded D 3 He-filled capsule)
Inertial Confinement Fusion Experiments & Modeling Using X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy of Thin Tracer Layers to Diagnose the Time-Dependent Properties.
Lecture 2: Symmetry issues Oswald Willi Institut für Laser- und Plasmaphysik Vorlesung SS 2007 User ID: Laser Passwort: Plasma Tel
MIT participation in the FSC research program* C. K. Li and R. D. Petrasso MIT Experimental: LLE’s fuel-assembly experiments Development of advanced diagnostics.
Syntec Technologies: Pushing the Polymer Envelope HRDT™ and patent-pending High Refraction Diamond Turning are trademarks of Syntec Technologies.
Point design and integrated experiments Convenors summary ( M Key, K Tanaka, P Norreys ) What is the status of integrated point designs for the various.
September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.
Physics of Fusion Lecture 15: Inertial Confinement Fusion Lecturer: Dirk O. Gericke.
1CEA-DAM Ile-de-France High-Gain Direct-Drive Shock Ignition for the Laser Megajoule:prospects and first results. B. Canaud CEA, DAM, DIF France 7th Workshop.
Systems Analysis for Modular versus Multi-beam HIF Drivers * Wayne Meier – LLNL Grant Logan – LBNL 15th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion.
Thermal Control Techniques for Improved DT Layering of Indirect Drive IFE Targets John E. Pulsifer and Mark S. Tillack University of California, San Diego.
In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.
N. Alexander, P. Gobby, D. Goodin, J. Hoffer, J. Latkowski, A. Nobile, D. Petti, R. Petzoldt, A. Schwendt, W. Steckle, D. Sze, M. Tillack Presented by.
Simulations investigating the effect of a DT-ice-covered cone tip on the implosion of a re-entrant cone-guided ICF capsule J. Pasley - University of California.
Presented June 1, 2001 Laser IFE meeting NRL Fred Elsner, Abbas Nikroo, John Saurwein, Rich Stephens Foam Shell Characterization Status.
Be Coating on Spherical Surface for NIF Target Development H. Xu, J. Wall, and A. Nikroo General Atomics 3550 General Atomics Court San Diego, CA
P. Gobby, A. Nobile, J. Hoffer, A. Schwendt and W. Steckle Concepts for Fabrication of Inertial Fusion Energy Targets.
Radiation, Hydrodynamics, and Spectral Modeling of Indirect-Drive Fusion Experiments on the OMEGA Laser David S. Conners, Katherine L. Penrose, David H.
Schafer Corporation An Employee-Owned Small Business Schafer Laboratories Division Office 448 Lindbergh Avenue Livermore, CA (Tel)
1 Update on MJ Laser Target Physics P.A.Holstein, J.Giorla, M.Casanova, F.Chaland, C.Cherfils, E. Dattolo, D.Galmiche, S.Laffite, E.Lefebvre, P.Loiseau,
A Target Fabrication and Injection Facility for Laser-IFE M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray, UC San Diego D. T. Goodin, N. B. Alexander, R. W. Petzoldt, General.
October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.
A. Schwendt, A. Nobile, P. Gobby, W. Steckle Los Alamos National Laboratory D. T. Goodin, Neil Alexander, G. E. Besenbruch, K. R. Schultz General Atomics.
Laser IFE Program Workshop –5/31/01 1 Output Spectra from Direct Drive ICF Targets Laser IFE Workshop May 31-June 1, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory Robert.
Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison NRL IFE Concepts Project 9/19/ Output Calculations for Laser Fusion Targets ARIES Meeting.
Thermal Control Techniques for Improved DT Layering of Indirect Drive IFE Targets M.S. Tillack and J.E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego D.T.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 1. Pre-Shot Aerosol Parameteric Design Window for Thin Liquid Wall 2. Scoping Liquid Wall Mechanical Response to Thermal Shocks.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
Assembly of Targets for RPA by Compression Waves A.P.L.Robinson Plasma Physics Group, Central Laser Facility, STFC Rutherford-Appleton Lab.
1 MODELING DT VAPORIZATION AND MELTING IN A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
October 19, 2003 Fusion Power Associates Status of Fast Ignition-High Energy Density Physics Joe Kilkenny Director Inertial Fusion Technology General Atomics.
A. Schwendt, A. Nobile, W. Steckle Los Alamos National Laboratory D. Colombant, J. Sethian Naval Research Laboratory D. T. Goodin, N. Alexander, G. E.
The High Average Power Laser Program in DOE/DP Coordinated, focussed, multi-lab effort to develop the science and technology for Laser Fusion Energy Coordinated,
Schafer Corporation An Employee-Owned Small Business Schafer Laboratories Schafer Corporation at Sandia National Laboratory 1515 Eubank SE, M.S 1196 Albuquerque,
VG-1 4/9/08 A Very Brief and Selective Historical Overview of ICF Capsule Fabrication Robert Cook Consultant for General Atomics Presented at 18 th High.
Heavy Ion Fusion-a Future Perspective E. Michael Campbell PPPL, June 7, 2004.
Reducing the Costs of Targets for Inertial Fusion Energy G.E. Besenbruch, D.T. Goodin, J.P. Dahlburg, K.R. Schultz, A. Nobile 1, E.M. Campbell General.
LA-UR “Mini-Workshop” on Coordination of IFE Target Thermo-Mechanical Modeling and DT Ice Experiments LANL, UCSD, and General Atomics at Los Alamos.
IFE Target Fabrication Update Presented by Jared Hund 1 N. Alexander 1, J. Bousquet 1, Bob Cook 1, S. Eddinger, D. Frey 1, D. Goodin 1, H. Huang, J. Karnes.
Some Thoughts on Phase II for Target fabrication, injection, and tracking presented by Dan Goodin Georgia Institute of Technology February 5th & 6th, 2004.
Laser IFE Program Workshop Naval Research Laboratory February 6 & 7, 2001 A. Nobile, J. Hoffer, A. Schwendt, W. Steckle, D. Goodin, G. Besenbruch and K.
DOE OFES/DP This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by the Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-36.
1. ID Target Aerosol limits 2. Tracking and Laser Aerosol Limits 3. Foam Mechanical Properties 4. Target Injection Accuracy 5. Future ARIES Target Task.
Aerosol Limits for Target Tracking Ronald Petzoldt ARIES IFE Meeting, Madison, WI April 22-23, 2002.
Top level overview of target fabrication tasks High Average Power Laser Program Workshop Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory October 27 and 28, 2004 Presented.
HIGH ENERGY DENSITY PHYSICS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS WITH Z PINCHES N. Rostoker, P. Ney, H. U. Rahman, and F. J. Wessel Department of Physics and Astronomy.
A. Schwendt, A. Nobile, P. Gobby, W. Steckle Los Alamos National Laboratory D. T. Goodin, G. E. Besenbruch, K. R. Schultz General Atomics Laser IFE Workshop.
DOE DP This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by the Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-36.
CORPORATE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, BHOPAL DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS NMOS FABRICATION PROCESS - PROF. RAKESH K. JHA.
Materials Science and Technology: Condensed Matter and Thermal Physics Simulation of Direct Drive Target Injection into ‘Hot’ Chambers James K. Hoffer.
John Saurwein February 6-7, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory, Washington IFE Target Process and Characterization Methods Development and Target Manufacturing.
Fabrication of Capsules with Angle Dependent Gold shims for Hohlraum Drive Symmetry Correction A. Nikroo 1, J. Pontelandolfo 1, A.Z. Greenwood 1, J.L.
Optimization of plasma uniformity in laser-irradiated underdense targets M. S. Tillack, K. L. Sequoia, B. O’Shay University of California, San Diego 9500.
Hydrodynamic Instabilities in Laser Plasmas Cris W. Barnes P-24 July 3, 2002.
Lithium Hydride Absorber Program C. M. Lei March 17, 2008.
Laser drilling of a Copper Mesh
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Titan June 2008 Experiment Planning January 31, 2016.
`` Solid DT Studies - Update presented by John Sheliak - General Atomics Drew A. Geller, & James K. Hoffer - LANL presented at the 18th High Average Power.
DOE DP This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by the Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-36.
FUEL ASSEMBLY: Theory and Experiments C. Zhou, R. Betti, V. Smalyuk, J. Delettrez, C. Li, W. Theobald, C. Stoeckl, D. Meyerhofer, C. Sangster FSC.
DOE DP This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by the Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-36.
Shock ignition of thermonuclear fuel with high areal density R. Betti Fusion Science Center Laboratory for Laser Energetics University of Rochester FSC.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
IFE Target Fabrication Update Presented by Jared Hund 1 N. Alexander 1, J. Bousquet 1, R. Cook 1, D. Frey 1, D. Goodin 1, J. Karnes 2, R. Luo 1, R. Paguio.
Progress on HAPL Foam Shell Overcoat Fabrication Presented by Jared Hund 1 N. Alexander 1, J. Bousquet 1, Bob Cook 1, D. Goodin 1, D. Jasion 1, R. Paguio.
1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL Meeting ORNL March.
Visit for more Learning Resources
Lecture 15: Inertial Confinement Fusion Lecturer: Dirk O. Gericke
Presentation transcript:

Innovation in target fabrication can reduce cost, schedule and risk of ignition and compensate for driver inflexibility US Japan IFE Workshop Joe Kilkenny General Atomics

Success inHEDP, and Ignition requires - There has been inadequate investment in target fabrication S&T commensurate with its role in the SS Program Drivers -major investment Z-R OMEGA EP & Nike,Trident,.. NIF Simulations, ASCI -major investment Target S&T -Cinderella ~$25M FY 04 3D rad.-hydro Simulation of igniting target Double shell target

3D codes allow sophisticated 3D targets, reduce risk, cost and schedule & compensate for driver limitations Hohlraums-gas fill reduces symmetry swings Cocktail hohlraum wall reduce x-ray wall loss-helps all drivers Graded doped ablators reduce instability,allow fill tubes& reduce cryo cost for NIF ignition target Innovation in target fabrication compensates for driver and facilty limitations

thin(0.1  m) windows Convection -- Baffles or low  foams Innovation in target fabrication: gas fill in Hohlraums provides symmetry control- Compensates for driver inflexibility Target fabrication challenges remain! Gas fill Reduces wall Motion BUT

Target fabrication and characterization Drives target choices Beryllium is the best ablator- But Be has fabrication and characterization issues: - surface finish - filling - no augmented beta layering -characterization difficult- opaque The first choice NIF ignition target was diffusion filled plastic with fewer target fab. issues

The NIF baseline target was plastic diffusion filled Baseline target-diffusion fill - Physics issues -surface finish -augmented  layering -Optical characterization BUT $ and schedule issues with The NIF cryogenic target handling system because diffusion fill/cold transport The large number of cryo. sub-systems increases complexity & cost

A 10 year ~ $30M GA & LLE effort was required for the OMEGA diffusion & cold fill cryo system: NIF prototype Tritium use late 2004?

Innovation in target fabrication: graded dopant Be shells less unstable & may allow a fill tube Filling in situ reduces the cost of the NIF cryo system Graded Cu dopant In Be shell Is less Unstable How much less? A small fill tube may Not cause too large A perturbation:

Dopants in the ablators are required to reduce x-ray preheat at the ablator-ice interface X-ray preheat at ice-ablator interface heats absorbed by ablator not by ice This makes ablator less compressible than DT ice Can lead to a hydrodynamically unstable interface Ablator DT ice  radius w/o dopant  radius w/ uniform dopant Reducing x-ray preheat can reduce density jump (Atwood number) at interface But: Shorter ablation scalelength Lower mass ablation rate

0.35% 0.7% 0.35% µm % Cu(%) 300 eV design: 200 Initial ablator roughness (rms, nm) Yield (MJ) Polyimide capsule Surface achieved with PI eV graded-doped Be(Cu) design, at same scale Innovations in target fabrication using Be with graded Cu dopant provide much more stability margin Be DT 0.0% But can the targets be made and then characterized To the required precise specifications?

Be and CH are both potential ablator materials for ignition capsules Physics Issues Fabrication Issues Dopant gradient flexibility Fill tube/Fill hole Be CH Hohlraum layering (conductivity) Surface finish Morphology (internal structure) Characterization Enhanced  -layering (DD and layer temp) 0 + 0/– + 0/+ 0/– + 0 0/+ – 0 Absorption Efficiency (density/opacity) Stability Fill tube tolerance Drive temperature range Morphology effects Be CH /– + + Be capsules are preferred for physics performance but present greater fabrication challenges

Hohlraum Energetics 10-20% of the laser energy to capsule % % Laser light (MJ) Absorbed Xrays Wall loss Hole loss Capsule Efficiency (%) % Au with CH Capsule Au with Be Capsule Cocktails - Be Capsule The Indirect Drive Ignition point design continues to evolve to optimize coupling efficiency Cocktails, LEH shields - Be Capsule %

Glass tube, 17 µm OD, 5 µm ID, inserted 20 µm, with 5 µm diameter hole through beryllium ablator Be DT Ignition Simulations indicate that a µm diameter tube will have an acceptable impact on the implosion Graded doped 200 kJ Be(Cu) capsule Calculation ignites and burns with near 1D yields Graded doped Be capsules are best but simulations carried out with uniformly doped Be, and graded doped CH capsules all give near 1D yields with 10 micron diameter tubes. Target Fabrication Update with point design scale info

New capsule provides new opportunities but also presents major fabrication challenges 400 nm Cross-section of 100  m thick shell Uniform copper Distribution by TEM Tiny holes have been laser drilled for filling 1  m Sub-micron grains Cu-doped Be capsules are made by sputter deposition onto CH mandrels in a bounce pan

We can attach ~ 6 µm fill tubes to capsules but with too large a perturbation so far 2mm OD 6µm OD fill tube, 2mm OD shell Epoxy 6µm OD Fill tube Target fabrication issues : too large a perturbation by the glue

Key fabrication capabilities for fill-tubes are being developed and demonstrated The glue layer is ~ 1µm thick 10 µm Glass Tube in Al Flat Laser Drilling in Be Entrance Exit 2 µm Laser: Ti:sapphire 405 nm, <1 µJ, 120 fs, 3.5 kHz drilling time: ~40 sec 2 µm Target Fabrication

The 2010 ignition plan has risk mitigation options for the key features of the point design target Capsule fill method Risk mitigation options Fill Tube Diffusion Fill (CH) Point Design (Risk) (Low/moderate) Impact of Failure Ablator Material Be CH (Low/moderate) 1.2 to 1.45 MJ (20%) Hohlraum material Cocktail Au (Low) 1.0 to 1.2 MJ (20%) Hohlraum geometry Includes LEH shields No LEH shields (Low) 0.85 to 1.0 MJ (17%) Hohlraum low-z fill SiO 2 foam (for operational simplicity and flexibility)  He/H gas fill  SiO 2, Be, or Ni solid liner (with prepulse to eliminate hydro coupling) (Low/moderate) (Scattering could increase from 10% to 30%) 1.45 to 1.7 MJ (20%) More complex cryo system

Nano technology methods can be used for monolithic fill tube manufacture ~ 5 micron mandrel grown with laser CVD on Be sphere in a laser drilled hole Be or Boron tube is grown off of the sphere and surrounding the mandrel also by laser CVD Mandrel is dissolved leaving fill tube 6m6m