WORKPLAN TWG V Pro-poor energy strategy by : Duha A.K Grand Candi Hotel - Semarang, July 10 th 2011

OUTLINE PLAN  Selection of location.  Needs assessment process. Visit to the target village Sosialization Collecting the quesionnaires Analyze outcome of energy needs assessment. Writing the report (final summary)  Continue policy evaluation (look for references and regulation, interview with stake holder on provincial programme.

Target Location

Selection of Location 1.“ Tobati “ Village. 2.“Enggros” Village. 3.“Kayu Pulo” Village. 4.“Nafri” Village. 5.“Puay” Village. 6.“Yoka” Village.. 7.“Kalkhote” Village.. 8.“Skouw” Village. 9.“Koya Koso” Village. 10.“Harapan” Village. 2

Enggros Village Tobati Village

Results from the Energy Needs Assessment Workshop in The Enggros Village :  The number of family heads approximately 115 families, with a livelihood as fisherman.  People who attended the workshop programme is 42 people (according to absent).  Based on questionnaire results : The average of income for each month of the local people in Enggros village is 750,000 IDR. Most people felt it was no longer able to use generator or battery for everyday activities, because operational and maintenance are very costly. Average consumption of gasoline and kerosene are 2 – 3 liters per day per household. Gasoline and Kerosene price is 7,000 IDR per liter. The total money they have spent to buy fuel is 1,000,000 IDR (approx.). / month. This is not comparable with their income which is only 750,000 IDR / month All the communities have agreed that solar-cell is suitable to their conditions and circumstances (to solve the energy problem).

QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYZE RESULT 1. Fuel used for cooking at home needs Fuel TypeAmount/dayCost/unitAmount/monthCost/month Kerosene 2 ltr7,000 IDR 60 ltr420,000 IDR LPG ---- Fire Wood 6 stalks-180 stalks- Others ----

2. Fuel used for the purpose of going to sea Fuel TypeAmount/dayCost/unitAmount/monthCost/month Kerosene -7,000 IDR-- Gasoline 10 ltr7,000 IDR300 ltr2,100,000 IDR Others ----

3. Fuel used for lighting Fuel TypeAmount/dayCost/unitAmount/monthCost/month Kerosene 1 ltr7,000 IDR30 ltr210,000 IDR Candle3 sticks2,500 IDR90 sticks225,000 IDR Gasoline 2 ltr7,000 IDR60 ltr420,000 IDR Battery / Accu --10 pcs50,000 IDR Others----

4. The energy used by the people directly Public facilitiesTypes of energy sources used Number of units Costs / monthWho pays for it Health facilities a)Generator b)Battery/ Accu 1Unit 500,000 IDR 200,000 IDR Local Government Local Goverment Church a)Generator b)Battery/ Accu 1Unit - Unit 500,000 IDR - Self-help society Meeting Room a)Generator b)Battery/ Accu 1Unit - Unit 500,000 IDR - Self-help society Village Hall a)Generator b)Battery/ Accu - Unit 1 Unit - 200,000 IDR Self-help society Chief Village Office a)Generator b)Battery/ Accu c)PV panel 1Unit - Unit 1 Unit 500,000 IDR - 100,000 IDR Self-help society

Type of Equipment Types of energy sources used Number of units Costs / monthWho pays for it Fuel for the boat (boat) a)Motor engine b)Battery/ Accu 1Unit 1000,000 IDR 200,000 IDR Self-help society Fridge to fish a)Generator b)Battery/ Accu - Unit ---- Self-help society Electricity to stall a)Generator b)Battery/ Accu 3 Unit - Unit 500,000 IDR - Self-help society 5. Energy needs for small businesses

Energy Access Index for Village Level :

In accordance with the above criteria, that the Enggros village have Energy Access Household Fuels - 2For cooking purpose, most people collect firewood from the forest around their settlements. Mechanical Power - 1Lack of education facilities and community education levels are generally low, resulting in the absence of mecanical power. Electricity - 3Most of people they have low-voltage DC access for their home application.

Overview & Evaluation of Existing Pro-poor Policies & Measures Policies/ProgramsPolicy objectivesImplementation Policy objective likely to be achieved Impact on poor NATIONAL LEVEL :Main obj.Secondary obj.To-dateFutureYes / No Subsidy for Household electricity use up to 900 kWh/month (30% cheaper) To lower the cost of electricity for the poor people To keep household energy use low (below 900 kWh/month) Fully implemented Need to be continued Yes - Poor communities with access to electricity have low costs for electricity - Because of cheap electricity new houses are cheap - Poor communities without electricity do not benefit from this policy Subsidy for LPG To convert kerosene use to use of LPG There is more supply of gas and it is a more efficient fuel In Papua subsidized LPG is not yet available Maybe not because of bad safety track record No No impact because the policy is not yet implemented in Papua. Removal of subsidy for Fuel Oil (BBM) For subsidy funds most to be used for social purposes, e.g : for education, health and poverty alleviation It leads to saving of fuel utilization In fact that the policy impact only felt by the rich people, because only those who consume the most fuel, specially for vehicle fuel There needs to be further studies to evaluate this policy YesNo direct impact

PROVINCIAL LEVEL Main obj.Secondary obj.To-dateFutureYes / No Impact on poor Kampung mandiri terang (“the shine of the villages”) Part of RE program of Papua province. Survey Investigation Design in villages across the province (program od Dinas Energy since 2005) to identify the energy potential in the village. The Dinas Energy choosed the villages with high solar potential and distributes (for free) solar panels to households. To identify best energy solution for local people (100 villages/year) To improve the quality of life of rural community Probably not fully achieved Not likely because of conflict of interest, low population density, no strict supervision of implementat ion Maybe over a long period of time ? - Limited success in improving the energy situation of some villages - It provides some villages electricity for lighting

Some activities have been done after the meeting in Mataram, among others:  June 10 th 2011, meeting with Head of Mining and Energy Department Papua Province.  June 14 th 2011, meeting with BAPPEDA Papua Province.  June 21 st 2011, meeting with Head of State Electricity Company (PLN) Papua Province.  June 22 nd 2011, meeting with Head of Infrastructure Management Agency Papua Province.  June 30 th 2011, Stake-holders meeting in ASTON Hotel, Jayapura.  Internal coordination and discussion with other TWG, regarding the data that has been obtained, every Saturday morning.

The results of several meetings that have been done :  To carry out the implementation of energy policies issued by the government, each agency or institution has its own program, but unfortunately there is no integration with each other.  After hearing and seeing (Stake-holders meeting on June 30, 2011) the results of our exposure, particularly on Casindo programs, all of them agreed that the Casindo program very necessary to be continued and developed in an integrated and sustainable. For that, some of them agreed to bring us to the governor.

PREPARE TO DRAFT REPORT Chapter 1Introduction CASINDO & TWG V Period and duration of research Description of objectives and approaches Chapter 2Overview & evaluation of existing pro-poor policies & measures  National  Regional  Local level Chapter 3Selected target location  Selection criteria and process  Description of demographic, economic and energy situation of selected community & whole province Chapter 4Energy needs assessment  Approach used to assess energy-related needs and priorities  Identified energy problems (supply-related, information void, awareness, energy devices etc.) Chapter 5Proposed policy measures that address the identified energy needs  Policy measures that address identified energy problems  Stakeholder consultation (community, local government, local energy businesses, local NGOs)  Pro-poor energy strategy Chapter 6Conclusions  Necessary follow up activities  Policy recommendation to local government  Policy recommendations to regional government  General recommendations for national pro-poor strategy 